Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Thread
- Thread starter Johnnyvee
- Start date
Continued from here to separate the topics: https://christisking.cc/threads/the-epstein-docs.614/post-103300
Have you, the reader, noticed this as well?
Again,
And again,
And again...
All over the web, people continue to rely on questionable evidence as "proof", including images and videos which turn out to be manipulated. This also goes for countless supposed screenshots, images of Tweets, audio of political interviews, videos of war, etc.
This is counter-productive to the intended message of the original communicator. Using fake images and videos to support an argument weakens both the believability of the argument AND the credibility of the person making the argument.
CiK and its members -- including myself -- are far from immune to the lure of these fakes. Indeed, by now we've all been fooled online, and in many cases, we were none the wiser about it. Fakery is only going to get better and better, which means more people getting fooled more often. This includes me and you.
If the accuracy of our perceptions is important, we can no longer take random data, especially images, audio, and videos at face value.
I'm confident that, in time, media and information-related AI will become a curse on humanity. "But it's saving so much time in my job!" That may be true for some people, yet it is already being used in ways too sick to describe here. Children in particular are incredibly vulnerable to both acute and chronic damage and exploitation.
Back when social media and online dating exploded, I came to the following conclusion (as did many others) about all things tech-related:
-->> Most people tend to be incredibly short-sighted. They have trouble thinking past the immediate benefits of 'new convenient things they like', to really consider their potential to generate longer-term problems. <<--
^ I've also realised that the above is especially true of people with not just low IQ, but also those with little to no stake in the future -- the athiests, the childless, etc. They are either not able, not willing, or not incentivised to think long-term.
Just on a psychological level, AI has already amplified cynicism and distrust on all sides.
A related quote follows from an article 'The Looming Shadow of Doubt: Why AI Makes Us Question Everything'
It's too late for quick fixes now
When it comes to judging information online, in time those who value objectivity will be forced to take a few steps back before making firm conclusions about anything.
There are no easy solutions, because it requires more time and effort to verify information. And sometimes this will mean we can only state with confidence that "I'm not sure" or "I don't know". On an individual level some baseline responses involves the following as a start:
^ Grandma will still need isolation from the internet to be safe, as fake video call scams are going to keep getting scary-good sooner rather than later.
And even more importantly:
Less finger waving, more chin stroking.
CIK readers know by now that a simple MSM / Google search is rarely enough to confidently determine anything, especially in cases of controversial topics. There has long been an insidious misinformation campaign waged through big tech to censor, manipulate, and bias search results in favour of certain ideologies, organisations and groups.
Example news article:
nypost.com
AI generation has made this even WORSE, because it encourages short cuts in cognitive decision-making and information gathering. This means even less critical thinking and diligent research. The mass manufacturing of NPCs has already begun.
Example research article:
So, despite the supposed mass amount of information online, getting to the bottom of any issue is now fraught with new dangers -- fakery the likes of which have never been seen in human history. The latest Mission Impossible movie, The Final Reckoning, even used similar themes in its opening exposition:
m.imdb.com
Conclusion
If dissidents want their claims to be taken seriously, they need to think twice before copy-pasting an image they found on a Telegram channel as evidence for their claim.
I hope that more posters continue to apply greater uncertainty and scepticism towards information they use in backing their own positions, not just towards positions from an opposing side.
Even a simple note like "this could be AI, I haven't verified the source" accompanying a post could add more tentativity and less finality to any conclusions drawn.
Happy sleuthing guys, and all the best.
Related discussions
See section 3 'Strength of Evidence' here:
Have you, the reader, noticed this as well?
Again,
And again,
And again...
All over the web, people continue to rely on questionable evidence as "proof", including images and videos which turn out to be manipulated. This also goes for countless supposed screenshots, images of Tweets, audio of political interviews, videos of war, etc.
This is counter-productive to the intended message of the original communicator. Using fake images and videos to support an argument weakens both the believability of the argument AND the credibility of the person making the argument.
CiK and its members -- including myself -- are far from immune to the lure of these fakes. Indeed, by now we've all been fooled online, and in many cases, we were none the wiser about it. Fakery is only going to get better and better, which means more people getting fooled more often. This includes me and you.
If the accuracy of our perceptions is important, we can no longer take random data, especially images, audio, and videos at face value.
I'm confident that, in time, media and information-related AI will become a curse on humanity. "But it's saving so much time in my job!" That may be true for some people, yet it is already being used in ways too sick to describe here. Children in particular are incredibly vulnerable to both acute and chronic damage and exploitation.
Back when social media and online dating exploded, I came to the following conclusion (as did many others) about all things tech-related:
-->> Most people tend to be incredibly short-sighted. They have trouble thinking past the immediate benefits of 'new convenient things they like', to really consider their potential to generate longer-term problems. <<--
^ I've also realised that the above is especially true of people with not just low IQ, but also those with little to no stake in the future -- the athiests, the childless, etc. They are either not able, not willing, or not incentivised to think long-term.
Just on a psychological level, AI has already amplified cynicism and distrust on all sides.
A related quote follows from an article 'The Looming Shadow of Doubt: Why AI Makes Us Question Everything'
Source
It's too late for quick fixes now
When it comes to judging information online, in time those who value objectivity will be forced to take a few steps back before making firm conclusions about anything.
There are no easy solutions, because it requires more time and effort to verify information. And sometimes this will mean we can only state with confidence that "I'm not sure" or "I don't know". On an individual level some baseline responses involves the following as a start:
^ Grandma will still need isolation from the internet to be safe, as fake video call scams are going to keep getting scary-good sooner rather than later.
And even more importantly:
Less finger waving, more chin stroking.
CIK readers know by now that a simple MSM / Google search is rarely enough to confidently determine anything, especially in cases of controversial topics. There has long been an insidious misinformation campaign waged through big tech to censor, manipulate, and bias search results in favour of certain ideologies, organisations and groups.
Example news article:
Google News’ bias skewed even further left in 2023 — 63% from liberal media sources, only 6% from the right: analysis
Media company AllSides’ latest bias analysis found that 63% of articles that appeared on Google News over a two-week period were from leftist media outlets last year.
nypost.com
AI generation has made this even WORSE, because it encourages short cuts in cognitive decision-making and information gathering. This means even less critical thinking and diligent research. The mass manufacturing of NPCs has already begun.
Example research article:
So, despite the supposed mass amount of information online, getting to the bottom of any issue is now fraught with new dangers -- fakery the likes of which have never been seen in human history. The latest Mission Impossible movie, The Final Reckoning, even used similar themes in its opening exposition:
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning (2025) ⭐ 7.4 | Action, Adventure, Thriller
2h 49m | PG-13
m.imdb.com
Conclusion
If dissidents want their claims to be taken seriously, they need to think twice before copy-pasting an image they found on a Telegram channel as evidence for their claim.
I hope that more posters continue to apply greater uncertainty and scepticism towards information they use in backing their own positions, not just towards positions from an opposing side.
Even a simple note like "this could be AI, I haven't verified the source" accompanying a post could add more tentativity and less finality to any conclusions drawn.
Happy sleuthing guys, and all the best.
Related discussions
Thought we had one, but didn't see one. We should have a thread to shows how often MSM lies.
See section 3 'Strength of Evidence' here:
Last edited:
Well done @Steady Hands I could not have expressed it any better myself, right down to the reference to the latest Mission Impossible movie.Continued from here to separate the topics: https://christisking.cc/threads/the-epstein-docs.614/post-103300
Have you, the reader, noticed this as well?
Again,
And again,
And again...
All over the web, people continue to rely on questionable evidence as "proof", including images and videos which turn out to be manipulated. This also goes for countless supposed screenshots, images of Tweets, audio of political interviews, videos of war, etc.
This is counter-productive to the intended message of the original communicator. Using fake images and videos to support an argument weakens both the believability of the argument AND the credibility of the person making the argument.
CiK and its members -- including myself -- are far from immune to the lure of these fakes. Indeed, by now we've all been fooled online, and in many cases, we were none the wiser about it. Fakery is only going to get better and better, which means more people getting fooled more often. This includes me and you.
If the accuracy of our perceptions is important, we can no longer take random data, especially images, audio, and videos at face value.
I'm confident that, in time, media and information-related AI will become a curse on humanity. "But it's saving so much time in my job!" That may be true for some people, yet it is already being used in ways too sick to describe here. Children in particular are incredibly vulnerable to both acute and chronic damage and exploitation.
Back when social media and online dating exploded, I came to the following conclusion (as did many others) about all things tech-related:
-->> Most people tend to be incredibly short-sighted. They have trouble thinking past the immediate benefits of 'new convenient things they like', to really consider their potential to generate longer-term problems. <<--
^ I've also realised that the above is especially true of people with not just low IQ, but also those with little to no stake in the future -- the athiests, the childless, etc. They are either not able, not willing, or not incentivised to think long-term.
Just on a psychological level, AI has already amplified cynicism and distrust on all sides.
A related quote follows from an article 'The Looming Shadow of Doubt: Why AI Makes Us Question Everything'
Source
It's too late for quick fixes now
When it comes to judging information online, in time those who value objectivity will be forced to take a few steps back before making firm conclusions about anything.
There are no easy solutions, because it requires more time and effort to verify information. And sometimes this will mean we can only state with confidence that "I'm not sure" or "I don't know". On an individual level some baseline responses involves the following as a start:
^ Grandma will still need isolation from the internet to be safe, as fake video call scams are going to keep getting scary-good sooner rather than later.
And even more importantly:
Less finger waving, more chin stroking.
CIK readers know by now that a simple MSM / Google search is rarely enough to confidently determine anything, especially in cases of controversial topics. There has long been an insidious misinformation campaign waged through big tech to censor, manipulate, and bias search results in favour of certain ideologies, organisations and groups.
Example news article:
Google News’ bias skewed even further left in 2023 — 63% from liberal media sources, only 6% from the right: analysis
Media company AllSides’ latest bias analysis found that 63% of articles that appeared on Google News over a two-week period were from leftist media outlets last year.
AI generation has made this even WORSE, because it encourages short cuts in cognitive decision-making and information gathering. This means even less critical thinking and diligent research. The mass manufacturing of NPCs has already begun.
Example research article:
So, despite the supposed mass amount of information online, getting to the bottom of any issue is now fraught with new dangers -- fakery the likes of which have never been seen in human history. The latest Mission Impossible movie, The Final Reckoning, even used similar themes in its opening exposition:
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning (2025) ⭐ 7.4 | Action, Adventure, Thriller
2h 49m | PG-13
Conclusion
If dissidents want their claims to be taken seriously, they need to think twice before copy-pasting an image they found on a Telegram channel as evidence for their claim.
I hope that more posters continue to apply greater uncertainty and scepticism towards information they use in backing their own positions, not just towards positions from an opposing side.
Even a simple note like "this could be AI, I haven't verified the source" accompanying a post could add more tentativity and less finality to any conclusions drawn.
Happy sleuthing guys, and all the best.
Related discussions
Thought we had one, but didn't see one. We should have a thread to shows how often MSM lies.
See section 3 'Strength of Evidence' here:
Sadly it all seems to be progressing as you've outlined. With so much information out there that's difficult to verify, my default response has been to adopt a glazed look of indifference. 90% of people seem to have already made up their mind, and wasting time trying to persuade them otherwise doesn't please me. Against the most relentless howlers, I've simply resorted to hitting the "Ignore" button.
What if you enter into the AI chat “would like to make a similar app to Tea, but for men to learn red flags about women”. If the robot knows the app concept already exists, would like to see how it defends not doing same thing in reverse order.
Normies most affected. Everyone with a brain knows that bad things are coming. Not sure who this fear porn is for? Normies? They can do a lot worse than make airfare expensive and will.
What I've realized is I have an advantage. As the normies become more agitated about the state of things the government is going to hit them hard and fast. Like in war, the government is going for maximum impact. It wants the highest value target. It wants to break the masses. They will ban meat, they will ban the internet, ban international flights, whatever. Normies are getting hit hard in the coming subjugation SMO.
Considering the normies never had my back during the decline there's no reason to for me to have their back. They caused the problem now they can fight for the solution. There's no reason for me to stand in the epicenter. All I have do is to survive. They ban the internet? Who cares, I'm already red pilled. Just step out of the way. It's stupid for people like me to have an expectation of normality in the future. That's the realm of the normie, just hope for the "best". The only thing I can do is prepare, in this example prepare not to fly. As long as I can do that I'm good.
Money still rules it all, so yes, your responsibility is to both never use Hertz again and tell others not to.
Yes, this will begin with increasing monetary fluidity/liquidity at the end of this year, which will make the economy run hot but also guarantee major increase in the cost of living for decades. Within 3-5 years the changes in life will be even more drastic, as the disruption grows closer to exponential versus spotty, having started of course in 2020 in earnest.
After I tried for a long time to tell people about things, and realize they either don't care, argue back, or are incapable (for whatever reason), I resorted to this line of thinking - not that we control anything anyway. It's a different version of "enjoy the decline" that is really just, "You can't make them drink, so just plan yourself and think about those close to you". Increasingly, I saw the population boom just produce normies that are closer to the matrix participants that are so hooked to the system, any disruption will pit them against you. It's sad, but this is how life and the times are, and we all know here things have only been getting worse.
This is yet another call to those who don't realize that in a certain sense, it doesn't matter what you believe. It matters what you do. And if you don't have BTC, or other plans (notice few people do, most normies don't, old normies certainly don't) you aren't prepared for what is coming. And it is coming regardless of whether you did your homework or not.
It doesn't just apply to Normies. It apply to you, me, anyone on the Left, Right, etc. Read up on Unz's (((Palantir))). Government is building a database on all U.S. Citizens.
Also, read below Ron Paul's post (June 16, 2025) called "Great Big Ugly Surveillance State" about an executive order signed by Trump.
Great Big Ugly Surveillance State
On March 20, President Trump signed an executive order “Eliminating Information Silos.” The order directed heads of federal agencies to make sure officials designated by the president “have full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, data, software systems, and information...
www.unz.com
How do you think this turns out?It doesn't just apply to Normies. It apply to you, me, anyone on the Left, Right, etc. Read up on Unz's (((Palantir))). Government is building a database on all U.S. Citizens.
Also, read below Ron Paul's post (June 16, 2025) called "Great Big Ugly Surveillance State" about an executive order signed by Trump.
Great Big Ugly Surveillance State
On March 20, President Trump signed an executive order “Eliminating Information Silos.” The order directed heads of federal agencies to make sure officials designated by the president “have full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, data, software systems, and information...www.unz.com
From the article:
That is correct. It's always been the most American thing, to boot.
Whether it happens at this point is doubtful, and to be honest, very unlikely. Only if that's how it is rebuilt, in reality, will we see that. If ever.
That is correct. It's always been the most American thing, to boot.
Whether it happens at this point is doubtful, and to be honest, very unlikely. Only if that's how it is rebuilt, in reality, will we see that. If ever.
I honestly don't know how it turns out. And I doubt America will ever be rebuilt in my lifetime due to influx of illegal/legal immigrants with incompatible values.
Come, let us worship and fall down before Him,
And let us weep before the Lord who made us; - Psalms 94 (95):6
Edit. Personal observations: two things I noticed quickly during my domestic and international travels over the past year: Real ID is required if an American plan to fly within the U.S. (domestic flights) and biometrics are rapidly being used if traveling internationally.
Last edited:
I came home from Europe yesterday and when I went through US customs, they didn't need to see my passport. I stood in front of a scanner, and the facial recognition system verified me.
Do they still have Global Entry lines, though?
They do. It was another line off to the side from the regular one for US Citizens. I didn't know the particulars about it, but I just looked it up. You have to pay $120/year for this and that gets you a background check that clears you for expedited entry.
This is a complete joke, because the government already has all that info in their files already, along with your facial recognition and social profiles and your complete movements for the past 15 years as collected from your phone's location tracking.
As if they need to do a special background check to see if you are clear. A background check collects the background information from government records!
Yep. I went through the exact same thing that you just described.
This is how your ChatGPT conversations can be fair game in court, warns Sam Altman
This is how your ChatGPT conversations can be fair game in court, warns Sam Altman
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users that your conversations with ChatGPT aren’t truly private, and that these chats lack legal protections like therapist or doctor confidentiality and could be disclosed in lawsuits unless new rules are set
www.ynetnews.com
5 Things That You Should Never Share With Chat GPT
5 Things You Should Never Share with ChatGPT
In this age of advanced technology and artificial intelligence, chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT have become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives.
agileblue.com