Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Thread

I don't suppose it's possible for any right-wing "based" think tanks or organizations to develop their own AI, especially now that DeepSeek is out and shows how cheaply it can be done. I get the sense AI is a critical part of the culture war, and if there's one thing I can agree with Cernovich on, it's how the right-wing tends to not fund or do anything to help each other out concerning culture-related things, like novels, TV productions, art (hopefully I'm simply ignorant on this and they do, in fact, spend loads of money boosting young conservative creatives), and technology. One reason why I left Twitter and stopped paying attention is from the impression most people on the right want to complain and point things out and blackpill, all while grifting and making money, and then never actually doing anything. Trump and co seem to be doing more in weeks than Republicans have done in ages, but when Trump decided to spend all that money on AI, isn't that just hefting over massive cash to left-wing big-tech that has spent decades censoring and deplatforming Trump's constituents?

Sometimes I feel like Republicans are the professional sports team with a small budget trying to beat the team with all of most expensive players who are the most motivated. Look at how much influence USAID had, especially in propping up nobodies, who knows how far spread and wide that Leviathan's tentacles have gone.
I think there is GAB - AI, iv seen it before but I need to set it up and give it a go, Iv heard good things about it, Andrew Torba did praise deepseek so I think he is going to take full advantage of it dont worry
 
I think there is GAB - AI, iv seen it before but I need to set it up and give it a go, Iv heard good things about it, Andrew Torba did praise deepseek so I think he is going to take full advantage of it dont worry
Indeed, that might be the only alternative. One hopes the church would be, one day, capable of cobbling together an AI servant to help meet the needs of its laity. I don't think it'd be any different than creating an interactive book.
 
Indeed, that might be the only alternative. One hopes the church would be, one day, capable of cobbling together an AI servant to help meet the needs of its laity. I don't think it'd be any different than creating an interactive book.
I dont think that would be a good idea for the church, for things regarding the church its best to go in person and speak to actual people, the way the church has been doing things doesnt need to change its best this way.
 
I don't suppose it's possible for any right-wing "based" think tanks or organizations to develop their own AI, especially now that DeepSeek is out and shows how cheaply it can be done. I get the sense AI is a critical part of the culture war, and if there's one thing I can agree with Cernovich on, it's how the right-wing tends to not fund or do anything to help each other out concerning culture-related things, like novels, TV productions, art (hopefully I'm simply ignorant on this and they do, in fact, spend loads of money boosting young conservative creatives), and technology. One reason why I left Twitter and stopped paying attention is from the impression most people on the right want to complain and point things out and blackpill, all while grifting and making money, and then never actually doing anything. Trump and co seem to be doing more in weeks than Republicans have done in ages, but when Trump decided to spend all that money on AI, isn't that just hefting over massive cash to left-wing big-tech that has spent decades censoring and deplatforming Trump's constituents?

Sometimes I feel like Republicans are the professional sports team with a small budget trying to beat the team with all of most expensive players who are the most motivated. Look at how much influence USAID had, especially in propping up nobodies, who knows how far spread and wide that Leviathan's tentacles have gone.
Keep in mind that tech-space generally attracts the typical anti-social computer nerds while right wingers prefer the classic mechanical technologies (e.g. cars, guns, plumbing). It doesn't help that many right wingers are ignorant technophobes (which I understand the fear these days lately), and even a few literally think all computers are witchcraft.

As for big tech, I think upper level managers sense a coming cultural shift after the US 2024 Election results are pricing it in. Google has recently changed their policies on making AI weapons as an example (not exactly a right wing action, but a step in that direction):
 
Last edited:
I don’t mean to be overloading the conversation on this thread but have findings I thought to share. So interesting that MetaAI (and assuming all competitors are doing the same), is they are trying to balance providing accurate information, with creating positive interactions experience for humans (i.e not just a tool, but a companion). Sort of the concept it’s better to tell a white lie if it avoids conflict or causes the person negative feelings. To me that is disturbing, as it seems they think replacing human interactions will be the better business model for these companies vs making a highly reliable and efficient tool for people.
In the near future I will be writing 'we are an AI free business' in large capital letters on all of our marketing materials and Web presence.

I am convinced that people will be more likely to buy from and want to deal with a business staffed 100% by real people.
 
In the near future I will be writing 'we are an AI free business' in large capital letters on all of our marketing materials and Web presence.

I am convinced that people will be more likely to buy from and want to deal with a business staffed 100% by real people.
Yip, there are also so many books being released that are written by AI, I think the new authors should also do the same NOT WRITTEN BY AI.
 
I dont think that would be a good idea for the church, for things regarding the church its best to go in person and speak to actual people, the way the church has been doing things doesnt need to change its best this way.
I don't think it should replace people, but imagine an AI trained exclusively on all of the texts of every manuscript of the bible and early fathers works. Priests could even fine-tune the model with RLHF to ensure its within church doctrine. Surely it would help free up the time of what few priests there are so they can attend to the most important duties and leave basic Q&A and guidance to an AI.
 
I don't think it should replace people, but imagine an AI trained exclusively on all of the texts of every manuscript of the bible and early fathers works. Priests could even fine-tune the model with RLHF to ensure its within church doctrine. Surely it would help free up the time of what few priests there are so they can attend to the most important duties and leave basic Q&A and guidance to an AI.
I really dont think its a good idea because then you wouldnt be asking the church about the church you would be asking AI to Catechise you. For things regarding the church I really think it should only be in person and talking to actual priests and monks.

I see you are an Orthodox inquirer thats good, you will soon find out the Orthodox Church isnt something you can attend online, sacrements and church are to be partaken in person.
 
I had another thought this morning on this, about how the industry is willing to rapidly invest so much money into this non-human intelligence, all so they can eventually not have to hire humans to do work, to save money. They also still want to bring in H1Bs. Where's the urgency to invest in their own people?
 
I don't think it should replace people, but imagine an AI trained exclusively on all of the texts of every manuscript of the bible and early fathers works. Priests could even fine-tune the model with RLHF to ensure its within church doctrine. Surely it would help free up the time of what few priests there are so they can attend to the most important duties and leave basic Q&A and guidance to an AI.
There are already catechism books that summarize the teachings of the Church fathers. For example this one by St. Philaret of Moscow that is in Q&A format.


AI cannot perfectly answer spiritual questions because it doesn't have a soul. When you ask another person, and especially your spiritual father, God enlightens him to give you the correct answer. AI just follows a series of logical steps to arrive at an answer, which may not accurately reflect the spiritual disposition of the catechumen's question.
 
I had another thought this morning on this, about how the industry is willing to rapidly invest so much money into this non-human intelligence, all so they can eventually not have to hire humans to do work, to save money. They also still want to bring in H1Bs. Where's the urgency to invest in their own people?
Its a good back up plan, I think, if us guys besides what ever job we currently doing to also be able to do work/business in some kind of a trade that a woman or AI isnt able to do, then we cant be affirmative actioned out of it😁
 
New news my friends in Russia regions now begin do AI make diagnosis of patients.

Russia leading world in many science my friends, this is very good for many regions in Russia with less people, hospital always far now AI do diagnosis on computer!!

 
I've noticed this too!

I asked it to give me the top teams in WAR for baseball. Even getting the top 5 teams I had to 'convince' it.


So I told it, "you're a computer, compute them. There are open source data site that provide this. Go compute it."

It was still giving me flack and being lazy. I opened another terminal and it did it right away. Huh????

FYI

1. 1927 New York Yankees

  • WAR (Position Players): ~66.3
  • Key Players: Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Earle Combs, Tony Lazzeri
  • Highlights: This "Murderers' Row" team had legendary offensive production and defensive prowess. Ruth hit 60 home runs, and Gehrig drove in 175 runs.

2. 1939 New York Yankees

  • WAR (Position Players): ~56.3
  • Key Players: Joe DiMaggio, Bill Dickey, Charlie Keller
  • Highlights: Joe DiMaggio's prime and a deep supporting cast led this team to a dominant season and a World Series title.

3. 1976 Cincinnati Reds

  • WAR (Position Players): ~55.4
  • Key Players: Joe Morgan, Pete Rose, George Foster, Johnny Bench
  • Highlights: Known as the "Big Red Machine," this team dominated offensively and swept the World Series.

4. 1998 New York Yankees

  • WAR (Position Players): ~54.3
  • Key Players: Derek Jeter, Bernie Williams, Paul O'Neill
  • Highlights: This modern Yankees dynasty set the American League record for wins (114) and won the World Series.

5. 1906 Chicago Cubs

  • WAR (Position Players): ~52.3
  • Key Players: Frank Chance, Joe Tinker, Johnny Evers
  • Highlights: This Cubs team combined exceptional defense and consistent hitting, finishing with a 116-36 record.
I'm using AI for my fantasy baseball league to figure out good trade scenarios and what positions are the most valuable in my league.
 
For those more knowledgeable in the AI space, what do you recommend tools like ChatGPT be used for?

What’s a daily habit I can implement that would add value to my life, help me self improve, or help with daily tasks?
 
Back
Top