Lounge of The Russian-Ukrainian War

GkO37PdW8AAJhcb




This toilet paper is still printing? Maybe they receive USAID.

Europe worst nightmare ending a war in european soil…. Yeah maybe for the vampires merchants of death it’s bad news.
 


This is moralistic garbage, which is unfortunately the rhetorical currency of the globalists because they have nothing else to say. For three years, President Trump and I have made two simple arguments: first, the war wouldn't have started if President Trump was in office; second, that neither Europe, nor the Biden administration, nor the Ukrainians had any pathway to victory. This was true three years ago, it was true two years ago, it was true last year, and it is true today. And for three years, the concerns of people who were obviously right were ignored. What is Niall's actual plan for Ukraine? Another aid package? Is he aware of the reality on the ground, of the numerical advantage of the Russians, of the depleted stock of the Europeans or their even more depleted industrial base? Instead, he quotes from a book about George HW Bush from a different historical period and a different conflict. That's another currency of these people: reliance on irrelevant history.

President Trump is dealing with reality, which means dealing with facts. And here are some facts:Number one, while our Western European allies' security has benefitted greatly from the generosity of the United States, they pursue domestic policies (on migration and censorship) that offend the sensibilities of most Americans and defense policies that assume continued over-reliance. Number two, Russians have a massive numerical advantage in manpower and weapons in Ukraine, and that advantage will persist regardless of further Western aid packages. Again, the aid is *currently* flowing. Number three, the United States retains substantial leverage over both parties to the conflict. Number four, ending the conflict requires talking to the people involved in starting it and maintaining it. Number five, the conflict has placed--and continues to place--stress on tools of American statecraft, from military stockpiles to sanctions (and so much else). We believe the continued conflict is bad for Russia, bad for Ukraine, and bad for Europe. But most importantly, it is bad for the United States.

Given the above facts, we must pursue peace, and we must pursue it now. President Trump ran on this, he won on this, and he is right about this. It is lazy, ahistorical nonsense to attack as "appeasement" every acknowledgment that America's interest must account for the realities of the conflict. That interest--not moralisms or historical illiteracy--will guide President Trump's policy in the weeks to come.And thank God for that.
 
Trump has fully exposed Zelensky, but the globalist controlled mainstream media has responded always reporting the news from Zelensky’s perspective. Their meme is “Trump is trapped in a disinformation bubble”. Something still needs to be done about the MSM. The alternative media and “X” is a good start, but the globalists still have a lot of power to deceive. The ability of the MSM to define the acceptable reality needs to be completely broken or they will eventual gain back power.
 




Russia doesn’t believe in the USA as a deal partner because it changes governments frequently and reneges on deals. China presumably views the US in the same way.The simple reality is that no coherent long-run foreign policy of the USA is possible given its form of government and internal divisions.Given that reality - a crude and temporary transactional approach to short term foreign relationships make sense. And no one should have any illusions about the ‘deal.’ And this also means the USA should retreat from any broad strategic goals and focus on itself, rebuilding consensus at home. Because no one important will trust the USA over more than a few years for the immediate future.

I fully agree.
When any country makes deals with the USA you always have to keep in mind the next congress and/or president may undo all the agreements made by the previous one, so any deals have to have real and tangible benefits within a very short timeframe. (2 to 4 years max).

Either that, or it has to be an action that cannot be undone with enormous difficulties. For instance, if the USA really removes all its troops from Europe, and closes all the military bases, the next administration would have enormous difficulties reversing that.
 
Last edited:
I like what he's saying but why does he dress like Marty McFly?

Is he going back to the future? (that would be too cool)

Sunglasses inside are a red flag. He seems to me like he's more spastic than usual lately, Ive seen him in past interviews where he was very calm and collected. Hope it doesn't mean he's been leaning on a crutch.
 
Trump and Fico both going hard on Zelensky. Both were subject to assassination attempt/s. One of Trump's assassins was a Ukraine fanboy that had spent years in the middle of spook recruitment turf. IIRC, Fico's assassination attempt was shortly after he had declared Slovakia as neutral or some such unacceptable comment - surely drawing attention from Zelensky.

I think both these men suspect Zelensky was part of these attempts, if not directly, then at least by association/causal. As a matter of life, they want him gone from the scene. Trump and Fico appear savvy and redpilled enough to suspect their own intel services may have even had a hand along the way - that's another reckoning to come.



Trump offering to withdraw US forces from ALL of Europe? If true, that is monumental. It is also very hard to reverse in short order (and certainly can't be done in real secrecy). Meaning, such a withdrawal, if reversed by a future Dem President, would take years to simply re-fill the current slots (let alone get on a true war footing). That pushes the reaction window well into the next administration's timeline, somewhat countering the understandable objection about ever-shifting US policy. Big missile implications as well - intermediate range systems become almost mute, once removed from European launchsites.

Dniprropetrovsk, Kherson, and Odessa oblasts are not converted to Russian rule presently. I don't think Putin is gullible enough to stop without at least Kherson and Odessa (oh, and Kharkiv). Interesting start point, and a fairly generous one if it means total US withdrawal from Europe.

If US weapons have stopped, the fat lady is singing. Somewhere else I read that US assets are no longer communicating incoming long-range missile strikes to Ukraine units - leaving Ukraine almost blind. For heaven's sake, now's the time for "decision making centers." Maybe the front line guys can get a pass on that type of attack at least. I guess we'll see just how long Ukraine can last once the US faucet is closed - maybe highlighting what a sham the whole thing was.
 
Sunglasses inside are a red flag. He seems to me like he's more spastic than usual lately, Ive seen him in past interviews where he was very calm and collected. Hope it doesn't mean he's been leaning on a crutch.
I think he's feeling cocky as hell because he's the richest man in the world, and he's going to save America, and open the solar system to humanity.

He needs to avoid pride and hubris, and give God the glory for his accomplishments and the amazing things he has in the works.
 
I think he's feeling cocky as hell because he's the richest man in the world, and he's going to save America, and open the solar system to humanity.

He needs to avoid pride and hubris, and give God the glory for his accomplishments and the amazing things he has in the works.

I thought about that after I posted. It’s possible that he’s just drunk on power. But I remember a chick from his past accusing him of liking amphetamines, which wouldn’t be a huge stretch for a high functioning dude.
There’s only two possibles for the sunglasses- either he’s just trying to look cool… or he’s trying to hide his eyes.
 
Back
Top