Yeah that's what Slovakia threatened, the Ukies quickly complied. If they cut off Russian gas, they'd better stock up on candles and firewood.
Yeah that's what Slovakia threatened, the Ukies quickly complied. If they cut off Russian gas, they'd better stock up on candles and firewood.
For the first time in nearly three years since the start of the war, Russian 'Geran' drones targeted the Verkhovnaya Rada building in Kiev. According to Ukrainian parliamentarians, the drones hit near Zelensky's office. Another target was the Ukrainian National Bank, which caught fire after a direct hit.I believe it's directly related to the cancelation of gas transit.
“I hope to have six months,” Trump said in a response to a journalist's question in this regard, later specifying that this could happen earlier.
It was immediately unclear what the president-elect referred to when he voiced the six-months timeline as the journalist's question was partially off the mic, As per Reuters, Trump implied the time he believes it would take to end the war.
Yea they'll probably need time to actually reach an agreement that is satisfying for both Russia and Zelensky. I doubt international courts would jail Zelensky, but Russia probably would, if the Ukraine were completely partitioned.Trump outlines possible timeline of talks to end war in Ukraine
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has expressed hope he will be able to end Russia's war against Ukraine through negotiations, including as a result of his future talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin over the next few months. — Ukrinform.www.ukrinform.net
Trump wants to end the war within 6 months, which, isn't as good as ending the war on day one like he boasted on the campaign trail.
The Democrats worked very hard to escalate as much as possible, with the Kursk invasion, missile strikes deep into Russia, and terrorist attacks. Just to spite Trump, and keep their cash cow war from ending.
Still, 6 months is way better than nuclear war so I'll take it.
I read the article. It seems like a lot of double talk. He is saying that there are many hidden agendas involved in the conflict, and that much of the information that comes out is hyped up and mixed with lies on both sides, and it's all a huge media product, so the reality bears little resemblance to the story being told. Therefore the war is fake.This post argues that the official narrative of the Russia/Ukraine war is fake in accordance with Baudrillian hyperreality: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-ukraine-war-did-not-take-place
Yes, like most talk nowadays. Not only are people misinformed and talking out of both sides of their mouths, but we have also been overun by AI bots and deep fakes. There is no telling what is real or fake on the internet anymore. AI is a lot farther along than most people realize.... a lot of double talk...
Yes, and so the war is fake in the sense that it was not necessary and is not what Putin claims that it is about, namely, land (history, language, NATO, etc.). Russia has a lethal nuclear arsenal and is the biggest country in the world comprising 10%+ of the world's land mass of which 75% is uninhabited and Russia needed more land for "safety" reasons? Bullshit. This war is about the jews that control Russia getting together with the jews that control Ukraine and figuring out how to get white Christian men to march to their death over nothing. Mission accomplished. The talmuds create these fake wars not only for the enjoyment of killing heterosexual Christian men, but also because they get rich off of the depleting of weapon's stockpiles from both sides. (((They))) are the military industrial complex. The Russian, American, Chinese, Iranian, and Israeli militaries are for all intents and purposes one big military as they all have the same JQ-objective... namely, making the rich richer, and the poor poorer (and/or dead).... there are many hidden agendas involved in the conflict, and that much of the information that comes out is hyped up and mixed with lies on both sides, and it's all a huge media product, so the reality bears little resemblance to the story being told.
You are using the word fake differently than I would. To me, saying a war is fake means there's not actually a war going on. However, it seems pretty clear to me that a war is in fact happening there.Yes, like most talk nowadays. Not only are people misinformed and talking out of both sides of their mouths, but we have also been overun by AI bots and deep fakes. There is no telling what is real or fake on the internet anymore. AI is a lot farther along than most people realize.
Yes, and so the war is fake in the sense that it was not necessary and is not what Putin claims that it is about, namely, land (history, language, NATO, etc.). Russia has a lethal nuclear arsenal and is the biggest country in the world comprising 10%+ of the world's land mass of which 75% is uninhabited and Russia needed more land for "safety" reasons? Bullshit. This war is about the jews that control Russia getting together with the jews that control Ukraine and figuring out how to get white Christian men to march to their death over nothing. Mission accomplished. The talmuds create these fake wars not only for the enjoyment of killing heterosexual Christian men, but also because they get rich off of the depleting of weapon's stockpiles from both sides. (((They))) are the military industrial complex. The Russian, American, Chinese, Iranian, and Israeli militaries are for all intents and purposes one big military as they all have the same JQ-objective... namely, making the rich richer, and the poor poorer (and/or dead).
So yes, in this sense, all modern wars are fake because they are unnecessary, and yet they are very real in terms of poor people being slaughtered for the enjoyment and financial benefit of the uber rich.
So basically there’s reality, bias, manufactured bias, and straight BS?This post argues that the official narrative of the Russia/Ukraine war is fake in accordance with Baudrillian hyperreality: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-ukraine-war-did-not-take-place
Hi Thomas, the title of the post "The Ukraine War did not take place" is a play on Baudrillard's "the gulf war did not take place". The post comments, "As Rurik’s tagline states, “The wars are fake, but the massacres are real.”" In other words, the soldiers on both sides are being ground up and killed in a conflict between two nations, but the war is simulated in the sense that the objectives being sought by our international financial elites (who exist at a level *above* that of the nation state, where both Putin and Zelensky are controlled by them) are totally different than the narratives fed to the masses about the nature of the war. What kind of war can it possibly be when both sides are controlled by higher level parties for nefarious, unacknowledged reasons, and neither is fighting to achieve military victory on the ground (which is the traditionally understood meaning of a war)?You are using the word fake differently than I would. To me, saying a war is fake means there's not actually a war going on. However, it seems pretty clear to me that a war is in fact happening there.
You can say the news reports about the war are untrue, and that the motives of all the key players are different than what they publicly claim, but to me that's different from saying the war is fake. The war is actually happening, so it can't be fake.
It seems natural to me that all parties would lie about a real war as it is going on. I think even Sun Tzu said this is how war should be practiced.
Hi Thomas, the title of the post "The Ukraine War did not take place" is a play on Baudrillard's "the gulf war did not take place". The post comments, "As Rurik’s tagline states, “The wars are fake, but the massacres are real.”" In other words, the soldiers on both sides are being ground up and killed in a conflict between two nations, but the war is simulated in the sense that the objectives being sought by our international financial elites (who exist at a level *above* that of the nation state, where both Putin and Zelensky are controlled by them) are totally different than the narratives fed to the masses about the nature of the war. What kind of war can it possibly be when both sides are controlled by higher level parties for nefarious, unacknowledged reasons, and neither is fighting to achieve military victory on the ground (which is the traditionally understood meaning of a war)?
Yes.You are using the word fake differently than I would.
The title is not the issue here dude. The issue is that your boy Putin is a jew.So, in other words....simply a clickbait title.
I suspect he is half or quarter jewish based on the history of the Shelomova family, but he definitely has some Uralic groid in him. That's why his blonde hair and blue eyes don't match the Nordic phenotype that they hail from, his phrenology would look more suitable with darker features and we can see a subtle Asiatic presence in his face and stature.The title is not the issue here dude. The issue is that your boy Putin is a jew.
Even by the time the war finishes the death toll likely won't exceed 5 million people. The population of Ukraine is estimated to be around 37 million and Russia is estimated to be around 138 million. I am not really seeing how killing at most 5 million people relative to these two population sizes is enough to send bloodlines to extinction.The entire war has done but one thing more than anything else, kill a significant number of Slavic bloodlines off for good and fuel forever changes in planned immigration into Russia and the Slavic and Baltic states.
You're nit picking details of Music's above Master's Thesis while avoiding the main body of The Argument... that is, that Putin and Zelensky are both controlled by elite talmudic jews.Even by the time the war finishes the death toll likely won't exceed 5 million people. The population of Ukraine is estimated to be around 37 million and Russia is estimated to be around 138 million. I am not really seeing how killing at most 5 million people relative to these two population sizes is enough to send bloodlines to extinction.
Even by the time the war finishes the death toll likely won't exceed 5 million people. The population of Ukraine is estimated to be around 37 million and Russia is estimated to be around 138 million. I am not really seeing how killing at most 5 million people relative to these two population sizes is enough to send bloodlines to extinction.