Life Under The Bridge
- Thread starter IRT
- Start date
In this thread I want to address Get2Chopaa’s war supporting tendencies (since I am not allowed to post in the Christian morality thread).
Basically you stated that you would support empire building/war for the USA where it is profitable for them.
Isn’t “thou shalt not kill” one of the ten commandants and one of the most basic tenets of Christianity?
Yet somehow you are advocating USA to invade foreign lands and plunder them for profit so that Americans citizens can be enriched. And somehow your priest is okay with your view?
Can you tell me where exactly in the bible it says “invade the lands of foreigners and plunder and pillage for the profit of you and your progeny” or any such similar message?
You aren’t Christian at all you are a complete fraud.
Oh and by the way when people like Francis K. And others keep going on about me looking for a virgin girlfriend instead of a wife it’s the year 2025 and marriage brings significant legal and financial risk for men in the majority of countries.
What benefit do you get out of being married as a man that you don’t get from just having a permanent long term girlfriend? Why take the legal and financial risk if you aren’t being rewarded. You can just get a girlfriend and still behave as a married couple. Technically it is a sin but in the modern era marriage has been perverted to the point where it’s no longer beneficial for men and is a completely one sided arrangement.
And you guys obsess over a detail so minor yet say nothing when someone like Get2Choppaa advocates the USA invading foreign lands for financial profit. Killing is a much greater sin than fornication and yet you mostly all stay silent on the issue.
Basically you stated that you would support empire building/war for the USA where it is profitable for them.
Isn’t “thou shalt not kill” one of the ten commandants and one of the most basic tenets of Christianity?
Yet somehow you are advocating USA to invade foreign lands and plunder them for profit so that Americans citizens can be enriched. And somehow your priest is okay with your view?
Can you tell me where exactly in the bible it says “invade the lands of foreigners and plunder and pillage for the profit of you and your progeny” or any such similar message?
You aren’t Christian at all you are a complete fraud.
Oh and by the way when people like Francis K. And others keep going on about me looking for a virgin girlfriend instead of a wife it’s the year 2025 and marriage brings significant legal and financial risk for men in the majority of countries.
What benefit do you get out of being married as a man that you don’t get from just having a permanent long term girlfriend? Why take the legal and financial risk if you aren’t being rewarded. You can just get a girlfriend and still behave as a married couple. Technically it is a sin but in the modern era marriage has been perverted to the point where it’s no longer beneficial for men and is a completely one sided arrangement.
And you guys obsess over a detail so minor yet say nothing when someone like Get2Choppaa advocates the USA invading foreign lands for financial profit. Killing is a much greater sin than fornication and yet you mostly all stay silent on the issue.
Last edited:
The entire book of Joshua came immediately to my mind. I suppose you could also argue for Christ's having come not to bring peace but a sword, although I probably wouldn't interpret it that way myself.
Non Christians always have strong views on what Christians believe, which actual Christians tend to disagree with.
I've seen others call G2C out for his jingoism. From what I can see, G2C is about as Christian and conservative as your standard fare MIC-funded GOPe politician. Even less so since he outsources his moral and spiritual life to a priest. Since that is blatantly obvious and comes across in every post, I don't see the need to make a spectacle of it. At least with G2C, you know what you're going to get.
Honestly AS it's not about what youre trying to do dude, at the very very least I can at least say that you're honest about it. I don't care what you do, I've even actually tried to help you realize certain things in regards to the feasibility of your goals which of course you ignored. You are who you are and it just is what it is, nobody cares anymore....
But that being said, don't come on here and try to throw someone else's faith in their face just because they can't do the same to you in return, you did that shit to me a while back in a discussion that had absolutely nothing to do with faith just because you knew it would strike a nerve. Stop preying on our tolerance of you, if you're going to be on a Christian forum as a Godless heathen at least pretend to have some respect for the place.
I said I would be more understanding if we were at least honest about what we were doing.
I.e. if we went to Venezuela for oil and for geopolitical security reasons do I accept that vs an obvious lie that we are there because we give a shit about a dictator etc....
For the record....I'm certainly not in favor of endless wars.
I don't think we need to go to Venezuela. I think we could work with Maduro.
But if we are gonna go there...let's not lie.
But most people won't accept that.
That's not exactly the translation. It's though shall not take an innocent life is my understanding from speaking with my priest.
It's rich to watch an atheist degenerate try and pull an alinsky tactic of making me play by my own moral compass when you have none.
No. It's merely my observation that that's what an empire does and we are an empire.
I don't think we are in the right to do so. But it will happen either way.
It doesn't and I don't believe it's the Christian thing to do. But you can still separate the reality that wars will always be fought over resources and an Empire will always be looking for ways to expand their influence via military/cultural/economic control.
War is politics by other means.
Well I guess I'll find out when I meet my maker.
You wouldn't even understand any of that because you're not a religious person.
When you have a person youre entering the sacrament of marriage with there's a whole different level of relationship.
Again you're too busy chasing 15 year old village girls to know.
Are you sure you're not JF Garieppy?
All sins are sins my boy.
Seriously though. People take you as serious as a wet fart.
You've been ravished by many here and are only left to a few fellow victim mentality sympathizing goofballs who share you're crusade of incredible stupidity.
While that's an incorrect statement....its almost a compliment.
Thanks I guess....
Blade I'm going to let this go brother because you're obviously very passionate about it, I was just trying to reason with you. But I'll say one more thing before I do, you have trouble discussing any view point which is in opposition to yours and instead of addressing what someone is saying you will just pick out specific things you can try to attack. You make it personal and start insulting people's intelligence any time they believe something different from what you believe. I have experienced this with you first hand and I'm not the only one. You just did exactly that to me for no reason....
The whole art of debating is to pick apart someone's argument point by point. Or are you trying to claim he is nitpicking on minor points while avoiding addressing the core issue? I have personally have not seen him doing that. As BladeRunner insulting people's intelligence he has done that from time to time but he is a lot milder on insults than many other forum members including yourself, Purple Urkel, Get2Chopaa, etc.
Okay well we're different there because I discuss things to learn and expand myself, not just to win the argument any way I can to justify to someone else what is in my own head. I don't see it as a competition, it only would become that if it were something that actually had impact on my life not just some random internet discussion.
Last edited:
Is fiat moral or immoral? On this hang all the issues, if you don't have the premise that fiat is immoral, it's not like we can go further than that.
"Win the argument" isn't what any of this was ever about. Those who hold BTC (in the case of the squabble) have already won, been winning, etc. It's like the analogy I've given in the past, a team beats you over and over and the only answer is "but but but" or "you're a religion/cult" or "it won't last" while its the losing team of course that is the one trying to justify, since their position doesn't meet reality.
How did you possibly even find a way to make any of what I said about bitcoin? Wrong thread dude....I genuinely do not care about any of that one way or another. I haven't typed the word "bitcoin" on this forum in years, you sound obsessed....
Last edited:
What does fiat money being moral or immoral have to do with anything.
If we are playing that game....
Is the concept of money as means of value storage moral or immoral at all regardless of the valuation basis underpinning it's worth?
This is a retarded argument that serves no point other than academic mindrot.
There is no valuation metric universally agreed upon for Bitcoin so it is indeed a religion of value based solely on unquantifiable metrics.
Which is totally fine. But those of us with some financial educational background don't have to pretend otherwise.
If you believe in it and think it's going up great. Cash in. But notice the trend of the major money managers like blackrock. I think it's less than 1 or 2 percent of their balance sheet