Supplying Iran with capable AD systems would have negated Israeli air supremacy, which in turn would have prevented the current turkey shoot that is happening over and on Iranian soil. It is quite certain that maintaining Israeli aerial superiority is part of a set of below the table agreements between Netanyahu and Putin.
Syria was the proverbial canary in the coalmine. For 8 years the Israelis had a free hand in Syrian airspace, and in the final stages of Bashar's rule the Russians and Israeli were daily coordinating strikes on SAA/Iranian targets, aka the Israelis told the Russians where and what they would strike to avoid accidents. Not once did the Russian AD systems engage, and not once did the Russian inform the Iranians about their impending doom. Some very big IRGC fish were fried in Syria over the years. The few outdated Russian AD pieces the Syrians operated were purposely compromised as to avoid the SAAs AD assets engaging Israeli jets, and by extension putting a block on Israeli operations.
View attachment 21785
Iran is a tad different as Russia cannot avoid Iran to fall due to the grave geopolitical consequences it would have. Nevertheless the Russians are very vocal about the need for the Iranians to abide by the Non Proliferation Treaty, and to cooperate with international organizations on the matter. The Kremlin might very well start pushing for negotiations and a new JCPOA tier deal soon enough, calling it here.
The Iranians have been trying to move the RU- IR relationship forward but got hit with a brick wall every single time. Pro tip: it might be an idea for one of the Boomerturbans to do an Early Life check on about half the Kremlin as to find out the why, stuff's embarrassing. Iran's last gesture of goodwill: providing Russia with drones and short distance missiles in the first months of Ukraine, and eventually granting Russia the needed licenses to move Shaheed production plants to Russia instead.
Per usual the Kremlinboomers did not return the favor, and have been behaving like a bunch of a-holes on just about every occasion instead. S400 sale, deliberately put on hold. S300 sale, delivery deliberatily delayed until the Iranians started a years long court case in Geneva. Su35 sale, deliberately put on hold. The Russians we're actually so not willing to hand over Iran its hardware that they fasttracked a much later placed Algerian order Su35 a couple of months ago.
www.timesofisrael.com/report-russia-freezes-delivery-of-s-300-missile-defense-to-iran/amp/
Nevertheless copetakes will continue flowing. Con-artists and snake oil vendors have been flocking around this stale narrative for over a decade, and that ain't gonna change overnight. Pay attention to how any reference to the S400/S35 saga will get conveniently ignored, yet junk garage sales of outdated and inferior Russian weapon systems and intentionally de-contextualized and misinterpreted official Russian statements are totally proof.
In that sense it will be a bit like the Gaza affaire. For 18 months Putin has also been just about to move on Gaza and flex his mucles to stop the genocide. Two more weeks y'all! Meanwhile half the European Continent is moving forward with boycotting and sanctioning Israel, but not a word on that.
Iran was never supposed to be a peer competitor and that set up has worked. Courtesy of Putin. Hence the Iranians now have to deal with 200-250 Israeli sorties per day without any tools or assets to stop those from hitting their target. Despite small recent victories in the form of leveling Israeli apartment buildings, and exacting a real price aka a death toll, the situation is unsustainable.
I believe Iran has been using Russian mid-range Pantsir AA systems.
Certainly both Russia and China are transactional/pragmatic in their realpolitik-driven foreign policies, but I doubt they let Iran down to the point of losing them. While the Russians do benefit from escalation in Iran as it will drain US and NATO resources, they do not want Iran turned into another Libya/Syria.
As to the Russians in Syria, their calculus was that they did not have escalatory dominance there, no safe supply lines while the Americans had a massive footprint in the region, if things blew up in Syria, their garnison would be in a very vulnerable position between US, Israeli and Turkish forces. That situation of course worsened after the Ukraine war started.
Iran did land some serious blows, hitting targets like the Haifa refinery, which supplies 60% of Israel's fuel, some port installations there and the defense ministry HQ in Tel Aviv. Beyond any material losses though they have scored psychological victories and have something to show for after being hit hard on the first day. They have shattered the myth of invulnerability of Israel. Israel is going to lose a fraction of its population and a lot of its foreign business there. Would executives from multinationals like Intel (which scrapped its $25 billion Israeli expansion plan) want to live and work in a potential warzone?
Iran as well has a culture of martyrdom, they threw a million bodies at Saddam's Iraq and ultimately prevailed. A US/Israeli bombing campaign is not going to make anywhere near that kind of a dent. And unlike Gaza or Syria, Iran is not going to go hungry.
Last edited: