Hitler versus Rothschild: the Logistics and Background of World War Two

I know and agree with all of these narratives and facts. I am well-versed in WW2 history.

This however, does not mean that Hitler was not a complete idiot and a buffoon who was into aryan pagan cults and destroyed Germany and much of Europe in trying to set up his aryan pagan third reich.

I don't have to read a book about some guy claiming that Hitler was an actual Catholic, I can see that the whole aryan pagan rituals and imagery are not just completely devoid of Christian content, but they are also in opposition to Christianity. The hundreds of thousands of adepts at Nuremberg worshipped a pagan symbol, the swastika, as opposed to the cross.
For as well versed as you claim to be in WW2 history, you don't seem to be well-versed in logic, and layered logic. You refuse to look into the material provided, because if you did, your points, which are not your own, would be proven wrong. You instinctively "know" Hitler was allegedly into "aryan pagan cults" yet you provide no proof. You're just repeating Allied victor propaganda here. Your ratio continues to tap into the vein of those who only make a priori judgments and don't tolerate dissent to their opinions.

You continue your ad hominem barrages against Hitler. Where are these alleged "aryan pagan ritual" photographs? Would the burning of jewish porn be a pagan ritual? If anyone goes out and burns a pile of modern-day tranny books and gives the Roman salute while the flames destroy the satanic filth within, are they a "pagan aryan cultist"? Torch-light Prussian military processions are suddenly pagan rituals? Promoting the health and wellness of a nation and it's people through cultivating physical fitness, large families, and adherence to Christian morals and laws is pagan?? You are severely misinformed, whatever created your opinions is a heap of lies.

Don't be lazy, go back and read my efforted posts which clearly show you to be in the wrong with every one of your claims. I've already talked about the Cross symbology, it's not my fault if you can't comprehend the immense historical variation of its connotation. If you seek to exert my energy by making me repeat myself over and over, then you are exhibiting the very behavior Hitler fought against in his early debates:



You fall in the same cognitive trap as in flat earth:
-NASA lies, we never went to the moon ===>therefore the earth is flat.
-Hitler had good motives, tried to fight judeo-masonry ===> therefore he is awesome, a devout Christian, and an intelligent, wise leader with sound judgment.

The earth is not flat, this is a very dumb concept, and Hitler was a fool who destroyed his nation and ended up solidifying the globalist grip on Europe. His opponents knew he would fail, and that's why they supported his rise.

That is also why nazi imagery and ideology is kept alive by glowies and the deep state, it's a very smart way to poison the nationalist well, just like flat earth is a smart way to decredibilize red pillers and destroy the modern truth movement. Both flat earth and the cult of Adolf Hitler are toxic poison pills that will destroy and de-crediblize not just the proponents of these cults., but also take down as collateral damage the wider opposition to the prevailing narratives.
Your attempts to disprove fact and truth are puerile. You misrepresent my posts in another thread in this one as if one logical conclusion immediately derives another and is correlated to the same thinking pattern. Hitler apparently believed in the Copernican model, even if German scientists in the Third Reich did not with their Knickebein Radar System. Hitler and I would probably disagree on cosmology, but that is entirely irrelevant. Nowhere did I reduce my posts to "NASA lies therefore earth flat," and nowhere here am I reducing my posts to "Hitler fights judeo-masonry = automatic saint". I bring in measurable evidence for every claim I make that is not in the realm of discussing hypotheticals, which I do not like to do.

Hitler's fight against Rothschild ended in a defeat of that conflict in 1945, but the fight of Rothschild against Europa, against Christendom, had been going on long before Hitler, and would have continued whether there had been a Hitler or not. So no, I am refusing these infantile claims that Hitler caused the suffering Europe is enduring in the present. It is a blatant lie and you should feel dirty for repeating it. Masonic trash like Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Rydz-Smigly, Stalin, and jews like Ehrenburg, Kaganovich, Weizmann, and Yagoda are responsible for our present day dystopia, how in the hell are the men who tried to stop these devils responsible merely because they lost?? Explain yourself. At least have the courage and penitence of Patton to admit you are wrong.

The people are waking up. Glowie influence does not work on awakened minds. Status quo shame tactics won't keep them penned into these simplistic and reductionist thought control frameworks. I've long suspected operatives on here, indirectly even, for failure to see this. In the very least you are influenced by the very operatives you feign to warn people like me against. Whatever the discourse descends to, whatever dialectical shift they're cooking up next, it's all a means to an end for them. The solution to any earthly troubles will only come from a violent overthrow of the Talmudic system by Christian White European men with guns who are better shots and more strategic than goblin men with suits and yarmulkes who have many legions of slaves. These men could very well be wearing both Crosses and Swastikas, though it's redundant if they did, as it is for any awakened European man with a full cognizance of their 2000 year history.

Your assumption about government control over fringe beliefs relies on a fallacy that everything the government touches it can keep perpetual control over forever, and that these beliefs allegedly originated with the deep state. The deep state is Israel, and jews, period. Every one of its functions serves the jewish agenda period, whether common street jews know it or not. The deep state takes the symbology of someone they vanquished, and inject it into a susceptible population with high drug-usage, recidivist tendencies, and low education, what do you expect will happen? There's more than one reason why most of today's self-admitted "White Supremacist's" are covered in cancerous tattoos and thrive in penitentiaries, and very few have the composure or dignity or intellect of a historical SS officer. The same reason why many blacks embrace Black Pantherism or Black Hebrew Israelite identity, even though some of them know the government has their hands on these movements, but they would rather live closer to a meaningful truth than a withered lie of hollywood-thuggery. At the same time, the plight of all these people is real. They are being eradicated, they are being extinguished, they are being murdered, what route do you expect people to take? Whites or not, the Blacks fare no better under the jews. Blacks or no, Whites are still eternally targeted by jews.

Are you going to come to this thread with facts and evidence or will you keep residing in the realm of speculation? You began well with citing Galland's talks, but all of your other claims about Hitler are nothing but campfire hearsay and have already been debunked. When I make a claim about anything, I back it up. I've given ample evidence that disproves paganism in the Third Reich, so if you keep bringing up this claim you are either being a troll at this point or you are having difficulties in comprehending a great number of variables at once. I am trying to help you and not chastise anyone, but lies must be dispelled, harshly if so. You need to grow beyond a diminutive fearful position of "well poisoning". This takes time, so if you don't have time to read, don't make the time to mislead the viewership with baseless claims.

I take it a good sign that people are having their feathers ruffled. No Christian should live in darkness and false comfort in these times. Prepare yourself for stronger battles, and stop blaming men who've done things that all of us would never be capable of doing. Start blaming your enemies don't turn down allies in this renewed fight. Sowing division amongst what remains of White America, Europe, and its offshoots is the handiwork of angry non-Whites, jews, deracinated Whites, and spiritual traitors to their kin. I don't see how any of you can levy these claims at this juncture in time, and be self-respecting White men, or behave in the Christian spirit of truth-seeking and dispelling lies, the answer is those who do, aren't.

Imagine, if you will, a productive forum environment where there is equilateral discourse, where the content of the post is analyzed and critiqued. I don't expect reciprocity like some unhinged woman, but at least some dignity with the accusations and the claims to be based in objectivity.
 
I can't even play anything associated with it on my country due to 'holocaust denial' so if anyone can find the book or has a PDF please send me a message.
Consider installing the Tor browser, or even better, start using a VPN service. I'm currently online with a French IP and can also access https://www.moneytreepublishing.com/shop with Tor.

If you like the audiobook, you can find it here:



There are single chapters as well as the whole audiobook in a single MP3 file.
 
AH-apology182f05b3dea25596.jpeg
 
For as well versed as you claim to be in WW2 history, you don't seem to be well-versed in logic, and layered logic. You refuse to look into the material provided, because if you did, your points, which are not your own, would be proven wrong. You instinctively "know" Hitler was allegedly into "aryan pagan cults" yet you provide no proof. You're just repeating Allied victor propaganda here. Your ratio continues to tap into the vein of those who only make a priori judgments and don't tolerate dissent to their opinions.

You continue your ad hominem barrages against Hitler. Where are these alleged "aryan pagan ritual" photographs? Would the burning of jewish porn be a pagan ritual? If anyone goes out and burns a pile of modern-day tranny books and gives the Roman salute while the flames destroy the satanic filth within, are they a "pagan aryan cultist"? Torch-light Prussian military processions are suddenly pagan rituals? Promoting the health and wellness of a nation and it's people through cultivating physical fitness, large families, and adherence to Christian morals and laws is pagan?? You are severely misinformed, whatever created your opinions is a heap of lies.

Don't be lazy, go back and read my efforted posts which clearly show you to be in the wrong with every one of your claims. I've already talked about the Cross symbology, it's not my fault if you can't comprehend the immense historical variation of its connotation. If you seek to exert my energy by making me repeat myself over and over, then you are exhibiting the very behavior Hitler fought against in his early debates:




Your attempts to disprove fact and truth are puerile. You misrepresent my posts in another thread in this one as if one logical conclusion immediately derives another and is correlated to the same thinking pattern. Hitler apparently believed in the Copernican model, even if German scientists in the Third Reich did not with their Knickebein Radar System. Hitler and I would probably disagree on cosmology, but that is entirely irrelevant. Nowhere did I reduce my posts to "NASA lies therefore earth flat," and nowhere here am I reducing my posts to "Hitler fights judeo-masonry = automatic saint". I bring in measurable evidence for every claim I make that is not in the realm of discussing hypotheticals, which I do not like to do.

Hitler's fight against Rothschild ended in a defeat of that conflict in 1945, but the fight of Rothschild against Europa, against Christendom, had been going on long before Hitler, and would have continued whether there had been a Hitler or not. So no, I am refusing these infantile claims that Hitler caused the suffering Europe is enduring in the present. It is a blatant lie and you should feel dirty for repeating it. Masonic trash like Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Rydz-Smigly, Stalin, and jews like Ehrenburg, Kaganovich, Weizmann, and Yagoda are responsible for our present day dystopia, how in the hell are the men who tried to stop these devils responsible merely because they lost?? Explain yourself. At least have the courage and penitence of Patton to admit you are wrong.

The people are waking up. Glowie influence does not work on awakened minds. Status quo shame tactics won't keep them penned into these simplistic and reductionist thought control frameworks. I've long suspected operatives on here, indirectly even, for failure to see this. In the very least you are influenced by the very operatives you feign to warn people like me against. Whatever the discourse descends to, whatever dialectical shift they're cooking up next, it's all a means to an end for them. The solution to any earthly troubles will only come from a violent overthrow of the Talmudic system by Christian White European men with guns who are better shots and more strategic than goblin men with suits and yarmulkes who have many legions of slaves. These men could very well be wearing both Crosses and Swastikas, though it's redundant if they did, as it is for any awakened European man with a full cognizance of their 2000 year history.

Your assumption about government control over fringe beliefs relies on a fallacy that everything the government touches it can keep perpetual control over forever, and that these beliefs allegedly originated with the deep state. The deep state is Israel, and jews, period. Every one of its functions serves the jewish agenda period, whether common street jews know it or not. The deep state takes the symbology of someone they vanquished, and inject it into a susceptible population with high drug-usage, recidivist tendencies, and low education, what do you expect will happen? There's more than one reason why most of today's self-admitted "White Supremacist's" are covered in cancerous tattoos and thrive in penitentiaries, and very few have the composure or dignity or intellect of a historical SS officer. The same reason why many blacks embrace Black Pantherism or Black Hebrew Israelite identity, even though some of them know the government has their hands on these movements, but they would rather live closer to a meaningful truth than a withered lie of hollywood-thuggery. At the same time, the plight of all these people is real. They are being eradicated, they are being extinguished, they are being murdered, what route do you expect people to take? Whites or not, the Blacks fare no better under the jews. Blacks or no, Whites are still eternally targeted by jews.

Are you going to come to this thread with facts and evidence or will you keep residing in the realm of speculation? You began well with citing Galland's talks, but all of your other claims about Hitler are nothing but campfire hearsay and have already been debunked. When I make a claim about anything, I back it up. I've given ample evidence that disproves paganism in the Third Reich, so if you keep bringing up this claim you are either being a troll at this point or you are having difficulties in comprehending a great number of variables at once. I am trying to help you and not chastise anyone, but lies must be dispelled, harshly if so. You need to grow beyond a diminutive fearful position of "well poisoning". This takes time, so if you don't have time to read, don't make the time to mislead the viewership with baseless claims.

I take it a good sign that people are having their feathers ruffled. No Christian should live in darkness and false comfort in these times. Prepare yourself for stronger battles, and stop blaming men who've done things that all of us would never be capable of doing. Start blaming your enemies don't turn down allies in this renewed fight. Sowing division amongst what remains of White America, Europe, and its offshoots is the handiwork of angry non-Whites, jews, deracinated Whites, and spiritual traitors to their kin. I don't see how any of you can levy these claims at this juncture in time, and be self-respecting White men, or behave in the Christian spirit of truth-seeking and dispelling lies, the answer is those who do, aren't.

Imagine, if you will, a productive forum environment where there is equilateral discourse, where the content of the post is analyzed and critiqued. I don't expect reciprocity like some unhinged woman, but at least some dignity with the accusations and the claims to be based in objectivity.


Much like with flat earth, you "win" an argument by flooding the conversation with walls of text, if you had a rational and solid counter-arguments you would have instead been easily able to summarize them and sustain a real debate.

I stopped arguing with you because you were so far off on my points about Galland and the Me262 which proved Hitler's complete idiocy when it came to all things military. You had zero expertise on that matter and used bad arguments in your typical approach of walls of copy-pasted prose. Hitler makes Zelensky look like a tactical genius.

Hitler was a maniacal figure who combined great charisma and oratory skills with mental retardation when it came to military skills, or the greater abilities to lead a country through. He sorely lacked wisdom and self-control, and the doctrine he preached, a fanatical aryan paganism, carried its own seeds of destruction.

Compare Hitler with Putin or Xi. Had Putin been like Hitler, he would have been sidelined, killed and his country destroyed forever like Germany was had he confronted NATO 15-20 years ago. Instead he patiently bid his time, used diplomacy, build up alliances, and managed his resources efficiently and now is beating a coalition of the entire western world as a result. Had Hitler had 1/10th of Putin's wisdom, patience and judgment, Germany would have survived as an independent strong country, instead of its current colonized globohomo ZOG shell.



You continue your ad hominem barrages against Hitler. Where are these alleged "aryan pagan ritual" photographs? Would the burning of jewish porn be a pagan ritual? If anyone goes out and burns a pile of modern-day tranny books and gives the Roman salute while the flames destroy the satanic filth within, are they a "pagan aryan cultist"?

You prove once again my point here, in your logic, Hitler had Weimar filth burned ===> therefore he was an awesome, devout Christian, and an intelligent, wise leader with sound judgment. Well most governments outside the West today don't allow tranny filth either, even western governments didn't allow it until the 1960s. Franco protected his country until his death, he was a strong Christian leader who promoted the best of conservative values in a Christian society.

The swastika is a pagan symbol, representing the black sun (sonnenrad), the same symbol widely used by Azovites in Ukraine, who have revived the aryan pagan cult in Europe. The Swastika was literally worshipped in large ritualistic nazi gatherings. The fact that you can't even acknowledge that proves how futile it is to argue with you on that matter.

Along with other symbols from the Nazi era such as the Wolfsangel, the Sig Armanen rune, and the Totenkopf, the black sun is employed by some neo-Nazi adherents of Satanism.[13] Scholar Chris Mathews writes:

The Black Sun motif is even less ambiguous. Though based on medieval German symbols, the Wewelsburg mosaic is a unique design commissioned specifically for Himmler, and its primary contemporary association is Nazi occultism, for which Nazi Satanic groups and esoteric neo-Nazis adopt it.
 
Would you blame every Saint and Martyr who lost their lives, the lives of their villages, or their armies, in defense of Christendom for losing?

Incomparable, because Saints and Martyrs are defensive in nature; they are not seeking a fight, they only die on the pillar of righteous in the name of God as they are attacked by Satan.

We're talking about military leaders, who live by the sword. Not men of God who wield no weapons except those of the spirit. And because such people are guided by the Holy Spirit, their deaths are actually victories, for God uses their deaths to change the hearts and souls of those around them. Hence why Pagan Rome because Christian Rome, why Islamic Spain became Christian Spain, or Communist Russia became Christian Russia.

When judging military leaders we use military standards, when judging spiritual leaders (such as Saints) we use spiritual standards. Compare apples to apples.

Let's play hypothetical history for a minute, so I can parallel your logic against Hitler:

The battle of Yarmouk in 636 happened under Heraclius' reign, the man you like to bring up as the perfect Christian victorious military commander, only here Muslim Arab forces decisively defeated the Byzantine Empire's forces. This specific defeat led to the Islamic conquest of Syria and Palestine, resulting in the loss of Byzantine territories in the Levant and paving the way for further Islamic expansion into the Byzantine Empire. Constantinople would have fared much longer had this not happened. By Domino effect, Heraclius had a greater responsibility than Hitler ever did for defending Christendom and he dropped the ball big time. That changed the course of history with ramifications we are still dealing with now.

Absolutely this was a massive blunder, and strictly because Heraclius was an old man by this time and yet he stubbornly refused to pass power to new leadership. The end of Heraclius' life was a tremendous set of failures, including the loss of Alexandria: he assembled an army to defend the siege of Alexandria, and rather than give control of it to a younger Strategos, he said he would go himself and instead died of old age. The army then had no General, and simply dissolved without any leadership while Alexandria was abandoned to the Muslims.

So my logic works fine here, Heraclius is a great example of someone who lets victory go to their head, believe themselves invincible, and see themselves as immortal. He needed to retire after the Persia campaign, but he clung to power and lost everything he worked his entire life to build. And all of Christendom suffered for it.

Young Heraclius was brilliant, and he dealt with Talmudic subversion well, but his later life was a disaster due to his own hubris.

Next at the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, Seljuk Turk forces defeated the Byzantine Empire once more, leading to the loss of Anatolia and weakening Byzantine control over the region. This time the Byzantine forces were led by Emperor Romanos IV Diogenes, whose capture hastened the defeat. This particular defeat contributed to the gradual decline of Byzantine power in the region. It also led to increased Seljuk Turk incursions into Byzantine territory. Romanos IV compounded on Heraclius' loss, which only made the perpetual geopolitical situation worse for Europa. Is he not to blame too?

Romanos was a failure, no argument from me. He was trash, he showed what NOT to do.

The Siege of Jerusalem and the Battle of Hattin in 1187 were valiant charges but they too failed. Are all those Crusaders worthless too?

The Crusaders failed badly here, yes, but we must remember that Crusaders had nothing to lose. It was a purely offensive operation, their home base in Europe was always safe. It was a low risk, high reward campaign, so a loss did not matter very much. They fought on their own dime and time, their spoils of war went strictly to them, so ultimately it was not worthless. They did a lot of damage and made some huge gains, and tons of war spoils went back to Europe with them. So those that stayed and were defeated were minor losses by comparison - a net gain overall.

The Battle of Mohacs in 1526 saw the Ottoman forces defeat the Kingdom of Hungary under King Louis II, leading to the partition of Hungary and the establishment of Ottoman suzerainty in the region. Is he not to blame for putting the war-bound Mohammedans on Europe's doorstep?

25% blame, the rest of Christian Europe not lifting a finger was shameful. He was outnumbered, you cannot expect someone who is outnumbered and out-geared to have a real chance of survival. You expect them to lose, which he did.

Compare that to Hitler who had a massive army that dwarfed his opponents at the start.

It is a fact that in every single one of these defeats, massive executions, tortures, rapes, and genocides took place in the conquered territories of the European peoples then, just as in 1945 and beyond. That is the nature of man. Despite all of these losses in antiquity, in the last millennium, and in this one, Christendom endures, even if battered and somewhat retreated. However, despite the losses of these Kings and Emperors which forever changed the landscape and demographics of Europe, I do not fault them for losing. The struggle in this life is what is worth it, the battle, the purpose, even if you don't win it.

These losses mean nothing unless we learn from them. We are also not immortal, and do not have infinite ability to lose. We need to win more than we lose, or else we will cease to exist as a people (obviously).

Thus we cannot take losses lightly, nor glorify them; we must excoriate and condemn them in the harshest terms to avoid their mistakes.

When it comes to warfare, the point is to win.

For us to be here typing on these keyboards to one another about the sacrifices of past men is proof that if you lose on this earth you are not a loser but have only guaranteed the struggle, and thus the purpose, continues for the next generation.

Your Hegelian view is nonsense; the struggle means nothing unless we win.
 
For anyone else viewing this thread with an open mind, do you see how little effort these people show? Baseless ad hominems, no evidence, speculation, and outright lying by purposefully stating something to be a historical fact when it is the opposite. This is how it's been under the shadow of the victors since 1945. Victory writes history in feeble sentences, and the languishing truth, which is stronger always, must overcome it with entire pages.

Keep wondering @magoo, with that line of thinking it won't take you long from wondering if jews are funding admiration for Christian Saints and Monarchs who kicked them out of Christian lands as well. They've already done damage like this with Ivan the Great, whom they want the world to remember as Ivan "The Terrible". Why if we were to enact any of the laws or repeat the actions any of Constantine I, Constantius II, Honorius, Theodosius II, Bishop Severus of Menorca, Valentinian III, Justinian the Great, Bishop Avitus of Clermont, Visigoth King Reccared I, Heraclius, Dagobert I, Visigoth Hispanian King Erwig, Leo III, Archbishop Ecgbert of York, Archbishop Agobard of Lyons, Romanos I Lakapenos, Monk Nikon Metanoite, Henry II, the Council of Girona, Count Emicho, they would come down hard with all their golems and endless kvetching and murderous schemes with no end. (That's just the greatest men from the first Millennium AD).

There is no historical evidence, that is out in the open or suppressed, to show that Hitler was "supported" by Jesuits as a means of him attaining prominence. There is no historical evidence to the claim that a Jesuit wrote Mein Kampf. Hitler wrote it during his sentence in Landsberg prison in 1924 dictating it to Rudolf Hess. The Weimar pigs couldn't care less that the then-revolutionary Hitler was writing a book in his prison cell.

German industrialists are the only verifiable source of external financial support for the National Socialists once they entered into the Reichstag as a political party in the mid to late 1920s, not international conglomerates, not jewish bankers, not wall street shabbos goys, and no Jesuit fronts. The early years were epitomized by immense suffering and ostracizing from Weimar authorities and mobs of communists as well as violent Bolshevik agents. You're conflating "Nazi's" and commies to be fundamentally synonymous shows your lack of understanding. They are not the same.

Would "jew shit" end jewish-created child trafficking in Germany? Would "jew shit" shut down jewish gay brothels? Shut down jewish porn, jewish prostitution, jewish-created drug trafficking, smash jewish marxism, smash jewish antifa, smash freemasons, remove jewish Rothschild bankers freeing their people from jewish usury banking?

You obviously have a problem with these truths getting out. Good. Be triggered, but eventually the sting of cognitive dissonance will wear off and you'll either accept the truth or keep living in ignorance.

Relevant video to debunk this:

"On the accusation that Hitler was financed"



Again with this "poisoning the well" manure? Do you think if you repeat this low-quality conversation-shut-down phrase enough times in every deep dive thread that it suddenly becomes true, and that the viewership, in Pavlovian fashion, accepts it on a whim? Is there a certain narrow line that cannot be crossed in terms of historical truth that upsets your interests?

Here are some of the quotes of wisdom from this ideological "brand" that you claim to be the most toxic in all the land:

"Christ is the genius of love and as such the most diametric anti-pole to Jewry, which is the incarnation of hate. … Christ was the first anti-Jewish opponent of stature. … The Jew is the lie that became flesh. He nailed Christ to the cross, and thus for the first time in history nailed the eternal truth to the cross." - Dr. Joseph Goebbels, December 29th, 1939.

"Give your goods to the poor: Christ.
Property is theft - as long as it's not mine: Marx" - Joseph Goebbels

"Christianity is not a religion for the masses, let alone for all. Cultivated by few and translated into deeds, it is one of the most splendid blossoms that can grow in the soul of a good man." - Joseph Goebbels.
"I have informed you of these three questions and answers in order to clerly present our stand on religion. Be assured tht we would not be able to form such an ironclad corps, if we did not have conviction and faith in a God who stands over us, who has created us, our fatherland, our folk, and the earth, and who sent us our Fuhrer." - Faith in God, SS Defender against Bolshevism, speech by Heinrich Himmler.

"Interconnected with this is the fact that the homosexual lies pathologically. He is not lying - to take an extreme example - as a Jesuit. The Jesuit lies for a purpose. He says anything whatever with a beaming face and knows that he is deceiving you. He has a moral foundation: for the glory of God; majorum dei gloriam. The end justifies the means. There is a whole moral philosophy, a moral doctrine that Saint Ignatius worked out." - The Homosexual Threat to Civilization, A Speech by Heinrich Himmler.
View attachment 8214


Himmler on Christ:

View attachment 8215

You see Cooper, there are two versions of history. There is the "victor's version," which you are still living in and subject to, and then there is what really happened, which is both liberating and maddening at the same time, something which delicate minds cannot grasp if they are not ready for it.

The uniting ideology in all the western countries that unites a population and a nation right now is not liberalism, its not atheism, marxism, conservatism. The fundamental ideology that unites everyone is "anti-nazism". In every single sector of society, all demographics like to compete about who is the most anti-"nazi," and who allegedly suffered the "most" under the Third Reich. Each sector of society puts out their propaganda that conforms to anti-"nazism" ideology. And none of it is cohesive or coherent, simply convenient, all propaganda put out from each point of view to keep up the hatred of the Third Reich. If you have an atheist, their anti-"nazi" propaganda would be how Christian the Third Reich was. A Catholic's anti-"nazi" propaganda would say how the Third Reich was totally Protestant and that the Catholics "suffered" or that Hitler and the NSDAP were "Pagan". A Protestant would put out that Hitler was either Catholic or Pagan, that would be their anti-"nazism" stance, and they would point to any sufferings of Protestants as their reason. Zero objectivity in all these stances. The jews defined worldview post-1945 is basically encompasses an opposing diametric: Hitler being reduced to the ultimate evil, and whatever is the complete opposite of Hitler being the the ultimate good. The further you are away from Hitler, the more "good" you are. I can see you take no hesitation to prove your distance and thus your "goodness" to this inverted and scripted reality.

"Toxic Nazilinity" is to the self-hating goyim what "Toxic Masculinity" is to the feminist.

When we hear National Socialism, it doesn't directly translate this connotation from Nazionalsozialismus into a reductionist ideology. It is an expression of a natural instinct for stewardship of the land and the preservation of cultural and ethnic identity. Just as diverse ecosystems thrive when each species plays its role in maintaining balance, human societies benefit from a parallel of cultures and identities. National Socialism, as was practiced by Germany for those twelve years, sought to protect and preserve a distinct national identity rooted in a deep connection to land, heritage, and tradition. What is intended is for each race to adopt a similar stance and every human race can live peacefully in parallel without interlopers.

Stew gets it on the money here:

"Hitler was justified in his choice of remedy, as will we, when we recapture the minds"

I don't know why you idolize Hitler so much. The bottom line is that he lost the war and it left Germany in ruins.
 
Much like with flat earth, you "win" an argument by flooding the conversation with walls of text, if you had a rational and solid counter-arguments you would have instead been easily able to summarize them and sustain a real debate.

I stopped arguing with you because you were so far off on my points about Galland and the Me262 which proved Hitler's complete idiocy when it came to all things military. You had zero expertise on that matter and used bad arguments in your typical approach of walls of copy-pasted prose. Hitler makes Zelensky look like a tactical genius.
You still keep bringing up flat earth even though I said I don't believe in the Gleason model. You mistake someone doing intense research on a subject for believing in that subject 100%. I remain impartial to the facts, and open to debate what is debatable. Go read that thread again, or go read it apparently for the first time. I debunked it there because of the Celestial poles, but at the same time I was showing the mathematical errors and inconsistencies with what we're given for the Copernican model and the abnormalities of our understanding of "curvature". No I don't believe in your globular prison with exact dimensions spoon-fed to us all from birth, because of many points that have nothing to do with NASA but rather the study of non-newtonian mechanical physics, ancient astronomy, and claims from Biblical Scripture, which I have posted many times, something you don't seem to consider.

Interesting how accuse me of copy-pasting prose when many of your posts were copy-pasted directly from 911's old posts from RVF. The guy was known for red pilling people in fringe corners of the internet, and then one day, he just up and vanished. You display exorbitant gatekeeper behavior. I suspect you have the entire old RVF board archived while you had the opportunity to do so, but you could always be using twitter/X as a springboard. You can jump on the smear bandwagon here for my one mis-citation in this thread but at least I've never plagiarized another member's posts. It's petty to use dirt against someone, but you're inability to properly engage in a debate has exposed your own follies as much as my long-winded incessant tirades are immunizing those with short attention spans from learning something.

I write a lot because there is much to say, and too many people are too silent for their own good.

Reductionism doesn't work when the truth has to fight against overwhelming lies, but since you insist I will endeavor to do so to reach a point of understanding from your background. However because your comments are riddled with speculation and in some parts superstition, which is unfitting of a White mind, I must ask you, are you descended from Europeans? Do you have a family history that was living in mainland Europe and can provide testimony to life under the Third Reich or any other Fascist country that affects your bias? My grandparents were young adults living in different European countries at the time, so I have two different stories from that time, plus I have done my own amateur-style historical quest of visiting sites and tracking people down who experienced these times to discuss my inquiries. There is an understanding which comes with this that is both inherent in my kind, and both far removed if one such European has been brainwashed or does not desire full truth. If you are an American and brainwashed then you are much further removed from understanding these truths, no matter how many books you read or documentaries you watch. You don't internalize racial consciousness, and even if you did, you would have to learn how to keep that alive in conjunction with a spiritual consciousness centered around Christ.

As for the Luftwaffe question, the Me-262 would not have changed the outcome of the war overall, it would not have secured the Axis foreign oil fields, it's only use would have been as a deterrent for bombers. It is highly debatable whether that changing variable alone would have swung the outcome of the combined hatred and might of the world's three largest empires at the time coming down on one small country.

biglosers.jpg

It proves nothing about Hitler or his alleged decisions around it. Your argument is highly speculative and based on the off-handed comments of Galland. The testimony of one man on one singular condition is not sufficient enough to have determined the probably outcome of a war that had never been seen before with rapidly changing alliances, politics, and other consequences. I have provided you with logistics and numbers and priority of logistics and numbers which you do not factor into your argument.

People like you have an a priori bias against Hitler for personal reasons or investments, or you could be shilling for the establishment to keep the anti-"nazi" rhetoric alive. In this day and age, any time Whites gather for their interests or self-survival this farcical term is thrown at them by haters. You can't even have a nuanced discussion on Hitler without inserting emotional bias or false superstition into it.

Hitler was a maniacal figure who combined great charisma and oratory skills with mental retardation when it came to military skills, or the greater abilities to lead a country through. He sorely lacked wisdom and self-control, and the doctrine he preached, a fanatical aryan paganism, carried its own seeds of destruction.

Compare Hitler with Putin or Xi. Had Putin been like Hitler, he would have been sidelined, killed and his country destroyed forever like Germany was had he confronted NATO 15-20 years ago. Instead he patiently bid his time, used diplomacy, build up alliances, and managed his resources efficiently and now is beating a coalition of the entire western world as a result. Had Hitler had 1/10th of Putin's wisdom, patience and judgment, Germany would have survived as an independent strong country, instead of its current colonized globohomo ZOG shell.
One doesn't combine great charisma and oratory skills with any kind of mental retardation. If you can prove Hitler was behind every military blunder then cite them. Your false claim that he didn't lead a country through are easily debunked by looking at the multitude of successes in the six and a half years of peace before the enemies of Germany were able to inaugurate their little war. National Socialism worked, no matter how much you condemn it.

"The Great Accomplishments of National Socialism"


These people were living in an advanced civilization, even if for such a brief time, and Christ was central to the formation of this civilization. Without the Christian morality, and the faith in the Living God, they would not have succeeded in building something so great so quickly. You don't pull almost seven million people out of unemployment, build hundreds of thousands of homes, eradicate political parties and classes causing division in a people without a clear-cut intellect and iron will. It was a product of its time, and the world will likely never see anything as wondrous or miraculous as the recovery from Weimar ever again.

If you read the book, Living Water about Dr. Viktor Schauberger's experiments, He made an appeal for Hitler's 4-year plan in 1933. Hitler was the only leader to ever invest heavily into pursuing alternative free-energy solutions that we know of (Gaddafi potentially was), solutions which did work, but the larger implications of not only dethroning the central banking cartels but also the industrialists in bed with them was too great to ignore. They knew Germany was searching for alternative power to become truly independent of even the means of the judeo-masonic controlled industries.

Your jew-lover Putin is actively destroying Europe, he's another criminal-in-arms like any politician from China, the USA, England, and France and any other commie-friendly "Allied party" who reaped what they sowed. Any situation in Europe and Eurasia with NATO is moot because the entire world order set up after 1945 was completely dominated by the Rothschilds. They put certain systems in place to insure that they would never have to suffer another Hitlerian figure uprising to destroy them ever again. Case in point, Putin is using African mercenaries to torture White Ukrainians, but he gets a free pass because he outlawed sodomy just like the Arabs do. KGB Commie Putin would send every single one of us to jail for questioning the holohoax which undermines the entire framework he's propped up for modern-Russia.

RussiaKillsWhites.jpg

Your jew-lover Putin compared Christianity to communism in speeches, and his foreign policy is to rid the world of "Nazism," aka a smear word for anything White. It seems fitting since the Bolsheviks concocted the Holohoax that their successors would throw anyone denying it in prison, and ban all White Russian organizations. Exposing the Holohoax is punishable with prison sentences there, worse than cucked-western Europe. They killed the White Russian Crusader Tesak in a detention cell before a tribunal because he was hunting down pedophiles with connections to Putin. I don't know if you've seen Russia recently, a satanic force is swelling inside of it under the very nose of the Orthodox Church. White Russian girls as young as 14 are often in relationships and impregnated by mixed-race Asiatics, or African migrants. Putin is going full Kwanza and obsessed with mixing all the races. There are so many blacks in Russia it isn't even funny, it's reverting to it's Bolshevik past by their inability to denounce Stalinism or any of its heinous crimes and making their entire outlook on their country based on "V-day" instead of any other vastly more important holidays in Russia's Christian history like the uniting of the Rus tribes to repel the Mongol invasion. Instead, they celebrate their "victory" over the last resistance to the satanic jewish NWO. Your Putin institutes draconian military laws that has peasant White Russians dying and often committing suicide by grenade in their vests on the frontlines while muds defile their women back home. Nothing new under the sun from a jewish servant.

If you're not White, or if you are White but you are deracinated, then you won't understand these plights, and quite frankly, you never will be able to, and you can keep hissing "pagan aryanism" until the end of time but it's not going to stop Whites from collectivizing for their mutual survival, whether one calls them "nazi" or not. The term is losing it's efficacy on the more stronger-minded people now. Soon, no one who can make a difference will care what fecal smearing the hacks and the operatives fling at them.

You prove once again my point here, in your logic, Hitler had Weimar filth burned ===> therefore he was an awesome, devout Christian, and an intelligent, wise leader with sound judgment. Well most governments outside the West today don't allow tranny filth either, even western governments didn't allow it until the 1960s. Franco protected his country until his death, he was a strong Christian leader who promoted the best of conservative values in a Christian society.

The swastika is a pagan symbol, representing the black sun (sonnenrad), the same symbol widely used by Azovites in Ukraine, who have revived the aryan pagan cult in Europe. The Swastika was literally worshipped in large ritualistic nazi gatherings. The fact that you can't even acknowledge that proves how futile it is to argue with you on that matter.


Your logic is contrived, and ignorant of clear spiritual stances. Satan does not stand against satan. Occult does not stand against occult. Evil does not stand against evil, especially not in proportions of the scale of a World War. They burned a lot more than jewish porn in those book piles.

You don't ban pornography, usury, transgender research, homosexuality and all deviancy (which carried with it the death penalty, especially in the SS), you don't ban Pagan religions, Pagan texts, you don't ban all occult societies including Ariosophy, Theosophy, and Freemasonry, and still end up being part of them. You don't call out the satanic jews and their satanic forces and somehow end up in league with the devil. That's not how it works buddy. You're too short-sighted in the spiritual realm to understand these implications. If Pepe the frog makes you nervous then you are not the kind of firmly-rooted mind to be withstanding these kind of revelations of truth. You need to go out more, experience more vibrancy from your local invaders, more usury from your local bankers, and more degeneracy from your own corrupted people to understand the harsh reality of this fight, genetically and spiritually.

Franco held a requiem mass for Hitler when he died, as a fellow Catholic. Other Bishops did the same. I doubt any of them would have held it for a Pagan. So again, don't be lazy. Go read this paper, which is far more credible than jewish wikipedia:

https://archive.org/details/was-hitler-catholic-2nd-ed_202402/

(To everyone else reading this thread: this is the 3rd time I've posted this short book and he refuses to look at it)

You're conflating the symbol of the Swastika with that of reverence unto God, which is a fallacy. That jewpedia article on Ariosophy contains all the hallmarks of post-war propaganda which are blatant lies.

If the Swastika is a pagan symbol as you claim it to be, then why did Christians use it in the 1st century of persecution? Why is it all over the Catacombs of Rome dating from that time period? Why is it in hundreds of frescoes, carvings, and patterns all over Cathedrals and Churches? Why did Popes have it on their Mitres? Why do Bishops have it on their Sepulchers? Why is it all over the inside of the Hagia Sophia? Why did Tsarist Russia and Romania use it? You can't even answer these simple questions. You are ignorant of the wide-variety of Christian symbolism of the past two millennia. This ignorance makes you uncomfortable, so you resort to the pre-scripted post-war victor propaganda programming that you carry out every time you thrust the accusation of "aryan paganism". You're basically speaking lines that were written for you in 1945 meant to last until every White person has been destroyed. I've posted enough pictures of Christian usage of the Swastika, Hakenkreuz, Fylfot, Tetragammadion for you to look at, but you don't. Or you ignore them on purpose because these truths diverge from your reality.

Here is a Cross Slab from Barhobble dating to the 10th century, a site of Christian Worship:
crossslabbarhobble.jpg

Celtic iconography had influences and symbolic tradition from the South. Both Saint Ninian and Saint Patrick were known to have strong connections with the continent and and by association the strong symbolic traditions arising from those early years of Christianity in Rome.

The Swastika was used in the American boy scouts for decades, as well as the 45th infantry division as late as 1941. This symbol was everywhere, it wasn't just German Nationalists using it for their government. It had been in use in Germany in that same style since 1870.

-It was used by the Latvian Air Force between 1918 and 1934.
-The Polish used it on their 21st and 22nd infantry divisions, and their anti-gas league.
-The British National War Savings Committee used is as their logo in WWI.
-It was used in Finland since 1918 as the Cross of Freedom. The jews don't want the White Europeans to have any freedom, they want them to be driven down into slavery and to be trampled upon by every gaggle of Heinz 57 blend of mystery meat golem.

For your information, the Swastika is not the same as the Sonnenrad. Artistic renditions can blend the two symbols together but they are not the same. The historical significance of the Sonnenrad is not a Norse pantheonic worship, it is another mystical or prophetic symbol which happens to carry the divine numbers surrounding Christ. Twelve arms around the one center, twelve apostles around the one Messiah. Much of early European symbols evolved from their true heritage and remembrance of God before they forgot Him and practiced pagan beliefs. There were many tales and symbols foretelling of the coming Savior in ancient times. Your interpretation of symbology is reversed, many symbols were taken from Israelite heritage and repurposed for pagan means. The prevalence and frequency of hooked crosses in Christian imagery, art, and architecture both Catholic and Orthodox, not some half-baked mushroom cult, is far too great to be a mere odd-inclusion.

The fact that you don't have an over-encompassing view of history to understand the symbology and resort to your Allied-victor and Strasserist brainwashing smears of "aryan paganism" shows you don't do your research, you just assume things based on superstition. This fear-based mentality is not of God, but something one would find in troglodytes, cave-dwellers, or Kashmiri atavists. It has no place in a world to the defense of the civilized Christian soul, which is being attacked on all sides by esoteric forces and vast legions of empty vessels of impulse, lest you be of service to them in destroying your own brethren, whether by your own accord or not.

You also don't understand the connotations behind the concept of Aryan, another word which has been heavily played with the last 79 years of captivity. The history of Christendom and the destiny of the Aryan peoples go hand in hand, they are not juxtaposed nor are they at odds with one another.

The symbol was racial, not pagan or anything related to a pantheon or deist system of belief. It heavily linked early German, Greek, and Indo-Iranian cultures, these cultures came from the same wellspring, the same progenitor lineages out of Dor, the tribe of Dan, and earlier Shemites post-flood pre-exodus. Therefore it's more absolute to say the symbol was something genetic in it's initial usage, as Chinese, Africans, Mesos, and sub-continental Indians would never have used it, and they are the ones who were essentially "appropriating" it for their own pagan beliefs. , much like they do everything else that was spawned by White minds.

There is no proof that the Swastika was ever placed higher than God or even on the same level of God by anyone in the National Socialist hierarchy. You just feverishly interpret these events according to a position of animosity and judaized repulsion. These millions of German men would go out and do their military processions, but they were all Christians, Church attendance was extremely high in National Socialist Germany. If they weren't out there marching in force, the Marxists would do their strut. The martial aspect of their military rituals were necessary to keep strength and unity in accord. There were spiritually-questionable people like Bormann and Rosenberg, but the first was killed before any information could be impartially extracted after the war (his "diary" is very suspect) and the latter was nowhere near as high up in the party as he was made out to be.

It's time you wake up. If you're not White then you need to reconnect with whatever race you are. Shed the village fear, or at least try to. While you are in this mortal coil your skin is your uniform, no matter if you bear a cross or not. Since you do bear the Cross, or claim to, you have no right to be ignorant of the racial realities which separate men for reasons ordained by no earthly authority.

You never mention Yagoda or Ehrenberg who were directly responsible for the deaths of millions of White Russian Christians, Ukrainians, Polish, Germans, and other Eastern Europeans, not Hitler. Your blaming Hitler is pathetic and infantile, and treacherous that you would ignore the murderers and blame the man who died defending those who were murdered. This claim is demonic and insulting to everyone who was raped to death or dismembered and gutted alive by Bolshevik hordes, and bombed into charred bits of flesh by criminal western bombers. The true criminals and their accursed offspring are still out there committing racial genocide to this very day, and on more than just the White race.

"Hitler's War - The Last Christian Crusade"


Here's what you or anyone else who posits this lame argument of "Hitler was responsible for destroying Germany" don't get:

"If Hitler had not come to power in 1933, there is more to consider than external Communist threats. There were 270,000 suicides the year prior. Germany was, in Berlin, the sin capital of the world, solely due to jewish entrepreneurs who ran the smut business, films, cabarets, and so on. It was also the dope capital for Europe. German Industry was virtually dead. The German welfare payments in the state of Thuringia were so incredibly high that they comprised 90% of that states budget.

Without Adolf Hitler, Germany would have died with a whimper in 1934 or 1935 and the world wouldn't have given a shit. Adolf Hitler saved Germany, and I am a child of Adolf Hitler's works. I would have never been born if my father had never gotten a job thanks to the genius of Adolf Hitler. Millions of other Germans would never have been born, who today, dump on Adolf Hitler. They deserve their miserable lives to this man who saved Germany and gave them work, bread, and honor, for at least twelve years. Germany did at least not live on its knees or crawl on its belly for twelve years, like it has done since Adolf Hitler's demise. At least he gave the Germans twelve years of liberation and freedom. To the question of the ten million or so Germans who died in the war, to defend the freedom of one hundred million people is sometimes expensive." - Ernst Zundel.

For as long as you blame Hitler and not the real criminals, you will never learn anything. As far as I'm concerned, it's tantamount to doing the jew's work, and thus the works of the devil, by inciting accusatory falsehoods or gatekeeping at such a controversial topic that if explored would unite more people than it currently divides.
 
You still keep bringing up flat earth even though I said I don't believe in the Gleason model. You mistake someone doing intense research on a subject for believing in that subject 100%. I remain impartial to the facts, and open to debate what is debatable. Go read that thread again, or go read it apparently for the first time. I debunked it there because of the Celestial poles, but at the same time I was showing the mathematical errors and inconsistencies with what we're given for the Copernican model and the abnormalities of our understanding of "curvature". No I don't believe in your globular prison with exact dimensions spoon-fed to us all from birth, because of many points that have nothing to do with NASA but rather the study of non-newtonian mechanical physics, ancient astronomy, and claims from Biblical Scripture, which I have posted many times, something you don't seem to consider.

Interesting how accuse me of copy-pasting prose when many of your posts were copy-pasted directly from 911's old posts from RVF. The guy was known for red pilling people in fringe corners of the internet, and then one day, he just up and vanished. You display exorbitant gatekeeper behavior. I suspect you have the entire old RVF board archived while you had the opportunity to do so, but you could always be using twitter/X as a springboard. You can jump on the smear bandwagon here for my one mis-citation in this thread but at least I've never plagiarized another member's posts. It's petty to use dirt against someone, but you're inability to properly engage in a debate has exposed your own follies as much as my long-winded incessant tirades are immunizing those with short attention spans from learning something.

I write a lot because there is much to say, and too many people are too silent for their own good.

Reductionism doesn't work when the truth has to fight against overwhelming lies, but since you insist I will endeavor to do so to reach a point of understanding from your background. However because your comments are riddled with speculation and in some parts superstition, which is unfitting of a White mind, I must ask you, are you descended from Europeans? Do you have a family history that was living in mainland Europe and can provide testimony to life under the Third Reich or any other Fascist country that affects your bias? My grandparents were young adults living in different European countries at the time, so I have two different stories from that time, plus I have done my own amateur-style historical quest of visiting sites and tracking people down who experienced these times to discuss my inquiries. There is an understanding which comes with this that is both inherent in my kind, and both far removed if one such European has been brainwashed or does not desire full truth. If you are an American and brainwashed then you are much further removed from understanding these truths, no matter how many books you read or documentaries you watch. You don't internalize racial consciousness, and even if you did, you would have to learn how to keep that alive in conjunction with a spiritual consciousness centered around Christ.

As for the Luftwaffe question, the Me-262 would not have changed the outcome of the war overall, it would not have secured the Axis foreign oil fields, it's only use would have been as a deterrent for bombers. It is highly debatable whether that changing variable alone would have swung the outcome of the combined hatred and might of the world's three largest empires at the time coming down on one small country.

View attachment 8299

It proves nothing about Hitler or his alleged decisions around it. Your argument is highly speculative and based on the off-handed comments of Galland. The testimony of one man on one singular condition is not sufficient enough to have determined the probably outcome of a war that had never been seen before with rapidly changing alliances, politics, and other consequences. I have provided you with logistics and numbers and priority of logistics and numbers which you do not factor into your argument.

People like you have an a priori bias against Hitler for personal reasons or investments, or you could be shilling for the establishment to keep the anti-"nazi" rhetoric alive. In this day and age, any time Whites gather for their interests or self-survival this farcical term is thrown at them by haters. You can't even have a nuanced discussion on Hitler without inserting emotional bias or false superstition into it.


One doesn't combine great charisma and oratory skills with any kind of mental retardation. If you can prove Hitler was behind every military blunder then cite them. Your false claim that he didn't lead a country through are easily debunked by looking at the multitude of successes in the six and a half years of peace before the enemies of Germany were able to inaugurate their little war. National Socialism worked, no matter how much you condemn it.

"The Great Accomplishments of National Socialism"


These people were living in an advanced civilization, even if for such a brief time, and Christ was central to the formation of this civilization. Without the Christian morality, and the faith in the Living God, they would not have succeeded in building something so great so quickly. You don't pull almost seven million people out of unemployment, build hundreds of thousands of homes, eradicate political parties and classes causing division in a people without a clear-cut intellect and iron will. It was a product of its time, and the world will likely never see anything as wondrous or miraculous as the recovery from Weimar ever again.

If you read the book, Living Water about Dr. Viktor Schauberger's experiments, He made an appeal for Hitler's 4-year plan in 1933. Hitler was the only leader to ever invest heavily into pursuing alternative free-energy solutions that we know of (Gaddafi potentially was), solutions which did work, but the larger implications of not only dethroning the central banking cartels but also the industrialists in bed with them was too great to ignore. They knew Germany was searching for alternative power to become truly independent of even the means of the judeo-masonic controlled industries.

Your jew-lover Putin is actively destroying Europe, he's another criminal-in-arms like any politician from China, the USA, England, and France and any other commie-friendly "Allied party" who reaped what they sowed. Any situation in Europe and Eurasia with NATO is moot because the entire world order set up after 1945 was completely dominated by the Rothschilds. They put certain systems in place to insure that they would never have to suffer another Hitlerian figure uprising to destroy them ever again. Case in point, Putin is using African mercenaries to torture White Ukrainians, but he gets a free pass because he outlawed sodomy just like the Arabs do. KGB Commie Putin would send every single one of us to jail for questioning the holohoax which undermines the entire framework he's propped up for modern-Russia.

View attachment 8295

Your jew-lover Putin compared Christianity to communism in speeches, and his foreign policy is to rid the world of "Nazism," aka a smear word for anything White. It seems fitting since the Bolsheviks concocted the Holohoax that their successors would throw anyone denying it in prison, and ban all White Russian organizations. Exposing the Holohoax is punishable with prison sentences there, worse than cucked-western Europe. They killed the White Russian Crusader Tesak in a detention cell before a tribunal because he was hunting down pedophiles with connections to Putin. I don't know if you've seen Russia recently, a satanic force is swelling inside of it under the very nose of the Orthodox Church. White Russian girls as young as 14 are often in relationships and impregnated by mixed-race Asiatics, or African migrants. Putin is going full Kwanza and obsessed with mixing all the races. There are so many blacks in Russia it isn't even funny, it's reverting to it's Bolshevik past by their inability to denounce Stalinism or any of its heinous crimes and making their entire outlook on their country based on "V-day" instead of any other vastly more important holidays in Russia's Christian history like the uniting of the Rus tribes to repel the Mongol invasion. Instead, they celebrate their "victory" over the last resistance to the satanic jewish NWO. Your Putin institutes draconian military laws that has peasant White Russians dying and often committing suicide by grenade in their vests on the frontlines while muds defile their women back home. Nothing new under the sun from a jewish servant.

If you're not White, or if you are White but you are deracinated, then you won't understand these plights, and quite frankly, you never will be able to, and you can keep hissing "pagan aryanism" until the end of time but it's not going to stop Whites from collectivizing for their mutual survival, whether one calls them "nazi" or not. The term is losing it's efficacy on the more stronger-minded people now. Soon, no one who can make a difference will care what fecal smearing the hacks and the operatives fling at them.


Your logic is contrived, and ignorant of clear spiritual stances. Satan does not stand against satan. Occult does not stand against occult. Evil does not stand against evil, especially not in proportions of the scale of a World War. They burned a lot more than jewish porn in those book piles.

You don't ban pornography, usury, transgender research, homosexuality and all deviancy (which carried with it the death penalty, especially in the SS), you don't ban Pagan religions, Pagan texts, you don't ban all occult societies including Ariosophy, Theosophy, and Freemasonry, and still end up being part of them. You don't call out the satanic jews and their satanic forces and somehow end up in league with the devil. That's not how it works buddy. You're too short-sighted in the spiritual realm to understand these implications. If Pepe the frog makes you nervous then you are not the kind of firmly-rooted mind to be withstanding these kind of revelations of truth. You need to go out more, experience more vibrancy from your local invaders, more usury from your local bankers, and more degeneracy from your own corrupted people to understand the harsh reality of this fight, genetically and spiritually.

Franco held a requiem mass for Hitler when he died, as a fellow Catholic. Other Bishops did the same. I doubt any of them would have held it for a Pagan. So again, don't be lazy. Go read this paper, which is far more credible than jewish wikipedia:

https://archive.org/details/was-hitler-catholic-2nd-ed_202402/

(To everyone else reading this thread: this is the 3rd time I've posted this short book and he refuses to look at it)

You're conflating the symbol of the Swastika with that of reverence unto God, which is a fallacy. That jewpedia article on Ariosophy contains all the hallmarks of post-war propaganda which are blatant lies.

If the Swastika is a pagan symbol as you claim it to be, then why did Christians use it in the 1st century of persecution? Why is it all over the Catacombs of Rome dating from that time period? Why is it in hundreds of frescoes, carvings, and patterns all over Cathedrals and Churches? Why did Popes have it on their Mitres? Why do Bishops have it on their Sepulchers? Why is it all over the inside of the Hagia Sophia? Why did Tsarist Russia and Romania use it? You can't even answer these simple questions. You are ignorant of the wide-variety of Christian symbolism of the past two millennia. This ignorance makes you uncomfortable, so you resort to the pre-scripted post-war victor propaganda programming that you carry out every time you thrust the accusation of "aryan paganism". You're basically speaking lines that were written for you in 1945 meant to last until every White person has been destroyed. I've posted enough pictures of Christian usage of the Swastika, Hakenkreuz, Fylfot, Tetragammadion for you to look at, but you don't. Or you ignore them on purpose because these truths diverge from your reality.

Here is a Cross Slab from Barhobble dating to the 10th century, a site of Christian Worship:
View attachment 8300

Celtic iconography had influences and symbolic tradition from the South. Both Saint Ninian and Saint Patrick were known to have strong connections with the continent and and by association the strong symbolic traditions arising from those early years of Christianity in Rome.

The Swastika was used in the American boy scouts for decades, as well as the 45th infantry division as late as 1941. This symbol was everywhere, it wasn't just German Nationalists using it for their government. It had been in use in Germany in that same style since 1870.

-It was used by the Latvian Air Force between 1918 and 1934.
-The Polish used it on their 21st and 22nd infantry divisions, and their anti-gas league.
-The British National War Savings Committee used is as their logo in WWI.
-It was used in Finland since 1918 as the Cross of Freedom. The jews don't want the White Europeans to have any freedom, they want them to be driven down into slavery and to be trampled upon by every gaggle of Heinz 57 blend of mystery meat golem.

For your information, the Swastika is not the same as the Sonnenrad. Artistic renditions can blend the two symbols together but they are not the same. The historical significance of the Sonnenrad is not a Norse pantheonic worship, it is another mystical or prophetic symbol which happens to carry the divine numbers surrounding Christ. Twelve arms around the one center, twelve apostles around the one Messiah. Much of early European symbols evolved from their true heritage and remembrance of God before they forgot Him and practiced pagan beliefs. There were many tales and symbols foretelling of the coming Savior in ancient times. Your interpretation of symbology is reversed, many symbols were taken from Israelite heritage and repurposed for pagan means. The prevalence and frequency of hooked crosses in Christian imagery, art, and architecture both Catholic and Orthodox, not some half-baked mushroom cult, is far too great to be a mere odd-inclusion.

The fact that you don't have an over-encompassing view of history to understand the symbology and resort to your Allied-victor and Strasserist brainwashing smears of "aryan paganism" shows you don't do your research, you just assume things based on superstition. This fear-based mentality is not of God, but something one would find in troglodytes, cave-dwellers, or Kashmiri atavists. It has no place in a world to the defense of the civilized Christian soul, which is being attacked on all sides by esoteric forces and vast legions of empty vessels of impulse, lest you be of service to them in destroying your own brethren, whether by your own accord or not.

You also don't understand the connotations behind the concept of Aryan, another word which has been heavily played with the last 79 years of captivity. The history of Christendom and the destiny of the Aryan peoples go hand in hand, they are not juxtaposed nor are they at odds with one another.

The symbol was racial, not pagan or anything related to a pantheon or deist system of belief. It heavily linked early German, Greek, and Indo-Iranian cultures, these cultures came from the same wellspring, the same progenitor lineages out of Dor, the tribe of Dan, and earlier Shemites post-flood pre-exodus. Therefore it's more absolute to say the symbol was something genetic in it's initial usage, as Chinese, Africans, Mesos, and sub-continental Indians would never have used it, and they are the ones who were essentially "appropriating" it for their own pagan beliefs. , much like they do everything else that was spawned by White minds.

There is no proof that the Swastika was ever placed higher than God or even on the same level of God by anyone in the National Socialist hierarchy. You just feverishly interpret these events according to a position of animosity and judaized repulsion. These millions of German men would go out and do their military processions, but they were all Christians, Church attendance was extremely high in National Socialist Germany. If they weren't out there marching in force, the Marxists would do their strut. The martial aspect of their military rituals were necessary to keep strength and unity in accord. There were spiritually-questionable people like Bormann and Rosenberg, but the first was killed before any information could be impartially extracted after the war (his "diary" is very suspect) and the latter was nowhere near as high up in the party as he was made out to be.

It's time you wake up. If you're not White then you need to reconnect with whatever race you are. Shed the village fear, or at least try to. While you are in this mortal coil your skin is your uniform, no matter if you bear a cross or not. Since you do bear the Cross, or claim to, you have no right to be ignorant of the racial realities which separate men for reasons ordained by no earthly authority.

You never mention Yagoda or Ehrenberg who were directly responsible for the deaths of millions of White Russian Christians, Ukrainians, Polish, Germans, and other Eastern Europeans, not Hitler. Your blaming Hitler is pathetic and infantile, and treacherous that you would ignore the murderers and blame the man who died defending those who were murdered. This claim is demonic and insulting to everyone who was raped to death or dismembered and gutted alive by Bolshevik hordes, and bombed into charred bits of flesh by criminal western bombers. The true criminals and their accursed offspring are still out there committing racial genocide to this very day, and on more than just the White race.

"Hitler's War - The Last Christian Crusade"


Here's what you or anyone else who posits this lame argument of "Hitler was responsible for destroying Germany" don't get:

"If Hitler had not come to power in 1933, there is more to consider than external Communist threats. There were 270,000 suicides the year prior. Germany was, in Berlin, the sin capital of the world, solely due to jewish entrepreneurs who ran the smut business, films, cabarets, and so on. It was also the dope capital for Europe. German Industry was virtually dead. The German welfare payments in the state of Thuringia were so incredibly high that they comprised 90% of that states budget.

Without Adolf Hitler, Germany would have died with a whimper in 1934 or 1935 and the world wouldn't have given a shit. Adolf Hitler saved Germany, and I am a child of Adolf Hitler's works. I would have never been born if my father had never gotten a job thanks to the genius of Adolf Hitler. Millions of other Germans would never have been born, who today, dump on Adolf Hitler. They deserve their miserable lives to this man who saved Germany and gave them work, bread, and honor, for at least twelve years. Germany did at least not live on its knees or crawl on its belly for twelve years, like it has done since Adolf Hitler's demise. At least he gave the Germans twelve years of liberation and freedom. To the question of the ten million or so Germans who died in the war, to defend the freedom of one hundred million people is sometimes expensive." - Ernst Zundel.

For as long as you blame Hitler and not the real criminals, you will never learn anything. As far as I'm concerned, it's tantamount to doing the jew's work, and thus the works of the devil, by inciting accusatory falsehoods or gatekeeping at such a controversial topic that if explored would unite more people than it currently divides.

The first meme photo is completely inaccurate. Lets not forget there were two sides to the war. The Axis side was not only Germany. It consisted of Germany, Japan, Spain and Italy. Also Hitler was retarded because he started an unwinnable war. If you look at the Axis side in terms of weaponry, technology, financial backing and manpower they were completely outgunned, outmanned and outfinanced by the allies. The war was in no way winnable by Hitler even if he didn't make the strategic mistakes he made. The best case scenario for Germany (and the axis side in general) is if they made strategically sound decisions they still would have lost the war but they could have managed to negotiate a reasonable surrender instead of getting bombed to a rubble and occupied and humiliated by becoming vassal states.
 
If you look at the Axis side in terms of weaponry, technology, financial backing and manpower they were completely outgunned, outmanned and outfinanced by the allies.

Not true, if you take America out of the picture. Without America, Germany had a massive advantage.

The fact that Japan attacked America instead of Russia was just yet another blunder by incompetent generals. America had a strong isolationist movement going after WW1, America had armed vets march on the White House after WW1 (look up the Bonus Army). The rulers of America were afraid to go to war without a good cause again, until they got one from Japan attacking Pearl Harbor.

If Japan had simply used their remaining oil reserves they had to attack Russia, and conquer it to link up with Germany for more oil supplies, they would have survived. Russia already had a large rail network they could have used to cross Siberia to the Bakken oil fields. Not to mention Germans produced most of their oil through coal liquification. Japan simply needed to reach Germany.

Instead they committed suicide in a spectacular fashion, and brought in an adversary who was 10x stronger than Russia.
 
The first meme photo is completely inaccurate. Lets not forget there were two sides to the war. The Axis side was not only Germany. It consisted of Germany, Japan, Spain and Italy. Also Hitler was retarded because he started an unwinnable war. If you look at the Axis side in terms of weaponry, technology, financial backing and manpower they were completely outgunned, outmanned and outfinanced by the allies. The war was in no way winnable by Hitler even if he didn't make the strategic mistakes he made. The best case scenario for Germany (and the axis side in general) is if they made strategically sound decisions they still would have lost the war but they could have managed to negotiate a reasonable surrender instead of getting bombed to a rubble and occupied and humiliated by becoming vassal states.
Hitler did not start a war and tried to avoid one at all costs. Re-read this thread to see my posts about the Polish situation. He never intended to fight a war, even with his rearmaments. The picture is correct if you consider that Judea declared war on Germany in 1933, which then started a worldwide jewish-funded embargo and boycott of all German goods, as well as Churchill being funded by the Focus Group in 1936 started agitating for England to go to war with Germany three years prior to their declaration, and the USSR committing terrorist attacks in eastern Europe and doing their own invasions to prepare for a greater invasion of the west.

Of the three empires, the Soviets were the most subtle until Hitler caught them by surprise on June 22nd, 1941. Read FDR's addresses, he was badmouthing Hitler in 1937 at a particular inflammatory speech in Chicago, but that wasn't the earliest. American ships were capturing German merchant vessels and impounding them at docks in the US, putting the German crews in jails and refitting the ships for US military service. All three of these asshole nations were bullying Germany to no end, goading it's neighbors into moves that would make Germany attempt to rectify the situation by doing something that would give them their casus belli. The international jew was indeed the mortar which held those three together. The Brain Trust behind FDR, the Focus Group behind Churchill, and the jews in the dark corners of the Kremlin surrounding Stalin were the ones responsible for everything. Their well-trained progeny is still in charge today.

Read "The Myth of German Villainy" by Benton L. Bradberry, it will clear up a lot of this for you.

https://archive.org/details/mythofgermanvill0000brad
(PDF available for download)

Spain only sent 20,000 troops of La Division Azul to the eastern front to fight the Bolsheviks in 1941, but Franco recalled the units in 1944. A few hundred disobeyed his orders and stayed fighting with the Germans until the end. The only time Spaniards fought Allied troops in the west was in some parts of the Ardennes offensive and in the west of Germany in the spring. The Miguel Ezquerra group was notorious for inflicting heavy casualties on Allied troops.

If you think there wouldn't have been bloodshed or demographic replacement under any kind of premature surrender or perhaps even an armistice (WWI was an armistice and look what happened after that) then you must go back and look at history again. This warfare tactic was already being used against defeated Germans after WWI. Weimar saw incredible bouts of miscegenation and suicide. The French unleashed their Senegalese colonial troops in the Rhineland in 1923 because Germany had apparently fell behind on WWI "reparation payments" from the diktat of Versailles. These troops raped thousands of German girls, and created an entire epidemic of fatherless mixed-race babies in the Rhineland when they departed in 1925 (the epidemic was known as "The Rape of the Saar"). It was a vile and disgusting act that any neighbor could do to one another, but the French were the most corrupted in Europe. It was they who sent thousands of Marxists to Spain in 1936 along with Bolsheviks from Russia who were responsible for dismembering and executing thousands of Catholic priests and nuns.

Read "Crusade in Spain" by Eoin O'Duffy to learn more about the Spanish "Civil War" and the geopolitics regarding Franco's struggle.
http://www.reconquistapress.com/crusade-in-spain.html
(I have not found a PDF yet but the book is a good read that clears up a lot of history, and worth the cheap price)

The powers that be had determined in 1918, and probably prior to that, that Germany must be destroyed, and that meant destroying the German people, be it racially, spiritually, economically, or all three.
 
Last edited:
Not true, if you take America out of the picture. Without America, Germany had a massive advantage.

The fact that Japan attacked America instead of Russia was just yet another blunder by incompetent generals. America had a strong isolationist movement going after WW1, America had armed vets march on the White House after WW1 (look up the Bonus Army). The rulers of America were afraid to go to war without a good cause again, until they got one from Japan attacking Pearl Harbor.

If Japan had simply used their remaining oil reserves they had to attack Russia, and conquer it to link up with Germany for more oil supplies, they would have survived. Russia already had a large rail network they could have used to cross Siberia to the Bakken oil fields. Not to mention Germans produced most of their oil through coal liquification. Japan simply needed to reach Germany.

Instead they committed suicide in a spectacular fashion, and brought in an adversary who was 10x stronger than Russia.
It is true that without America, the war would not have gone on as long as it did. FDR's Lend-Lease Act is the culprit for more deaths in the east than anything else, for both German forces, as well as any ethnicity forced to fight for the Bolsheviks. If the American barges filled with tanks, trucks, guns, equipment, food, clothing etc at the Murmansk port stopped arriving, then Stalin would not have been able to keep throwing endless human fodder against the Germans and overwhelm the Axis force with ridiculous odds, and the Russian restorationists and nationalists would have set up a new government like what was planned between Himmler and Vlasov in Smolensk. Even with that Lend-Lease aid it took over another three years for the USSR to finally push back west. It is why I suspect the turning point, the halt in Barbarossa, which came in December of 1941, was due to a compounding series of factors, including the Commissar's gathering hordes from the east and a pipeline of equipment from the northwest of Murmansk down to Moscow, Leningrad, and Stalingrad.

The way in which the equipment was moved was the primary means of Soviet logistics in their battle-readiness. A significant portion of military equipment and supplies were transported by railway networks which connected Murmansk to other parts of northern Russia, including the city of Petrozavodsk, which lies to the east of Leningrad. From Petrozavodsk, the equipment would be further transported by rail to Leningrad. The waterways, including rivers and canals, played a vital role in moving equipment from Murmansk to Leningrad and further south. Equipment would be loaded onto smaller barges and transported along rivers such as the Neva and the Svir, which connected Leningrad with Lake Ladoga.

Most of the aid America sent was in 1941 and 1942, but they sent it all over the course of the war in the east from 1941 - 1945. If one looks at the alleged numbers, it is enormous. Over 400,000 trucks and jeeps and other motorized units, around 11,400 airplanes, and over 12,000 armored vehicles, 7,000 of them being tanks. The United States kept respawning the Soviet Red Army over and over again. Stalin repaid them by keeping over 5,000 US soldiers as gulag slaves from Poland after the war. Apparently the USSR only paid off some of that massive "lease" debt to the USA by 1971. The cooperation between these two has always been suspect, even for the 46 years after the war. Too many cutthroats and murderers like Eisenhower or Truman, and too few penitent warriors like Patton.

As for Japan, one must consider the prelude to Pearl Harbor. I'm sure you're aware of what the United States was doing in China (sending aid to the combined forces of Chiang Kai-Shek and the future CCP) and the Philippines (this is worthy of its own thread) at that time, but also the economic stranglehold they were putting on Japan. Japan and the USSR had signed a non-aggression pact in April of 1941, similar to the one signed between Germany and the USSR in August 1939. There were many reasons for this, but mainly because occupying Manchuria and outer Mongolia required a significant number of troops from both. The non-aggression pact did not resolve these territorial disputes, it was kind of a hiatus move, to keep things neutral or preventing them escalating in the least, while concerns occupied these nations more pressingly on other fronts.

It is a massive hypothetical to suggest that Japan should have turned northwest to attack the USSR (who were not bolstered by enough American equipment yet and weren't considered a major threat to east Asia in 1941) as opposed to clearing up the Pacific as was strategized in the GEACPS agenda. The Soviet Union's true goals were not recognized by many, except by the German High Command in 1941 when the build-up to Operation Thunder grew to ridiculous proportions.

Japan was already engaged in a prolonged and costly war with China, and it was heavily dependent on imports of strategic resources, including oil, from abroad like you mention. The Bakken oil fields are located in the western part of Siberia, thousands of kilometers away from the borders of Manchukuo (Japanese-occupied Manchuria) and Japanese-occupied territories in China.

The vast expanse of rugged, harsh, and at some parts impassable Siberian territory held significant logistical hurdles for any invading force. Establishing and maintaining supply lines over such vast distances, especially through hostile or contested territory would have been extremely difficult. The existing railway infrastructure in Siberia was limited and underdeveloped especially in the remote areas between Manchukuo (the most likely point of a hypothetical Japanese invasion into USSR) and the Bakken Oil Fields. Building a new railway line across such vast distances would have required significant resources and manpower, which would have hindered Japan in its mobilization given its ongoing military commitments elsewhere. Even if a railway line had been constructed, supplying and maintaining Japanese forces in Siberia would have posed immense logistical challenges. What geography were you thinking of in this particular hypothetical instance, and at what point in time in 1941?

America ultimately cornered Japan into attacking the US naval fleet at Pearl Harbor. Studying the logistics and movements of the USAAF reveals a lot of things that are not in their "historical canon," and what Japan was doing in other regions surrounding it. It seems both the European Axis and the Japanese Empire desired a de-colonialization of Asia and a return to the proper spheres of influence for each. Part of the Tripartite negotiations discussed these ambitions, which all went against the impetus of massive wealth stolen by the Rothschilds through the British over the last few centuries.

According to the conventional narrative about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during World War 2, the Kido Butai Combined Fleet set sail on November 26th, 1941 with 6 aircraft carriers and 24 others major naval ships, attacking Pearl Harbor on the island of Oahu, Hawaii from the north on the morning of December 7th, 1941.

Plotting the route on Google Earth and looking at shipping lanes and other anomalies reveals problems in the conventional Pearl Harbor attack narrative, suggesting it's a story to make the Japanese a scapegoat in a British-American false flag attack. Pearl Harbor was indeed attacked, but there are conflicting versions of the story from the leaked radio communications of Japanese and FDR's cabinet telling the Navy intel to stand down, to them attacking themselves much like on 9/11. I'm open to the idea of either, but the history of manipulation has followed the USA ever since 1913 when the jews and the federal reserve took over the country.

The continuation of Soviet overreach into Asia certainly happened, just after 1945. The CCP and North Korea were spawned by the same ideology.
 
Last edited:
Music, why do you keep bringing up Ukrainian stuff in a Hitler thread? Keep posts on topic. I'm moving some of your posts to the Ukraine lounge. Do not go off-topic please.
 
Not true, if you take America out of the picture. Without America, Germany had a massive advantage.

The fact that Japan attacked America instead of Russia was just yet another blunder by incompetent generals. America had a strong isolationist movement going after WW1, America had armed vets march on the White House after WW1 (look up the Bonus Army). The rulers of America were afraid to go to war without a good cause again, until they got one from Japan attacking Pearl Harbor.

If Japan had simply used their remaining oil reserves they had to attack Russia, and conquer it to link up with Germany for more oil supplies, they would have survived. Russia already had a large rail network they could have used to cross Siberia to the Bakken oil fields. Not to mention Germans produced most of their oil through coal liquification. Japan simply needed to reach Germany.

Instead they committed suicide in a spectacular fashion, and brought in an adversary who was 10x stronger than Russia.
Yes obviously the allied side would have been a completely different story without America. But the fact is that America did get involved therefore it was retarded for the Axis to continue fighting at that point. They should have just signed a peace treaty rather than continue the war.
 
Yes obviously the allied side would have been a completely different story without America. But the fact is that America did get involved therefore it was retarded for the Axis to continue fighting at that point. They should have just signed a peace treaty rather than continue the war.

Oh Germany tried that from day one, Britain refused all peace treaties early on unless Germany gave an unconditional surrender. This is quite famous actually, Germany tried to seek peace regarding the situation at Danzig, but was ignored. They invaded Poland and France, then tried to seek peace again, and was rebuffed. They tried to seek peace again after the invasion of the USSR, but also again rebuffed over and over.

Peace was never an option the second they decided to disobey the Boss Chews, which is why they needed a real plan for war and not simply parading around in Paris after France. And Japan needed to attack Russia, attacking the USA was complete idiocy.
 
Yes obviously the allied side would have been a completely different story without America. But the fact is that America did get involved therefore it was retarded for the Axis to continue fighting at that point. They should have just signed a peace treaty rather than continue the war.
Re-read the earlier posts. Hitler offered 16 different known peace proposals to the Allies starting on September 2nd, 1939, the day after the war was declared on them and the rest offered up until June 1941. At some point it was not worth attempting this anymore. The other side was determined to wipe them out.

There was to be no peace. The jews determined Germany had to be utterly destroyed and their three golem empires were put to the task. This is why they fought so religiously and fanatically, as some people derogatorily comment "to the last man," because it was an utter struggle of life and death for an entire people. This was made clear to the Germans well before Hitler ever came to power.

The sequence of events can be easily misunderstood if any pact or treaty is overlooked in chronology. It's also a tendency for people to simplify what happened into very straight-forward terms, which is not always the case. I used to think it was easy to explain it all away in a sentence or two, but the details of all of these events are more complicated than past centuries. The way the world changed in the 33 years between 1912 and 1945 was like the speed of light compared to the last 1879 years before that, since Christ's death (1912 - 1879 = 33AD). Everything changed in the matter of that time, in virtually every country in the world, and every year is important too, not just the main six years of WWII. The most important were the first seven, 1912 up until the conclusion of 1918, that set the stage for the remaining.
 
Last edited:
Oh Germany tried that from day one, Britain refused all peace treaties early on unless Germany gave an unconditional surrender. This is quite famous actually, Germany tried to seek peace regarding the situation at Danzig, but was ignored. They invaded Poland and France, then tried to seek peace again, and was rebuffed. They tried to seek peace again after the invasion of the USSR, but also again rebuffed over and over.

Peace was never an option the second they decided to disobey the Boss Chews, which is why they needed a real plan for war and not simply parading around in Paris after France. And Japan needed to attack Russia, attacking the USA was complete idiocy.
They could have negotiated terms of surrender the minute U.S.A. got involved in the war, and the terms of surrender would have been much more favorable then what they received when they finally lost the war. Not to mention Germany would have been spared many bombings and pointless deaths.

Hitler and other Germans not liking the Jews and wanting to stop their influence and subversion I can understand but the way Hitler dealt with it was very extreme and something most Germans even at the time ultimately did not approve of. They could have just kicked the Jews out of Europe and sent them back to Israel. They did not need to go to the extent they did. If Hitler was really a Christian he should have had more forgiveness towards the Jews like Jesus did. By the way I am not saying Hitler killed 6 million Jews. I think 6 million is a symbolic figure rather than a literally accurate account. But nevertheless a lot of Jews died because of Hitler.
 
They could have negotiated terms of surrender the minute U.S.A. got involved in the war, and the terms of surrender would have been much more favorable then what they received when they finally lost the war. Not to mention Germany would have been spared many bombings and pointless deaths.

Hitler and other Germans not liking the Jews and wanting to stop their influence and subversion I can understand but the way Hitler dealt with it was very extreme and something most Germans even at the time ultimately did not approve of. They could have just kicked the Jews out of Europe and sent them back to Israel. They did not need to go to the extent they did. If Hitler was really a Christian he should have had more forgiveness towards the Jews like Jesus did. By the way I am not saying Hitler killed 6 million Jews. I think 6 million is a symbolic figure rather than a literally accurate account. But nevertheless a lot of Jews died because of Hitler.

A lot more non-Jews have died, far more than 6 million, because of the Talmud, so I don't feel pity for them. That said, Germany did send Talmuds down to Israel under the Haavara Agreement, they did in large numbers until the Allies put a blockade on Germany in 1939. Then, when Hitler realized he was going to lose the war in 1942, he issued the Final Solution, and there was mass extermination of all partisans (especially Talmuds) because Germany realized they couldn't negotiate peace unless they gave total surrender, and they couldn't export the Talmuds because of the naval blockade.

The Germans rightfully feared Talmudic extermination as what happened to the Russians, so they figured it was better just to kill off their enemies before they were conquered.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
 
A lot more non-Jews have died, far more than 6 million, because of the Talmud, so I don't feel pity for them. That said, Germany did send Talmuds down to Israel under the Haavara Agreement, they did in large numbers until the Allies put a blockade on Germany in 1939. Then, when Hitler realized he was going to lose the war in 1942, he issued the Final Solution, and there was mass extermination of all partisans (especially Talmuds) because Germany realized they couldn't negotiate peace unless they gave total surrender, and they couldn't export the Talmuds because of the naval blockade.

The Germans rightfully feared Talmudic extermination as what happened to the Russians, so they figured it was better just to kill off their enemies before they were conquered.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
I read the Wikipedia article you linked to. Allegedly in a 6 year period only 60,000 Jews (out of the millions of Jews living in Germany) took up the chance to go back to Israel despite how bad things were Germany for them. This tells me that likely there were many restrictions and practical roadblocks that stopped those Jews from actually going back to Israel. Otherwise 6 years is plenty of time for them to evacuate themselves back to Israel.
 
I read the Wikipedia article you linked to. Allegedly in a 6 year period only 60,000 Jews (out of the millions of Jews living in Germany) took up the chance to go back to Israel despite how bad things were Germany for them. This tells me that likely there were many restrictions and practical roadblocks that stopped those Jews from actually going back to Israel. Otherwise 6 years is plenty of time for them to evacuate themselves back to Israel.

They did not want to go back because they had it really good exploiting Germans and other Europeans of their money and labor.

But they did have an option to leave the big bad evil Anti Semitic Germany, yet they wanted to stay. Funny how that works, right? You'll never hear about that one in history class.

The story is always the same. "WHITES ARE EVIL!!!!1" and yet everyone wants to live with them and profit from their labor. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top