I mean what I said, which is that the author of the article claimed the boom-bust cycles are for the rich to make more money, but for almost 20 years now they have foregone a bust by bailing out everyone in 2009, and then propping for greater asset prices through today, even doing what they did in 2020. One of my pet peeves for people around our forum is making claims and then redefining what happened, even though it didn't fit the claim. That's why "controlled opposition" claims always just confuse the situation all the more. They can be true, theoretically, but they can also be vastly overused (and are).What do you mean?
That's going to be a problem for you.I didn't think about BTC at all.
Webb is interesting but has already been outed as an exaggerator for doom saying click bait, like most on the internet, as it sells the most. Go ask Jim Rickards about where the SDR basket is going to land as the "new world reserve". Or Schiff about how BTC is still going to zero and everything is collapsing.Something about all this doesn't add up, it's just fishy to me. I think there's more to this whole situation than it seems, we're at a precipitation point, and about to jump off a cliff.