Donald Trump

Get2choppaaa said:
Click to expand...


A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".
 
Aldebaran said:
A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".
Click to expand...
Wait, is Zohran Mamdani not a communist then?
 
Aldebaran said:
A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".
Click to expand...

There has been wealth inequality for as long as there has been socio-economic systems. Communists have their top 1% like all systems. It's the Pareto distribution and everything always seems to break down along those lines.

Who suggested billionaires should pay 0% tax? Wealth inequality has been discussed for as long as I have been alive and paying attention and nobody has been able to properly deal with it. Government take-over of supermarkets and the means of production to address income disparity is an old idea that is communist and never achieves that goal. It only exacerbates it. Further, I don't think communism was ever intended to address the plight of the 'have nots'. It was always an excuse to muster resentment by the masses as a vehicle to seize power for the few Godless, sociopathic, narcissists who are intent on destroying creation itself in utter rebellion against God.

Americans are serfs? Serfdom has been a reality for 99% of all human beings who have ever lived. Western capitalism certainly has its problems but it has created a better quality of life for more people than any other economic system in history.

Who suggested that collective bargaining through unions is communist? As a union member myself, I see collective bargaining as an effective tool to increase benefits and wages for large swaths of people.
 
Uzisuicide said:
There has been wealth inequality for as long as there has been socio-economic systems. Communists have their top 1% like all systems. It's the Pareto distribution and everything always seems to break down along those lines.

Who suggested billionaires should pay 0% tax? Wealth inequality has been discussed for as long as I have been alive and paying attention and nobody has been able to properly deal with it. Government take-over of supermarkets and the means of production to address income disparity is an old idea that is communist and never achieves that goal. It only exacerbates it. Further, I don't think communism was ever intended to address the plight of the 'have nots'. It was always an excuse to muster resentment by the masses as a vehicle to seize power for the few Godless, sociopathic, narcissists who are intent on destroying creation itself in utter rebellion against God.

Americans are serfs? Serfdom has been a reality for 99% of all human beings who have ever lived. Western capitalism certainly has its problems but it has created a better quality of life for more people than any other economic system in history.

Who suggested that collective bargaining through unions is communist? As a union member myself, I see collective bargaining as an effective tool to increase benefits and wages for large swaths of people
Click to expand...

People get this confused not because unionizing is communist, but because most Unions are communists.
 
Aldebaran said:
A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".
Click to expand...

Ok sure ....but is the guy a communist or not?

Forget the talking points, does this guy help promote serfdom or not?

We agree most Americans don't know shit from shinola. This guy's only gonna help the hand eaters and Muslims ye or nay???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top