Donald Trump



A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".
 
A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".
Wait, is Zohran Mamdani not a communist then?
 
A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".

There has been wealth inequality for as long as there has been socio-economic systems. Communists have their top 1% like all systems. It's the Pareto distribution and everything always seems to break down along those lines.

Who suggested billionaires should pay 0% tax? Wealth inequality has been discussed for as long as I have been alive and paying attention and nobody has been able to properly deal with it. Government take-over of supermarkets and the means of production to address income disparity is an old idea that is communist and never achieves that goal. It only exacerbates it. Further, I don't think communism was ever intended to address the plight of the 'have nots'. It was always an excuse to muster resentment by the masses as a vehicle to seize power for the few Godless, sociopathic, narcissists who are intent on destroying creation itself in utter rebellion against God.

Americans are serfs? Serfdom has been a reality for 99% of all human beings who have ever lived. Western capitalism certainly has its problems but it has created a better quality of life for more people than any other economic system in history.

Who suggested that collective bargaining through unions is communist? As a union member myself, I see collective bargaining as an effective tool to increase benefits and wages for large swaths of people.
 
There has been wealth inequality for as long as there has been socio-economic systems. Communists have their top 1% like all systems. It's the Pareto distribution and everything always seems to break down along those lines.

Who suggested billionaires should pay 0% tax? Wealth inequality has been discussed for as long as I have been alive and paying attention and nobody has been able to properly deal with it. Government take-over of supermarkets and the means of production to address income disparity is an old idea that is communist and never achieves that goal. It only exacerbates it. Further, I don't think communism was ever intended to address the plight of the 'have nots'. It was always an excuse to muster resentment by the masses as a vehicle to seize power for the few Godless, sociopathic, narcissists who are intent on destroying creation itself in utter rebellion against God.

Americans are serfs? Serfdom has been a reality for 99% of all human beings who have ever lived. Western capitalism certainly has its problems but it has created a better quality of life for more people than any other economic system in history.

Who suggested that collective bargaining through unions is communist? As a union member myself, I see collective bargaining as an effective tool to increase benefits and wages for large swaths of people

People get this confused not because unionizing is communist, but because most Unions are communists.
 
A sidenote: It is interesting how the guy asking the question insists on calling Zohran Mamdani a "communist".

It's an indication on how incredibly efficient the corporatist propaganda has been in the USA for the last several decades. Any reference to the massive and exponentially growing wealth inequality in the US is immediately branded as "communist". Any suggestion that multi-billionaires should pay more than 0 % tax is immediately branded as "communist".

Most Americans are nothing but serfs that think they are free. They work two jobs and can't even afford a house of their own or to raise a family, while the corporations that they work for pay out hundreds of millions in bonuses to the people in upper management. But still, to suggest that they should unionize so that they can collectively negotiate better terms is "communist".

Ok sure ....but is the guy a communist or not?

Forget the talking points, does this guy help promote serfdom or not?

We agree most Americans don't know shit from shinola. This guy's only gonna help the hand eaters and Muslims ye or nay???
 
Ok sure ....but is the guy a communist or not?

Forget the talking points, does this guy help promote serfdom or not?

We agree most Americans don't know shit from shinola. This guy's only gonna help the hand eaters and Muslims ye or nay???

I’m in New York City. Mandamis ideas and proposed laws are definitely communist

However, he strikes me more as a total scam artist rather than a true communist. He is suggesting “free, buses and trains“, “free childcare for all New York City, mothers,“ a freeze on all rent stabilized units. (Many land lords in New York City keep rent stabilized units vacant on purpose for tax purposes). He also wants to have government run supermarkets to make groceries cheaper for all New York City residents.

And to be fair, even our liberal Democrat governor Hochul he stated that none of these would pass the state assembly into law.

However, my instinct is that Mandami is saying all of these things to try to get elected and basically is like the middle school student running for a president with the idea of getting soda to come out of the drinking fountains.

Also, his plan to pay for all of these laws would be to drastically increase taxes on all New York City residents making over $1 million per year.

Also, he plans to defund the police of New York City

Edit, it’s unclear just how much or how little could be put into law. Lowering spending on Police is certainly possible.

But the rest? I’m inclined to say that none of those ideas would be passed into law, perhaps freezing the rent on stabilized units, but that could easily backfire, as I say many of those stabilized units are simply sitting empty.

Are there ideas that could work? 🤔 perhaps maybe. Like punishing landlords for keeping units vacant, especially considering we have such a housing shortage?
 
Last edited:
I’m in New York City. Mandamis ideas and proposed laws are definitely communist

However, he strikes me more as a total scam artist rather than a true communist. He is suggesting “free, buses and trains“, “free childcare for all New York City, mothers,“ a freeze on all rent stabilized units. (Many land lords in New York City keep rent stabilized units vacant on purpose for tax purposes). He also wants to have government run supermarkets to make groceries cheaper for all New York City residents.

And to be fair, even our liberal Democrat governor Hochul he stated that none of these would pass the state assembly into law.

However, my instinct is that Mandami is saying all of these things to try to get elected and basically is like the middle school student running for a president with the idea of getting soda to come out of the drinking fountains.

Also, his plan to pay for all of these laws would be to drastically increase taxes on all New York City residents making over $1 million per year.

Also, he plans to defund the police of New York City

Edit, it’s unclear just how much or how little could be put into law. Lowering spending on Police is certainly possible.

But the rest? I’m inclined to say that none of those ideas would be passed into law, perhaps freezing the rent on stabilized units, but that could easily backfire, as I say many of those stabilized units are simply sitting empty.

Are there ideas that could work? 🤔 perhaps maybe. Like punishing landlords for keeping units vacant, especially considering we have such a housing shortage?
He's honestly the perfect modern "token" candidate that today's average retarded brainwashed liberally deranged NYCer eats up. He's appealing to all the extremist voters who are either so young, entitled, uneducated and out of touch or malicious rich people with a virtue signalling victim complex against their own skin color or a white hater.

How most of NYC evaluates him:

Not white (white == bad).

Brown skinned (but not too brown skinned to remind NYCers of Africans or black people who most of them are secretly prejudiced against anyway).

Indian (quirky, exotic [lol], a good leader because the media portrays many Indian CEOs now so it must be true [lol x2]).

Offers "free" goods in return for seemingly no effort on the part of the receiver. Given the lazy, entitled attitudes of today's youth, they eat this stuff up like candy. No critical thinking ability whatsoever. The kicker is that most probably come from well to do backgrounds but like pretending they are part of the struggling class, underdog complex.

Promises to target the rich and extract their resources (the sworn privileged "enemy" of these "poor" oppressed people whose very existence keeps them in the same sad state of living. Again, this is comical because most of these fantasy land revolutionaries come from rich families. They live such comfortable, stress free lives that they feel the need to invent and create fabricated adversity to feel accomplishment in their lives.)

He preys on the basic needs of people by offering surface level solutions that only sound good on paper but not practice. Saving people money on housing, nourishment, and making resources more available for all. In NYC, home of most of the greediest and most vain people on this planet. Good luck getting any landlord or establishment to lower their prices.

He's also young so the younger crowd feels as if they can relate to him and he has their best interest at heart.

He's basically a younger, sharper, legitimately dangerous DEI version of Bernie Sanders. The majority of the population especially in NYC, have become so castrated, so stupid, so indoctrinated. They look down on whites without being able to explain why, have lost all common sense and critical thinking, and expect results without effort. They stand no chance against battle hardened deceivers like him unified in their goal to take over the West.
 
Back
Top