Donald Trump: Criticism & Debate Thread
- Thread starter Caduceus
- Start date
-
- Tags
- public figures zionist
He said he's a Christian.
Did he say "I converted to Judaism and left Christianity?"
Jared Kushner (and Ivanka) I don't think will be part of the new administration in an official capacity.
Though the article does say he could "advise" on Middle East issues.
Pompeo on the other hand I can see joining. He was one of the loyalists that never fell out with Trump and Trump seems intent on having loyalists around him this time around.
Though the article does say he could "advise" on Middle East issues.
Pompeo on the other hand I can see joining. He was one of the loyalists that never fell out with Trump and Trump seems intent on having loyalists around him this time around.
Hearsay is just bullshit rumors until proven otherwise. Anyone could make any claim about anyone.
I don't 100% trust Pompeo because of his CIA/spook background. He's an intelligent man, crafty and probably self-serving. He's wisely playing the long game with Trump. Reward his fealty with an appointment to Ambassador to Luxemburg or a similarly meaningless post.
He was likely involved in advising Trump to not to release the JFK assassination files and the Julian Assange situation (i.e., pardon).
Last edited:
I heard that as well. I also believe around the time of the Butler shooting, him and Haley were talking a lot about working together. Of all the legacy staff that are still loyal to Trump, he's the one you have to most keep an eye on. Heavy Kissinger vibes from him.
A good comprehensive list of who should not serve in this tweet thread.
The older I get the more I understand how special Hitler was. What nationalism is suppose to look like, hype and all. Imagine talking about this dollar store conservative like he’s about to save the white race. On what grounds? His heart is in the right place? People are starting to get “it”? The SJWs have lost control? The real men are rolling up their sleeves? The force has awakened? I have a good feeling?
There’s no difference between men and women anymore. I’m not even sure why I’m right wing. Might as well put on lipstick and go to the women’s Olympics. Just a bunch of “feelings” BS all around. Biden makes me feel bad, Trump makes me feel good.
Is China and Russia still checkmating the United States or is that cancelled? Will they grovel like they haven’t actually made any moves whatsoever last 4 years? Or is Trump going to fail hard in containing these alpha males and it’s about to be a disaster?
So many unanswered questions.
There’s no difference between men and women anymore. I’m not even sure why I’m right wing. Might as well put on lipstick and go to the women’s Olympics. Just a bunch of “feelings” BS all around. Biden makes me feel bad, Trump makes me feel good.
Is China and Russia still checkmating the United States or is that cancelled? Will they grovel like they haven’t actually made any moves whatsoever last 4 years? Or is Trump going to fail hard in containing these alpha males and it’s about to be a disaster?
So many unanswered questions.
The tendency for you to downvote and smear with a single sentence rather than reply with any valuable information is more realistic of very low quality posting, and your insistence on silencing people in other threads who question the narrative is low quality moderation. If you don't have time, don't post. Completely irascible, as usual.
Do you have evidence to back your claim that the Democrat "side" has ten times as many jews? Or are you simply referring to voting statistics? Every single jew with capital and pull votes for him, the frumpy Weather Underground types and the liberal shylock varieties are simply placeholders and would have no say over Whites education or economics if their right-wing cousins who funded their think tanks were suddenly not in power anymore.
The entire political apparatus is infested with these vermin. Even if you don't count all the AIPAC handlers, there is an uninterrupted streak of lip service to jewish groups, agendas, and think tanks to the detriment of heritage White Americans by all politicians across the spectrum. When every single Republican politician is afraid to even mention "White Americans" by name except to call them "supremacists" or "racists," this only further confirms their indebtedness to jewish interests.
You're not posting in good faith by trying to take the heat off Republicans and playing boiling-frog insurance with this left-right jumping tactic. The following jewish groups:
Are overwhelmingly intertwined with American politicians both left and right. The very name of one of them, the Republican jewish Coaliation, is telling. Let's see what the RJC has to say on Trump:
"The contrast between President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris could not be clearer. We were safer under President Trump. At this inflection point in Jewish history, with the stakes this high, Kamala Harris is a risk we cannot afford to take."
https://www.rjchq.org/coleman_the_jewish_case_for_trump
"As we’ve said from the beginning: the jewish vote matters, and it played a major role in delivering the Presidency for President Trump. jewish voters from coast to coast rejected Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party due to their failure to keep the jewish community safe, and for undermining our ally Israel as it continues to fight an existential war against Iran and its terrorist proxies."
https://www.rjchq.org/rjc_congratul..._on_greatest_political_comeback_in_us_history
https://www.rjchq.org/breaking_pres...e_largest_share_of_the_jewish_vote_in_decades
Massie admitted that every single Republican except for himself that he knows of, has an AIPAC babysitter. He is going solo in this, perhaps more will join him, or perhaps a shadow operative will finish the job they started when they offed his wife to get rid of his inconvenience to their publicity. They boast about it to everyone's face like its nothing:
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64731
Calling out jewish lobbyists is currently the riskiest thing for any politician, and yet none of them will still dare even name Whites in their rightful position as the founders, builders, and majority of Americans. The overton window is stuck until they begin doing this.
Every one of our assumptions is still preliminary, be it in favor of or against decisions Trump made and decisions he may make in the future. The old adage "the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior" applies in this context because so far it is not wrong.
Let's see what Trump's administration actually does with interest rates, instead of what he says he's going to do. There's a start.
Everyone should study Hitler up until 1933. Not what he did in office, which was probably the greatest economy turn around ever, by running off disgusting filthy capitalists, but what lead up to that. His life story, up until 1933, is one of legends. They hell he went through, the fight he had in him, the desire, determination, and the vision. The man was beyond special, the man was truly once in every few generations, maybe even every few centuries type of man.
What he came from, what he went though, what he was able to accomplish, was beyond the beliefs of most anyone who has ever walked this planet.
And, this is why, outside of Jesus Christ, Hitler is probably the most important historical figure. He is certainly the most talked about, even if it is all propaganda and lies, it still shows how much our enemies fear him even being studied. I mean, if you look at both sides of our main-stream media "literally Hitler" just defeated "fascist Hitler" in the "most important election in our country's history". And now "literally Hitler" is in charge again, but "literally Hitler" will put a stop to the "fascists on the left"
Last edited:
Trump increased the amount of Hispanic republican voters.
It doesn't mean he has joined a cartel, started wearing a hairnet or calling people "Esse".
Attachments
You just wait! In his second term he'll get a teardrop tattoo for each of his drone strike kills.
Heh, when you find out who funds and arms the Mexican cartels, it all comes together. So, in an indirect path, this is actually correct. Which is why our military will continue to fight endless wars and commit war crimes by building bases in Syria but for some reason we will never do that in Mexico to stop the cartels.
1. You will never stop the demand for narcotics unless you legalize it and regulate the production and distribution like alcohol and cigarettes, which will never happen...
2. As you can never stop the demand, the best you can do is massage and control the production and distribution by providing overwatch on the handful of cartels that engage in this business...
3. You use your hand and power to prevent them from growing too strong but also ensure there is moderation and overall control over the cartel families/systems...
4. When one entity gets out of line, you make an example of them with covert/overt actions via SOF and the like.
Its been like this for 50-60 years and as long as governments south of our border remain generally fragile and fragmented, it will continue to remain as it has - a Potemkin 'war on drugs' that funds a robust economy of interdiction AND trafficking simultaneously. Believe me, with the C3 the US possesses, we could shut down the narcotics trade in six months if we wanted to.
The conceit is the status quo largely works, as long as a cartel doesn't become too fragmented or step out of line - see the relative peace when Escobar ran the majority of the cocaine business.
Until you solve the consumption/demand problem, this will always be. Quite frankly, if this is the predominate international concern we have, its very manageable and acceptable. We worry about our own backyard re: Monroe Doctrine and worry less about provoking wars in other nations. And as long as foreign actors like China with its fentanyl and Arabs with their terrorists choose to stay out of our little hemisphere, then all can live and let live.
I agree with you. Israel influences on this side of the border keeps all these policies in place and on the other side of the border funds the drug cartels and makes billions in profit off of them. What a great "ally".
Drugs weren't an issue a hundred years ago because America was mostly White and Christian. Drugs have been the favorite product peddled by jews since the middle ages. All of it, pharmakaios, sorcery, potions, opium, was all pushed by wealthy jewish families. The Sassoons for example. The conversos and marranos who took over Mexico now lord over millions of violent murdering Mesoamericans that are easily controllable with drugs. The browner America becomes, the higher the demand will be for drugs, thereby making drugs less easily to be destroyed.
The congress critters let the flow continue because their creditors deem it good business, no matter how many millions of lives it ruins. The Sacklers, et al. The amount of violence and murder caused by drug cartels and gangs even just people on drugs in general is Capitalism's equivalent to Communism's Bolshevism. It truly is the epitome of capitalist vulture expression.
How many machismo Mexicans do you know who would vote for a woman? He pandered to them ad nauseum, they're a people very susceptible to flattery, just as they are adversely to insults. Easily emotionally manipulated. The vote of jews is an addition to his other very jewish connections.
Mexico has a female president right now. So does Honduras. For what it's worth.