This post makes interesting points that Greenland is the best place to locate ballistic missile defenses against Russian rockets aimed at the US. I don't know how well this holds up with Russia's latest designs, but it seems to make sense.
Donald Trump and US expansionism in North America
- Thread starter LaAguilaNegra
- Start date
If this would end NATO can Russia just invade European countries and run them over without us intervening like with the current war?
Probably part of the plan. This won't have EU intervention as Greenland decided not to be part of it in 1985.
Inversely, it would be the best place on US territory from which to launch a nuclear first-strike on Moscow and Russian nuclear assets.
For Moscow maybe, but for a lot of Russia, Alaska is much closer.
Russia and America are both owned and operated by jews so ain't gonna happen. We are already in a One World Government. (((They))) just enjoy attacking themselves with the good cop bad cop format (psyop) to keep the goyim masses at bay while They rape, pillage, and horde all the gold.
The risks of that happening go up if one of the two parties slips from their control. Russia is more than halfway there, China is there already.
We’d use nuclear subs for that.
During the Cold War we had weapons stored in Alaska, that is closer to Moscow and China than Greenland. If we want to nuke Europe, Greenland is closer, but again we’d use nuclear subs, at least in a first strike scenario.
(You can do a search for "Seven Doors of Doom" site on Adak if curious)
There’s a few problems with first strike scenarios. Even if we had an enemy we wanted to nuke, for arguments sake let’s say our leaders want to nuke China or India.
Russia has enough of a nuclear stockpile and would likely have no choice but to attack the USA because they’d correctly figure that they are next.
A lot would have to happen to trigger such an event( maybe if our oil sources run dry, we start nuking each other, that is one possible doomsday scenario), and unless you’re actively building a sustainable bomb shelter, with a can opener, and clean water sources, it’s not worth stressing over
Last edited:
The irony being taken out by a Canadian would be great.
Any sort of strike on Russia or the US will surely result in a nuclear reprisal.
You’d have to in order to compensate the Greenlanders from losing their cheap college and healthcare. This could cause some serious issues. You just added like 50k millionaires to the us while the average American is getting bent over a barrel for one.
Two, this would be adding another blue state. Indigenous pride and what not. You’d have to Puerto Rico them. If you added Puerto Rico and Greenland you’d have to add Venezuela as a potential red state to balance out everything.
Honestly, I’m not even so much worried about Russia or China or even North Korea.
If there’s one country that I would predict to use nuclear weapons in a first strike? It would be israel and it’s not even close.
God I hope so been wanting to live this Post Apocalyptic fantasy for 40 years..
That’s an interesting question. In the event of an all out nuclear war, would anyone even bother nuking Australia?
Edit,
Also, if you look at Australia’s current wildlife, will the post apocalyptic horror even be that different if they get hit with nukes and have mutated wildlife?
(These are actual Aussie wildlife photos, not sci fi horror)
Last edited:
Using lefty tactics to turn Greenland against Denmark. Interesting. Truth is if Greenland swaps, their living standards will drop. Don’t know if the people would be up for it.
How would their living standards drop? Are you saying this because they would no longer receive Danish welfare services? They would likely receive a large payout, and then would stop being welfare cases.
Looks like the plan is to use the profits of oil from Venezuela to buy Greenland.
I'm not signing up for that expat assignment anytime soon.