Donald Trump and US expansionism in North America

I hope you guys don't actually believe he'll be doing any military action in this hemisphere.

Panama Canal - Current Pres. of Panama is openly disrespecting Trump/Rubio, using aggressive language & says US can't pass for free & our Chinese friends continue to man the entrance/exits. Meanwhile in Catatumbo, Colombia, the largest battles since the 80's are taking place, 10's-100's of daily casualties. Whoever controls Catatumbi is within Shaheed range (in a mountainous jungle nearly impossible to conduct airstrikes) & can easily shut down the Panama Canal, similar to the Houthis in the Red Sea. Iran has a technical facility capable of large scale Shaheed production (as per Erik Prince) a short drive from Catatumbo. If the US started anything, the canal could easily be shut down on the Carribean side since the US nor Colombia gov. no longer control Venezuelan border region. US cannot control Catatumbo despite decades of trying via Plan Colombia & is finally withdrawing completely from Colombia, letting fleets of blackhawks sit idle, indicating no further military action in the area.

Mexico - As much as I'd support military action there & hate their current president, I'd recommend you watch her latest speeches. She saying some very problematic things. The problem with what she's saying, is that it's true. Short version "yes, we bring fentanyl to the border but what happens to it after that? US gov profits from it's distribution & is just as crooked as we are". Those "sigint" flights in the Big Bend, TX area being publisized happen all the time for decades now, it's routine. Unfortunately, there will be no real drug war, for the same reason Miami is a drug addict society & Havana, Cuba you won't find a single illicit drug.

Canada - Lol...

Lot of tough talk from weakling nations. We don't need to use the military, can crush them so easily with economics it's not even funny. If we wanted to use military and kill their leaders it would happen overnight btw, but there's no need because when Trump tells them to jump they will ask, "How high?" That's how enslaved they are to the USD.
 
I hope you guys don't actually believe he'll be doing any military action in this hemisphere.

Panama Canal - Current Pres. of Panama is openly disrespecting Trump/Rubio, using aggressive language & says US can't pass for free & our Chinese friends continue to man the entrance/exits. Meanwhile in Catatumbo, Colombia, the largest battles since the 80's are taking place, 10's-100's of daily casualties. Whoever controls Catatumbi is within Shaheed range (in a mountainous jungle nearly impossible to conduct airstrikes) & can easily shut down the Panama Canal, similar to the Houthis in the Red Sea. Iran has a technical facility capable of large scale Shaheed production (as per Erik Prince) a short drive from Catatumbo. If the US started anything, the canal could easily be shut down on the Carribean side since the US nor Colombia gov. no longer control Venezuelan border region. US cannot control Catatumbo despite decades of trying via Plan Colombia & is finally withdrawing completely from Colombia, letting fleets of blackhawks sit idle, indicating no further military action in the area.

Mexico - As much as I'd support military action there & hate their current president, I'd recommend you watch her latest speeches. She saying some very problematic things. The problem with what she's saying, is that it's true. Short version "yes, we bring fentanyl to the border but what happens to it after that? US gov profits from it's distribution & is just as crooked as we are". Those "sigint" flights in the Big Bend, TX area being publisized happen all the time for decades now, it's routine. Unfortunately, there will be no real drug war, for the same reason Miami is a drug addict society & Havana, Cuba you won't find a single illicit drug.

Canada - Lol...
I'm not sure we are actively planning any military action in Panama. I likely it's even necessary.

Mexico on the other hand I do think there will be asymmetrical strikes at some point.

As far as Iran and all that... If Erik Prince knows where the Shathead facility is... And its used against our interests.... I'm confident we would just bomb the shit out of it.

Trump isn't afraid to use military actions when it's limited and specific. That's been demonstrated multiple times. Hegseth is on board.
 
That's every country ever... Unless you're found to genocide the people. And even then, pendulum swings. Look at the Indians.
It is strange when Canadians and Brits bring up the US withdrawal from Afghanistan with Americans as a gotcha. It's as if they've forgotten they were there with us, or they think they're still over there slogging it out with the Taliban.
 
What about the Indians? Have they been genocided?
They're certainly not doing well.

I don't know if you follow Vox Day, but he's brilliant with historical parallels and one of his most interesting is that Americans right now are about where the Plains Indians were in 1850. Another is that we're undergoing a Volkerwanderung (an overwhelming movement of foreigners into our empire) similar to what the Western Romans experienced in the last few centuries of the Empire, just on a much larger scale. Yet another of Vox's brilliant observations is that the further you allow multiculturalism and mass immigration to proceed, the more painful it is and the more violence and death is required to fix it.

To bring it back to Trump's expansionism, the attempts to control Greenland and Panama, and the bluffing (he's probably bluffing) about Canada, as well as the looming possible major wars with more powerful rivals further away like China and Iran, remind me of late Roman wars and attempts to expand their declining empire. Julian's failed invasion of Persia, Majorian's failed desperate attempt to reconquer North Africa, for example. It's still early to say whether Trump will fail as the late emperors of Western Rome did or maybe somehow be able to turn things around for us.
 
Last edited:
It is strange when Canadians and Brits bring up the US withdrawal from Afghanistan with Americans as a gotcha. It's as if they've forgotten they were there with us, or they think they're still over there slogging it out with the Taliban.

Don’t take it emotionally and get defensive. I was being purely pragmatic. The Vietnamese and Afghans wrote the playbook and you’d be smart to realize that the world noticed, before getting too cocky.
Actually I’ve seen a journalist make a convincing case that Americas defeat in Vietnam was the beginning of Americas power waning on the world stage. Trump “expansionism” could end up being an implosion
 
They're certainly not doing well.

Actually, this is a popular trope that is totally false. Indians today are doing better than they have in centiries. More American-Indians are alive today than in the 1850's, in fact, there are millions of Indians today, numbers that did not exist until like 1500, before the first disease waves came from Europe.

I don't know if you follow Vox Day, but he's brilliant with historical parallels and one of his most interesting is that Americans right now are about where the Plains Indians were in 1850. Another is that we're undergoing a Volkerwanderung (an overwhelming movement of foreigners into our empire) similar to what the Western Romans experienced in the last few centuries of the Empire, just on a much larger scale. Yet another of Vox's brilliant observations is that the further you allow multiculturalism and mass immigration to proceed, the more painful it is and the more violence and death is required to fix it.

The Indians lost because they got violent, actually. They were the ones who first attacked Whites to drive them out, and got crushed as a result. Today Whites have no need for violence. They just need to actually stand up to their women, and have families again.

To bring it back to Trump's expansionism, the attempts to control Greenland and Panama, and the bluffing (he's probably bluffing) about Canada, as well as the looming possible major wars with more powerful rivals further away like China and Iran, remind me of late Roman wars and attempts to expand their declining empire. Julian's failed invasion of Persia, Majorian's failed desperate attempt to reconquer North Africa, for example. It's still early to say whether Trump will fail as the late emperors of Western Rome did or maybe somehow be able to turn things around for us.

There is a huge difference between America trying to overstretch itself, vs. America taking control over it's nearby areas. Just like there was for Rome. Rome's farthest expansions were too much and caused a massive loss of resources. But focusing on the nearby problems Rome was able to do for centuries after their peak. Shouldn't be too hard for America either.
 
Don’t take it emotionally and get defensive. I was being purely pragmatic. The Vietnamese and Afghans wrote the playbook and you’d be smart to realize that the world noticed, before getting too cocky.
Actually I’ve seen a journalist make a convincing case that Americas defeat in Vietnam was the beginning of Americas power waning on the world stage. Trump “expansionism” could end up being an implosion

It wasn't Vietnam who used that playbook. It was America herself! America was founded on guerilla warfare. You'd think our leaders would understand this, but no, they are just simpletons.
 
Lots of arrogant, grandiose delusions of American superiority here, probably from people who think guns are useful in modern combat. A recap of what's being pumped daily, covid style in Spanish language media & for the world to see.

Panama - USA vessels WILL NOT freely transit the canal & the Chinese WILL REMAIN IN CONTROL of the ports. Why? Because the Panama Canal IS NOT AMERICAN, NOR WILL IT BE.

Mexico - USA WILL NOT conduct any action (including airstrikes) without prior Mexican approval. For that, US ACTS AGAINST OC FIRST domestically.

Colombia - US deportation flights have continued to Colombia BUT ALL COLOMBIAN CITIZENS MUST NOT WEAR HANDCUFFS NOR SHACKLES. The US government respects this decision & Petro has cancelled all American oil projects in Colombia & called for a union state with Venezuela.

Trump nor Rubio have responded to any of this.

Many of you are probably too young to know what it looks like when American leaders make credible threats of violence they can act on, but it looks nothing like what Trump is doing & his bluff was quickly called.

Deportations, I don't even think they've achieved Obama numbers & already ran out of resources, 2 weeks into "the largest deportation operation in history", lol. Camera loving, makeup wearing, Top vlogger in chief Tom Homan, will surely fix that.

To date very few, if anyone, has been actually fired from the government just as the vast majority of goods from China continue to flow untarriffed. Because all of this is theatrics & 95% (maybe more) of the US political class is broke & irrelevant today, as such, US politics is irrelevant.

US is at a historical weak point, it's now a drug addict/faggot/whore country with more in common with opium addicted China living it's "century of humiliation" or alcohol addicted Russia when it lost ~30% of it's territory to the Germans. In both cases, estimated ~10% of general population & ~30% of adult male population were addicts, just like in the US today. Govs supplied the masses with alcohol & opium in these years, just as the US gov sells you & your family fentanyl & pills & historically it's the catalyst for bad times.
 
The Indians lost because they got violent, actually. They were the ones who first attacked Whites to drive them out, and got crushed as a result. Today Whites have no need for violence. They just need to actually stand up to their women, and have families again.
The Indians were violent towards the whites for the same reason they were violent towards each other. They had a stone age culture with a warrior ethos. Every man was a warrior, and their primary self image and community status were based on how good a warrior they were. Attacking white people was a fundamental instinct, no different than the fundamental drive to attack other Indians.
 
Lots of arrogant, grandiose delusions of American superiority here, probably from people who think guns are useful in modern combat. A recap of what's being pumped daily, covid style in Spanish language media & for the world to see.
If you don't think conventional weapons are useful in modern combat that I don't know what to tell you.

Are you a veteran and have you ever served in a combat theater ? In the last decade?

Conventional munitions are never going away and surgical strikes like I mentioned will continue to be utilized on high priority targets and high pay off targets.

Panama - USA vessels WILL NOT freely transit the canal & the Chinese WILL REMAIN IN CONTROL of the ports. Why? Because the Panama Canal IS NOT AMERICAN, NOR WILL IT BE.

Mexico - USA WILL NOT conduct any action (including airstrikes) without prior Mexican approval. For that, US ACTS AGAINST OC FIRST domestically.

Colombia - US deportation flights have continued to Colombia BUT ALL COLOMBIAN CITIZENS MUST NOT WEAR HANDCUFFS NOR SHACKLES. The US government respects this decision & Petro has cancelled all American oil projects in Colombia & called for a union state with Venezuela.


Who cares. They re out and thsts really all we give a shit about.

Booo hoo - Columbia project loss. Meh green jacket gold jacket who gives a shit ...

Maybe you've heard of Guyana and Suriname. They make Venezuela and Columbia quite less appealing. Not sure you're speaking from an informed opinion on the Oil and Gas sector here.




Never mind all the deals going on in Guyana. Which prompted Chevrons attrempt to buy Hess and the lawsuit between them and the other partners in the region.

Trump nor Rubio have responded to any of this.

Many of you are probably too young to know what it looks like when American leaders make credible threats of violence they can act on, but it looks nothing like what Trump is doing & his bluff was quickly called.
Really? Seems like what he's doing is working.

Methinks the opposite of what you're saying is occuring.

Deportations, I don't even think they've achieved Obama numbers & already ran out of resources, 2 weeks into "the largest deportation operation in history", lol. Camera loving, makeup wearing, Top vlogger in chief Tom Homan, will surely fix that.

To date very few, if anyone, has been actually fired from the government just as the vast majority of goods from China continue to flow untarriffed. Because all of this is theatrics & 95% (maybe more) of the US political class is broke & irrelevant today, as such, US politics is irrelevant.
Factually in corrct. Many firings. The best firings. They'll continue to be fired and we should all rejoice.

Have you actually been paying attention to the USAID discussion?


US is at a historical weak point, it's now a drug addict/faggot/whore country with more in common with opium addicted China living it's "century of humiliation" or alcohol addicted Russia when it lost ~30% of it's territory to the Germans. In both cases, estimated ~10% of general population & ~30% of adult male population were addicts, just like in the US today. Govs supplied the masses with alcohol & opium in these years, just as the US gov sells you & your family fentanyl & pills & historically it's the catalyst for bad times.
Cool it Grandpa.

You seemed a bit unhinged.

If US politics is irrelevant than why would we even be posting about it and seeing the impacts globally we are seeing?

Where are you from? Just curious for more context for your outlook... Reads Like someone from Europe.
 
Last edited:
I often hesitate to engage the illeterate, but here goes...
If you don't think conventional weapons are useful in modern combat that I don't know what to tell you.

Are you a veteran and have you ever served in a combat theater ? In the last decade?

Conventional munitions are never going away and surgical strikes like I mentioned will continue to be utilized on high priority targets and high pay off targets.

Forward observation, snipers & even artillery crews have largely been automated & replaced & the US military (which is nothing more than a welfare apparatus now) would need complete reform just as the Russians, Ukrainian, Chinese, etc are doing but it's not going to happen. Who's the most lethal single man/small team in modern combat? It's no longer the sniper, it's the FPV operator/crew (which often no longer carry guns nor grenades). How many does the US have? None. US doesn't even produce drones. You've got new companies like Anduril (look at Anduril's weapons menu, roadrunner, barracuda, etc - it's nothing conventional) which are poised to "disrupt the defense industry", ie the big 4 contractors, but they do not scale anywhere near to Russia, Chinese or Ukrainian capacity & currently they're tiny, irrelevant companies.

I know, I saw that heroic strike of like 2 or 3 jihadis in the hisotrically strategic Somali mountains that are so important to the US. Man, we really need the Somali mountains. We all talk so much about the Somali mountains. Such an important "combat theater". Mr Trump is obviously fearless. It's definately not like the US is too weak to open up the Red Sea/Suez... definately not that....

Factually in corrct. Many firings. The best firings. They'll continue to be fired and we should all rejoice.

Have you actually been paying attention to the USAID discussion?

As per your article, it's a whole 200 people fired thus far, which is nothing. You proved my point. Again, this is media theatrics for a drug addicted, illiterate population. I know you think it's funny & a large part of your existence is to "own da libs hhahehe!!1"., but "the libs", that's your neighbors, brothers & sisters, they're identical to you & celebrating their actual despair/hardship of hard firings as 100's of 1000's employees move into government housing would mean you can't walk public spaces in peace, which is why it won't happen.

If you want to talk oilngas, I can do that, but my point wasn't that it's significant just that Petro is slapping around US companies for fun, proving the histroic Monroe Doctrine is over.

Where am I from? It's irrelevant, but Same place you claim to be from, hoss. Bornnbred in the petrochemical corridor, started my career in oilngass bidness under one of the most legendary oilmen Texas ever knew, breathing flared hydrocarbons when you were in diapers, when it was still a profitable industry. When daddy Bush & Clinton were taking countries like Napoleon, our tools were used in exploration & production so I understand what credible threats look from a nation state look like as I profited from them (they're very polite & always followed by action) & why Trump's threats are theatrics for the demoralized, humilliated & unwashed masses.

I'm guessing you clean tanks in east Houston, but if you worked downstream you'd know Oilngas bidness never recovered from '08, you should well know in our area alone something like 10 refineries are shutdown since 2020 & they're opening up battery plants (although lazy American drug addict chemists are largely too inexperienced/incompetent to make them productive). Hydrocarbons are irrelevant, not worth discussion & certainly no longer part of foreign policy. If you know so much about Guyana, you'd know the oilmen there have said it's the last time in history it'll happen.

I'll say it for the 3rd time, Trumps theatrics achieved nothing, the Chinese aren't going anywhere in Panama, this is being pumped out covid style in Spanish language press from Panama, they'll be audited by Panamian firms & that's it. US has 0 leverage over Panama, yes they import nearly all their food but Brazil dominates food production & Lula has already said they'd fully support Panama & US has no right to dictate anything.
 
Many of you are probably too young to know what it looks like when....

old-man-cloud-HD.jpg


Where am I from? It's irrelevant, but Same place you claim to be from, hoss. Bornnbred in the petrochemical corridor, started my career in oilngass bidness under one of the most legendary oilmen Texas ever knew, breathing flared hydrocarbons when you were in diapers, when it was still a profitable industry. When daddy Bush & Clinton were taking countries like Napoleon...


giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Today Whites have no need for violence. They just need to actually stand up to their women, and have families again.
That’s any oxymoronic statement.

When a woman can divorce you and take your kids and all of your belongings, at any time and for any reason, with the full backing of the state’s “resources” to act coercively and violently, you aren’t going to be able to just “stand up” to an errant woman without some kind of force.

And when that same state will protect the woman’s bad behavior and throw you into prison and take away your kids and any rights you may think you have if you so much as raise your voice (yes, this can constitute domestic abuse if she claims she felt threatened - so can taking things away from her, calling her a name she doesn’t like, etc), let alone a fist, you aren’t going to be using any sort of force unless you plan on a last hurrah. And that would mean you lose your kids anyway (and they lose you), doesn’t it?

You aren’t going to politely argue a spoiled and delusional Western woman into submission with assertiveness and good points, or a display of gentle, Christlike humility for that matter. That’s like thinking you’re going to get little children to obey you with sound reasoning and rhetoric rather than discipline. In fact that’s how women think, which is why they hate it when anyone disciplines children. Because they are children, and children need discipline to mature into productive adults.

What scenario do you think is going to be a bigger motivation to a spoiled brat to behave?

A) “I can do whatever I want without any consequences but I really respect that guy so I guess I’ll do what he says;” or

B)”I really want to act out but I might wind up broke or in a dumpster?”

We’re all living in option A. Option B is what is referred to as “civilization.”
 
I often hesitate to engage the illeterate, but here goes...


Forward observation, snipers & even artillery crews have largely been automated & replaced & the US military (which is nothing more than a welfare apparatus now) would need complete reform just as the Russians, Ukrainian, Chinese, etc are doing but it's not going to happen. Who's the most lethal single man/small team in modern combat? It's no longer the sniper, it's the FPV operator/crew (which often no longer carry guns nor grenades). How many does the US have? None. US doesn't even produce drones. You've got new companies like Anduril (look at Anduril's weapons menu, roadrunner, barracuda, etc - it's nothing conventional) which are poised to "disrupt the defense industry", ie the big 4 contractors, but they do not scale anywhere near to Russia, Chinese or Ukrainian capacity & currently they're tiny, irrelevant companies.

I know, I saw that heroic strike of like 2 or 3 jihadis in the hisotrically strategic Somali mountains that are so important to the US. Man, we really need the Somali mountains. We all talk so much about the Somali mountains. Such an important "combat theater". Mr Trump is obviously fearless. It's definately not like the US is too weak to open up the Red Sea/Suez... definately not that....
Yes illiterate I am. But I do love the taste of crayons.


I was an Artillery Officer in the Marine Corps as recent as 6 years ago and I guarantee you, having deployed overseas and taught at the school house that I'm more knowledge able than you on this from deployment and first hand experience in fire support, fires planning, fires execution, targeting and served with multiple maneuver units.

Please don't lecture me as though I'm a neophyte sir. You're sundowners is coming out.



As per your article, it's a whole 200 people fired thus far, which is nothing. You proved my point. Again, this is media theatrics for a drug addicted, illiterate population. I know you think it's funny & a large part of your existence is to "own da libs hhahehe!!1"., but "the libs", that's your neighbors, brothers & sisters, they're identical to you & celebrating their actual despair/hardship of hard firings as 100's of 1000's employees move into government housing would mean you can't walk public spaces in peace, which is why it won't happen.

If you want to talk oilngas, I can do that, but my point wasn't that it's significant just that Petro is slapping around US companies for fun, proving the histroic Monroe Doctrine is over.
I reject that your assessment is accurate. Simply put sir, I don't believe this is a major impact and irrelevant.
Where am I from? It's irrelevant, but Same place you claim to be from, hoss. Bornnbred in the petrochemical corridor, started my career in oilngass bidness under one of the most legendary oilmen Texas ever knew, breathing flared hydrocarbons when you were in diapers, when it was still a profitable industry. When daddy Bush & Clinton were taking countries like Napoleon, our tools were used in exploration & production so I understand what credible threats look from a nation state look like as I profited from them (they're very polite & always followed by action) & why Trump's threats are theatrics for the demoralized, humilliated & unwashed masses.

I'm guessing you clean tanks in east Houston, but if you worked downstream you'd know Oilngas bidness never recovered from '08, you should well know in our area alone something like 10 refineries are shutdown since 2020 & they're opening up battery plants (although lazy American drug addict chemists are largely too inexperienced/incompetent to make them productive). Hydrocarbons are irrelevant, not worth discussion & certainly no longer part of foreign policy. If you know so much about Guyana, you'd know the oilmen there have said it's the last time in history it'll happen.

Your above comments about hydrocarbons being dead is directly contradictory to what the super majors are doing.

Like you literally don't know what you're talking. Go read the 30 year plans from CBC/BP/XOM/Shell ECT.

They are all forecasting hydrocarbon continued use over the next 50 years and there is not sufficient energy infrastructure to transition to alternative forms globally or US specifically.

Wrong again batman. Worked in both downstream and upstream. I worked refinery support for a period and am well aware of our refinery infrastructure. After that it's been upstream at global companies.

Your above says nothing to refute the international play and merely talks about your experience with refining... And doesn't refute neither Jack nor Shit!


I'll say it for the 3rd time, Trumps theatrics achieved nothing, the Chinese aren't going anywhere in Panama, this is being pumped out covid style in Spanish language press from Panama, they'll be audited by Panamian firms & that's it. US has 0 leverage over Panama, yes they import nearly all their food but Brazil dominates food production & Lula has already said they'd fully support Panama & US has no right to dictate anything.
I think all the above remains to be seen until you're proven correct.
 
Last edited:
That’s any oxymoronic statement.

When a woman can divorce you and take your kids and all of your belongings, at any time and for any reason, with the full backing of the state’s “resources” to act coercively and violently, you aren’t going to be able to just “stand up” to an errant woman without some kind of force.

And when that same state will protect the woman’s bad behavior and throw you into prison and take away your kids and any rights you may think you have if you so much as raise your voice (yes, this can constitute domestic abuse if she claims she felt threatened - so can taking things away from her, calling her a name she doesn’t like, etc), let alone a fist, you aren’t going to be using any sort of force unless you plan on a last hurrah. And that would mean you lose your kids anyway (and they lose you), doesn’t it?

You aren’t going to politely argue a spoiled and delusional Western woman into submission with assertiveness and good points, or a display of gentle, Christlike humility for that matter. That’s like thinking you’re going to get little children to obey you with sound reasoning and rhetoric rather than discipline. In fact that’s how women think, which is why they hate it when anyone disciplines children. Because they are children, and children need discipline to mature into productive adults.

What scenario do you think is going to be a bigger motivation to a spoiled brat to behave?

A) “I can do whatever I want without any consequences but I really respect that guy so I guess I’ll do what he says;” or

B)”I really want to act out but I might wind up broke or in a dumpster?”

We’re all living in option A. Option B is what is referred to as “civilization.”

I don't think it's something the "state" can fix. This is a cultural thing, divorcing or being unmarried and childless should be taboo and shamed. That's how it is in my culture, on my dad's side of the family I am the black sheep because I am the one that isn't married yet and everyone comes down on me for it. We don't have a single divorce because divorce isn't an option....mind you my dad has 10 siblings we have a massive family tree. When someone in my culture gets a divorce it's a massive shame to their family and they are afraid to ever show their faces in church.

It used to be this way in all Christian cultures, including every Christian culture here in the USA.
 
Back
Top