Donald Trump and US expansionism in North America

Where are we falling behind Russia and China?
Since we're talking about Greenald, this means rare earth elements. And when it comes to this, we are indeed lagging behind.
China has cornered the rare earths market having both: the largest deposits and production numbers. And while Russian production numbers are low, they rank 4th when it comes to reserves, and they're increasing these numbers - just a few days ago they captured one of the largest lithium deposits in Europe.
Meanwhile we're the complete opposite of Russia - low reserves, but high production numbers. In the long run it's untenable. And that's where Greenland comes into play with rare earth deposits estimated to be the same size as American. So if we could acquire Greenland, or at least strongarm Denmark into granting us concessions, we would double our reserves.

Rare-Earth-Elements.jpg
 
Last edited:

Full text:
Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino issued a firm rebuke of Trump’s inauguration speech, rejecting any suggestion that the U.S. has influence over the Panama Canal.
“The Canal is and will continue to be under Panamanian control with permanent neutrality. No nation interferes with its administration”. Mulino emphasized that the Canal was not a concession but the result of generational struggles, warning that Panama will defend its sovereignty.
Source: Panama Gov Press Release
 
I've spoken to a Panamanian before, he told me the government of Panama was insanely corrupt, and prices were sky high in Panama. The government stole most of the funds generated by the Canal, while the people went without.

The canal is falling into disrepair, and because dollars are constantly hoarded by the upper class, they can afford to buy the nicest things imported from all over the world, which causes the cost of consumer goods there to skyrocket.

However, he told me one upside was that land was cheap and rents were much lower there than in America. But it didn't matter because the average income of a Panamanian was much lower than in America.

In short, Panama might actually be better off if Americans reclaimed the canal. From what he told me, it doesn't sound very good there now.
 
Panama has significant selfie-stick deaths, lots of girls falling from 40 or 50 plus high-rise residencies just to get those dopamine hits. Although, India is number one in that arena. On the other hand, the Panamanian people hate the LGBBQWTF crowd and they actively try to "breed Whiter" like most Hispano-Iberic colonies tended to do. The barrios are filled with the usual Aztec suspects who commit nearly all of the crime. Most Banana Republic governments are a joke and corrupt, the only guy who made one less corrupt recently is that half-Arab guy in El Salvador. For as much as jackbootism is bad for America, they need to go into westside Chicago and east LA and round up all the jogger and latin gangs in the same way, or have the military smoke them out.

With Greenland it's more about extracting resources than "national security" there are incredible deposits of rare earth minerals there just waiting to be exploited:

https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/...atteries and other technological applications.
 
Funny thing about American territorial claims to Greenland. Last night I watched a movie called Against the Ice with Nikolaj Coster-Waldau and Charles Dance (Jaime Lannister and Tywin Lannister from GoT, respectively). Based on the true story of a Danish Greenland expedition to recover notes and maps from an earlier, ill-fated Danish expedition from the early 1900's. Apparently, American Robert Peary had explored NE Greenland and thought there was a channel that separated a chunk of land from the main landmass. This expedition proved it untrue, debunking American geographical claims to Greenland.

For what it's worth...
 
Funny thing about American territorial claims to Greenland. Last night I watched a movie called Against the Ice with Nikolaj Coster-Waldau and Charles Dance (Jaime Lannister and Tywin Lannister from GoT, respectively). Based on the true story of a Danish Greenland expedition to recover notes and maps from an earlier, ill-fated Danish expedition from the early 1900's. Apparently, American Robert Peary had explored NE Greenland and thought there was a channel that separated a chunk of land from the main landmass. This expedition proved it untrue, debunking American geographical claims to Greenland.

For what it's worth...
Stop being a commie.

It's ours
 
Two videos. One taken before T's inauguration, one after. In the first video Sheinbaum (who's been straightening her jewfro since decades) tries to clown amd troll around by calling previous Spanish dominions America Mexicana therefore alluding they are Mexican clay. In the second one Sheinbaum calls Mexicans in favor of the US dismantling the cartels traitors.





Trump on the matter of using the US military to eliminate the cartel infrastructure in Mexico.

 
Options for the Panama Canal:
1. Panama cancels the deal it has with the Hong Kong based Hutchison Holdings, for the management of Balboa and Cristobal ports, and grants a new contract to an American company.
2. A land lease deal between US and Panama, where the whole canal area goes under American control in exchange for profit sharing and US investments into local infrastructure.
3. Military intervention.
 

I've seen reports that something like 10% of Canadians would support annexation into the USA. This Wikipedia article puts the percentages at anywhere between 7% and 20% in the current century:


Even those small percentages surprise me. I'd be interested to hear if any of the Canadian guys on the forum ever here anyone on their side of the border talking positively about joining the US. I've never encountered this, even among Canadians who have a very positive opinion of the US.

Even if there were more support for annexation on the Canadian side, thinking about it rationally, I don't see how it would be beneficial to the US. I mean that mainly in the sense that I view Canadian moderates as basically the same as American liberals, so we'd essentially be adding tens of millions of "woke" liberal voters, not to mention all the Indians and other third worlders Canada has imported under Trudeau.
 
I've seen reports that something like 10% of Canadians would support annexation into the USA. This Wikipedia article puts the percentages at anywhere between 7% and 20% in the current century:


Even those small percentages surprise me. I'd be interested to hear if any of the Canadian guys on the forum ever here anyone on their side of the border talking positively about joining the US. I've never encountered this, even among Canadians who have a very positive opinion of the US.

Even if there were more support for annexation on the Canadian side, thinking about it rationally, I don't see how it would be beneficial to the US. I mean that mainly in the sense that I view Canadian moderates as basically the same as American liberals, so we'd essentially be adding tens of millions of "woke" liberal voters, not to mention all the Indians and other third worlders Canada has imported under Trudeau.
I’m often guilty of broad generalizations myself but when I read a comment like yours I realize that I shouldn’t always be. Part of it is that you only get exposed to a certain narrative, but understand that Canada is a huge country with diverse mindsets and there are a lot of very based salt of the earth rural people along with the liberals. The generalization of Canada being liberal has been blown out of proportion the last eight years or so as we’ve been dragged down into a hellhole by a globalist new world order minion. A lot of people are waking up and we’re likely to see a conservative landslide next election just as America did, although things are harder to predict now that the great white north has been invaded by the Southern Hemisphere.

As for your questions - most importantly America would get access to Canadas vast natural resources, which are pretty much the catalyst to Canadas prosperity in the past but haven’t been capitalized on lately because Canadians interests have been subverted by our globalist government.
To this day Canadian mining companies are some of the biggest in the world and operate all over the world because they became so profitable extracting Canadian resources. There are still a lot of those metals in the ground they just aren’t being explored to the same degree anymore for a variety of reasons, mostly political and some logistical. Plus there’s our oil and natural gas, timber, farmland, potash/fertilizer, coal, electricity ect.

Would I support becoming American? Probably not. I would rather fix Canada… or rather I think Canada is lost at this point but I think a heartening future is for like minded Canadians to carve out their own areas and start fresh.
While I would welcome some parts of being American - property and self defence rights, free speech, the right to bear arms, lower cost of living, higher wages to name a few.
There are some drawbacks that would probably be deal breakers for me - mostly your incarceration industry, overzealous and over powerful IRS who imprisons people for not paying their slave dues, your expensive medical and medical insurance industry - off the top of my head.

It really is a tragedy what has happened to Canada over the last ten or fifteen years. When I grew up in the 80’s and 90’s Canada was a bright, prosperous, homogenous trust based society with a low cost of living. It’s astounding how quickly that has changed, but it doesn’t make me want to join another country. It makes me want to start again and rebuild, and ‘it can happen because it must happen!’ … can we get a Roman salute emoji on here?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top