Daily Stormer & Andrew Anglin Thread

do not insult (calling others women)
RedLagoon said:
He might have started a family bozo
Click to expand...
My understanding is that he does have one. I believe he has talked about it in some articles here and there. In any case, that's not the reason he's quitting the daily news. He stated that the censorship makes it completely impossible for him to grow his audience any further, so he's just writing for people who've been reading him for years, who are already in the know. This means right now he's basically just an entertainer, writing funny articles for people who already know the truth.

He wants to spread the truth to a wider audience, and he thinks other projects would let him do that, but doing reporting on the daily news is too much of a time sink and it keeps him from getting into those other projects.

RedLagoon said:
Obviously something you're not too aware of.
Click to expand...
Get your T levels checked. You argue like a woman. I'm not trying to be snarky, I mean it genuinely. This is not something a healthy man would think to post in this context. Suddenly questioning the interlocutor's reproductive success in a completely unrelated discussion is something women do all the time. It's not normal behavior from a man.

"Heh, I have sex, and babies, bet you don't even know what that is, huhuhu"

Wow, you really got me there, I don't have kids in my early 20's, I bet you had a small army at my age. That's great, you're so fecund, congratulations. But we're talking about Andrew Anglin. Please focus.
 
Last edited:

I Can’t Produce Anything Interesting Right Now - Daily Stormer

The level of burnout I'm experiencing has only now become obvious to me. Working for 60-80 hours a w
dailystormer.in dailystormer.in

This feels like the end of an era. Andrew Anglin, who is genuinely a hero of mine, is now old and tired. Part of me hopes he keeps making new things, not necessarily articles but perhaps a podcast, a book or something of the sort. I think I still have a lot I could learn from him. But maybe he's ready to just focus on his own personal life now, and maybe it's for the best.

He says he has projects in his personal life that he can't talk about but which bring him money and are a lot more interesting to him than being the most censored man on the internet and shouting into a void.

Everyone is allowed to notice the Jews on X now, but somehow he's not. He's still banned, inexplicably. Other people are making lots of money talking about Jews, but not him. People like Fuentes say many of the same things he says, but somehow they don't have their domains and their access to CDN services taken away, while Anglin does. You are allowed to promote Fuentes on X, but links to the Stormer are still banned. You can't even send them to people through DMs. Everyone is allowed to have reach except Anglin. He has been forgotten and can no longer have much of an impact at all.

He says he might write a book. I doubt he would be able to find a publisher, but he has talked about how he could just post the PDF/EPUB file and let people spread it online. Maybe he's onto something with that.
 
Last edited:
Unending Powerhouse Match said:
Everyone is allowed to notice the Jews on X now, but somehow he's not. He's still banned, inexplicably. Other people are making lots of money talking about Jews, but not him. People like Fuentes say many of the same things he says, but somehow they don't have their domains and their access to CDN services taken away, while Anglin does. You are allowed to promote Fuentes on X, but links to the Stormer are still banned. You can't even send them to people through DMs. Everyone is allowed to have reach except Anglin. He has been forgotten and can no longer have much of an impact at all.
Click to expand...

That's the difference between controlled opposition and genuine opposition.
 
The most recent Memetic Monday (the first in a few months, as far as I can tell) has a quite interesting rambling essay, as we've learned to appreciate in the last moments of his daily news posting.

I can't remember him quoting the Bible that often in earlier times, it definitely seems that his views took a sharp Christian turn. Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks to me that he got much closer to God through fasting & praying recently. Feel free to check it out, it's a good read. https://dailystormer.in/memetic-monday-you-can-thank-the-man-who-invented-memes-for-this/

As a little tack-on, this paragraph strongly reminds me of Dostoevsky & the whole reflection in Demons about morality without God.
If I didn’t believe in God, I wouldn’t risk anything to do the right thing. Frankly, if I didn’t believe in God, I would act like Lenin or Pol Pot, and I don’t think there is anything wackier than “Jew atheists” like Sam Harris and the “Weinstein brothers” saying “even though God doesn’t exist we should all act like he does.” If I didn’t believe in God, there would be rape and murder and a lot worse, because it is just basic common sense that if you don’t believe in God, the only thing that matters is power.
Click to expand...

In another somewhat recent article he mentioned he lurks in some internet communities to get an idea of people's response to his articles. Well, Andrew, if you're reading this, you have my support. May God give you guidance.
 

If You “Don’t Pick a Side” in the Israel vs. Islam Conflict, You’re Siding with the Jews - Daily Stormer

There is a supposedly edgy take on the whole Middle East conflict that goes something like:
dailystormer.in dailystormer.in

This Israel thing seems to have destroyed him.

This is how powerful liberalism is. You even have Anglin convinced, absolutely fanatical that you have to take some kind of moral stance on a subject. While at the same time claiming that there’s no material benefit to him continuing the site.

Imagine believing that we have some kind of moral duty towards our enemies yet we shouldn’t let them migrate here because it’s too problematic. What kind of white nationalism is this?

Another internet chapter comes to an end.

So many years of common sense articles.
 
Sandalwood Peak said:

If You “Don’t Pick a Side” in the Israel vs. Islam Conflict, You’re Siding with the Jews - Daily Stormer

There is a supposedly edgy take on the whole Middle East conflict that goes something like:
dailystormer.in dailystormer.in

This Israel thing seems to have destroyed him.

This is how powerful liberalism is. You even have Anglin convinced, absolutely fanatical that you have to take some kind of moral stance on a subject. While at the same time claiming that there’s no material benefit to him continuing the site.

Imagine believing that we have some kind of moral duty towards our enemies yet we shouldn’t let them migrate here because it’s too problematic. What kind of white nationalism is this?

Another internet chapter comes to an end.

So many years of common sense articles.
Click to expand...

Huh?

Here’s the problem: if you are living in a Western country, it does involve you, because it is your tax money that is paying for the Jews to kill all these people.
Click to expand...

He's not wrong, he's pointing out that we should call out Israel as the antagonists here. I like many conservatives here have finally got to say "I told you so" about the evil Jews to people who are only now all too willing to listen.
 
Valentine said:
Huh?

He's not wrong, he's pointing out that we should call out Israel as the antagonists here. I like many conservatives here have finally got to say "I told you so" about the evil Jews to people who are only now all too willing to listen.
Click to expand...

I don't perceive this as arguing a point. He's lashing out on what appears to be white nationalists who say they don't care. Not the first time he's done so if you read him. He has consistently thrown support behind anyone supporting the Palestinians. Doesn't matter who it was, Greta Thunberg, he always approved with a long article. Sometimes it felt out of mockery towards his readers, because they're stupid and don't get it. His justifications for this behavior is that this is the moment we're all been waiting for, everyone knows the jews are evil now, this is greatest thing to ever happened.

He also states that the "antisemites" getting locked up or deported are a precedent to kill white people in the future. No one actually supports these antisemite laws or actions though.

What he fails to grasp is "indifference" towards the Jews, and the powers that be, is what gives people the ability to even criticize them. It is precisely the people that don't care that can see the Jews for what they are.

There's people who care about the Jews. These people are quiet as a church mouse as we can see.

Lastly there's people who care about the Palestinians, like Anglin apparently. Most of these people are not in Palestine. Lo and behold, I can't actually do anything for the actual Palestinians. It's almost like there's some kind of geographical obstacle for starters. It's like the laws of physics are trying to tell me something is not my business. The only thing I can do is throw my hat in with the Global Intifada people in the west, like Anglin does. As Anglin has clearly explained already in a democracy there's no such thing as petitioning the government. He must of forgot. Not sure how he expects me to petition the government stop funding Israel.

Turns out that these Intifada people are just anti-white faggots and muslims [redundant] who think white colonialists are killing brown people in the desert.

By supporting them I'm not actually resurrecting dead babies in Palestine, nor am I shooting a loaf of bread into the mouth of a hungry grandma. When I support these people I'm just empowering them, giving them importance and social approval so they could continue their anti-white activities into the future.

So no I don't care or support these Palestinians because it's not my problem, I don't like them and I'm not in charge of foreign aid.

Anybody who wants to be a good Christian can pray that the Palestinians stop provoking jewish wrath and learn to live in a multicultural utopia with the jews, or just do what the jews tell them to do to prevent more death.
 
vasalatlaning said:
I can't remember him quoting the Bible that often in earlier times, it definitely seems that his views took a sharp Christian turn. Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks to me that he got much closer to God through fasting & praying recently. Feel free to check it out, it's a good read.
Click to expand...
It's been a gradual development. He still kinda seems like a neophyte. I guess there's this effect where when smart guys with wide worldview accept Christianity, and then start thinking they mastered it because they feel like they have more puzzle pieces than anything else. I'm guilty of that myself, but after 5 years as a baptized Orthodox, my attitude changed a little bit.

Andrew is smart, probably much smarter than me, but like many smart guys, he developed some serious chips on his shoulder over the years than he can't seem to move past. And his thoughts on Christianity seem to have stagnated a little bit throughout the past 2 years, at least from my reading of his articles (I do read all of them, though). His knowledge of a wide range of literature, including Dostoevsky, has always been there, but never fully integrated with his growing spiritual feelings.

His frustration about the futility of day-to-day politics and activism in general is also something I saw in myself for a while. But I think it's just one of those things where God wants you to unlearn certain things, get completely turned off by them, only so that you get back into it later with a less cynical and more Christian attitude.
 
Sandalwood Peak said:
Anybody who wants to be a good Christian can pray that the Palestinians stop provoking jewish wrath and learn to live in a multicultural utopia with the jews, or just do what the jews tell them to do to prevent more death.
Click to expand...

Anybody minding their own business unintentionally provokes Jewish wrath through their hysterical insecurity. Whites were willing to let these parasites in their nations throughout history yet Jews are persistent in their subversion and get themselves kicked out constantly.

Even if you do exact what Jews want - be gay! No wait, be transsexual! Even better, turn YOUR KIDS transsexual! In fact, let us rape and traffic your kids! - you're still going to suffer the multitude of Jewish horrors such as your wages being garnished to fund genocide/faggots/chemtrails/infectious viruses/etc, your sperm being destroyed and body filled with microplastics and estrogen, your culture and identity and history being attacked, etc etc.

There's no winning with these psychos, and the only way we're going to have a chance to kill their "special relationship" with America and most of the world is by agreeing and amplifying every horror they commit against any group, and that rhetoric will eventually grow a large enough mass of population that are willing to say "fuck the Jews" that might actually be able to make a difference.
 
Valentine said:
There's no winning with these psychos, and the only way we're going to have a chance to kill their "special relationship" with America and most of the world is by agreeing and amplifying every horror they commit against any group, and that rhetoric will eventually grow a large enough mass of population that are willing to say "fuck the Jews" that might actually be able to make a difference.
Click to expand...

You can't make people hate the Jews forever as history teaches us.

The Gaza War has been terrible publicity for Israel. I feel it has been bad for a number of reasons.

First of all morality. People in 2025 are not in the bomb the kids kind of mood. They see the destruction, they don't like it. Unfortunately, the red pill space can't claim credit for this. Some people fanned the flames perhaps but like every social development there's a runaway effect because the normies are on their own time. Bombing and trying to ethnically cleanse people tends to raise some eyebrows in modern universal neoliberal morality.

Rightfully people are asking some good questions nowadays like why does America love glazing the jews. I'm not sure if this will have political ramifications, but it will definitely have social ones.

I'm not really against you "amplifying" anything but it's strange to conflate the Gaza War with trannies, anti-whiteness, feminism, etc. The normies are not going to connect those things together because it's not on their radar.

The problem I have with simping for Palestinians, if that's what you think people should be doing, is the moral framework you would be promoting.

Let's trying to be neutral for a second and look at the greater picture of what exactly we're opposing here.
  1. Muslims showed up, and basically claimed the land, like they love to do. This happened a long time ago to their credit.
  2. The Jews came back and want to get rid of them.
I don't really see a problem here. Their methods might be brutal but they're sovereign. They're doing what's in their interest. Kind of like what white people should be doing.

Now obviously the leftists believe the Jews should just live happily with the brown people. Essentially the leftist sees Israel as a racist oppressor.

Can someone explain to me what is the middle ground here? What do you think the Jews should be doing?
 
Sandalwood Peak said:
The problem I have with simping for Palestinians, if that's what you think people should be doing, is the moral framework you would be promoting.

Let's trying to be neutral for a second and look at the greater picture of what exactly we're opposing here.
  1. Muslims showed up, and basically claimed the land, like they love to do. This happened a long time ago to their credit.
  2. The Jews came back and want to get rid of them.
I don't really see a problem here. Their methods might be brutal but they're sovereign. They're doing what's in their interest. Kind of like what white people should be doing.

Now obviously the leftists believe the Jews should just live happily with the brown people. Essentially the leftist sees Israel as a racist oppressor.

Can someone explain to me what is the middle ground here? What do you think the Jews should be doing?
Click to expand...

The moral framework of "don't ethnically cleanse an indigenous people just because you gypsies now want a permanent ethnostate"?

Whites have recognised the evilness of kind of behaviour and are repaying natives in America and Canada in various ways. Yet Israel is doing this in the modern era and much of the American Right cheer it on.

What Jews should instead do is use their vast collective wealth to buy land wherever they want to settle. It's how they've taken over places like Brooklyn in NY. But being Jews, they'd rather hoard their wealth and it's much cheaper to kill the inhabitants than it is to pay them a fair amount for their land.
 
Valentine said:
The moral framework of "don't ethnically cleanse an indigenous people just because you gypsies now want a permanent ethnostate"?

Whites have recognised the evilness of kind of behaviour and are repaying natives in America and Canada in various ways. Yet Israel is doing this in the modern era and much of the American Right cheer it on.

What Jews should instead do is use their vast collective wealth to buy land wherever they want to settle. It's how they've taken over places like Brooklyn in NY. But being Jews, they'd rather hoard their wealth and it's much cheaper to kill the inhabitants than it is to pay them a fair amount for their land.
Click to expand...

I’m familiar with your moral framework. I don’t know if it has a name but it’s very popular. Let’s call it the “Be Nice” morality. The morality that can’t solve a problem but it can always identify one. It’s very fluid, it doesn’t know where the lines are but it always knows when you’ve gone too far.

Whites did not actually atone for the wickedness of ethnic cleansing. The government did, somewhat. Given that you suggest this is a good thing, is atonement still required from white people?

Of course when we talk about ethnic cleansing, we have to define it. Is the cause of white flight a type of ethnic cleansing? Why is gentrification a quasi ethnic cleansing?

The Jews have made our moral condemnation easy. They bomb hospitals, they bomb food trucks. What if they had done what you propose, would that be moral? Is buying someone out moral? Does land given through birth have a price?

The Indians got some concessions but they’re still not happy. Being nice does not account for equity. As long as people have more than you, are in a better position than you, then they always could have done more. That is the ultimate flaw of such a moral system; the inherent inequality.

Point being you can always say something is not nice, but can you explain why it’s wrong?
 
Sandalwood Peak said:
The Jews have made our moral condemnation easy. They bomb hospitals, they bomb food trucks.
Click to expand...

Sandalwood Peak said:
Point being you can always say something is not nice, but can you explain why it’s wrong?
Click to expand...
Are you trolling? Does it have to be explained from first principles that the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent people is wrong?

The willingness - indeed, the eagerness - with which the Jews have engaged in the mass murder of Palestinians, and the degree to which they have intentionally targeted civilians (and particularly children) is completely unprecedented in the modern era. Even in ancient times this sort of barbarism was the exception rather than the rule. To make the matter even more reprehensible, the vast majority of Jews not only support and justify these crimes, but openly gloat about them, and celebrate the death and/or maiming of Palestinian children. This is a uniquely sadistic and deranged group of people, who can only be justly and accurately described as completely antichrist.
 
scorpion said:
Are you trolling? Does it have to be explained from first principles that the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent people is wrong?

The willingness - indeed, the eagerness - with which the Jews have engaged in the mass murder of Palestinians, and the degree to which they have intentionally targeted civilians (and particularly children) is completely unprecedented in the modern era. Even in ancient times this sort of barbarism was the exception rather than the rule. To make the matter even more reprehensible, the vast majority of Jews not only support and justify these crimes, but openly gloat about them, and celebrate the death and/or maiming of Palestinian children. This is a uniquely sadistic and deranged group of people, who can only be justly and accurately described as completely antichrist.
Click to expand...
That's a fair point. This is just a thought exercise.

So on the morality scale we have you at murder. You strongly condemn the murder of innocent people. That's your line in the sand.

@Valentine says that the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians is wrong because ethnic cleansing itself is evil. I asked him what they should do instead. He says they should buy the land. He also said that we can use this war as evidence they're evil. So we can red pill people on the fact that they're murderous, as you point out. We can also red pill people on the fact that they're ethnic cleansers as he points out. The bottom line is the jews are evil/immoral.

What I want to know is at what point do the actions of the Jews become immoral?

Maybe it's too philosophical but I think the question is merited. We're not just condemning the Jews for a crime of passion, people are claiming this is some kind of moment of truth about their character. If it's a moment of truth then the details are worth debating? No?

I understand you think it's stupid but if people are going to hate the jews for drinking water, then that's something I want to understand because I' m sort of a water connoisseur myself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top