Coronavirus Lounge
- Thread starter JR5
- Start date
Former Japanese Minister of Internal Affairs apologizes for pushing the vaxx. He's had cancer for the last year.
Does anyone know of any of the lawsuits coming down the pike that might start a chain reaction?
I saw a few recently that were re-initiated (Mayo), and University of Colorado appeal that deemed the mandate by the University illegal.
Still laughing at this video clip making the round. The guy behind Fauci cracked me up with his facial expressions.
Edit.
Edit.
Last edited:
Warning: Language.
Full text
Full text
Another win! According to Stand4Thee.com, an Ontario Court of Justice issued a ruling concerning the legitimacy of an order which was used to ticket people for refusing the PCR test! The following is a summary from the website.
The less fearful people are, the more likely they are to use their brains and challenge stupid orders. Keep the tyrants' feet to the fire!
The less fearful people are, the more likely they are to use their brains and challenge stupid orders. Keep the tyrants' feet to the fire!
Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan has enumerated the main points from Kansas Attorney General's lawsuit against Pfizer:
1. Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress, and omit material facts relating to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.
2. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data – the study was repeatedly delayed, including a delay from January 2023 to February 2024 because of a late vaccination of a single study participant (out of 44,000 participants).
3. The FDA did not immediately make the safety and effectiveness data for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine available, claiming it would take 55 years, but a federal judge forced them to release 55,000 pages per month rather than 500.
4. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group once the FDA approved emergency use authorization in December 2020.
5. In its press release announcing the emergency use authorization, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its COVID-19 vaccine trials.
6. Pfizer knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.
7. By March 2021, the United States military and Israel's Ministry of Health detected a safety signal for myocarditis.
8. In August 2021, after Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorization to provide its COVID-19 vaccine to 12-15-year-olds, Pfizer decided to study “how often” its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis in children by testing 5-16-year-olds for troponin I.
9. Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes. The FDA's and CDC's “surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and strokes in people aged 65 and over," and an FDA study found that individuals 85 years or older who received both a flu vaccine and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine “saw a 20% increase in the risk of ischemic stroke.”
10. Pfizer’s knowledge of a safety signal for increased fatalities. In February 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
11. Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 trial participants who were in the 65- to 85-year-old age range and did not test it on any participant older than 85.
12. Pfizer did not publicly release adverse event data from its database. By February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events from 42,086 case reports, including 1,223 fatalities, although Pfizer did not make causality findings. Pfizer was receiving so many adverse events reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “nonserious cases.” Pfizer did not know “the magnitude of under-reporting.
13. Pfizer announced a study on pregnant women but omitted the fact that more than one in ten women (52) who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination. Six women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported premature deliveries; several babies died.
14. Pfizer’s February 18th, 2021, press release also did not disclose other adverse effects on the reproductive systems of women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. By April 2022, Pfizer knew of tens of thousands of adverse advents connected to its COVID-19 vaccine, including heavy menstrual bleeding (27,685), menstrual disorders (22,145), irregular periods (15,083), delayed periods (13,989), absence of periods (11,363) and other reproductive system effects.
15. Pfizer’s study on pregnant women failed. They destroyed the placebo control group, and the results were kept secret.
16. Pfizer misrepresented and concealed material facts relating to the durability of protection provided by its COVID-19 vaccine.
17. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission even though it knew it had never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission.
18. Despite admissions by Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla and Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb that Pfizer did not know if its vaccine prevented transmission, Dr. Bourla warned Kansans on multiple occasions that not receiving a COVID-19 vaccine would affect the lives of those around them, thus implying that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission.
19. Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims. On July 19th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed social media companies had an “obligation” and an “affirmative responsibility” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on their platforms. Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla called people who spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.”
20. Pfizer worked to conceal and suppress material facts. On August 24th, 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb contacted Twitter to complain about a column written by Alex Berenson that criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci. On August 27th, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb had a conference call with Twitter employees to discuss Mr. Berenson. Twitter banned Mr. Berenson the next day. Dr. Gottlieb also contacted Twitter about removing posts related to natural immunity, which "Twitter later slapped with a misleading label and blocked the ability to like or share the tweet."
The full article is linked below:
1. Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress, and omit material facts relating to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.
2. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data – the study was repeatedly delayed, including a delay from January 2023 to February 2024 because of a late vaccination of a single study participant (out of 44,000 participants).
3. The FDA did not immediately make the safety and effectiveness data for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine available, claiming it would take 55 years, but a federal judge forced them to release 55,000 pages per month rather than 500.
4. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group once the FDA approved emergency use authorization in December 2020.
5. In its press release announcing the emergency use authorization, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its COVID-19 vaccine trials.
6. Pfizer knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.
7. By March 2021, the United States military and Israel's Ministry of Health detected a safety signal for myocarditis.
8. In August 2021, after Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorization to provide its COVID-19 vaccine to 12-15-year-olds, Pfizer decided to study “how often” its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis in children by testing 5-16-year-olds for troponin I.
9. Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes. The FDA's and CDC's “surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and strokes in people aged 65 and over," and an FDA study found that individuals 85 years or older who received both a flu vaccine and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine “saw a 20% increase in the risk of ischemic stroke.”
10. Pfizer’s knowledge of a safety signal for increased fatalities. In February 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
11. Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 trial participants who were in the 65- to 85-year-old age range and did not test it on any participant older than 85.
12. Pfizer did not publicly release adverse event data from its database. By February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events from 42,086 case reports, including 1,223 fatalities, although Pfizer did not make causality findings. Pfizer was receiving so many adverse events reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “nonserious cases.” Pfizer did not know “the magnitude of under-reporting.
13. Pfizer announced a study on pregnant women but omitted the fact that more than one in ten women (52) who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination. Six women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported premature deliveries; several babies died.
14. Pfizer’s February 18th, 2021, press release also did not disclose other adverse effects on the reproductive systems of women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. By April 2022, Pfizer knew of tens of thousands of adverse advents connected to its COVID-19 vaccine, including heavy menstrual bleeding (27,685), menstrual disorders (22,145), irregular periods (15,083), delayed periods (13,989), absence of periods (11,363) and other reproductive system effects.
15. Pfizer’s study on pregnant women failed. They destroyed the placebo control group, and the results were kept secret.
16. Pfizer misrepresented and concealed material facts relating to the durability of protection provided by its COVID-19 vaccine.
17. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission even though it knew it had never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission.
18. Despite admissions by Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla and Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb that Pfizer did not know if its vaccine prevented transmission, Dr. Bourla warned Kansans on multiple occasions that not receiving a COVID-19 vaccine would affect the lives of those around them, thus implying that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission.
19. Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims. On July 19th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed social media companies had an “obligation” and an “affirmative responsibility” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on their platforms. Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla called people who spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.”
20. Pfizer worked to conceal and suppress material facts. On August 24th, 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb contacted Twitter to complain about a column written by Alex Berenson that criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci. On August 27th, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb had a conference call with Twitter employees to discuss Mr. Berenson. Twitter banned Mr. Berenson the next day. Dr. Gottlieb also contacted Twitter about removing posts related to natural immunity, which "Twitter later slapped with a misleading label and blocked the ability to like or share the tweet."
The full article is linked below:
Tyson Foods lost a court case.
A magistrate judge will decide on the plaintiffs' damages. You may read the decision here:
A magistrate judge will decide on the plaintiffs' damages. You may read the decision here:
Last edited:
The Hal Turner (yes I know he's a federal informant) radio show mentioned a Portuguese appellate court ruling that the PCR test isn't a good diagnostic tool 
. From the court's ruling: "In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus."
EDIT
More news
. From the court's ruling: "In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus."EDIT
More news
Last edited:
Tanja Benton, a woman who refused her employer's demand that she submit to the covid-19 injections, won her lawsuit. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee. She was awarded $687,240.00 in damages.
You may read about the case here: https://fox17.com/news/local/woman-...employee-directive-fired-for-not-getting-shot
You may read about the case here: https://fox17.com/news/local/woman-...employee-directive-fired-for-not-getting-shot
Precedent has been set. Let's hope millions more people do this and bankrupt these demonic pharma companies.
It's amazing that BCBS of Tennessee thought they could get away with that - but also may have been just what the larger Blue Cross system and sick bureaucracy did or wanted.
When was it first filed? I see it said in the fox article that she worked "until November 2022" so she probably filed within a couple of months of that.
I'm not certain. Sorry.
In other covid news, Dr. Francis Boyle has sworn an affidavit claiming that the covid injections are bio-weapons. Some background on Dr. Boyle from his Wikipedia page:
"He received a Bachelor of Arts in political science from the University of Chicago in 1971. He earned a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1976 and Master of Arts and Doctor of Philosophy in political science from Harvard University in 1983. Boyle practiced tax and international tax law with Bingham, Dana & Gould."
Dr. Boyle doesn't have a background in science, but this is still nevertheless interesting as Dr. Boyle provided this affidavit as evidence in a Florida case. Dr. Joseph Sansone launched this case in the form of an Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus that seeks to compel Governor DeSantis to prohibit the distribution of ‘COVID 19 injections’, ‘COVID 19 nanoparticle injections’, and ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’, in the state of Florida. It also aims at compelling Attorney General Ashley Moody to confiscate the vials.
You can review his affidavit and additional details surrounding the court case via the following link:
EDIT
I'm assuming that this interview with Stew Peters is the one referenced in Dr. Boyle's affidavit.
https://www.bit chute.com/video/JOT6KVRxj3zy
Attachments
Last edited:
Doctors now have a chance to sue their regulatory boards for muzzling them during the scamdemic. Please read the excerpt below:
"The case was brought by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Education Foundation against the American Board of Internal Medicine, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American Board of Family Medicine and the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security over various situations in which those organizations threatened or actually acted against doctors because of what they said about COVID.
Their medical opinions essentially contradicted the government’s talking points about taking various experimental shots, which evidence now shows have been extremely damaging to thousands of people.
The challenge focused on the coordinated campaigns to “censor and chill the speech of physicians,” with special targeting of those who criticized the unfounded positions taken by White House adviser Anthony Fauci, lockdowns, masks and more.
A district judge had claimed that the AAPS “lacked standing,” but a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has reversed that dismissal. [emphasis mine]
It’s headed back to the lower courts for discovery, and potentially a full trial."
You may read the article in full here:
This, in addition to the other information posted recently, indicates a big shift away from blindly "trusting the science."
"The case was brought by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Education Foundation against the American Board of Internal Medicine, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American Board of Family Medicine and the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security over various situations in which those organizations threatened or actually acted against doctors because of what they said about COVID.
Their medical opinions essentially contradicted the government’s talking points about taking various experimental shots, which evidence now shows have been extremely damaging to thousands of people.
The challenge focused on the coordinated campaigns to “censor and chill the speech of physicians,” with special targeting of those who criticized the unfounded positions taken by White House adviser Anthony Fauci, lockdowns, masks and more.
A district judge had claimed that the AAPS “lacked standing,” but a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has reversed that dismissal. [emphasis mine]
It’s headed back to the lower courts for discovery, and potentially a full trial."
You may read the article in full here:
This, in addition to the other information posted recently, indicates a big shift away from blindly "trusting the science."
Yes, the case was filed in July 2022 in the Southern District of Texas.
There have been quite a few wins surrounding the scamdemic, and mandatory this and that, lately.