Charlie Kirk Thread

Well my point is the Troons and Nazis are bold enough to do crap like this as solo individuals. Usually Anti fa runs in mobs. Our guy didn’t even wear a mask. Charlie Kirk was a giant Zionist shill. I could see a Nat soc gunning down a “Jewish Puppet” I mean this guy mentioned he kept the sabbath. I understand why. Young dude my age picks up the Bible and it’s brilliant. I’ve fought with Pepe pagans over religion. They’d ask me to embrace the white gods while I’d be like Noooooooooo… “Jesus was brown” bleeh blah. So some Pepe pagan nazi I could see it. Troons - Weimar. Nazis were a reaction against the Troons. Now we’re in a weird era where the Jews have captured a certain Christian element.
When was the last time a Nazi went out and assassinated someone? I can't honestly think of it happening.

There have been many instances of far-left people doing individual attacks. School shootings, shooting at a 4th of July parade, etc. Most likely all of them were associated with an Anti-Fa group.
 
If someone sent you a link suggesting that it was just going to be a typical Charlie Kirk speech you'd be seeing, I agree that that's a bit much.

I still don't get why seeing a video of one guy shot to death traumatized you when this kind of thing and much worse happens daily all over the world, but I'm sorry you felt that way. I suppose seeing it makes a difference to some people in some way I fail to understand.
I don't like gore. I've seen lots of video clips of robbers getting shot and such, but those usually aren't gory. They just fall down, or maybe roll around moaning for a short while. I would never watch one of those beheading videos, or a video of someone's guts being blown wide open. I don't need to see that.

Also, the videos of criminals getting shot are men who are bad guys. I certainly would never want to see an innocent woman or child being turned into gore. That's awful!

People are designed to shy away from seeing such things. It takes a lot of desensitization to not be affected. That may be necessary for combat soldiers or paramedics, but I don't need to become desensitized to that kind of thing. I'm not interested in seeing it in movies either.
 
I don't like gore. I've seen lots of video clips of robbers getting shot and such, but those usually aren't gory. They just fall down, or maybe roll around moaning for a short while. I would never watch one of those beheading videos, or a video of someone's guts being blown wide open. I don't need to see that.

Also, the videos of criminals getting shot are men who are bad guys. I certainly would never want to see an innocent woman or child being turned into gore. That's awful!

People are designed to shy away from seeing such things. It takes a lot of desensitization to not be affected. That may be necessary for combat soldiers or paramedics, but I don't need to become desensitized to that kind of thing. I'm not interested in seeing it in movies either.
I would also suggest that the aftermath of the gore (stabbing, gunshot, etc) is less traumatic than the act of creating the gore (the actual penetration of the bullet or knife). I think most people in healthcare would attest to that.
 
When was the last time a Nazi went out and assassinated someone? I can't honestly think of it happening.

There have been many instances of far-left people doing individual attacks. School shootings, shooting at a 4th of July parade, etc. Most likely all of them were associated with an Anti-Fa group.
At the end of my life. I was there Gandalf. 3000 years ago. I remember the Charleston shooter.

Other examples, New Zealand, the kid in El Paso, there’s quite a few white supremecist moves. Just like the Troons. This is an antifa actor and well, they act in mobs. It’s out of character. I expected some shooter like the Dylan roof guy who was angry of Charlie’s love for Israel or some troon angry about his ideology. Anti-Fa nut was a curve ball. They usually act in massive blobs of people who believe the nonsense.
 
Last edited:
I’ll start by saying that I’ve been praying for Charlie Kirk and his family the past few days. The whole situation is very sad and I haven’t really had much to add to the discussion until now, especially since I lack the knowledge and experience of other forum members. With everything that’s come out over the past few days-the past few hours even-I’ve been thinking of a few points and one thing in particular that bothers me: the shooter’s academic record.

Please bear with me. Supposedly, the shooter had a 4.0 G.P.A, was awarded a $32,000 scholarship, and was described as being of above average intelligence by his former classmates. For the year he attended a university he was a pre-engineering major. In spite of all of this he decides to quit college and go into the trades?

I’m not knocking the trades, I’ve done that kind of work before and have been considering going back into something related for awhile now. It’s certainly possible for a typical student to get “burned out” or see through the nonsense of most modern colleges. Poor Charlie Kirk himself quit college because he realized that there were better ways to use his time and talents. In this case though, something is not adding up for me.

Also, there’s the “roommate” who is supposedly in the training program as well. There’s been a big push over the last few years to recruit women and minorities for the trades (a lot of this is to avoid accusations of sexism, racism etc) but there’s only so much that blue collar laborers will put up with. I doubt this person was the ideal candidate for this type of program. I’d be very curious to know what kind of scores these two were getting in trade school. I don’t think the media will be too concerned with that though.
 
Here's a video of the last guy to talk with him...which at the time seemed very suspicious as it seemed to cue the shooter. Could it just be coincidence? Skip to 2:15 if you want to avoid the introduction.

 
The more I think about this the more it angers me, the man was killed and taken from his family for having rational Christian based beliefs and the courage to voice them.
Moreover he was actually compassionate and not condescending in his discourse. Something I can rarely even do when taking to people here with a like minded community.

We should all be a lot more like Charlie.
 
I waited a few days for the dust to settle before sharing much in the way of thoughts on this event. Lots of very heat-of-the-moment rhetoric (for understandable reasons), and I wanted some more time to think it over.

First, obviously it's a huge tragedy and I feel awful for his family which has been horribly hurt by the murder.

Second, I'm shocked by what a big deal this was in the mainstream. I had no idea Charlie Kirk was so popular; I knew he was better known than somebody like Nick Fuentes, but now it seems like everybody everywhere has been familiar with him for a while. I think I must have severely underestimated TPUSA's influence, but I've been a bit checked out of the political situation for a long time now.

Third, I'm at least a bit suspicious of the idea that Tyler Robinson was a lone crazy leftist, and like others here have suggested, it seems quite plausible that he had help. While I think it's possible that the Zionist regime had something to do with it, I'd need more compelling evidence than we have right now.

Fourth - and this is where things get a bit spicy - this event and the murder of the Ukrainian girl on the train and all the associated fallout has been the biggest PR boost for the right that I've seen in my entire life, in a single week a Left that has been already been on the backfoot for years has completely lost the moral high ground.

The Woke left has been in sharp decline for a few years now, as evidenced by Trump's huge victory last November, but this was the death blow. With these two events, the right has completely snatched the moral high ground from opponents who took it for granted and assumed they'd hold it forever. If the Left can't play the Goodperson card, then they've lost arguably their most vital rhetorical tool. This doesn't mean the Left is over, but it does mean that their wickedness has been clearly exposed to those in the middle. I think much of the nastiness of leftists reveling over Kirk's death is some kind of subconscious death throe, the realization that on some level their side just sustained a death blow.

Fifth, as much good as Charlie did alive, his impact as a martyr for conservatism is likely to be greater. In death he exposed the ugly truth about Leftism more viscerally than he ever could in his life. He died at the point where he would have maximum impact: young, attractive, with a lovely young family horrifically rent apart by a deranged leftist. No mistresses, no criminal record or shady dealings or any of the other things that tend to bring down guys in his position (especially over time.) He walked the talk. His death sends a message to people ranging from centrists to traditional conservative republicans: a message that would once be unceremoniously delivered by the Boomercon as a TL;DR wall of text has now been immortalized in a visceral and brutal shock, a rhetorical BFG 9000 delivered into the hands of the Right and primed to lay waste to the wailing demons.

What exactly this might entail is a bit hard to say. There are all sorts of ways things should go from here, and my generally wary and skeptical nature makes me hesitant to declare victory, but there's no doubt that the right has some sort of golden opportunity here, one that I didn't really expect to see in my lifetime. But I think our leaders, pundits, activists, YouTube and Twitter personalities, whatever it may be, need our prayers more than ever: this is a momentous time.
 
Oh, I guess I’m wrong.



So they’re saying the assassin is a white heterosexual male, because his tranny lover is a woman despite having a penis.




One can use the Krassensteins' rhetorical trajectory to compose a mathematical proof that one can never attain peak gay-jew. Gay-jew can increase without limit.
 
Just a few observations to start wrapping this thing up before it is memory holed and we're onto the next new thing.

For this latest "event" I have only come to this thread for info. This is where I learned of Charlie Kirk's death and by choice I decided to stick with the analysis here and tune out the outside world. I have not watched or read one outside source (except a few tweets that are linked here). I have not seen the assassination footage or any other MSM "news" footage on this subject. I have also been fairly isolated over the last several days (until today) and have spoke to no one about this killing and no one has spoken to me about it.

In addition, on the weekends I work at a large outdoor venue and conference center and interact with and observe over a 1000 people per day and not once today did I hear one person mention this event, much less Charlie Kirk's name. It's as if nothing happened. The venue looked busier and as normal as ever as it was hosting a gun and knife show, a monster truck demo event, and a sports ball trading card and Pokemon card show (complete with bizarre looking "furries"). Trannies (5 or 6) and homos (dozens) galore mixing effortlessly with hard core Trumpsters (some of whom were armed) and moderate Democrats alike with no signs of friction or discomfort.

At this venue there is an old retired man who flaunts and gives away crazy pro-Trump paraphernalia. I mean highly incendiary stuff to the point where occasionally you'll see young lefties yelling at him. He never responds aggressively and just smiles which infuriates them. However, most people who dislike Trump just stop and gawk at the old man, take pictures, and laugh at him under their breath. Today was no different. There were no references to or pictures of Charlie Kirk in the old man's booth today which I found a bit odd (and was quite frankly expecting).

Personally, I still believe the shooting was a conspiracy involving several people. I still don't see how the kid got away from the scene undetected. The rifle in that box in the woods makes no sense either. And then we have this old jew man suspect that was tackled and detained (can anyone confirm that he yelled "I did it!" or why he was tackled and detained?) that apparently was in some 911 video (like the would be Trump assassin being in the Blackrock commercial and the other in some Ukraine video) and then someone here also alleged that the old jew man also called in a bombing hoax after the Boston Marathon bombing (can anyone confirm any of this?). Anyhow, the whole thing stinks to high heaven.

I appreciate everyone's thoughtful analysis on this tragic event that has allowed me to sidestep and avoid the over-emotional psycho drama and double speak psyops that the MSM is no doubt presenting.

May The Lord protect and heal Charlie Kirk's family, and may Charlie find himself in the arms of God tonight.
 
Back
Top