Charlie Kirk Thread

Well my point is the Troons and Nazis are bold enough to do crap like this as solo individuals. Usually Anti fa runs in mobs. Our guy didn’t even wear a mask. Charlie Kirk was a giant Zionist shill. I could see a Nat soc gunning down a “Jewish Puppet” I mean this guy mentioned he kept the sabbath. I understand why. Young dude my age picks up the Bible and it’s brilliant. I’ve fought with Pepe pagans over religion. They’d ask me to embrace the white gods while I’d be like Noooooooooo… “Jesus was brown” bleeh blah. So some Pepe pagan nazi I could see it. Troons - Weimar. Nazis were a reaction against the Troons. Now we’re in a weird era where the Jews have captured a certain Christian element.
When was the last time a Nazi went out and assassinated someone? I can't honestly think of it happening.

There have been many instances of far-left people doing individual attacks. School shootings, shooting at a 4th of July parade, etc. Most likely all of them were associated with an Anti-Fa group.
 
If someone sent you a link suggesting that it was just going to be a typical Charlie Kirk speech you'd be seeing, I agree that that's a bit much.

I still don't get why seeing a video of one guy shot to death traumatized you when this kind of thing and much worse happens daily all over the world, but I'm sorry you felt that way. I suppose seeing it makes a difference to some people in some way I fail to understand.
I don't like gore. I've seen lots of video clips of robbers getting shot and such, but those usually aren't gory. They just fall down, or maybe roll around moaning for a short while. I would never watch one of those beheading videos, or a video of someone's guts being blown wide open. I don't need to see that.

Also, the videos of criminals getting shot are men who are bad guys. I certainly would never want to see an innocent woman or child being turned into gore. That's awful!

People are designed to shy away from seeing such things. It takes a lot of desensitization to not be affected. That may be necessary for combat soldiers or paramedics, but I don't need to become desensitized to that kind of thing. I'm not interested in seeing it in movies either.
 
I don't like gore. I've seen lots of video clips of robbers getting shot and such, but those usually aren't gory. They just fall down, or maybe roll around moaning for a short while. I would never watch one of those beheading videos, or a video of someone's guts being blown wide open. I don't need to see that.

Also, the videos of criminals getting shot are men who are bad guys. I certainly would never want to see an innocent woman or child being turned into gore. That's awful!

People are designed to shy away from seeing such things. It takes a lot of desensitization to not be affected. That may be necessary for combat soldiers or paramedics, but I don't need to become desensitized to that kind of thing. I'm not interested in seeing it in movies either.
I would also suggest that the aftermath of the gore (stabbing, gunshot, etc) is less traumatic than the act of creating the gore (the actual penetration of the bullet or knife). I think most people in healthcare would attest to that.
 
When was the last time a Nazi went out and assassinated someone? I can't honestly think of it happening.

There have been many instances of far-left people doing individual attacks. School shootings, shooting at a 4th of July parade, etc. Most likely all of them were associated with an Anti-Fa group.
At the end of my life. I was there Gandalf. 3000 years ago. I remember the Charleston shooter.

Other examples, New Zealand, the kid in El Paso, there’s quite a few white supremecist moves. Just like the Troons. This is an antifa actor and well, they act in mobs. It’s out of character. I expected some shooter like the Dylan roof guy who was angry of Charlie’s love for Israel or some troon angry about his ideology. Anti-Fa nut was a curve ball. They usually act in massive blobs of people who believe the nonsense.
 
Last edited:
I’ll start by saying that I’ve been praying for Charlie Kirk and his family the past few days. The whole situation is very sad and I haven’t really had much to add to the discussion until now, especially since I lack the knowledge and experience of other forum members. With everything that’s come out over the past few days-the past few hours even-I’ve been thinking of a few points and one thing in particular that bothers me: the shooter’s academic record.

Please bear with me. Supposedly, the shooter had a 4.0 G.P.A, was awarded a $32,000 scholarship, and was described as being of above average intelligence by his former classmates. For the year he attended a university he was a pre-engineering major. In spite of all of this he decides to quit college and go into the trades?

I’m not knocking the trades, I’ve done that kind of work before and have been considering going back into something related for awhile now. It’s certainly possible for a typical student to get “burned out” or see through the nonsense of most modern colleges. Poor Charlie Kirk himself quit college because he realized that there were better ways to use his time and talents. In this case though, something is not adding up for me.

Also, there’s the “roommate” who is supposedly in the training program as well. There’s been a big push over the last few years to recruit women and minorities for the trades (a lot of this is to avoid accusations of sexism, racism etc) but there’s only so much that blue collar laborers will put up with. I doubt this person was the ideal candidate for this type of program. I’d be very curious to know what kind of scores these two were getting in trade school. I don’t think the media will be too concerned with that though.
 
Here's a video of the last guy to talk with him...which at the time seemed very suspicious as it seemed to cue the shooter. Could it just be coincidence? Skip to 2:15 if you want to avoid the introduction.

 
Back
Top