Catholicism: Criticism & Debate Thread

You cannot be Christian and hold the belief that all religions are a path to God. “Jesus said to him, I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” John 14:6.

 
You cannot be Christian and hold the belief that all religions are a path to God. “Jesus said to him, I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” John 14:6.

As stated in the same article the doctrine didnt change.

“However, the much-loved and widely respected approved catechism, the Baltimore Catechism, reminds readers simply that “The one true Church established by Christ is the Catholic Church.” {Q. 152}”

Above posts discuss how the pope (argentinian) speaks sometimes but doesnt change anything. Thank God.
 
Last edited:
You cannot be Christian and hold the belief that all religions are a path to God. “Jesus said to him, I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” John 14:6.

It gets even worse than this. Look up the doctrine of Invincible Ignorance, which is the idea that pagans who never had the chance to hear the Gospel can still be saved by doing good works. It's pure Vatican 2 liberalism.

What the Pope is saying here is in line with Catholic theology, which is why Catholic theology as a whole is faulty. Catholics see their church as broad enough to accommodate all these different view points, it has been described to me as the "beauty" and "strength" of Catholicism. This is why you see so much difference in emphasis within Catholicism, as it does not present a consistent worldview, and results in endless goal-post shifting when you engage with Catholics.

Historically, the Reformers understood the Pope to be the Antichrist. And given his recent statements, it's hard to disagree. He is 2-0 on teaching the exact opposite of what the Bible says in recent months. First, he says "the heart is fundamentally good" then he says "every religion is a way to God."
 
Last edited:
It gets even worse than this. Look up the doctrine of Invincible Ignorance, which is the idea that pagans who never had the chance to hear the Gospel can still be saved by doing good works. It's pure Vatican 2 liberalism.

What the Pope is saying here is in line with Catholic theology, which is why Catholic theology as a whole is faulty. Catholics see their church as broad enough to accommodate all these different view points, it has been described to me as the "beauty" and "strength" of Catholicism. This is why you see so much difference in emphasis within Catholicism, as it does not present a consistent worldview, and results in endless goal-post shifting when you engage with Catholics.
Ahahah Protestants saying catholics are broad enough to acomodate all these different view points? Are you doing some kind of stand up?

You want me to post links of protestants denominations with completely opposing views? You don´t have morals to question catholics. Orthos ok. They are serious people. Even though. They suffer from the same vice. But prots? Come one? Protestants countries are the most degenerate filth that history have ever witnessed. This will be remembered in history books as an era worse than Weimar. US and most of protestant countries will be remembered as the worse moral era in history.

Historically, the Reformers understood the Pope to be the Antichrist. And given his recent statements, it's hard to disagree. He is 2-0 on teaching the exact opposite of what the Bible says in recent months. First, he says "the heart is fundamentally good" then he says "every religion is a way to God."

Reformers wanted the english king to have sex with as many woman he could. Your fundamentals are a depraved king. And it shows.
 
Ahahah Protestants saying catholics are broad enough to acomodate all these different view points? Are you doing some kind of stand up?

You want me to post links of protestants denominations with completely opposing views? You don´t have morals to question catholics. Orthos ok. They are serious people. Even though. They suffer from the same vice. But prots? Come one? Protestants countries are the most degenerate filth that history have ever witnessed. This will be remembered in history books as an era worse than Weimar. US and most of protestant countries will be remembered as the worse moral era in history.



Reformers wanted the english king to have sex with as many woman he could. Your fundamentals are a depraved king. And it shows.
France, mainly Catholic, accepts adultery more than any nation.


Just 47% of the French say it is morally unacceptable for married people to have an affair, the lowest percentage among 39 nations surveyed in 2013 by the Pew Research Center. In fact, France was the only country where less than 50% of respondents described infidelity as unacceptable. Instead, four-in-ten think it is not a moral issue, while 12% say it is actually morally acceptable. And there is essentially no gender gap on this issue, with 45% of French men and 50% of women saying affairs are unacceptable.
 


GXl94_9W0AEpwyS




What scandalizes and fills us with horror is not as much the series of monomaniacal provocations of Bergoglio, who has now proven his rebellious and apostatic nature, so much as the cowardice of the entire Episcopate.

I do not understand how a Successor of the Apostles can tolerate the open apostasy from the Faith of the one who presents himself as the head of the Church, as if it were the ravings of a deranged person to whom one should not pay too much attention to. I consider with horror what Our Lord will impute to them when they will present themselves before Him and have to account for their silence before the systematic destruction of the Church.

These are the horrible sins for which the Hierarchy must repent and ask forgiveness.

Edit.

 
Last edited:

This pope speaks and acts directly against the words of Christ.

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person's enemies will be those of his own household.” Matthew 10:34-36.
 

This pope speaks and acts directly against the words of Christ.

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person's enemies will be those of his own household.” Matthew 10:34-36.
I ran across this post saying the Pope's statements on other religions and God are nothing new. They are straight out of Vatican II. In particular, the Vatican II documents seem to say that Allah is the same God Christians worship.

I would say this is absolutely not true. God is the trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Allah is much different. Not only is Allah not the trinitarian God, he is much different that God the Father. Muslims simply do not worship the God of the Bible.

I was surprised to see the statements being quoted from the Vatican II. They do seem to be the same as the current Pope's recent statements.

 
Muslims simply do not worship the God of the Bible.

Totally agree. I'm convinced now that the god of muslims is actually a demon. Possibly more than one - because that sort of thing always devolves into confusion and chaos. The identities of the gods of the hindus are more obvious as to what they actually are (the art and stories speak for themselves.)
 
Totally agree. I'm convinced now that the god of muslims is actually a demon. Possibly more than one - because that sort of thing always devolves into confusion and chaos. The identities of the gods of the hindus are more obvious as to what they actually are (the art and stories speak for themselves.)
The supernatural entity known as 'Allah' was originally a moon deity worshiped by the nomadic Bedouin. Or so I learned many, many years ago.
 
The position of Sedeprivationism seems fairly more reasonable than that of Sedevacantism.

I am returning to the Catholic faith after over a year of Orthodox Inquiry, I was born a Catholic and I don't feel that it is best to leave the faith when I agree with all traditional doctrine of the Church and the teachings of the Church fathers. I attend a TLM, and even if it were to be outright banned, there is far too many that will continue to practice Quo Primum.
 
The position of Sedeprivationism seems fairly more reasonable than that of Sedevacantism.

I am returning to the Catholic faith after over a year of Orthodox Inquiry, I was born a Catholic and I don't feel that it is best to leave the faith when I agree with all traditional doctrine of the Church and the teachings of the Church fathers. I attend a TLM, and even if it were to be outright banned, there is far too many that will continue to practice Quo Primum.
It is a more faithfully logical approach than something that leads to further schism. On the whole the outlook should be one of unification between the west and east in complete Apostolic unity, but we cannot betray our roots from one to the other. It is most logical that a child of Catholicism, whose parents and grandparents and previous generations came into this world, lived, and died in it, is more genetically in tune with living this way than he would be as a Protestant, an Orthodox, or any other form of belief even non-Christian forms. My family has been Catholic for at least 800 years as far back as I've researched. For me to switch to Orthodoxy out of some spiritual convenience due to the assault on the Catholic Church that has not ceased, to me, is a betrayal of my roots, despite my overwhelming support for Orthodoxy and the nations which embrace it.

The TLM heals addiction, and more. It truly carries the Holy Spirit to the congregation in a way that I can't see being done otherwise. It won't be banned, and those who try to, they cannot sever a true link between God and man. Faith always finds a way back.
 
For me to switch to Orthodoxy out of some spiritual convenience due to the assault on the Catholic Church that has not ceased, to me, is a betrayal of my roots, despite my overwhelming support for Orthodoxy and the nations which embrace it.
Okay, but this is not the reason people are joining the Orthodox Church. They join because they recognize the Orthodox Church as the One holy, catholic, and apostolic church established by our Lord Jesus Christ with the grace of the Holy Spirit. You're free to disagree, but that's ultimately what it comes down to.

Basing your views on genetics or heritage won't give you any epistemic grounding. At one point all of our ancestors were pagans having lived that way for hundreds of years. When Christian missionaries came to them, they weren't "betraying their roots" by accepting Christ. They were simply accepting the truth, and Christianity became part of their culture.
 
Okay, but this is not the reason people are joining the Orthodox Church. They join because they recognize the Orthodox Church as the One holy, catholic, and apostolic church established by our Lord Jesus Christ with the grace of the Holy Spirit. You're free to disagree, but that's ultimately what it comes down to.

Basing your views on genetics or heritage won't give you any epistemic grounding. At one point all of our ancestors were pagans having lived that way for hundreds of years. When Christian missionaries came to them, they weren't "betraying their roots" by accepting Christ. They were simply accepting the truth, and Christianity became part of their culture.
With the constant assault on the Catholic church from both inside and out, I would argue that it, too, is canonical. It is a very exciting time to be a Catholic, for I see us taking the church back to its roots in the very near future. Those that are Catholic today are by and far orthodox Catholic - the men in seminaries today are vastly orthodox.

The majority of Orthodox converts are coming from Protestant (Evangelical and Presbyterian anecdotally) sects. I would have been in err to leave Catholicism for the Orthodox church of America (in my case).
 
The position of Sedeprivationism seems fairly more reasonable than that of Sedevacantism.

I am returning to the Catholic faith after over a year of Orthodox Inquiry, I was born a Catholic and I don't feel that it is best to leave the faith when I agree with all traditional doctrine of the Church and the teachings of the Church fathers. I attend a TLM, and even if it were to be outright banned, there is far too many that will continue to practice Quo Primum.
Glory be to God that you finally found your way, albeit in Catholicism and not Orthodoxy. I have a friend who was living a hedonistic life, but he repented and took his Catholic faith seriously. Eventually, he found his future wife at a Catholic event. Now he is clean from his hedonistic past. I have another friend whose partner was a Buddhist, but before marriage, she converted to Catholicism. Now they are married under the sacrament of the Catholic Church. If God calls you through the Catholic Church, then that's the way it is.

For me personally, despite going to a Catholic junior high school, Catholic high school, Catholic university, and even attending Catholic mass, Catholic events, doing the rosary, etc., it did not do anything for me. Christ called me through the Orthodox Church. It seems that God has different plans for each of us.
 
I think Catholics have made a rod for their own back in many ways by their placing so much authority on the Pope and granting him infallibility.

Orthodox leaders say troubling stuff a lot, but we don't hold them as infallible, so we can just say "yeah he's wrong on that" but Catholics will have to Popesplain everything because their position makes it all the more difficult to just say "he's wrong". I appreciate that the exact details of how and when the Pope is declaring dogma are nuanced, but in general the Catholics have developed a position where people see what the Pope says as Catholic dogma.

I think they tend to get a lot of flack for this.
 
I think Catholics have made a rod for their own back in many ways by their placing so much authority on the Pope and granting him infallibility.

Orthodox leaders say troubling stuff a lot, but we don't hold them as infallible, so we can just say "yeah he's wrong on that" but Catholics will have to Popesplain everything because their position makes it all the more difficult to just say "he's wrong". I appreciate that the exact details of how and when the Pope is declaring dogma are nuanced, but in general the Catholics have developed a position where people see what the Pope says as Catholic dogma.

I think they tend to get a lot of flack for this.
There is a difference between speaking ex-cathedra (which has happened once in 1950 to define a Marian dogma I am sure the Orthodox would too agree with - The Assumption of the Holy Mother) and being "infallible" when speaking to reporters on an airplane. This too, was a hangup in me returning to Catholicism, but with further investigation it doesn't hold up. The Kingdom of God is heirarchical, and thus I do believe that there too, is a representative on Earth that is that person. We don't worship the Pope, but look to him for guidance as we would a spiritual father.

The popes themselves have even said that infallibility is tremendously rare: In July 2005 Pope Benedict XVI stated during an impromptu address to priests in Aosta that: "The Pope is not an oracle; he is infallible in very rare situations, as we know." Pope John XXIII once remarked: "I am only infallible if I speak infallibly but I shall never do that, so I am not infallible."

The main issue people have is with Francis and the TLM and his seeming inability to take a hardline on Catholic doctrine. And, a pope can err - this has happened many times in the Catholic church. I am not defending him, nor do I like what he says and wish he would just say "hey, this is what we believe, we are not for the world, so obviously we don't promote abortion or want gay marriage" but he hasn't. I simply pray for him as I pray for the leader of a country I live in but don't agree with.

The issue I had with the Orthodox patriarchical structure is that 1. The Orthodox church is not actually united as they say they are (there isn't agreement on valid baptisms, there is obvious strife between the Ukrainian and Russian churches) and 2. They can't have a council without the Catholic church, there hasn't been an Ecumenical council since 787. I pray for the unification of Christ's Church where all brothers and sisters are united under One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church with the Church Struggling and the Church Triumphant.
 
Back
Top