2024 Election Lounge

Christos_NIKA said:
They don't even try to hide their cheating anymore. The US is worse than most 3rd world countries in regards to voting at this point, yet feels it can lecture the rest of the world about "voter irregularities" or just simply foment revolutions everywhere.

View attachment 13760
Click to expand...
Im 3rd world South Africa we have to have a barcode ID that gets scanned outside before we are allowed into the building to vote, the once inside we present our ID books it has a photos, all the political parties have members at each voting stations observing the entire vote casting and counting, its all manual and on paper, once we vote on our way out they stain your finger with a powerful dye that takes days to come off to prevent people from voting twice, once all the votes are in the vote counting is down by an independant organization and all the political parties are there present and check everything, no dominion machines, no mail in voting. You guys are in serious trouble something needs to be done.
 
mountainaire said:
The situation as it stands now, Kamala needs to sweep all three of the battleground rust belt states to win. PA, MI, and WI. Trump wins with just any one of the three. They could rig both Pennsylvania AND Michigan and she still loses if Trump takes Wisconsin, for instance.

And that's not factoring in the real threat of a lean-blue state like VA flipping over to Trump, since she's basically underperforming nationally compared to Biden in 2020.

That's why she's behind the 8 ball here, and the betting markets are the way they are.
Click to expand...
It's worth noting that Michigan and Pennsylvania both have governors who will likely seek the Democratic nomination in 2028 if Kamala loses, and whose presidential ambitions would be totally thwarted if she were to win. It's unclear what (if any) influence governors have over the Democrat voter fraud operations in their states, but both Gretchen Whitmer and Josh Shapiro have a very strong professional incentive to withhold any extra help from Kamala Harris. Plus, on a personal level, Shapiro would likely be glad to see her lose after she publicly snubbed him for VP, and Whitmer would undoubtedly prefer to become the first female POTUS herself. That being said, there is good reason to believe that to whatever extent those two governors are able to rein in their respective statewide voter fraud operations, they will do so.
 
mountainaire said:
The situation as it stands now, Kamala needs to sweep all three of the battleground rust belt states to win. PA, MI, and WI. Trump wins with just any one of the three. They could rig both Pennsylvania AND Michigan and she still loses if Trump takes Wisconsin, for instance.

And that's not factoring in the real threat of a lean-blue state like VA flipping over to Trump, since she's basically underperforming nationally compared to Biden in 2020.

That's why she's behind the 8 ball here, and the betting markets are the way they are.
Click to expand...
New Hampshire had a recent poll leaning towards Trump. Trump could lose the rust belt and win 272-266.
 
scorpion said:
It's worth noting that Michigan and Pennsylvania both have governors who will likely seek the Democratic nomination in 2028 if Kamala loses, and whose presidential ambitions would be totally thwarted if she were to win. It's unclear what (if any) influence governors have over the Democrat voter fraud operations in their states, but both Gretchen Whitmer and Josh Shapiro have a very strong professional incentive to withhold any extra help from Kamala Harris. Plus, on a personal level, Shapiro would likely be glad to see her lose after she publicly snubbed him for VP, and Whitmer would undoubtedly prefer to become the first female POTUS herself. That being said, there is good reason to believe that to whatever extent those two governors are able to rein in their respective statewide voter fraud operations, they will do so.
Click to expand...

Can't stand her, but Whitmer would have definitely been a much stronger candidate than Harris. She kind of has a goofy accent but did well against the more attractive Tudor Dixon.
 
scorpion said:
It's worth noting that Michigan and Pennsylvania both have governors who will likely seek the Democratic nomination in 2028 if Kamala loses, and whose presidential ambitions would be totally thwarted if she were to win. It's unclear what (if any) influence governors have over the Democrat voter fraud operations in their states, but both Gretchen Whitmer and Josh Shapiro have a very strong professional incentive to withhold any extra help from Kamala Harris. Plus, on a personal level, Shapiro would likely be glad to see her lose after she publicly snubbed him for VP, and Whitmer would undoubtedly prefer to become the first female POTUS herself. That being said, there is good reason to believe that to whatever extent those two governors are able to rein in their respective statewide voter fraud operations, they will do so.
Click to expand...
Yeah I don't think Kamala has any real friends in high places that are going to help fraud her over the goal line like Biden had, and even if she did, there isn't enough baseline support there to get it done anyhow.
 
As expected, Arnold endorsed Kamala Harris.


I don’t really do endorsements. I’m not shy about sharing my views, but I hate politics and don’t trust most politicians.

I also understand that people want to hear from me because I am not just a celebrity, I am a former Republican Governor.

My time as Governor taught me to love policy and ignore politics. I’m proud of the work I did to help clean up our air, create jobs, balance the budget, make the biggest infrastructure investment in state history, and take power from the politicians and give it back to the people when it comes to our redistricting process and our primaries in California.

That’s policy. It requires working with the other side, not insulting them to win your next election, and I know it isn’t sexy to most people, but I love it when I can help make people’s lives better with policies, like I still do through my institute at USC, where we fight for clean air and stripping the power from the politicians who rig the system against the people.

Let me be honest with you: I don’t like either party right now. My Republicans have forgotten the beauty of the free market, driven up deficits, and rejected election results. Democrats aren’t any better at dealing with deficits, and I worry about their local policies hurting our cities with increased crime.

It is probably not a surprise that I hate politics more than ever, which, if you are a normal person who isn’t addicted to this crap, you probably understand.

I want to tune out.

But I can’t. Because rejecting the results of an election is as un-American as it gets. To someone like me who talks to people all over the world and still knows America is the shining city on a hill, calling America is a trash can for the world is so unpatriotic, it makes me furious.

And I will always be an American before I am a Republican.

That’s why, this week, I am voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz.

I’m sharing it with all of you because I think there are a lot of you who feel like I do. You don’t recognize our country. And you are right to be furious.

For decades, we’ve talked about the national debt. For decades, we’ve talked about comprehensive immigration reform that secures the border while fixing our broken immigration system. And Washington does nothing.

The problems just keep rolling, and we all keep getting angrier, because the only people that benefit from problems aren’t you, the people. The only people that benefit from this crap are the politicians who prefer having talking points to win elections to the public service that will make Americans’ lives better.

It is a just game to them. But it is life for my fellow Americans. We should be pissed!

But a candidate who won’t respect your vote unless it is for him, a candidate who will send his followers to storm the Capitol while he watches with a Diet Coke, a candidate who has shown no ability to work to pass any policy besides a tax cut that helped his donors and other rich people like me but helped no one else else, a candidate who thinks Americans who disagree with him are the bigger enemies than China, Russia, or North Korea - that won’t solve our problems.

It will just be four more years of bullshit with no results that makes us angrier and angrier, more divided, and more hateful.

We need to close the door on this chapter of American history, and I know that former President Trump won’t do that. He will divide, he will insult, he will find new ways to be more un-American than he already has been, and we, the people, will get nothing but more anger.

That’s enough reason for me to share my vote with all of you. I want to move forward as a country, and even though I have plenty of disagreements with their platform, I think the only way to do that is with Harris and Walz.

Vote this week. Turn the page and put this junk behind us.

And even if you disagree with me, vote, because that’s what we do as Americans. vote.org
Click to expand...
 
Douglas Quaid said:
Probably did some homo stuff to get famous. Doesn't seem like a pedo but who knows anymore.
Click to expand...
He DID pose for softcore porn in his early bodybuilding career, so I think it HIGHLY probable that he has some homosexual skeletons in his closet.

I think it's possible that he could have been groomed/molested in childhood; his hyper-masculine bodybuilding obsession could be some sort of compensation for homosexual childhood trauma inflicted upon him(?)
 
Last edited:
To the former red pill and game guys on here, please explain this deification of Doug Emhoff as this new 'masculine ideal' by leftist women


It seems he fits all the boxes - powerful (jewish) docile guy who got his woman to a position of power, then was willing to stand back and let her be the center of attention. This seems to be what clout chasing women want a man for
 


3uw9ag.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top