The fact he is willing to publicly discuss these issues, putting himself at serious risk, makes him seem like a good man. I wasn't sold on him until he didn't back down on his discussions, even after the Trump meeting.
Nick Fuentes Thread
- Thread starter MusicForThePiano
- Start date
The fact he is willing to publicly discuss these issues, putting himself at serious risk, makes him seem like a good man. I wasn't sold on him until he didn't back down on his discussions, even after the Trump meeting.
I have long had the same criticism of Nick. That he is just a snot nosed kid who is too arrogant to listen to the "wignats" who were right the entire time. Worse off, he then slowly steals their talking points, but then not only doesn't give them acknowledgement, he goes on to keep attacking them.
The problem with this, for Nick, is since he is only parroting talking points, and doesn't know them in and out and the foundation of them, he cannot offer a viable path forward. The path forward is organization around a racial super majority and Christianity, and then the political process can begin. He is advising the opposite, he is advising to individually infiltrate the system, but without a stated purpose or group, other than "to the right of the GOP".
The flip side Corey, as far as I can see, is not explaining a path forward either. Though, reading him over the years, I think he would agree with what I said, instead of saying "you are stupid to think this will work", he should lay out a path forward and then defend it, not just attack another path forward.
This is a good post by Nick, at least the message of not putting up with the controlled opposition spreads.
I think Nick's plan is a lot more viable and realistic than whatever Mahler is proposing. "Subversion" doesn't only go one way. The right lost the culture wars because they never had a long game. They're not going to win it now by still neglecting the long game.
The right "lost" the culture war because they were paid to do so.
I think Nick has some good points. People who agree with him need to take this very seriously. Workout, eat right, cut all drugs, work hard, build up wealth, become independent of the system as you can. Secretly fund organizations that will help spread grassroots growth. But even Nick himself doesn't do these things, eating junk food and scared to workout, he doesn't make much of a leader.
But if you get into the GOP and they get an idea that you agree with Nick, they will toss you out right away.
No political party cares about the ideas of the people on the ground. You can go in there and be the most tatted up, wignat, Christless conservative all you want, the GOP will put you on canvas duty or collecting signatures. The only ones who's ideas really matter are the people who have the power of the office, and even then, the people who pay the politicians are the only ones who's ideas really matter. People like Nick will never be the leader of any movement that stops this, but he's doing a good job of exposing the grift where he does.
What does it take to actually change the country and governance, however that looks, back to the leaders that care about the country, even if they have somewhat disputed notions of what's best for culture, national unity, government size, etc?
I have some thoughts but don't want to bias you.
I agree, Nick is a great messenger and is spreading the word far and wide. I was on a chat website and a person from Qatar asked me what I thought of Nick Fuentes, because they were a big fan of his. I was shocked people in Qatar know who he is.
Simply, a better people. We get the leaders we deserve.
True, but how do you get better people when the system and both parties import worse people and promote the worst people from within?
There's really only one answer to that and it's God's grace. I can't hold a gun to your head and make you a better person. I can hold a gun to your head and make you do everything I want you to do but I can't hold the gun there forever. If the people are grace non-responders then there's only one way this goes down.
I would say two ways...
Revolting against this evil system and saving our homelands, but we are a LONG ways from this happening due to no organization or collective effort.
Or
It collapses from within and the Chinese come and take it. What the Chinese are able to do with technology right now is simply amazing. They are running circles around us. What they do with the people here is anyone's guess.
One of those two things will happen. Those things have always happened historically. We are at that precipice again. I make no predictions about which of the two will happen, but one of them will happen.
I see the latter happening over the former. In this secularized America, nothing has any meaning and so nothing is worth fighting for. When the Chinese come, who's to say that the people won't just give up willingly? The liberals will sell their own souls for comfort and the conservatives will realize that the America they knew and loved has been long gone.
That said, I don't think America losing its dominance on the world stage (which it already has in many ways) is the end of the world. The Gospel is actually growing faster in China than we are apostatizing here. If the options are a Christian China and a gay, pinko America then the future doesn't seem so bad.
I totally agree. In fact, the USA truly is satanic and losing its global influence is a great thing for mankind. Unless the people here get off their duffs and rid ourselves of this evil govt., the next best thing is us losing on a global scale. Seeing Hamas take it to Israel, seeing Iran punk us this summer, seeing China's innovation while we are stuck in the mud, seeing Russia punk us in Ukraine, seeing the USD lose global influence, I see these as all great signs from God that evil will not parish over us forever. It gives me hope and motivation.
I don't know what exactly the Chinese will or will not do, but I know they will not spread homosexuality, child transgenderism, drug dealing, and usury across the globe. So, that will be a big step up from where we are now.
What's with this Chinese stuff lol
When they come? They ain't coming anytime soon. The world will be crazier than ever technologically for that to never happen. We will see far more informational and technological power projections well before any silly invasion happens, a total waste of time and energy (with humans).
It's nonsense
Something to consider when thinking about INMT's laughable how come "China will take over and turn everyone to fertilizer" theory: how come they haven't done this in Africa already?
Africa:
- does not have the Pacific Ocean as a barrier between it and China.
- already has China entrenched deep in with China basically strip mining it of it's resources
- is an actual third world society. A big part of INMT's argument for the "China takes over the entirety of the US" theory is that the US will eventually become too weak to resist Chinese takeover due to third world immigration lowering the IQ of the country to the point of it of being incapable of matching the more high IQ Chinese. If this is the case, then it should be way easier for China to take over Africa which isn't merely 60% or 70% third world (or whatever estimate you want to think the US's third world immigration population percentage will be in 40 years) but is 100% third world. The IQ and tech difference between China and Africa at this point is greater at the moment then it will be between the US and China even in 50 years.
IIMT has insisted his "the stronger country will always take the land of the weaker countries" is an ironbound historical law multiple times on this board. It's become a trademark IIMT meme at this point in the same vein as working 70 hours a week or having 70 20 year old women hitting on him. Example of him exerting this theory:
If "White people no longer exist in any real sense, who will stop the Chinese from taking the west?", is true, I would ask why it's not already happening in countries that are 1) closer to China and have 2) no white people. If his law is true then shouldn't Africa already have been conquered by China at this point? I can use India as an example too - it's right next to China and if Indians in the West are causing it to collapse then surely a country that is all Indian should already fallen to China by INMT's logic.
Africa:
- does not have the Pacific Ocean as a barrier between it and China.
- already has China entrenched deep in with China basically strip mining it of it's resources
- is an actual third world society. A big part of INMT's argument for the "China takes over the entirety of the US" theory is that the US will eventually become too weak to resist Chinese takeover due to third world immigration lowering the IQ of the country to the point of it of being incapable of matching the more high IQ Chinese. If this is the case, then it should be way easier for China to take over Africa which isn't merely 60% or 70% third world (or whatever estimate you want to think the US's third world immigration population percentage will be in 40 years) but is 100% third world. The IQ and tech difference between China and Africa at this point is greater at the moment then it will be between the US and China even in 50 years.
IIMT has insisted his "the stronger country will always take the land of the weaker countries" is an ironbound historical law multiple times on this board. It's become a trademark IIMT meme at this point in the same vein as working 70 hours a week or having 70 20 year old women hitting on him. Example of him exerting this theory:
If "White people no longer exist in any real sense, who will stop the Chinese from taking the west?", is true, I would ask why it's not already happening in countries that are 1) closer to China and have 2) no white people. If his law is true then shouldn't Africa already have been conquered by China at this point? I can use India as an example too - it's right next to China and if Indians in the West are causing it to collapse then surely a country that is all Indian should already fallen to China by INMT's logic.
They already few a balloon over our country, now they got gutless Trump to back down on tariffs. They are just starting, their technology and innovation is decades beyond ours, because they promote the best and brightest and we turned our country into the make-a-wish foundation and opened up the borders to hostile third worlders.
The funny thing was when China came out with laser technology to shoot down missies and the USA was left with its third world "engineers" trying to figure out 1990's technology and Israel begging China to sell it to them. China said "no", LOL.