Iran-Israeli Conflict Thread

[TruckDriver9]

Reza Pahlavi is not perfect, and of course, he has his flaws. However, compared to the mullahs, he remains the best option for Iran at this moment. As clichéd as it may sound, he is neither aligned with the West nor the Islamists—he is on the side of Iran.

Unfortunately, many people believe the solution is either maintaining the Islamic Republic, which continues to stand against ZOG, or toppling it and replacing it with a democracy. But why not restore the Shah to his rightful throne?

Reza Pahlavi does not seek power out of personal ambition. Rather, as the rightful ruler of Iran, it is his duty to lead his nation, and the people need him. Unlike a presidency, which is a position of privilege attained through winning elections, the role of Shah is a solemn responsibility. He never chose to be born as the Crown Prince of Iran, but God placed him in this position. It is a duty that cannot be abandoned—just as a father or husband cannot forsake his responsibilities.

I truly believe that if the Shah were to reclaim his throne, Iran could restore its past imperial glory while maintaining strong relations with both Middle Eastern countries and the West. He would not necessarily be a puppet, as his father—though initially intended to be one, as you mentioned—ultimately managed to break free and stand for what was best for Iran.​

Like I said, it's not about politics from my POV. From my POV it's about a spoiled princeling who calls others to fight for his throne, while living in comfort and safety halfway across the world. If, as You say, it's his sacred duty to lead his people, than what he's doing living in LA? Why isn't he leading the rebellion against the mullahs himself?

 

[Giordano Bruno]

You're right that 3000 houses damaged per missile is unlilely. You conclude from this there must have been more missiles. But how many more? 500 misiles would still give 300 houses damaged per missile. That still seems like too many houses per missile. Maybe 5000 misisiles with 30 houses each. Not all misslies would have damaged houses at all. Some were aimed at military targets.

I heard Iran had 2000 missiles to start with, so I doubt.they fired 5000. The other alternative is that the damage was exaggerated.

You really can't believe the official statements on damage, or missile count, or anything else.

Most likely, housing damage includes things like a house hundreds of metres away that had some shrapnel fall in the garden, or whose owner kicked a table after hearing the loud bang.

Twisting rather than just lying wholesale. Every lie has a grain of truth, and Jews love to twist the truth into knots right up until they accidentally hang themselves with their own sins.

 

[Giordano Bruno]

What does that have to do with anything?

Where did I call anyone a rag heads. You said that not me.

Also go watch a mom blow up her own kids at a check point and tell me about how admirable some of these folks are.

There is nothing "noble" about war. There is only winning.

There is one thing that is noble in war.

We call him Jesus Christ.

Exodus 15:3
King James Version
3 The Lord is a man of war: the Lord is his name.

 

[RedLagoon]

Most likely, housing damage includes things like a house hundreds of metres away that had some shrapnel fall in the garden, or whose owner kicked a table after hearing the loud bang.

Twisting rather than just lying wholesale. Every lie has a grain of truth, and Jews love to twist the truth into knots right up until they accidentally hang themselves with their own sins.

They have a way of 'claiming' things don't they?

 

[Giordano Bruno]

They have a way of 'claiming' things don't they?

What's it called again? That technique where they lie so shamelessly people hesitate to call them out on their lies?

Chutzpah?

 

[RedLagoon]

What's it called again? That technique where they lie so shamelessly people hesitate to call them out on their lies?

Chutzpah?

Building 7

 

[LaAguilaNegra]

Three days into the ceasefire and Israeli agents on the ground have assassinated two IRGC officials and a nuclear scientist in a precision drone strike in Tehran. Media silence in Iran's press bytheway.

Coincidentally this strike happened at about the same time when Lil Coop clicked the 'Send' button on his latest hallucination about an 'Israeli capitulation' or whatever, man's on a mission to spam this thread with as much feel good nonsense as is necessary to get the 'IRAN WON' narrative across.

Legit Pravda vibes. Bytheway one can see how scared the Israelis are of the big Iranian lion, and how much of a deterrent has been established. High profile killings continue unabated, and the IDF is already drawing up contingency plans to re-start the war. There is unfinished business and Bibi doesn't like Trump putting a cap on the whole operation at all. Meanwhile the turbans and their e-simps 'celebrate' Iran entering the final stage of their death spiral because they managed to land a few dozen rockets on Israel territory, it's bizarre.



Katz: Operation Rising Lion was just the trailer, also announces the IDF will implement the 'Lebanon Model' in Iran, aka near daily targeted strikes on Iranian HVTs, and Iranian infrastructure related its nuclear program, it's ballistic missile program, and at any attempts at rebuilding its Airforce, radar capacities, and ADs.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Reza Pahlavi is not perfect, and of course, he has his flaws. However, compared to the mullahs, he remains the best option for Iran at this moment. As clichéd as it may sound, he is neither aligned with the West nor the Islamists—he is on the side of Iran.

Unfortunately, many people believe the solution is either maintaining the Islamic Republic, which continues to stand against ZOG, or toppling it and replacing it with a democracy. But why not restore the Shah to his rightful throne?

Reza Pahlavi does not seek power out of personal ambition. Rather, as the rightful ruler of Iran, it is his duty to lead his nation, and the people need him. Unlike a presidency, which is a position of privilege attained through winning elections, the role of Shah is a solemn responsibility. He never chose to be born as the Crown Prince of Iran, but God placed him in this position. It is a duty that cannot be abandoned—just as a father or husband cannot forsake his responsibilities.

I truly believe that if the Shah were to reclaim his throne, Iran could restore its past imperial glory while maintaining strong relations with both Middle Eastern countries and the West. He would not necessarily be a puppet, as his father—though initially intended to be one, as you mentioned—ultimately managed to break free and stand for what was best for Iran.​

Not aligned with the west? He literally is the west, living here, enjoying the satanic backwards life style in luxury, and used as a puppet to attack the regime.

If this puppet is installed you will have mass divorces, transgender children, Africans destroying large sections of the city, and women with pink hair and tattoos telling you how to live within 5 years.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

There is one thing that is noble in war.

We call him Jesus Christ.

Exodus 15:3
King James Version
3 The Lord is a man of war: the Lord is his name.

according to other posters here you can't be a man of God and apparently serve in the US military. That's not my view very obviously... But the non servicemen are free to pontificate.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

Not aligned with the west? He literally is the west, living here, enjoying the satanic backwards life style in luxury, and used as a puppet to attack the regime.

If this puppet is installed you will have mass divorces, transgender children, Africans destroying large sections of the city, and women with pink hair and tattoos telling you how to live within 5 years.

What the literal fuck are you talking about?

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

What the literal fuck are you talking about?

The Shah and what would happen if this western puppet were to be installed in Iran.

 

[LaAguilaNegra]

What does that have to do with anything?

Where did I call anyone a rag heads. You said that not me.

Also go watch a mom blow up her own kids at a check point and tell me about how admirable some of these folks are.

There is nothing "noble" about war. There is only winning.

Obviously only winning counts, which is why fifth columnists and foreign subversives hold the US against a double standard trying to erode its massive military advantage by acting as the devil's advocate appealing to human rights, international law and if nothing else works, religion and certain hot domestic issues to get that visceral reaction going.

It's like the modern turdworldist variant of the leftist academia, press and incognito political Marxists of the Cold War era. Back in the days those fellow travellers would praise brutal commie dictatorships around the world, whilst writing scathing pieces about US human rights abuses on poor minorities or whatever. Literal 5 meter tall pyramids of human skulls in commietopia vs a baton on a black skull at a riot ergo US BAD. With the add on that those old school commies at least had ideological coherency with their covert donor regimes, meanwhile the turdworldist right would be considered hostile by any of their self-adopted pet dictators.

It's nothing but a ploy, and one that comes from weakness to boot. Nobody here likes the current political elite in whichever Western country, yet getting funneled into an online propagandanetwork of DR grifters, gangsters and shills is cringe as hell.

 

[RedLagoon]

What the literal fuck are you talking about?

Why the swearing?

 

[Get2choppaaa]

Why the swearing?

For Dramtic effect.

The shah and his family are probably the most appropriate ruler of Iran instead of the Ayatollah which Carter's CIA established.

People pushing for the Ayatollah don't seem to know the history, they just see enemy of Israel good...US bad.

Not winning in my book...but hey tomato/tomaato

 

[Sandalwood Peak]

What does that have to do with anything?

Where did I call anyone a rag heads. You said that not me.

Also go watch a mom blow up her own kids at a check point and tell me about how admirable some of these folks are.

There is nothing "noble" about war. There is only winning.

You were accused of doing the bidding of the Jews by participating in unjust wars. The accusation is a little much for me because there are way too many violations to keep a scorecard. Almost everyone pitches in when it comes advancing the Jewish agenda. Paying taxes is helping ZOG. I guess we can say your contribution is larger, since you were imposing Jewish directives where there was natural resistance to it, otherwise they would have rolled over. Sort of like the guilt of police officers in the anti-white agenda, you carry a similar sort of guilt. What slightly absolves you is that these ragheads are indeed the "other". So in that sense you didn't hurt us, you hurt them.

I understand Soleimani was wearing a different color jersey, had it out for you good ol' boys, so you're happy he lost.

You do lose me when you start alluding to some Christian warrior versus ragheads type shaming. You did not advance the Christian Agenda in the Middle East. Or did you?

You really lose me with blue pill "fighting for freedom" type stuff.

I highly doubt you feel guilty, I'm not even sure you should but you have to understand the predicament you are in.

People want to fight ZOG. You're connected to ZOG. That's how the cards fell on the table. It's an awkward situation and I wish you luck in trying to come to terms with that.

 

[RedLagoon]

For Dramtic effect.

Come on man you're better than this.

 

[Samseau]

Like I said, it's not about politics from my POV. From my POV it's about a spoiled princeling who calls others to fight for his throne, while living in comfort and safety halfway across the world. If, as You say, it's his sacred duty to lead his people, than what he's doing living in LA? Why isn't he leading the rebellion against the mullahs himself?

The shah is speaking for all of the Iranian diaspora who've long since fled and hate the Iranian government.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

You were accused of doing the bidding of the Jews by participating in unjust wars. The accusation is a little much for me because there are way too many violations to keep a scorecard. Almost everyone pitches in when it comes advancing the Jewish agenda. Paying taxes is helping ZOG. I guess we can say your contribution is larger, since you were imposing Jewish directives where there was natural resistance to it, otherwise they would have rolled over. Sort of like the guilt of police officers in the anti-white agenda, you carry a similar sort of guilt. What slightly absolves you is that these ragheads are indeed the "other". So in that sense you didn't hurt us, you hurt them.

I don't have any guilt, only survivors guilt for the people who didn't get to come home and I don't get to have a beer with. Having been to war, I'm not interested in going back again but I do have sympathy for the people caught up in it.

I understand Soleimani was wearing a different color jersey, had it out for you good ol' boys, so you're happy he lost.

Yes and he was just doing his job I suppose. He knew the deal.

You do lose me when you start alluding to some Christian warrior versus ragheads type shaming. You did not advance the Christian Agenda in the Middle East. Or did you?

You really lose me with blue pill "fighting for freedom" type stuff.

I never said any of that dude. Go find where I did. If you're attributing that to me, you need to re read things and get your comprehension checked. Go find where I said rag head bullshit you're attributing to me, stop attributing false claims and lying.

I highly doubt you feel guilty, I'm not even sure you should but you have to understand the predicament you are in.

People want to fight ZOG. You're connected to ZOG. That's how the cards fell on the table. It's an awkward situation and I wish you luck in trying to come to terms with that.

I have no more to come to terms with than you do if you pay taxes and exist in the USA.

And I don't expect you to thank service men for our service, but I'll be honest, I do believe im a superior citizen to someone who hasn't served because of it. If I had my druthers, voting would not exist absent military service.

That's would prevent us from all these unnecessary wars as the founding fathers intended.

As far as the ZOG thing... Ill remind you again there are prayers for our servicemen in our Orthodox service and there are priests who've served... So Im able to disaggregate the act of the military as the means of political enforcement from and the agenda of an Empire from the people doing the work.

 

[Cooper]

The shah is speaking for all of the Iranian diaspora who've long since fled and hate the Iranian government.

A lot of their diaspora loves their country more than they hate their current government, and are not happy with Israel bombing their cities and scientists. The feedback I got early on is that they were pissed at their army not stopping Israeli raids, and satisfied with the counterstrikes.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

A lot of their diaspora loves their country more than they hate their current government, and are not happy with Israel bombing their cities and scientists. The feedback I got early on is that they were pissed at their army not stopping Israeli raids, and satisfied with the counterstrikes.

Of course and all people rally when their homeland is attacked