United Healthcare CEO Assassinated

Shaquilleoatmeal said:
United Healthcare isn’t a government entity, it’s a private company. Isn’t terrorism supposed to be for political reasons? This is corporate, not political.
Click to expand...
The government closely regulates and protects both the medical and insurance industries, so this murder can easily involve a political motivation, which would make it terrorism.
 
Psiman said:
The government closely regulates and protects both the medical and insurance industries, so this murder can easily involve a political motivation, which would make it terrorism.
Click to expand...
Get2choppaaa said:
Using violence as a means to invoke a societal response, whether political, corporate, or social is terrorism.
Click to expand...
So now CEOs of insurance companies are a protected class. They’re more important and deserve more protections than children in schools.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
So now CEOs of insurance companies are a protected class. They’re more important and deserve more protections than children in schools.
Click to expand...

Well think of this way, if someone was going around shooting homeless people they would do the same thing for them or for any "group" which was possibly being targeted. The main goal is to keep the peace, or however else you want to nefariously phrase it, they can't have people just going around shooting other people thinking it's okay....

I realize it's hard to find sympathy for these people but you have to look at the situation objectively, trying to stop murders is what they are supposed to do regardless of the circumstances.
 
homersheineken said:
Now you get it :)

Become useful to your (((masters))) and enjoy protections.
Click to expand...
apnews.com

Biden backed off a pledge to abolish the federal death penalty. That's left an opening for Trump

Prosecutors recently announced that they'd seek capital murder charges in the Buffalo mass shooting case, despite a moratorium on the federal death penalty that's held for nearly three years.
apnews.com apnews.com

Joe Biden of the Democrats, a party which is supposedly against the death penalty, didn’t get rid of the federal death penalty. Now, we have two killers who committed crimes in New York, a state where there is no death penalty, who could face death via federal court because of hate crime or terrorism charges,

www.wkbw.com

Death penalty trial for Buffalo mass shooting gunman to begin September 8, 2025

The death penalty trial for the Buffalo mass shooting gunman has been set to begin September 8, 2025.
www.wkbw.com www.wkbw.com

www.abc4.com

Will Luigi Mangione face the death penalty?

The 26-year-old is charged with the death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, a crime that authorities have described as “brazen” and targeted.
www.abc4.com

If you think that Democrat politicians are against the death penalty, you’re a moron.
 
Last edited:
FrancisK said:
Well think of this way, if someone was going around shooting homeless people they would do the same thing for them or for any "group" which was possibly being targeted. The main goal is to keep the peace, or however else you want to nefariously phrase it, they can't have people just going around shooting other people thinking it's okay....

I realize it's hard to find sympathy for these people but you have to look at the situation objectively, trying to stop murders is what they are supposed to do regardless of the circumstances.
Click to expand...
Charge them with murder then. You don’t think there are people deterred by the threat of jail?
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Charge them with murder then. You don’t think there are people deterred by the threat of jail?
Click to expand...

You don't think the fact that everyone is rooting on more murder perhaps compelled them to take further action? I'm not sitting here telling you this is wrong or this is right I'm explaining it objectively.
 
FrancisK said:
You don't think the fact that everyone is rooting on more murder perhaps compelled them to take further action? I'm not sitting here telling you this is wrong or this is right I'm explaining it objectively.
Click to expand...
Luigi shouldn’t be charged for what other people thought of his crime. Furthermore, why not just charge him with murder, that will tell society murder won’t be tolerated.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Luigi shouldn’t be charged for what other people thought of his crime. Furthermore, why not just charge him with murder, that will tell society murder won’t be tolerated.
Click to expand...

Agree with you 100% but they're going to do whatever they can to make an example of him to avoid this repeating itself.
 
FrancisK said:
Agree with you 100% but they're going to do whatever they can to make an example of him to avoid this repeating itself.
Click to expand...
Which is my point. Democrat politicians aren’t against the death penalty, both parties want the federal death penalty in place so those who commit revolutionary crimes (whether in response to great replacement or healthcare) can still be punished. The death penalty “debate” is just a way of dividing and distracting the left vs right (abortion is also a good example.)
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Which is my point. Democrat politicians aren’t against the death penalty, both parties want the federal death penalty in place so those who commit revolutionary crimes (whether in response to great replacement or healthcare) can still be punished. The death penalty “debate” is just a way of dividing and distracting the left vs right (abortion is also a good example.)
Click to expand...

They're against the death penalty when it involves the little people. When it involves them, Dems are 100% pro-execution no questions asked. Look at what they did to the J6'ers, trespassing charges elevated to years in jail.
 
reason.com

We don’t need terrorism laws when murder is already illegal

New York state prosecutors announced on Tuesday that they were charging Luigi Mangione, the alleged killer of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson, with
reason.com reason.com
Murder is bad enough. The government should punish murderers, deter serious death threats, and break up conspiracies to kill civilians. Creating a special category for political violence isn't necessary to accomplish these things. What counterterrorism laws do accomplish is allowing politicians to grandstand on public fears—and increase their own power in the process.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top