The Trump-Vance Administration

Get2choppaaa said:
Why?

I've spoken with my priest specifically about this issue and told that is perfectly ok and while not required for salvation, not something that's against The Church.
Click to expand...
That's interesting. St. John Chrysostom was not a big fan of circumcision. Although the context of this is addressing those who do it in a misguided attempt to obey the Law:

"(6) But someone might say: "Is there so much harm in circumcision that it makes Christ's whole plan of redemption useless? Yes, the harm of circumcision is as great as that, not because of its own but because of your obstinacy. There was a time when the law was useful and necessary, but now it has ceased and is fruitless. If you take it on yourself to be circumcised now, when the time is no longer right, it makes the gift of God useless. It is because you are not willing to come to him that Christ will be of no advantage to you."

 
Thomas More said:
I see stuff on Twitter that goes harder against the Jews every day than anything here. In fact, much of the JQ stuff posted here consists of tweets. Twitter is not preventing criticism of the jews.

I figured I'd go on Twitter right now and find the first post that's critical of the Jews I find. Sure enough, I only had to go a half page down.

Click to expand...

Awesome. I also feel it‘s been getting better since the Jews let the mask off and just started genociding the Palestians and then started again lecturing everyone on „antisemitism“.

But the rot of censorship is still much deeper that mere public-private conspiracy. It‘s in the minds of people and executive orders can‘t prevent the Tech giants from censoring due to own terms and conditions or pressure from „non-governmental“ entities.

But we‘ll see.
 
Labienus said:
Look, folks, I hope I'm wrong. However, I just don't see Trump as reliable at all. I think his deep connections to Israel and his character flaws (very susceptible to flattery, big ego) will lead him to repeat many of the mistakes/decisions he made during his first terms.
Click to expand...
A huge issue that will have to be navigated is the fact that even though what Trump has pledged to do will benefit this country for decades to come, there are going to be a lot of short run dislocations on the way there. Bringing back manufacturing and establishing energy independence isn't just a matter of quick fix policy or regulations, it is going to take years and billions put to capital investment. Tariffs and mass deportations are going to hit the economy somewhat in the short run. Shutting down the Ukraine war is essentially an admission that we cannot destroy Russia economically or otherwise, which is a hit to American prestige and the perception that we can do whatever we want around the world.

These and other short term issues are unavoidable consequences of actually reforming America and putting us on a more sustainable long term path. But Trump's Status Quo enemies will no doubt seize on those short run problems as evidence of failure. And unlike nebulous charges of being a "threat to democracy," they can point to something real. For example, if Trump actually starts deporting people we will be bombarded with stories about this or that distraught family that has now been split apart. The media will camp out at the border and give us endless footage of crying women and children who were denied entry, hoping to capture a viral or iconic image. Business owners will get on TV and complain about how they had to shut down a plant or have to reduce output because they have no more access to illegals, or that this tariff has now all of a sudden made production costs rise to the point of unprofitability. Netanyahu is clearly trying to manufacture a true crisis point where the US either "has" to go all in and fight Iran on behalf of Israel, or tell them to pound sand and make some kind of deal. US neocons are assisting by putting out propaganda about how Iran was meddling in the election, and continuing to flesh out the narrative that Iran is behind Trump assassination attempts. If such a crisis point arrives will Trump really have the stones forcefully and explicitly restrain Israel? Perhaps, but it's doubtful.

Trump will have to cross multiple Rubicons if his administration is going to be anything more than a giant rhetorical victory. What is interesting is the totality of the election win means that he actually has a mandate from the electorate to cross those Rubicons. But as Ive been saying, the Power Structure is going to make it hurt if he tries. Can Trump find enough people for his administration who have the fortitude to stay the course, keeping the public on side even when the heat is on? Trump himself tends to have good instincts, but if he once again puts weak establishment types in key places, it will be difficult to envision him standing strong in the face of media pressure, when unlike campaign season they can point to tangible negative consequences to real people.
 
Last edited:
This is not a thread to discuss circumcision, nor is this a thread to debate why you like or dislike Trump. This is a thread to objectively discuss Trump's incoming administration, and his personnel. Keep it focused or I'll have to hand out thread bans.
 
Get2choppaaa said:
Probably not the thread for this.... Your comparison is totally ridiculous... Apples to oranges bro.
As I've said I have had this conversation with my priest, clearly not a jewish subverter, and sufficient see no reason to equate it to the same thing as female Gen mutilation. And don't tell me shit about not enjoying sex, I got a whole gaggle of kids refuting that notion.
Click to expand...
I wont clog the thread up with this, but you need to look it up yourself and not rely on your priest.

The most common form of male genital mutilation (circumcision) is carried out significantly more often than the most common form of female genital mutilation. And it is significantly more damaging than the female version. Like the female version, its only purpose is to desensitise the head of the penis (clitoris in the female), leading to less sexual pleasure.

Its only benefit is to reduce the chances of someone (the giver) from contracting HIV. It reduces the chance by about 50%.

Dont conflate sexual pleasure with procreating capability.

It is a barbaric, talmudic practice. The only place in the white Western world that routinely practices this is the USA. Nowhere else does, they just allow it, for Jews, because of Jews.

There is no reason for it, it has no medical, scientific, sexual, or spiritual benefit. Its a Jewish custom. It should be banned in all non-jewish countries and anyone who practices it should be treated like any child abuser (I would prefer execution for child abusers).

I feel the same about female genital mutilation to. Anyone who would support those disgusting acts needs to take a long hard look at themselves.

This is the last I will say on it here. You can PM me if you want.
 
Last edited:
Samseau said:
This is not a thread to discuss circumcision, nor is this a thread to debate why you like or dislike Trump. This is a thread to objectively discuss Trump's incoming administration, and his personnel. Keep it focused or I'll have to hand out thread bans.
Click to expand...
Whoops, probably should have read that 5 minutes ago.

Mea Culpa.
 
Get2choppaaa said:
Homie is listening. @It_Is_My_Time please eat crow.
;)

Also everyone who said Trump was cozy with the trans folks

Click to expand...

To be fair, the videos of Trumps plans for his first days in office have been pretty much on point. They are clear, concise and determined. Pretty hard to refute.

But giving advanced warning like this, I can see the deep state trying a proper assination attempt on him before he is inaugaurated.
 
Get2choppaaa said:
Homie is listening. @It_Is_My_Time please eat crow.
;)

Also everyone who said Trump was cozy with the trans folks

Click to expand...

I hope no one here still thinks Nikki Haley or Mike Pompeo are independent thinkers who just came up with the idea of being Zionist Neo-Cons. They are paid very handsomely to push Zionist rhetoric, and they have a very big reputation for it. Now that people are sick of it, they can just pick out another soulless puppet, paid by the very same people who pay Nikki and Mike, to push the very same agenda, but with a different name.

Chris Miller is an example. Many here may not even know who he is, but he will push just as hard as Nikki and Mike for war with Iran. Tom Cotton is another, just a few days ago more than happy to lie about the happenings in Amsterdam. I will happily dig into Trump's pick for Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense to see if they are Zionist Neo-Cons or not.



I bet Robert O'Brien will end up on the staff as well. And he is hardcore Neo-Con as they come, and many would celebrate his pick, because they know little to nothing about him.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top