I'm even lazier and tend to opt for the audiobook version, or if that's not available, I just listen via text to speech on the reader app.
The Off-Topic and Random Thoughts Thread(Anything Goes!)
- Thread starter JCSteel
- Start date
I saw someone criticized the size of the forum title at the top, but now I can't find the post.
The mods obviously took this to heart! The logo is glorious now!
Could still be bigger though....
The mods obviously took this to heart! The logo is glorious now!
Could still be bigger though....
This is Jewdan Peterstein with a bunch of other Steins and Bergs who lurk here collabing on an essay because (((they))) are concerned that Christ's name is being taken in vain. Lol. The jews are fake-upset that Christian men here are using the term "Christ Is King" to defend themselves against jewish globohomo psyops! You can't make this inverted clown world stuff up. Christ is King! And the jews are Antichrist because they denied and betrayed Christ which resulted in a new covenant in His blood. Therefore God's chosen people are now Christians and not jews.
Read em' and weep all you commie jew lurkers.
I agree it's a nice name. Funny how names come and go. Here's the first appearance of Violet in Peanuts.
I don't know if this is true, but I am shocked it so! 
How do Catholics reconcile the doctrine of transubstantiation with their rejection of transgenderism? This is from catholic.com "The Church has a different take, one that is grounded in genuinely confirmed reality. One is born either or male or female, and this also applies to hermaphrodites who, though they manifest both male and female anatomical aspects at birth, are either biological boys or girls."
If the church's take is that of what is visually obvious reality, then how do they square that with the Eucharist, which is when the bread and wine become the actual body of Jesus but are still outwardly bread and wine. I suppose, to answer my own question, the difference is that the Eucharist changes the bread and wine, whereas the transperson isn't divinely changed but declares themselves to be one gender or another. It's not like the bread and wine identify as Christ, since it is inanimate food.
If the church's take is that of what is visually obvious reality, then how do they square that with the Eucharist, which is when the bread and wine become the actual body of Jesus but are still outwardly bread and wine. I suppose, to answer my own question, the difference is that the Eucharist changes the bread and wine, whereas the transperson isn't divinely changed but declares themselves to be one gender or another. It's not like the bread and wine identify as Christ, since it is inanimate food.