This makes sense. While women love to spend money, woman’s most valued currency is social capital. They interact by means of reputation, and so they look for men of reputation that can elevate theirs by proximity and stimulate their egos by capturing the attention of such a man.
Well, you all probably could guess that I would have a field day here in the interim, so here goes. Yes, women are consensus thinkers and mirrors, looking for others for validation moreso than men of course, and always comparing with their interactions. This describes social proof (there must be something about that guy that I don't know since she's good looking) which is again, proof of proxy thinking (making the point irrefutable), and also it describes the reason for monkey branching, not idealism that guys have, but rather conditional "attachment".
This even works on a micro level to some extent. For example I have met mountaineering guides that were average looking but told me various stories of hooking up with female clients. Or for example there might be a microinfluencer on twitter or Instagram with only 10,000 followers but he is considered an expert in his highly specialised niche and women who are into that niche hit up his dms and sleep with him.
Yes, you'll hear from many that being around a lot of people in general (the problem with modern west other than bad women generally) and having a mini fiefdom or local reputation/hierarchy is by FAR the most directly related to possibilities with women, let's just put it that way. You'll see this in bartenders/restaurants, offices, schools, etc.
This will likely never happen in westernized countries, at least not under a majority white ethnicity in power which is sad because they're probably the only ones who actually care about their women and dont consider them property or disposable.
It's the classic irony that also shows you that dark side of the base aspects of women: no good deed goes unpunished. The more you allow, the more they shit test you and go chaotic, ironically or paradoxically looking for restriction.
Women are be the weaker sex. This does not mean inferior or lesser. It means they're built differently, wired differently, for a different purpose than men. Someone helping another or being helped does not mean one is better than the other. It means two parties are working together towards a common goal. For God's purpose towards mankind, this means both men and women were built differently, each being better suited and specialized for specific tasks.
You correctly say that each has its purpose. Yes, much like each man and woman has his or her purpose, indeed. The problem is that the backdrop for this comment in the modern world already implies that we are all trying to express, exert, or impress ourselves on others, which is a fundamentally masculine/individual trait and thus in that context, women are lesser. But everyone lies about this, because they can't be honest about differences in general, and the lies of egalitarianism. The weirdest part about it is that everyone of course knows this just by nature and walking around, looking and talking to people.
It's not that women are stupid, it's that they have a different nature than men and have different wants and needs.
I agree that they have different wants and needs, but I dispute that women have a high level of awareness at all until they get to the level or status of matriarch, having experienced things that they should experience in life to have wisdom. Anymore, this is
very rare in the modern day. Most women literally just think, oh yeah, that's a guy, he basically has money, can do certain things I probably am not interested in doing overall, and has a dick (for his desires and maybe a woman's).
If you ever get married you will have to date your wife for the sake of a healthy marriage. If dating is a chore than you're doing it wrong or you're with the wrong person, or both.
I agree with this.
Granted, they can be difficult, often maddeningly so. However, it sometimes seems to me that men dismiss the possibility of enjoying a woman's company just to talk and spend time together.
No, we just talk about a) the modern day and b) the overall context of how common this is for the modern person, both the male and female sexes interacting.
^ That's actually one of big reasons I suggest that the virgin wife hunters in this thread would actually be better off not getting married and that even if they did find unicorn wives they would eventually become irritated with her and be longing for release from the marriage.
You guys keep harping on this topic but refuse to consider the context that we have stated literally 10-20 times. We suggest that finding these women is rare, they probably only exist in large part in other societies, and you guys just keep accusing us of "hating" women or some such simpleton argument that is nonsense.
I’ve never met one of these. This is something which, at these numbers, exists in only theory for most men. It is a fantasy, and one that used to entertain my mind when I was a younger man. Probably based on some book I read or movie I saw.
This is the context. Why is this so hard to understand for the others? For example, my mother is pretty old at this point. I barely meet women even remotely similar to her (regarding being a wife, etc). That's the point.
That's my concern. Perhaps the reason certain men haven't met these women is because they're chasing a fantasy, an idol. Do not be surprised when people on the ground do not match up to the gods (goddesses) of your imagination.
Again, it's because they really just aren't out there. It's possible many have been hidden in the "fattening" but again, that doesn't do us any good, either, since it renders the same result or reality.
Do you all finally understand now so you can stop with the same responses that don't, and haven't encapsulated what we have been saying? For the love of God, please.
