The Destruction of Modern Women

Just a random thought, I remember when I visited the main museum in Wellington, New Zealand, there was a display about the 19th century when settlers were arriving from the UK. There was an advert, asking for men who are engineers, builders, farmers, etc to qualify for passage. For the women, just be under 40 with no further qualifications. Even then, the expectations placed on women were comically low. Maybe that's where we went wrong.
The expectations are. Like I can’t do the PUA thing because I actually believe the orthodox thing. So I’m liking for a girlfriend to become a wife. My only requirements:
- not obese. You can be a bit chubby, I’m not a hypocrite
- no kids, not doing baby daddy drama
- be supportive friendly and pleasant, and I’ll return the favor.

That’s a very low bar. Compare that to mens requirements.
 
No, they were just realistic and knew that women were of no use in the science fields, even the few women with the aptitude to perform at that level. Most women, when allowed to go into such fields, will cause chaos and disorganization and eventually death. The few women who can make it are not worth kicking the applecart over when bringing the rest of the women with them. They realized women's only real purpose was to have and raise children, which is the most important purpose of human life. The fact we believe women are capable of both having and raising children, which is the most difficult and important job of both sexes, but they can just as well work as men in the outside world, is absolute insanity. It is a train of thought we must destroy.

Women have their own responsibilities to family and their men. Being both good mothers but also nurturing spouses that make men's struggle against the environment a worthwhile task. Women today are failing at both of these things by pretending to be equal to men, until the going gets tough, then they run and hide and leave the mess to some other man they look down upon.

And of course Christianity has a long history of keeping their women in the right place. Not done with beatings, but done with love, respect, but also very strict rules to follow.
Right on brother 👍
 
The expectations are. Like I can’t do the PUA thing because I actually believe the orthodox thing. So I’m liking for a girlfriend to become a wife. My only requirements:
- not obese. You can be a bit chubby, I’m not a hypocrite
- no kids, not doing baby daddy drama
- be supportive friendly and pleasant, and I’ll return the favor.

That’s a very low bar. Compare that to mens requirements.
My expectations are not much different. But I would add that she must have an IQ roughly one standard deviation above the mean (~110-115). Much lower and she would drive me nuts.

And no chubbers, just can't do it. Thin or athletic women only. And yes, I am currently working on losing a few pounds so as not to be a hypocrite.
 
Much lower and she would drive me nuts.

And no chubbers, just can't do it. Thin or athletic women only.
This is the bigger problem; higher IQ is rarely good looking. Also, higher IQ for women is also rarely interested in things or ideas like guys are. The best you will do is complementary with smarts and hobbies that she likes to do, as opposed to dumb gossipy interaction with other women that is the equivalent of these reality TV shows of vapid nothingness. It's filth, most of the stuff modern women watch and are interested in, in the modern day.
 
This is the bigger problem; higher IQ is rarely good looking. Also, higher IQ for women is also rarely interested in things or ideas like guys are. The best you will do is complementary with smarts and hobbies that she likes to do, as opposed to dumb gossipy interaction with other women that is the equivalent of these reality TV shows of vapid nothingness. It's filth, most of the stuff modern women watch and are interested in, in the modern day.
I've met plenty of good looking women with above average IQ, not genius level of course. More in Europe than stateside though. There's actually a tendency of attractive, young American women to hide their intelligence to make themselves more popular. Or maybe it's that filth they watch that dumbs them down.

I'm okay with not having the same interests. Just want to avoid communication issues when talking about anything more complicated than setting the table.
 
This is the bigger problem; higher IQ is rarely good looking. Also, higher IQ for women is also rarely interested in things or ideas like guys are. The best you will do is complementary with smarts and hobbies that she likes to do, as opposed to dumb gossipy interaction with other women that is the equivalent of these reality TV shows of vapid nothingness. It's filth, most of the stuff modern women watch and are interested in, in the modern day.
I was with a higher IQ woman. She was smarter than me. I have a whole thread about her that’s open for anyone to read. IQ doesn’t matter much because our minds get clouded with emotions. I can’t win her back with my ability to talk of Marx and Engels God and angels… points if you get the reference.

“Her lovers cued up in the hallway
I heard them scratching at the door
I tried to tell her of Marx and Engels
God and Angels, but I’m not really sure what for”
 
This is the bigger problem; higher IQ is rarely good looking.
The opposite is true. Good looks are strongly correlated with good genetics in general, including IQ.
Also, higher IQ for women is also rarely interested in things or ideas like guys are.
The fact of the matter is that, in my experience, IQ doesn't actually change much in a woman at all.

A woman with a high IQ might have more general knowledge and be easier to have an interesting conversation with, but that's actually about where the benefits end. They're still women and therefore still very silly, usually still terrible at impulse control, usually just as brainwashed as all their peers, and still very very susceptible to outside influence, particularly from figures with perceived social capital and/or authority.

A lot of men say that their ideal woman has a high IQ and shares their nerdy hobbies, but as a wise man once said, what you're looking for in that case is not a woman, your soulmate is a man with Asperger's.
 
The opposite is true. Good looks are strongly correlated with good genetics in general, including IQ.

The fact of the matter is that, in my experience, IQ doesn't actually change much in a woman at all.

A woman with a high IQ might have more general knowledge and be easier to have an interesting conversation with, but that's actually about where the benefits end. They're still women and therefore still very silly, usually still terrible at impulse control, usually just as brainwashed as all their peers, and still very very susceptible to outside influence, particularly from figures with perceived social capital and/or authority.

A lot of men say that their ideal woman has a high IQ and shares their nerdy hobbies, but as a wise man once said, what you're looking for in that case is not a woman, your soulmate is a man with Asperger's.
Probably. And… I think I figured it out. Now I just turned 34. Now what? You’re 100% right. Friendship and love just don’t work hand in hand like boomer mythology.
 
Gods punishing us for not keeping our pimp hand strong. We can regain our pimp hand. It’s easy, look at Iran in 1979 and Afghanistan post US. I think the poisoning thing on another thread is the perfect excuse to pull an Iran. Just American men don’t have the jewels to do it. Let’s put it this way, I see a lot of parallels if American men found their stones to the Iranian Revolution in 1979. Remember kids, America was founded against Europe, against the WEF, against the bumblings of the UKs Jews. What about our culture? 1979 in Iran could easily be a 2029 in America. Kick out foreign interests and make America American. Ending affirmative action for women and a nice, good round of inflation could easily get the job done. Outside of nursing and a small minority, a lot of women work jobs that are the fat that needs trimmed anyway. We could easily have guys walk up to them and be like “we don’t do that anymore, sorry, unemployment.” Combine that with a non existent welfare state, thugs will come out in the wash.
1732248755833.jpeg

The opposite is true. Good looks are strongly correlated with good genetics in general, including IQ.

The fact of the matter is that, in my experience, IQ doesn't actually change much in a woman at all.

A woman with a high IQ might have more general knowledge and be easier to have an interesting conversation with, but that's actually about where the benefits end. They're still women and therefore still very silly, usually still terrible at impulse control, usually just as brainwashed as all their peers, and still very very susceptible to outside influence, particularly from figures with perceived social capital and/or authority.

A lot of men say that their ideal woman has a high IQ and shares their nerdy hobbies, but as a wise man once said, what you're looking for in that case is not a woman, your soulmate is a man with Asperger's.


There's one big benefit:

Most of the time that's genetic, so it can benefit your offspring.
 
A great historical thread following the origins of the decline of America's women:



They knew even back then.

One thing I’ve noticed liberals tend to do, and it’s a slick psyop against traditionalism and conservatism, is to imply that people of past generations were stupid. Then they link it to modern conservatism and call us backwards. As if all our technology has made us smarter and better. It’s the opposite because in previous generations people had to rely on their tribe and figure things out on their own without information en masse.

They even do this with arguments against the resurrection, as in the apostles and people who saw Jesus were just inbred tribal groups and hallucinating. Like people back then had no idea that humans don’t typically come from the dead and couldn’t tell the difference between a hallucination and a real miracle.
 
The opposite is true. Good looks are strongly correlated with good genetics in general, including IQ.

The fact of the matter is that, in my experience, IQ doesn't actually change much in a woman at all.

A woman with a high IQ might have more general knowledge and be easier to have an interesting conversation with, but that's actually about where the benefits end. They're still women and therefore still very silly, usually still terrible at impulse control, usually just as brainwashed as all their peers, and still very very susceptible to outside influence, particularly from figures with perceived social capital and/or authority.

I’d argue being over-educated and ‘high IQ’ makes women even worse. Those PhD and lawyer types are usuallly terrible partners. I’ve made the mistake of dating a few when I was younger.


A lot of men say that their ideal woman has a high IQ and shares their nerdy hobbies, but as a wise man once said, what you're looking for in that case is not a woman, your soulmate is a man with Asperger's.

I think this talk is a cope. Many men who say this were the smarter nerdy ones when younger and the beautiful women tended to ignore them. So they want to settle for the ‘nerdy’ girl. Truth is most men would go for beautiful, caring, chaste, less ‘intelligent’ over the nerdy ‘smart’ girl any day of the week.

Above a certain level higher ‘intelligence’ in a woman is a total detriment to having a stable family and home life.
 
They even do this with arguments against the resurrection, as in the apostles and people who saw Jesus were just inbred tribal groups and hallucinating. Like people back then had no idea that humans don’t typically come from the dead and couldn’t tell the difference between a hallucination and a real miracle.
It always infuriates me to no end too that most people these days think everyone who lived before the dawn of the Jewish plastic nightmareworld age was retarded.

You talk to these morons about an ancient polymath genius noble and they unironically tell you that "well, he lived in le evil church dark ages so probably a current day highschooler is smarter than he was".

WhatsApp Image 2024-07-13 at 4.15.57 PM.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Above a certain level higher ‘intelligence’ in a woman is a total detriment to having a stable family and home life.
The fact that a woman with even just slightly above average intelligence will no doubt have been showered with compliments from an early age on how much of a "genius" she is has to be considered as well. A lot of these women are so full of completely idiotic ideas but they have such big heads, they're really exhausting to talk to.
 
It always infuriates me to no end too that most people these days think everyone who lived before the dawn of the Jewish plastic nightmareworld age was retarded.

You talk to these morons about an ancient polymath genius noble and they unironically tell you that "well, he lived in le evil church dark ages so probably a current day highschooler is smarter than he was".

View attachment 14711

This bothers me too. This also happens in physical and mental sports. An example is Chess where you see people criticize players of the past because they ran their games through a near perfect playing chess engine.

“Anatoly Karpov or Bobby Fischer weren’t that good.”

The same people don’t realize they’d never get to 10% of their level without the massive amount of information available today.

The ancients figured out A LOT without access to the internet or think tanks or researchers sharing knowledge. It’s much more amazing than some hack academic getting a doctorate today.
 
I’d argue being over-educated and ‘high IQ’ makes women even worse. Those PhD and lawyer types are usuallly terrible partners. I’ve made the mistake of dating a few when I was younger.
Yes they are incredibly annoying. And since a lot of them actually don't sleep around, you might think it's worth trying to get to know them. Nope, waste of time.

I know women like this that I've started to ignore, and now they act bitter and like a pouting child when we run into each other. Should have been nicer when we talked the first few times. Be nice to men ladies, it's not hard. And your career doesn't make you special.

This is what's great about getting older. The ability to not simp and walk away.
 
I'll be honest, when I see this kind of thing as a divorced man, it makes me lose all hope that the risk of re-marriage is worth the trouble. I wonder, were women always this bad? Is this really only a "western problem"? It makes one wonder. Maybe St. Paul was right that men should stay single and celibate, like he was. Sadly, he puts a p***s pump advert in the middle of his video, cheapening it's value, so fast-forward through that. I thought those stupid things went out of style in the 1970s.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top