The Corrupt Courts of America

Supreme Court Rejects Alex Jones' Appeal Of $1.4 Billion Defamation Judgment​

This is unfortunate. I always thought that judgment against him had no legitimate basis, and was pure liberal courts run amuck. The fact that the conservative leaning SCOTUS failed to overturn it is hard to understand.
 
This is unfortunate. I always thought that judgment against him had no legitimate basis, and was pure liberal courts run amuck. The fact that the conservative leaning SCOTUS failed to overturn it is hard to understand.

I was not expecting an overturn. Lowering the amount of damages from sone other amount than 1.5 billion dollars would have been totally reasonable. But that didn’t happen for whatever reason
 
It's a violation of the 8th and 1st amendments.

In what world is a $1.4B judgment reasonable???
He did hurt a lot of feelings, tho. And one person sort of drove by their house.

I mean sure, mainstream media can dox your dying parents so that antifa can burn them down while they sleep because you said the n-word and that's protected speech, but Alex hurt some fee-fees real bad.
 
I’m curious, did this actually happen? What exactly are you referring to?
I'm combining two cases off the top of my head and exaggerating one of them that's relevant to this forum. I'm going to recount one of them here from memory, but it's likely many other forum members know the story much better than I do because I didn't hear of Roosh until a few years later.

In 2016 (or was it '15?), the founder of the forum from which this forum originated, RooshV, was made the most infamous man in the Anglosphere because he published a satirical article about preventing rape by legalizing it on private property. This was in response to women claiming they were raped after getting drunk and having consensual sex at men's houses, dorms, etc., and then making false accusations that ruined men's lives. Roosh was also organizing IRL meet-ups for his followers in many cities around the world.

The frenzy of hatred against him was so great that in response to a rumor that Roosh was going to use a boat to land in Australia, their navy was literally sent to patrol the suspected area on ingress. The mayors of Toronto and Montreal declared they would not allow Roosh into Canada.

During this time, both Roosh's divorced parents' addresses were put into the public domain by rags like the Daily Mail, which attracted visible protestors, but more importantly there is a well-known pattern of violence from leftists in these situations.

Roosh had to hire security for his parents and himself for a week or two until he left the country and the attention died down.

Unlike my semi-fictional example, his parents were in good health and never harmed.

The other case I was referring to is from Australia and the National Socialist Network (NSN), a pro-white political activist group whose leaders (Tom Sewell, Joel Davis, Jacob Hersant) have been smeared as White supremacists by the press and physically attacked by antifa in public and, after a paid agent/writer infiltrated and doxxed one of their prominent members who does much of their fitness training, Tim Lutze, his house and car were hit with multiple Molotov cocktails in the middle of the night, I believe on Christmas Eve or thereabouts, while he, his wife, and their children slept inside.

His car was destroyed and his fence burned down, but thank God his house did not catch fire as one of the Molotovs failed to ignite and was left intact lying in the front yard.

The police refused to investigate but, when pressed, some special branch of them came to Lutze' house in a group so they could check a box, but also refused to investigate. They said to the woman who answered the door they were afraid to enter the victims' house because some of the victims' friends were there (in order to console them, as expected) and the coppers were too scared to come inside and talk to them.

The cops demanded everyone but the Lutze's leave in order for them to remain and take a statement and they wouldn't even look at the damage and evidence outside, but left without doing a thing since the Lutze's refused the police demand to kick out their friends in their time of need.

Here's another example off the top of my head, but if I began googling I could go on for days:

During the initial BLM riots in the last week of May 2020, following the death of felon and self-overdosed fentanyl eater George Floyd, a right-leaning journalist named Cassandra Fairbanks (she's married now & named MacDonald), who worked for non-MSM sources like Gateway Pundit, was prominently tweeting every day in order to counter the nonsense coming from the MSM about "mostly peaceful" protests.

Unbeknownst to her, Twitter, like all of silicon valley and social media, is part of the revolutionary hive-mind and provides intel to antifa by leaking passwords so that DM's can be read by leftist agitators and their goon squad, who visited Cassandra's house in Washington, D.C. around midnight, and then terrorized her and her small children by shooting fireworks at her windows for about an hour, which she recorded on video and posted on Twitter.

Fortunately for Cassandra, she was not injured by the attempted arson and was able to move to a safer and undisclosed location within a week.
 
.

-snip-

The other case I was referring to is from Australia and the National Socialist Network (NSN), a pro-white political activist group whose leaders (Tom Sewell, Joel Davis, Jacob Hersant) have been smeared as White supremacists by the press and physically attacked by antifa in public and, after a paid agent/writer infiltrated and doxxed one of their prominent members who does much of their fitness training, Tim Lutze, his house and car were hit with multiple Molotov cocktails in the middle of the night, I believe on Christmas Eve or thereabouts, while he, his wife, and their children slept inside.

His car was destroyed and his fence burned down, but thank God his house did not catch fire as one of the Molotovs failed to ignite and was left intact lying in the front yard.

The police refused to investigate but, when pressed, some special branch of them came to Lutze' house in a group so they could check a box, but also refused to investigate. They said to the woman who answered the door they were afraid to enter the victims' house because some of the victims' friends were there (in order to console them, as expected) and the coppers were too scared to come inside and talk to them.

The cops demanded everyone but the Lutze's leave in order for them to remain and take a statement and they wouldn't even look at the damage and evidence outside, but left without doing a thing since the Lutze's refused the police demand to kick out their friends in their time of need.

Here's another example off the top of my head, but if I began googling I could go on for days:

During the initial BLM riots in the last week of May 2020, following the death of felon and self-overdosed fentanyl eater George Floyd, a right-leaning journalist named Cassandra Fairbanks (she's married now & named MacDonald), who worked for non-MSM sources like Gateway Pundit, was prominently tweeting every day in order to counter the nonsense coming from the MSM about "mostly peaceful" protests.

Unbeknownst to her, Twitter, like all of silicon valley and social media, is part of the revolutionary hive-mind and provides intel to antifa by leaking passwords so that DM's can be read by leftist agitators and their goon squad, who visited Cassandra's house in Washington, D.C. around midnight, and then terrorized her and her small children by shooting fireworks at her windows for about an hour, which she recorded on video and posted on Twitter.

Fortunately for Cassandra, she was not injured by the attempted arson and was able to move to a safer and undisclosed location within a week.

Yeah I remember the roosh v articles and meetups. If you’re a writer, and you self publish articles advocating the legalization of rape, I’m sure he expected and wanted some blowback/attention etc

At the time toothmosis wrote an article saying women with eating disorders are better to date than your standard girl(they are thin, take them to a restaurant and all they order is salad etc) and also “24 signs she’s a slut”

And the reeeeeeeeee was even bigger when roosh wrote rape should be legalized…. That was all intentional/on purpose but blew up in roosh’s face

I honestly didn’t hear about the Aussie stories. Or we get so much Aussie tyranny that it all meshes together
 
Yeah I remember the roosh v articles and meetups. If you’re a writer, and you self publish articles advocating the legalization of rape, I’m sure he expected and wanted some blowback/attention etc

At the time toothmosis wrote an article saying women with eating disorders are better to date than your standard girl(they are thin, take them to a restaurant and all they order is salad etc) and also “24 signs she’s a slut”

And the reeeeeeeeee was even bigger when roosh wrote rape should be legalized…. That was all intentional/on purpose but blew up in roosh’s face

I honestly didn’t hear about the Aussie stories. Or we get so much Aussie tyranny that it all meshes together
Roosh was not actually advocating rape. He was doing satire clearly riffing from Jonathon Swift's famous 1723 piece "A Modest Proposal", which called for the Irish to sell their children to be eaten, thereby getting some money and having fewer mouths to feed. Swift was not really advocating cannibalism. He was drawing attention to the inadequate efforts to alleviate hunger. Likewise, Roosh's piece was intended to draw attention to women's behavior that puts them in compromised situations.

Naturally the left played dumb and acted like it was a straight up piece promoting rape.
 
Roosh was not actually advocating rape. He was doing satire clearly riffing from Jonathon Swift's famous 1723 piece "A Modest Proposal", which called for the Irish to sell their children to be eaten, thereby getting some money and having fewer mouths to feed. Swift was not really advocating cannibalism. He was drawing attention to the inadequate efforts to alleviate hunger. Likewise, Roosh's piece was intended to draw attention to women's behavior that puts them in compromised situations.

Naturally the left played dumb and acted like it was a straight up piece promoting rape.


Yes I understood that at the time. Even as satire, he had to expect and want the blowback, again it was not a one time deal. It was to get clicks/attention etc. I’m not saying roosh was stupid about it, but he understood that fake news and clown world was the norm. We didn’t know about usaid at the time but none of us were surprised by that

He likely expected a lot of mouse clicks and hits to his websites but didn’t anticipate getting doxxed, randoms showing up at his parents house
 
Yes I understood that at the time. Even as satire, he had to expect and want the blowback, again it was not a one time deal. It was to get clicks/attention etc. I’m not saying roosh was stupid about it, but he understood that fake news and clown world was the norm. We didn’t know about usaid at the time but none of us were surprised by that

He likely expected a lot of mouse clicks and hits to his websites but didn’t anticipate getting doxxed, randoms showing up at his parents house
I guess you're right. He probably expected outrage and clicks, but thought at the end of the day they'd have to concede that it was just satire. Instead, they doubled down on saying he really meant rape rape should be legalized, which he didn't expect.
 
Last edited:
ACB has to be the worst Supremes judge that Trump put up. Concrete reliance interests? There was plenty of precedent of concrete reliance interests before Obergefell that the leftist Supremes were happy to ignore.
She also is supportive of contraceptive rights.

At one point in the conversation, Barrett included marriage rights and the right to use contraception in a list of liberties that are guaranteed under the principle of “substantive due process” — rights which are not specifically enumerated by the Constitution, but which are “so widely understood to be fundamental that they go without saying,” Barrett told Douthat.

……..

Barrett’s comments were similar to those made in her recent book Listening to the Law, in which she wrote, “The court has held that the rights to marry, engage in sexual intimacy, use birth control, and raise children are fundamental, but the rights to do business, commit suicide, and obtain abortion are not.”
 
She also is supportive of contraceptive rights.

These fair-weather "Christians" amaze me. They act like God doesn't care about what they do in their line of work. When we give an account on the last day, we're not going to be able to say "Well, it was just politics."
 
Women shouldn´t be judges. Or lawyers. Or study law. God knows already the pain in the a** of what arguing with a woman means. Imagine teaching her how to argue even better. She looks like a daddy girl. Who is doing all the right things to impress her father. I doubt she even wanted to study law. Women in law are probably one of the biggest reasons why everything as became so f complicated.
 
These fair-weather "Christians" amaze me. They act like God doesn't care about what they do in their line of work. When we give an account on the last day, we're not going to be able to say "Well, it was just politics."
Women shouldn´t be judges. Or lawyers. Or study law. God knows already the pain in the a** of what arguing with a woman means. Imagine teaching her how to argue even better. She looks like a daddy girl. Who is doing all the right things to impress her father. I doubt she even wanted to study law. Women in law are probably one of the biggest reasons why everything as became so f complicated.

There are 5 men on the Supreme Court now who would be against same-sex “marriage.” The 4 women on the court now would be for it (assuming the nigress supports it).

Women and their defense of fags is atrocious.
 

There are 5 men on the Supreme Court now who would be against same-sex “marriage.” The 4 women on the court now would be for it (assuming the nigress supports it).

Women and their defense of fags is atrocious.


I suppose the government being involved in normal marriage was a trojan horse to introduce same sex “marriage.”
 
Last edited:
Back
Top