The Corrupt Courts of America


Hearing now underway in Judge Boasberg's courtroom on his nationwide temp restraining order related to the president's March 15 proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act. Boasberg acted within hours of a lawsuit filed by ACLU on behalf of 5 suspected Venezuelan terrorists.
...
Boasberg: I have scheduled this hearing for fact finding on government's response to my order. Focus on timeline involved and get a sense of numbers of people here. I just want "facts" not planning to issue any ruling about the government's conduct.

Boasberg asks DOJ if it's still true that the 5 individual plaintiffs are in the US. DOJ says yes.

"How many planes departed the US on Saturday under the proclamation?" DOJ says flights complied with his order but won't disclose more to anyone.

Boasberg: "Anyone including me?"
DOJ: "Yes."
Boasberg: "Based on what?"

DOJ cites national security concerns, flight patterns.

Boasberg: "You're saying it's classified? I can receive classified information. Or there is some other basis?Why are you showing up today without answers?"

Nothing but a power play.
...
Boasberg: Here is a list of questions I want answered and you can tell me why you won't give me these answer.

How many planes left at any time Saturday based solely on the proclamation.

How many people were on each plane.

In what country did the planes land.

What time did they take off and land.

When were they in air space.

What time were individuals on the plane transferred to custody.

Now asks ACLU if they have any questions about flights.
...
There are three flights at issue: two that left before any written order (and that DOJ says did not include individuals covered under the Alien Enemies Act) and one that might have departed after Boasberg's minute order posted around 7:30pm on Saturday.

ACLU wants a sworn statement that third flight did not include illegals covered by proclamation. Boasberg tells DOJ he will order the govt to file a sworn declaration as to the third flight.

Boasberg: Now you can tell my why the other two flights complied with my order?

DOJ again argues Boasberg's oral statement during March 15 5pm hearing was not controlling in terms of timeline--that his order went into effect once it was posted on docket.
...
ACLU lawyer babbling about equities btw executive and judicial branches.

I have not yet heard any reason from Boasberg as to why he entered the TRO and then turned it into a class action lawsuit on Saturday.

He is not raising any due process issues or even disputing the president's authority to issue the Alien Enemies Act.

Boasberg now demanding to know when the proclamation went into effect. Wants to know how many people are subjected to the proclamation.

DOJ: I don't have the answer to that.
...
ACLU suggests a flight related to proclamation took off on Friday March 14.

Boasberg again demands that DOJ tell him how many people are covered by proclamation. DOJ resists and Boasberg says he wants to know why he cannot receive that information.

"What I will hear from you by noon tomorrow and I will memorialize this in a written order that you will offer me a sworn declaration that no one on the third flight was subject to the proclamation and why you cannot answer my specific questions in public and in what form you can answer them."


Wow.

Judge Boasberg demands the Justice Department must disclose highly classified information about a national-security operation involving the worst terrorists and one of America's strongest allies in the Western Hemisphere.

This will have serious consequences for the President's ability to handle national-security operations and foreign affairs, if foreign leaders think their secret operations will become public.

This puts American and allied lives in grave danger.

Hell. No.

The Justice Department cannot comply with this lawless, dangerous order by Judge Boasberg.

This is a serious violation of the separation of powers.

The President must revoke Boasberg's security clearance.

The House must impeach this unhinged judge.

Because the Chief Justice refused to get his judicial house in order two weeks ago.
 

**ahem** Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts.

Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed *Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC.

[*strong probability McCord is active CIA]

McCord's husband, Sheldon Snook, was the key staff of Roberts and almost certainly the leaker of the Dobbs decision. Chief Justice Roberts had to hide that reality (which he did after the US Marshal investigation) because it put the leak inside his office.

Boasberg knows this (and other stuff) and Roberts reacts to eyes on Boasberg from a defensive posture.
 
It´s not only in america. In all western europe excessive regulation is used as a blackmailing tool.

The power of these corrupt judges comes from the atrophy of law. Communism.

In this case no idea why Trump is using presidential powers to do something a simple immigration officer can do?

Any immigration officer can deport an illegal alien without a judge hearing. Maybe cause they werent deported back to Venezuela but to a different country? Why is Trump invoking war powers???? Why does he have to write an executive order for something which can legally be done by any immigration officer? Who is giving him legal advices?

Why is he sending aliens to Salvador? US doesnt have prisons? Just cause it´s cheaper?

Private people can do whatever they want as long as it´s not forbidden. Government is the opposite. Anything the government does. Must have a law allowing it. People through parliament must allow any government action.

Either way it´s retarded to defy courts. Cause judges don´t like that. Trump is creating bad rep in judges (more than he already had). There´s legal ways to achieve what its illegal. But in this case it´s actually legal what he is doing. If immigration officers are not working. He needs to replace them. A president can´t be making individual cases.

If judges continue to abuse their power. They´re power will wither. It always happens. Judges enact justice in the name of the people. Guarranted minimal constitutional rights for everybody.

Nobody will take judges decisions seriously if they continue to abuse their power and usurping the power of the executive branch. It´s clear as water.

What´s the point of all this retardness?
 
do not insult other members
In this case no idea why Trump is using presidential powers to do something a simple immigration officer can do?
Because the lawless Democratic Party is defying Trump's deportations order. That is why they took it to court.

Any immigration officer can deport an illegal alien without a judge hearing. Maybe cause they werent deported back to Venezuela but to a different country? Why is Trump invoking war powers????
"War Powers"? What are you talking about?

Why does he have to write an executive order for something which can legally be done by any immigration officer?
Because Biden Administration's immigration policies created the mess in the first place.

Who is giving him legal advices?
Stephen Miller.



Why is he sending aliens to Salvador?
Secretary of State's Rubio met Bukele in El Salvador last month.

Multiple agreements were struck to fight the waves of illegal mass migration currently destabilizing the entire region. President Bukele agreed to take back all Salvadoran MS-13 gang members who are in the United States unlawfully. He also promised to accept and incarcerate violent illegal immigrants, including members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, but also criminal illegal migrants from any country. And in an extraordinary gesture never before extended by any country, President Bukele offered to house in his jails dangerous American criminals, including U.S. citizens and legal residents.

US doesnt have prisons? Just cause it´s cheaper?
See above.

Either way it´s retarded to defy courts.
Tell that to the unhinged Democrats.



Cause judges don´t like that.
Which judges? Have you heard of radical/activist Democrat judges?
Trump is creating bad rep in judges (more than he already had).
What is the point of Democrats' lawfare tactics against Trump, MAGA, J6ers, etc.?

There´s legal ways to achieve what its illegal. But in this case it´s actually legal what he is doing. If immigration officers are not working. He needs to replace them. A president can´t be making individual cases.
This doesn't make sense.

What´s the point of all this retardness?
I don't know. I felt retarded after reading your post.
 
do not insult other members
Because the lawless Democratic Party is defying Trump's deportations order. That is why they took it to court.

It´s not just the Democratic Party.

"War Powers"? What are you talking about?


Alien enemies act is a wartime power to be used against foreign nations or governments.

"Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government,"

Do you think Tren de Agua is a foreign nation or government?


Because Biden Administration's immigration policies created the mess in the first place.

True. two wrongs dont make a right though.

Stephen Miller.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Dude is graduated in political science. This idiot is giving legal advice to the president of a superpower?!???
Trump needs to have a litigator working for him. A badass litigator.

Secretary of State's Rubio met Bukele in El Salvador last month.




See above.

This is weak. The message is US can´t handle their own criminals? They need help from a third world country? It´s a failed state. A third world country has better conditions than US?

Unless they are planning something else.

You don´t know who will be there in 4 years using this tyranny powers. Laws are not there to protect only venezuelan migrants. There are there to protect you also.

Tell that to the unhinged Democrats.




Which judges? Have you heard of radical/activist Democrat judges?

What is the point of Democrats' lawfare tactics against Trump, MAGA, J6ers, etc.?


UCLA and other organizations to whom you should be thankful they exist only asked 5 illegals to not be deported. One of the reasons was they had court hearings in 5-10 days. So basically Trump went needlessly into the sphere of the judiciary.

There´s lawfare when the judge excessively extended his injunction to all illegals on those planes. That wasn´t asked by UCLA. It was a disproportionate overeach of judicial power. Most of them already had deportation orders without the dumb war act proclamation.

The judge issued an abusive excessive confrontational order. Without evaluating the values at stake. First this aliens were already going to be removed with or without Trump war proclamation. And even if they were removed solely based on the order. It´s not up to the judiciary to evaluate all political decisions. It´s the people through congress and elections who will evaluate the merit or not of Trump political decisions.

If judges want to enact political decisions they should go to elections. If not it´s a government of unelected. It´s comfortable to make policies without having to be accountable to people.

That´s why it´s all retardness.

Trump invokes war powers without any war deporting people to a third nation. Judge overeach his power with an excessive injunction. And in the end. None of it was necessary cause the law already allows the deportation without court hearings (unless specific cases).

It will be interesting to see how the supreme court manages to resolve this.

This is the answer from ICE:

"On March 15, 2025, after the Proclamation was publicly posted and took effect,three planes carrying aliens departed the United States for El Salvador International Airport(SAL). Two of those planes departed U.S. territory and airspace before 7:25 PM EDT. The thirdplane departed after that time, but all individuals on that third plane had Title 8 final removalorders and thus were not removed solely on the basis of the Proclamation at issue. To avoid anydoubt, no one on any flight departing the United States after 7:25 PM EDT on March 15, 2025,was removed solely on the basis of the Proclamation at issue. ICE carefully tracks the TdAmembers who are amenable to removal proceedings. At this time approximately 54 members ofTdA are in detention and on the detained docket, approximately 172 are on the non-detaineddocket, and approximately 32 are in criminal custody with active detainers against them. Shouldthey be transferred to ICE custody, they will likely be placed in removal proceedings."

ICE is basically saying it´s not cause of Trump. They wouldve gonna ahead without the proclamation. This is not true at least for the 5 aliens waiting court hearing. As I said before. Illegal migrants can already be deported without the aliens war act. Why is the blonde orange dumbass invoking this powers might be for something else. Or he is just stupid.

Anyone working under Trump must realize the shit he issues might be illegal. And if they enforce it legal problems might arise for them. In this case Trump just transformed a simple operation into a legal clusterfuck. But the ICE people were acting within the law (not counting the orange war proclamation). Except when they failed to comply to a court order. And are therefore probably in contempt and will receive fines. Unless the judge continues in his dumb crusade.

The j6 people were lucky Trump won or they would still be in jail.


I don't know. I felt retarded after reading your post.

I don´t think you need to read anything to feel retarded.
 
Last edited:

We all know about the felon exception to the Second Amendment. It’s right there in the Constitution, next to the clauses about the right to abortion and the prohibition of speech against Israel.
 
GmqlnbTWUAAc1xo


 

Senior U.S. District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal
 

Senior U.S. District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal
Ok to ban pro Palestinian protestors but not drag shows????
The First Amendment should apply to everyone, or else it effectively applies to no one. If it weren't for double standards, there wouldn't be any standards for these clowns...
 
Back
Top