Tatted Unmarried-Mother Raises $500,000+ By Saying N-Word (Jew Pys-op Confirmed)

Status
Not open for further replies.
These laws involve calling your opponent Hitler, do you even read? Your posts are remarkably low-quality.
Pot calling the kettle black.

Do you even read?
Reductio ad Hitlerum (Latin for "reduction to Hitler"), also known as playing the Nazi card, is an attempt to invalidate someone else's argument on the basis that the same idea was promoted or practiced by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.
 
Yes, do you? To whom did my argument address? I described an idea, in general, to support my larger idea, in specific. The Hitler reference was not directed to anyone in particular.
I never said it was directed at anyone, I pointed out the fallacy, which is that pointing out that Hitler believed in “white pride” is an argument against white pride, is a fallacious argument.
That you might feel it was directed towards you, however, is telling.
It’s telling that I “might” feel something? Stop pussyfooting around it.
 
I never said it was directed at anyone, I pointed out the fallacy, which is that pointing out that Hitler believed in “white pride” is an argument against white pride, is a fallacious argument.

He made it into a political movement, which is about the most direct testing any idea can get, and Whites did not rally around it. That's not fallacious and I did not compare this to anyone else, which is what the Hitler fallacies are about.

Hitler fallacies are basically ad hominins using Hitler. I'm not discrediting White pride because Hitler used it. I'm discrediting it because it failed.
 
A person who wrote this trite has no business calling others out for arguing in bad faith. On top of that, the statement is double factually wrong - borders in Europe are often across natural boundaries (were you European, you'd know that Europe is a land of rivers, including great ones, like Rhine or Danube, and mountains, like Pyrenees, Alps and Carpathians), and if not, they separate two distinct ethnic groups. Arbitrary borders like Russia-Ukraine or France-Switzerland are an exception, not a norm. Furthermore, Middle East is far more divided with arbitrary borders that don't respect local customs, ethnicity or language.
Youre getting it, the entire thread hes done nothing but take any excuse to put whites in a negative light. Gaslighting and making dishonest arguments along the way.

You could just as easily say whites have more borders per sq meter because they have the highest drive of all races for creative expression which leads to such a high amount of diversity in culture/countries. No he just cant help being anti white. With fake ''brothers'' like these who needs enemies.

The hypocrisy of a troubled individual telling others to seek god and visit a priest for supporting shiloh, or whatever he thinks will cause people to hurt and second guess themselves and their ideas. Get actual priests to look at samseaus postings and see how he would fare.

Samseaus quest is not for truth and peace he seems to live for and feed off this bad faith arguing and pushing his agenda. Its a black hole with no end. Beat up truck said it best, he should not be in any position of influence to lead people anywhere.
 
Last edited:
Youre getting it, the entire thread hes done nothing but take any excuse to put whites in a negative light. Entirely consumed by gaslighting and making dishonest arguments along the way. Beat up truck said it best, he should not be in any position of influence to lead people anywhere.

The hypocrisy of a very troubled individual telling others to seek god and visit a priest, or whatever he thinks will cause people to hurt and second guess themselves and their ideas. Get actual priests to look at samseaus postings and see how he would fare.

You could just as easily say whites have more borders per sq meter because they have the highest drive of all races for creative expression which leads to such a high amount of diversity in culture/countries. No he just cant help being anti white. With fake ''brothers'' like these who needs enemies.

In an alternate universe with an ampartial samseau he wouldve banned himself long ago, But we are stuck with someone deeply flawed enslaved to personal demons using every ditry trick he knows to confuse and dissuade people from embracing positivity towards their own. How many warnings has he given himself. the double standards are so obvious.

Samseaus quest is not for truth and peace he seems to live for and feed off this bad faith arguing. Its a black hole that can never be filled.
In his mind he wins every argument because he reflexively dismisses legitimate counter-arguments, like OrthodoxWanderer's.

He calls his subjective opinions facts and therefore unquestionably not anti-white sentiment.

It doesn't work to have a mod who engages so vituperatively in so many discussions while still trying to enforce the rules.
 
42 pages in this thread already...


WTDnnwE.gif



full



source.gif
 
Last edited:
Youre getting it, the entire thread hes done nothing but take any excuse to put whites in a negative light. Gaslighting and making dishonest arguments along the way.

You could just as easily say whites have more borders per sq meter because they have the highest drive of all races for creative expression which leads to such a high amount of diversity in culture/countries. No he just cant help being anti white. With fake ''brothers'' like these who needs enemies.

The hypocrisy of a troubled individual telling others to seek god and visit a priest for supporting shiloh, or whatever he thinks will cause people to hurt and second guess themselves and their ideas. Get actual priests to look at samseaus postings and see how he would fare.

Samseaus quest is not for truth and peace he seems to live for and feed off this bad faith arguing and pushing his agenda. Its a black hole with no end. Beat up truck said it best, he should not be in any position of influence to lead people anywhere.

Zero arguments, all ad hominins, from a hypocrite no less - be honest, do you even go to Church? You've made zero posts in the Christian forum and you're telling me to see if Priests would approve of my posts or yours? You have no idea, I actually speak with Priests on a near daily basis you utter fraud...

In his mind he wins every argument because he reflexively dismisses legitimate counter-arguments, like OrthodoxWanderer's.

He calls his subjective opinions facts and therefore unquestionably not anti-white sentiment.

It doesn't work to have a mod who engages so vituperatively in so many discussions while still trying to enforce the rules.

I actually present counter-arguments - you resort to character attacks. You've got nothing, just bad feels.
 
It is time to make a verdict on the Samseau question:

Sam:
1) Posts hateful screeds about Europeans, calling ~40% (I wonder where did he get that data point form? Sam never presented a statistical model) "subhumans", sorry, natural liars, backstabbers and traitors
2) Thinks Europe should be one big blob with no regard for national identity and history - like India - and is completely ignorant of European history and geography. Thinks that ethnic and cultural diversity of Europeans is a proof of their inherent backstabbing nature and implies that Irishmen, Belorussians and Sicilians are the same thing.
3) Vehemently opposes any kind of nationalism... as long as it is European nationalism.

My verdict, based on the points considered above, is that Samseau's ethnicity is most likely to be:
- Punjabi Indian
With 2nd most likely being
- Ashkenazi Jewish
And other possibilities:
- Other Jewish, Other Indian, Han Chinese.

The reason why I think Indian hypothesis deserves more merit than Jewish one because advocating for autistic Europareich is something rather unusual for an Ashkenazi Jew, it might be bad for Europeans, it is not going to be better for the Jews.
 
Samseau,I believe you should consider locking this thread.

Perhaps you should also reconsider some of your stances regarding this forum.

I pointed out to you some time ago: cursing Jewish people and arguing that the "Bible tells you to do so" is a sin. You disagreed.
Now, most of your own followers call you "a Jew" and are cursing you out. I guess the irony is lost on you.

I think you should read the Scriptures with a bit more understanding. Perhaps it is also a good idea for you to decide: do you want your small forum to be really based upon the real messages of the Bible...or you allow most of your current commenters to push their questionable political agendas here, and you let them do it, simply because their badges say "orthodox". You know that the two are mutually exclusive.
This is your forum, the choice is ultimately yours.

All the best to you, Sammy.
 
Last edited:
Samseau,I believe you should consider locking this thread.

Perhaps you should also reconsider some of your stances regarding this forum.

I pointed out to you some time ago: cursing Jewish people and arguing that the "Bible tells you to do so" is a sin. You disagreed.
Now, most of your own followers call you "a Jew" and are cursing you out.

I think you should read the Scriptures with a bit more understanding. Perhaps it is also a good idea for you to decide: do you want your small forum be really based upon the real messages of the Bible...or you allow commenters with to push their questionable political agendas here, and you let them do it, simply because their badges say "orthodox".

All the best to you, Sammy.
May as well lock because there is no point in posting anything contrary to Samseau's edicts.

I posted some memes about Shiloh in the meme thread where I thought it would be less conspicuous or controversial. Samseau made a thread for it with a biased title, said he would change the title, then never did. He has not even a pretense at impartiality.

He opposes Shiloh because he hates whites and makes up whatever to support that. If you don't like it, too bad, he has to win every argument, and he's down to gaslighting and "No, you." retorts.
 
It is time to make a verdict on the Samseau question:

Sam:
1) Posts hateful screeds about Europeans, calling ~40% (I wonder where did he get that data point form? Sam never presented a statistical model) "subhumans", sorry, natural liars, backstabbers and traitors

40% of Whites voted for Democrats in the 2024 election. There's no reason to vote Democrat if you're White unless you're motivated by prideful, selfish reasons.

Note I am not saying one needs to vote Republican. I am saying there is never any reason to vote Democrat at the Federal level. So 40% voting Dem = 2/5 Whites are treacherous. This does not make them subhumans, that is your emotional over-reaction to my criticism.

2) Thinks Europe should be one big blob with no regard for national identity and history - like India - and is completely ignorant of European history and geography. Thinks that ethnic and cultural diversity of Europeans is a proof of their inherent backstabbing nature and implies that Irishmen, Belorussians and Sicilians are the same thing.

I'm indifferent to the number of countries - I'm merely pointing out that the great number of political boundaries are indicative of their racial character. This is indisputable.

3) Vehemently opposes any kind of nationalism... as long as it is European nationalism.

False, I'm against blind, ideological nationalism. I'm against reductionism in general, we are more than our race or political boundary, however, both are still important.

My verdict, based on the points considered above, is that Samseau's ethnicity is most likely to be:
- Punjabi Indian
With 2nd most likely being
- Ashkenazi Jewish
And other possibilities:
- Other Jewish, Other Indian, Han Chinese.

These guesses are hilarious. You would be humbled if you met me.

The reason why I think Indian hypothesis deserves more merit than Jewish one because advocating for autistic Europareich is something rather unusual for an Ashkenazi Jew, it might be bad for Europeans, it is not going to be better for the Jews.

When have I ever advocated for the a new Reich? No idea where you are reading this from.
 
The funny thing is y'all getting super salty at criticism of whites are proving Samseau's point. You want to claim all the greatness of whites' history but will own up to none of the flaws. Playing the victim, it's all the Jews' fault, just like black folks who claim it's all whitey's fault and refuse to acknowledge their race's respective downfalls. Missing his original point to get hysterical about rhetorical details like women. Honestly. Very sad thread.
 
Samseau: whites need repentance and Christ to collectively overcome their sins of pridefulness, greed and treachery, it's their fault the Jews had the success they did

Others: Why do you hate white people

View attachment 21364

Cap, Lil S just got his panties in a twist when he found his ingrained ((Marxist)) race denialism and incoherent anti White brainwashing were no longer the consensus and has since been swinging haymakers left and right with his takes ranging from 'Whites don't exist' to 'Whites ackshually do exist and are totally responsible for their own demise and those looking to right the ship are part of a 'Talmudic Jewish' plot'.

In the presence of such affirmative action tier nonsense, guilt tripping, putting up strawmen, self righteous posting and intentionally misrepresenting takes are par for the course, above slop post proves my point
 
The funny thing is y'all getting super salty at criticism of whites are proving Samseau's point. You want to claim all the greatness of whites' history but will own up to none of the flaws. Playing the victim, it's all the Jews' fault, just like black folks who claim it's all whitey's fault and refuse to acknowledge their race's respective downfalls. Missing his original point to get hysterical about rhetorical details like women. Honestly. Very sad thread.
Jews, browns and Marxists hate Whites standing up for themselves. You literally went from feigned concerns over heavenly salvation of fellow forum members to racial slurs within the span of 10 minutes.

Not for the first time in this thread, sad indeed.
 
Last edited:
do not tell, or insinuate, to other members to kill themselves
The funny thing is y'all getting super salty at criticism of whites are proving Samseau's point. You want to claim all the greatness of whites' history but will own up to none of the flaws. Playing the victim, it's all the Jews' fault, just like black folks who claim it's all whitey's fault and refuse to acknowledge their race's respective downfalls. Missing his original point to get hysterical about rhetorical details like women. Honestly. Very sad thread.
You're going with the, "I didn't do anything, you're just too sensitive" routine?

What a joke of a gaslighting attempt.

No one is more open and receptive to criticism of self and of others than Europeans. It's one of our cultural features finally idealized and implemented in the USA with freedom of speech in the First Amendment, something that was never before codified, made possible by European culture and its thousands of years of development.

What's in this thread are mostly non-whites throwing their manure around because they can not tolerate the faults of their race being on display in social media and so often posted here.

And what I'm not receptive to is hatred and denigration, such as:

F*ck whites

Whites are the most treacherous people on earth

Whites are backstabbers

Go take a flying leap.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top