Tatted Unmarried-Mother Raises $500,000+ By Saying N-Word (Jew Pys-op Confirmed)

Yes, it does contradict it, Whites are no more or less likely for ethnic conflict than other races, except maybe East Asians, and even that is a complete guess. They have a longer history of it due to the reasons I listed (advanced infrastructure, smaller land mass per population, the breakup of the roman empire which forced them to live together).

The history isn't that important, the results are. Hence why the European political map is a mess while others are just big blobs of countries. Places like Africa barely even have a recorded history. They have bigger problems to worry about than pride.

But Whites always destroy one another, always seek advantages to the detriment of one another, and hold grudges over past acts that continue for centuries, even thousands of years. The Irish still refuse to be part of England for example.

So nothing you've said contradicts the main thrust of my argument.

I’m not sure what predictions I have gotten wrong, much less 90% of them. I am only witnessing White racial consciousness rising across the globe. I make 0 predictions as to how it will conclude.

We could make an entire thread dedicated to all of your false predictions and claims, that's how reliably wrong you are. Just the other day:

I think they are dumb enough to try this. I don't think they truly realize how unpopular Israel is with people under 40. This will be a massive backfire.

"They" didn't try anything nor did anything backfire. Just another empty claim of yours that goes nowhere.

There is a reason so many have you on ignore.
 
To realize that whites corrupt themselves isn't anti-white LMAO. It's a fact but that doesn't mean I want my family to intermix.

*Beatuptruck could've gone out with a bang like his truck almost did but decided to just keep tinkering on it 2/10.
 
The history isn't that important, the results are. Hence why the European political map is a mess while others are just big blobs of countries. Places like Africa barely even have a recorded history. They have bigger problems to worry about than pride.

But Whites always destroy one another, always seek advantages to the detriment of one another, and hold grudges over past acts that continue for centuries, even thousands of years. The Irish still refuse to be part of England for example.

So nothing you've said contradicts the main thrust of my argument.



We could make an entire thread dedicated to all of your false predictions and claims, that's how reliably wrong you are. Just the other day:



"They" didn't try anything nor did anything backfire. Just another empty claim of yours that goes nowhere.

There is a reason so many have you on ignore.
I thought your point was that Whites are more likely to commit ethnic conflict. If that is your point, then I strongly disagree. If it is not your point, then I apologize and ask, what is your point? That Whites are just as likely to commit ethnic conflict as others and also make a lot of mistakes and do brutally evil things? With that, I will agree, though Sub-Saharan Africans are in a league of there own verse all other people of the world. But Whites v. MENA v. East Asians v Indians v. Nomadic Tribes, I would assume all have the same temperament in these regards.

I very much agree that Whites have weaknesses, have committed horrible crimes, are very far from perfect. Growing up around almost only White people, I see a lot of things about White people I would like to change. But I can't change hundreds of millions of people's behavior. And at the end of the day, maybe these behaviors will be the reason Whites do go extinct.

As for my predictions I have gotten wrong, would you let me know one, or even a few of them? I can't think of any off the top of my head.
 
As for my predictions I have gotten wrong, would you let me know one, or even a few of them? I can't think of any off the top of my head.
That America and/or the US dollar is going to collapse in our lifetime, that because you are mentoring young white men they will soon rise up against blacks and browns in America and create a white American ethno state, that there are no good women in America to marry, that the women in Eastern Europe are far superior to American women because they are more loyal and less likely to be whores, that living in Russia or EE as an expat outsider provides a better life than living in America, that rural America has been destroyed and that there are no places left to hide from black and brown people, that Patriot Front is a non-fed infiltrated organization who's ranks will continue to grow because young white men have "had it" and will therefore soon be putting blacks in their place by starting a race based civil war (without weapons), that Shilou Hendrix is not a tatted up attention whore who doxxed herself but a living white legend that whites will rally behind because they've "had it," that you will soon be a multi-millionaire who can then move to EE and buy a teenage virgin bride, and that Nick Fuentes is not a faggot.
 
That America and/or the US dollar is going to collapse in our lifetime, that because you are mentoring young white men they will soon rise up against blacks and browns in America and create a white American ethno state, that there are no good women in America to marry, that the women in Eastern Europe are far superior to American women because they are more loyal and less likely to be whores, that living in Russia or EE as an expat outsider provides a better life than living in America, that rural America has been destroyed and that there are no places left to hide from black and brown people, that Patriot Front is a non-fed infiltrated organization who's ranks will continue to grow because young white men have "had it" and will therefore soon be putting blacks in their place by starting a race based civil war (without weapons), that Shilou Hendrix is not a tatted up attention whore who doxxed herself but a living white legend that whites will rally behind because they've "had it," that you will soon be a multi-millionaire who can then move to EE and buy a teenage virgin bride, and that Nick Fuentes is not a faggot.
I can see both the USA and the USD dollar collapsing in my lifetime. I hope I am wrong, but I certainly can see this happening. I don't know that it will happen, but it is certainly a possibility.

I have never said White men in the USA would rise up and create an ethnostate. I said they are becoming more racially conscious, but my prediction is that it is too little and too late, this should have happened under LBJ if there was to be success.

I've never said that about American women or about Eastern European women.

Rural America has been destroyed and with mass immigration, like we have seen of Hattians into rural Ohio, they will make sure to leave no stone unturned in their quest to change rural American demographically.

I never once said Patriot Front doesn't have Fed infiltration. Heck, their own leader Rosseau says they probably have been infiltrated but makes the joke that at least an FBI agent is actually helping White people, which probably makes them sick, LOL.

I don't know Nick's sexuality, nor do I care, he is doing a good job of waking up people to the satanic elites, and he is far from my go to guy for information. The guys I go to are years ahead of him, and always have been.
 
I know, you've also never said that China will invade America and make Americans their slaves or that America will soon be getting into a war with Iran which Iran will win.
I did say these two things. I stand by them, well, I never said China would make us their slaves, I said they would eliminate most non-Chinese.
 
I thought your point was that Whites are more likely to commit ethnic conflict. If that is your point, then I strongly disagree. If it is not your point, then I apologize and ask, what is your point?

I never mentioned ethnic conflict once:

As for the nature of Whites being treacherous, disagreeable people, you don't need to be a professional historian to figure this one out.

The point is what Whites are naturally treacherous, rebellious, disagreeable people, and that this reality is reflected in a political map of Europe, which has more political lines than any other place on the planet per sq mile.

Very simple point, but it can be tough for ideologues such as yourself to understand.

Whether or not Whites are killing each other over ethnicity is beside the point and irrelevant to their nature. They can just as easily start wars or rebellions over money, religion, but also, political and ideological differences as well.

This is unlike other races that will submit to powerful rulers for longer periods of time. Additionally, when these rulers fall, other races generally do not hold grudges over what happened in the past and use it as a motivation for future political action. Whites do, and that's why Wales is distinct from England (because they never submitted to Guillaume the Conqueror, for example), because Whites are motivated by pride more so than any other race.

Whether or not this makes Whites inferior or superior is irrelevant, the point is very simple, and it is that Whites are their own worst enemy, and always have been. This is why "White Nationalism" is for fools, completely blind to their own nature as Whites, and literally dead on arrival.

Hitler tried the whole "White pride" thing and all he got for it was even more wars with everyone around him, which is exactly what you'd expect from a race that has a history of backstabbing, grudges, and rebellion.
 
I never mentioned ethnic conflict once:



The point is what Whites are naturally treacherous, rebellious, disagreeable people, and that this reality is reflected in a political map of Europe, which has more political lines than any other place on the planet per sq mile.

Very simple point, but it can be tough for ideologues such as yourself to understand.

Whether or not Whites are killing each other over ethnicity is beside the point and irrelevant to their nature. They can just as easily start wars or rebellions over money, religion, but also, political and ideological differences as well.

This is unlike other races that will submit to powerful rulers for longer periods of time. Additionally, when these rulers fall, other races generally do not hold grudges over what happened in the past and use it as a motivation for future political action. Whites do, and that's why Wales is distinct from England (because they never submitted to Guillaume the Conqueror, for example), because Whites are motivated by pride more so than any other race.

Whether or not this makes Whites inferior or superior is irrelevant, the point is very simple, and it is that Whites are their own worst enemy, and always have been. This is why "White Nationalism" is for fools, completely blind to their own nature as Whites, and literally dead on arrival.

Hitler tried the whole "White pride" thing and all he got for it was even more wars with everyone around him, which is exactly what you'd expect from a race that has a history of backstabbing, grudges, and rebellion.
Ah, I apologize then.

I actually agree that Whites are rebellious, to a fault. It is something Whites must learn to correct about themselves. That was why I told my Chinese friends that in a 500-year battle, Whites will win, but they will eventually self-destruct and in a 6,000-year battle, the slow and more steady East Asians would win.

Well, to Hitler's credit, there were a lot of Whites who sided with him, it was the Whites living in areas where the satanic elites had full control over the press to lie and get their men to fight against their own interest. But I have also said, as far as the allies in WW2, if you are going to travel thousands of miles and pick up a rifle and shoot another Christian, you better have a damn good reason for it and "my nation needed me" isn't it and that is one of many big lessons from WW2. With the comments I see about Iran today, I think this lesson is being learned, I pray I am correct.

I do agree with your points here on White people and these are things I would change about them, if I could.
 
I want to add something that might surprise some people, but I think about this subject a lot, and it isn't black and white, it is a very big question humans have to solve. For our entire existence we lived in separate regions of the world, ones in which we slowly, through reproductive selection, became suited for. For thousands of years, very few humans on the planet traveled further than 30 miles. It wasn't until post WW2 that traveling long distances became a normal thing. Even my mom remembers the days before the interstate, and she is still with me and in good health. Her parents lived long before air travel is possible, I don't know if any of my grandparents, other than my dad's dad who served in WW2, ever even flew once in their life. I assume they did, but thinking back on it, they maybe never did.

I well remember the days before the internet, I remember when school first got the "information super highway" my junior year of high school and it was more like the "dud information highway" as it was slow, glitchy, and gave no better information than the newspapers in the library, but with the blue screen and inability to move around physically.

I guess, what I am saying is that technology is moving faster than the human body and brain will evolve. And this leads to some big questions that will take a long time to answer.

I am not one who thinks Whites are perfect or superior, we have our own way to do things. I think it should be preserved, as I think all cultures should be preserved. I see a lot of faults in Whites I wish I could fix. I can list them out, but I am not trying to write a book. I feel like God brings us to information, people and places for a reason. Yesterday, just by chance, on twitter I saw this tweet...



And this image made me sick to my stomach, and I had to think it over. I understand the White men of their time; they would never get to travel to these far-off lands and see these people with their own eyes. I have the advantage of just pulling up my cell phone, at any time and learning about these far-off lands and people. They didn't have this advantage, and it was a way for them to learn. The White men of this time also worked long hours, in dangerous jobs and faced death, so they were much more callous. I can't fault them for these things. At the same time, the look on this girl's face really made me feel sick. This is just wrong, we can all see this is wrong, and deep down we now know this is wrong.

And this leads me to some important points...

#1) The fact we all know this is wrong means that we, as humans are advancing and don't treat each other this way, which is a huge change over the last 125 years and gives me great hope.

#2) That through Christ, we all must come together and beat the evil that caused things like this to ever occur, especially the satanic elites who constantly want more.

#3) Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. We are all on the same side against evil and we must learn to work together and respect each other if we are to win this great battle, maybe the greatest battle humans have ever faced. Truly good v. evil.
 
#1) as humans are advancing and don't treat each other this way
How progressive, except we still do.

White people are sick in the head. Deranged even. I guess we do need black people in movies so we're able to process reality. The only time white people seem to experience empathy or introspection is when they see a monkey wearing a bow tie riding bicycle, forcing the white person into an introspective trance on the nature of reality. If only therapists knew this one simple trick.

The actual facts paint a different picture.

The US government thought it would be a good idea having these indigenous circus shows for their (((foreign policy))). The girl is not tied up. White people attended because why not. Various people did find the displays dehumanizing. They were shut down.

Once again proving that white people are able to police our own when things get out of hand.
 
Hitler tried the whole "White pride" thing
On this point, in my current mixed state of education and ignorance on Hitler's theoretical basis, I suspect he focused on German consolidation. This particular white subgroup has had a wide geographic spread through Eastern Europe and Russia (and, incidentally but perhaps less importantly to Hitler, in the USA) of ethnically conscious members, and with such a distribution comes the concern over ethnic conflict. Whatever you think of putting the Volk first, I wouldn't consider it an historically unusual impulse.
 
There's a big difference. Christ was a Jew and the King of Jews, why should modern blashpeming Jews be considered the same? They are followers of the Talmud (man-made) and not the Gospel (God made).

How can one be considered a Jew if they do not follow the King of Jews? Hence the title of this forum.

Talmudic Jew is a perfect descriptor because it's not about the race, it's about the spirit. Read more:

Sounds a lot like splitting hairs. Jews consider everyone of Jewish descent to be Jewish, with one exception - if they confess to follow non-Jewish religion (usually Christianity or Islam) in public. That includes Reform, Conservative, Beta Yisrael, converts who are married to Jewish partners (like Ivanka Trump), even atheists (atheist ideology is Jewish). Are you angling for existence of some mythical good Jews? If they indeed exist, their moral conviction should incentivize them to stop being Jewish as soon as possible. Because being good while being Jewish is like being good while being a drug-dealing member of a mafia syndicate.
 
The most politically divided landmass in the world. None of these lines actually exist except in the minds of the Whites who made them, which occurred over thousands of years after the collapse of the Roman Empire. There are more countries per sq meter than anywhere else in the world strictly because of the tendency of Whites to betray, rebel, and kill one another for power.

A person who wrote this trite has no business calling others out for arguing in bad faith. On top of that, the statement is double factually wrong - borders in Europe are often across natural boundaries (were you European, you'd know that Europe is a land of rivers, including great ones, like Rhine or Danube, and mountains, like Pyrenees, Alps and Carpathians), and if not, they separate two distinct ethnic groups. Arbitrary borders like Russia-Ukraine or France-Switzerland are an exception, not a norm. Furthermore, Middle East is far more divided with arbitrary borders that don't respect local customs, ethnicity or language.
 
On this point, in my current mixed state of education and ignorance on Hitler's theoretical basis, I suspect he focused on German consolidation. This particular white subgroup has had a wide geographic spread through Eastern Europe and Russia (and, incidentally but perhaps less importantly to Hitler, in the USA) of ethnically conscious members, and with such a distribution comes the concern over ethnic conflict. Whatever you think of putting the Volk first, I wouldn't consider it an historically unusual impulse.

Hitler tied his nationality to the concept of race, which hitherto had not been done in any serious way or shape before, and Hitler also thought of the French and the English as Germanic cousins; which while true, both were his enemy and worked to destroy him and succeeded. So much for the Volk.


Let me take a wild guess, you also believe eugenics is bad and evil?

These laws involve calling your opponent Hitler, do you even read? Your posts are remarkably low-quality.

Sounds a lot like splitting hairs. Jews consider everyone of Jewish descent to be Jewish, with one exception - if they confess to follow non-Jewish religion (usually Christianity or Islam) in public. That includes Reform, Conservative, Beta Yisrael, converts who are married to Jewish partners (like Ivanka Trump), even atheists (atheist ideology is Jewish). Are you angling for existence of some mythical good Jews? If they indeed exist, their moral conviction should incentivize them to stop being Jewish as soon as possible. Because being good while being Jewish is like being good while being a drug-dealing member of a mafia syndicate.

Why should I, or you, care who Talmuds consider to be Jewish? They are blasphemers on a one way track to hell. I don't care what blasphemers think, but that they repent.

A person who wrote this trite has no business calling others out for arguing in bad faith. On top of that, the statement is double factually wrong - borders in Europe are often across natural boundaries (were you European, you'd know that Europe is a land of rivers, including great ones, like Rhine or Danube, and mountains, like Pyrenees, Alps and Carpathians), and if not, they separate two distinct ethnic groups. Arbitrary borders like Russia-Ukraine or France-Switzerland are an exception, not a norm. Furthermore, Middle East is far more divided with arbitrary borders that don't respect local customs, ethnicity or language.

There are thousands of places in the world where natural borders could exist and yet do not, apart from Europe. Your theory is easily disproved. China for example should be at least 5 different countries.

Moreover you completely neglect the ever shifting nature of European borders, as if it's some fixed thing attached to the land when any historical analysis shows otherwise.

Finally, the Middle East has it's borders setup by the Brits after WW1, who probably did so under the guidance of the Talmuds - hardly indicative of Arab nature. Most of ME history had 1-3 countries.
 
Back
Top