Racial Slurs

I feel stadtaffe's post was kind of rude, but you kind of dug your own grave here. Most of the thread was ghosted by its OP (You) until now, which is barely ever a good thing.

The arguments were made, the counterarguments were kind of made, so I'd suggest mods to create some kind of poll or final decision on this. Thread goes nowhere outside of a few memes. Bada bing, bada coon.


Let me disregard this by stating that the context itself was not wrong. I have already stated my views of what is a scholastic person, based on many university years on the glorious state university of the city of Lagos, Nigeria.

If he said "lowlife black", this thread would not have been made at all. Do you see a problem in this? We all know the Somalis he talked about are just scholars looking for education in the prestigious but hard working universities of Sweden, and not to do crime and abuse welfare, so what is the problem in this?

I don't want to make this personal, as the debate would have been made eventually, but I find it ironic how you had a Stonetoss profile picture of a British cop restricting speech on the last forum, then one 6 letter word makes you support censorship.


I'm all for free speech, but this is a Christian forum. Do you think we should permit swearing on here? Blasphemy? How about a porn thread? Or do you agree with me that on a Christian forum there needs to be standards?

As for ghosting the thread, I made my point and the mods acted on it. There was nothing more for me to say.
 
Do you think we should permit swearing on here? Blasphemy? How about a porn thread? Or do you agree with me that on a Christian forum there needs to be standards?
You seem to be equating the word black in Spanish to blasphemy. That would be moving the goal post either way. As I said before, I believe it's just a word, and the context was not even bad.

As for ghosting the thread, I made my point and the mods acted on it. There was nothing more for me to say.
Mods and admins have their say on the forum at the end of the day, but I disapprove of having a one-sided censorship request, over defending Somali lowlifes of all things. It just shows the argument is frail.
 
If he said "lowlife black", this thread would not have been made at all. Do you see a problem in this?
It was not even here is a list of ten recent racial slurs on the forum it was just a knee-jerk reaction to one! Just like all the stop hate speech police on the left that we have in our face all the time, on billboards etc.

I disapprove of having a one-sided censorship request, over defending Somali lowlifes of all things
Right now politicians and other important decision makers are meeting the wannabe World Government in Davos and being subjected to tactics to get them comply with the various agendas. Who knows exactly how, brown envelopes, promises of promotions and glory in the halls of power, threats of being demoted if they don't comply, whatever it takes to turn them into puppets and bring about You will own nothing and be happy by 2030, wear a mask and don't leave your house if we tell you to because the virus, and of course of relevance here, censorship of fake news and fighting hate speech. Of course that implies sanctioning racial slurs.

At least racial slurs are still in the human realm, whereas the Davos agenda is trans-humanist. It is said that Claus Schwab's previous academic work was very much along the lines of that new philosophy. You have to pick a side and if you are attacking a single racial slur on the forum, maybe @Papist it wasn't meant that way but it makes it sound like you're with them.
 
Apparently this type of conversation is "racial slurring" and is very typical of white American men. WARNING: Not funny.



Let's turn the tables. Go to Korea as a white man. See how many times you get asked the same question. And it's totally understandable - there's no reason to become offended unless you're entitled.

If I expect special treatment as an outlier to the 'bedrock' of the population, then THAT is racial priviledge. What this attempt at comedy is expressing is actually minority racial privilege.

I lived in Southeast Asia for 7 years and this was part of my daily conversation. Times I got butthurt and became a loser about it: 0.

It wouldn't have mattered if I was born there and became completely, perfectly fluent in any of their languages - I'd still be asked this question.

And I hope it never changes. I hope even 50 years into the future I still get asked that question on a daily basis as a white man in Asia.

And I'm glad. I respect their culture and heritage. I don't want them to become diluted by people like me.

When I write the words "melting pot" the emoji that automatically populates is this one: 😍. Part of the problem.

This same woke Asian chick will probably fly the Korean flag, gloat about how Korean she is with her cooking, or how Korean women have a particular flavor of quirky sassyness.

The fact that so many people get triggered by what should be normal behavior while at the same time think this is funny shows how backwards things are, especially in the woke west.

This type of conversation is normal even amongst fellow whites in my experience (or really any race just take your pick).

We aren't really "white". That doesn't mean anything. So we ask about each other's ethnic backgrounds. Example: "I'm Greek/Italian, what are you?" Always an interesting topic.
 
Last edited:
We aren't really "white". That doesn't mean anything. So we ask about each other's ethnic backgrounds. Example: I'm Greek/Italian, what are you? This is always an interesting topic.
...yes but you forgot to add a racial slur - this thread gets boring without one!

What do they call each other where you used to live, how do they slur, c'mon tell us ;)
 
...yes but you forgot to add a racial slur - this thread gets boring without one!

What do they call each other where you used to live, how do they slur, c'mon tell us ;)

In Thailand it was "farang ki nok". It means bird poop foreigner. 😆

I'm not exactly clear on the context but apparently it's used when foreigners complain about double standards for pricing and act 'cheap', or, ironically, when they exploit the native Thais in some way or another I guess.

One time, I was at a festival in my Thai girlfriend's country redneck farming village, and her uncle SangSom Chang got drunk and called me a bird poop foreigner.

My girlfriend was aghast and scolded him. I just thought it was funny and also true in some ways. I couldn't really blame him.

I was deflowering his niece, couldn't speak their language or commune with them properly, had hardly anything in common, and was just sitting there out of place, like a white stain on his tractor.

This slur is simple and cogent. What is bird poop? It's a white stain.

These fish heads are very clever!
 
Last edited:
Do you all think there are actually people who don't believe that all people look up to Europeans/Euro civilization? I find it odd that most people can't admit that the whole world has an obvious inclination to have euro characteristics or wants to live in their countries. You can admit this without any worry if you are a secure person.

Is it just random that the european evolved in harsher climates and had harder selection pressure? It's a curious thing to think about.
 
Do you all think there are actually people who don't believe that all people look up to Europeans/Euro civilization? I find it odd that most people can't admit that the whole world has an obvious inclination to have euro characteristics or wants to live in their countries. You can admit this without any worry if you are a secure person.

Is it just random that the european evolved in harsher climates and had harder selection pressure? It's a curious thing to think about.
I would say 99 percent of wokeness is driven by envy. BIPOCS who are envious and angry that whites are smart, better looking, more accomplished, etc.
 
One time, I was at a festival in my Thai girlfriend's country redneck farming village, and her uncle SangSom Chang got drunk and called me a bird poop foreigner.

My girlfriend was aghast and scolded him. I just thought it was funny and also true in some ways. I couldn't really blame him.

I was deflowering his niece, couldn't speak their language or commune with them properly, had hardly anything in common, and was just sitting there out of place, like a white stain on his tractor.

This slur is simple and cogent. What is bird poop? It's a white stain.
Off-topic but all this talk of bird poop reminds me of something I often think back on but nobody ever mentioned on the forum. This belongs in another thread.. I used to follow German politics more closely..

And what an incredible coincidence that someone should mention bird poop and this should come up on 27th January, International Holocaust Remembrance Day !

One of the former leaders of the AfD Alexander Gauland held a speech on 2 June 2018 to the newly founded youth section of the party which contained the following :
Wir haben eine ruhmreiche Geschichte, die länger dauerte als 12 Jahre und nur wenn wir uns zu dieser Geschichte bekennen, haben wir die Kraft, die Zukunft zu gestalten. Ja, wir bekennen uns zu unserer Verantwortung für die 12 Jahre, aber liebe Freunde, Hitler und die Nazis sind nur ein Vogelschiss in unserer über tausendjährigen Geschichte.
Vogelschiss = bird poop

Basically that a certain 12 years with Hitler and the Nazis were but a bird poop on Germany's over thousand year long glorious history.

Actually in the video of that "bird poop" video there was a few more words, a bit more respectful and acknowledging again about it -

Of course as respectful as it was, trying to give Germany a chance to move past its guilt, the comment stirred up a fury in the mainstream press and in mainstream politics. The bird-poop affair..
 
Do you all think there are actually people who don't believe that all people look up to Europeans/Euro civilization? I find it odd that most people can't admit that the whole world has an obvious inclination to have euro characteristics or wants to live in their countries. You can admit this without any worry if you are a secure person.

Is it just random that the european evolved in harsher climates and had harder selection pressure? It's a curious thing to think about.
I'm a race realist. There's no question that certain races have different physical and mental attributes and, like you, I think that environmental pressures are the reason for this. I cannot see how that can be denied, one only needs to look at the 100m sprint, or swimming or the racial profile of chess grandmasters to see this.

I think that Europeans must have needed to cooperate more in order to survive harsh climates and I imagine that honesty and altruism would have been integral to this. If there is mutual dependence in order to survive a cold winter and somebody doesn't do their job or pull their weight then it would affect the chances of survival of the whole community. Folk would have needed to rely on the words and deeds of other members of the the community. I don't think this is true of other parts of the world where resources were more abundant.

However, the idea that Europeans are more intelligent than all other races is nonsense, IMHO. I believe Richard Lynn found that East Asians have the highest IQ and interestingly when one looks at academic achievement and crime rates, this seems to substantiate his findings.

Mass-immigration into the Occidental World, AKA Christendom, will be its undoing. To me, this has always been obvious. People are tribal by nature and I learnt this at an early age. The result will be a fractured society, where mutually antagonistic communities compete for resources. One can only speculate as to the why this is happening and who is behind it. Though I'm absolutely certain it is contrived, I think there is more than one group pushing the agenda - but all are ultimately driven by Lucifer.

The New World Order was foreseen and advocated for by many people. H. G. Wells even wrote a book entitled just that:


The New World Order is a non-fiction book written by H.G. Wells and was published by Secker & Warburg in January 1940. In The New World Order, Wells proposed a framework of international functionalism that could guide the world towards achieving world peace.[1] To achieve these ends, Wells asserted that a socialist and scientifically planned world government would need to be formed to defend human rights.[2]

I think we're in the final stages of the plan. When 'The Event' happens (more likely a series of events - war, an economic crash, a new pandemic), there will be unprecedented tension and large-scale civil unrest. The solution will be a police state and ultimately, the 'mark of the beast' foretold in Apocalypse (Revelation).

Kyrie eleison.
 
I think that Europeans must have needed to cooperate more in order to survive harsh climates and I imagine that honesty and altruism would have been integral to this. If there is mutual dependence in order to survive a cold winter and somebody doesn't do their job or pull their weight then it would affect the chances of survival of the whole community. Folk would have needed to rely on the words and deeds of other members of the the community. I don't think this is true of other parts of the world where resources were more abundant.
This makes sense for some of the Nordic types perhaps, since you see them commonly doing lefty/communist/socialist sympathy garbage in the modern west or EU, or even as 3rd-5th generation immigrants to places like Minnesota. What makes those of us who are european, understand all of this, and have personalities that are quite tribal to boot reject all of this nonsense - even though we are christian?
However, the idea that Europeans are more intelligent than all other races is nonsense, IMHO. I believe Richard Lynn found that East Asians have the highest IQ and interestingly when one looks at academic achievement and crime rates, this seems to substantiate his findings.
You're missing a key point that others identified. We are very closely related to east asians in many ways, not so much physically though for a large number of reasons. As a collective, east asians (and it's north east asians, btw) have the highest IQ but europeans aren't far behind with one more important and interesting fact: europeans have the smartest people overall, that is, the highest number of extremely intelligent or high IQ people, and it's not close. Said in a statistics way, there is a skew there, where the east asian group is more normally distributed.
 
This makes sense for some of the Nordic types perhaps, since you see them commonly doing lefty/communist/socialist sympathy garbage in the modern west or EU, or even as 3rd-5th generation immigrants to places like Minnesota. What makes those of us who are european, understand all of this, and have personalities that are quite tribal to boot reject all of this nonsense - even though we are christian?

All human beings are tribal. I can only speak of the United Kingdom, as that is where I am from, however the concept of a racially plural society would have been rejected outright at one time, in the not so distant past.

I read Simon Heffer's biography of Enoch Powell, a mainstream British politician (and theologian, poet, linguist, author and army officer) and it's quite clear that he had the support of the vast majority of the British public. After making his much maligned Rivers of Blood speech, which I highly recommend to anybody who has never read it, he was actually assigned his own Royal Mail van to deliver his post. In poll after poll ~85% of the public agreed with him, when he suggested that immigration should be stopped and repatriation started.

He was a highly intelligent man, though I suspect he had Aspeger's, and achieved a double-starred first from Oxford and was the youngest professor in the Commonwealth at the start of World War II, when he became the only man to rise from private to brigadier!

Anyway, there was opposition to immigration. The National Front marches attracted lots of working class support and was killed off when Thatcher stated that lots of people were concerned the UK was being 'swamped' (I cannot recall her exact words, but you can find the video on YouTube).

IMHO, British attitudes would never have changed were it not for the media. Firstly, they ridiculed those who opposed mass-immigration, by initially portraying them as stupid and ignorant. A classic example is Alf Garnett (and Enoch gets a mention in this clip):



Rigsby in Rising Damp is another example, for those who are familiar with comedy of that time.

As for the NF, the Battle of Lewisham and similar pitched battles allowed the biased media to distort the truth and portray the party as thugs. Essentially, the NF marchers used to attract ordinary, working class people - they even used to be led by a pipe band, I believe. However, the 'reds' mobilised students, blacks and others and started attacking the marches. The normal working class folk naturally became discouraged by having bags of urine and bricks thrown at them. However, a lot of young, working class types - often linked to the skinhead scene and football casuals - enjoyed the fighting. The media then portrayed the party as thuggish and violent and it became a stereotype perpetuated by the media. Here's an example:




Add to that all the Holocaust propaganda (ever considered why there are so many films about the alleged Holocaust and not the genocides committed by the Communist regimes, even during the Cold War period?).

So essentially, opposition to mass-immigration was equated with racism with connotations of thuggery and genocide.

It has been a cleverly orchestrated plan, which is why I have stated previously that it was contrived. It is also why I am suspicious of folk who come on to forums and start using racial slurs, as it simply helps perpetuate the stereotype expressed in that second clip.

You're missing a key point that others identified. We are very closely related to east asians in many ways, not so much physically though for a large number of reasons. As a collective, east asians (and it's north east asians, btw) have the highest IQ but europeans aren't far behind with one more important and interesting fact: europeans have the smartest people overall, that is, the highest number of extremely intelligent or high IQ people, and it's not close. Said in a statistics way, there is a skew there, where the east asian group is more normally distributed.

Quite possibly, it would also imply there are a lot of moronic, bovine Europeans. Though, I have always thought that East Asians' tendency to conformity stifles creativity and invention.
 
Quite possibly, it would also imply there are a lot of moronic, bovine Europeans. Though, I have always thought that East Asians' tendency to conformity stifles creativity and invention.
No, because the IQ difference isn't large. The skew is notable, though, but it's still a small tail. We're talking about 150 IQ + ... that's not common.

European creativity and innovation is unmatched, and it has something to do with culture, but that always has to do somewhat with genetics as well.

The ancients always saw the European as the middle of all the world races, the most balanced. Objectively, the most desirable traits and clearly the best looking as well.
 
No, because the IQ difference isn't large. The skew is notable, though, but it's still a small tail. We're talking about 150 IQ + ... that's not common.

European creativity and innovation is unmatched, and it has something to do with culture, but that always has to do somewhat with genetics as well.

The ancients always saw the European as the middle of all the world races, the most balanced. Objectively, the most desirable traits and clearly the best looking as well.

I agree to an extent. Certainly the thought that Thomas Edison must have more inventions to his name that the entire sub-Saharan peoples have in their whole history has occurred to me more than once. However, I do think that East Asians stifle creativity with their need for conformity. To be an inventor, one has to think outside of the box, so to speak.

I think it's worth remembering that 99.9999999% of European people do not advance civilisation in any meaningful way. We all must be grateful to those who do. The reason we live in comfort is a result of the ingenuity of others. The other thing to remember is the majority of Europeans have either subscribed to the current social-Marxist ideology, or are too cowardly to do anything about it.

Many years ago, almost two decades back, I was a member of a 'far-right' political party. I wasn't a member for very long, just two years. I distributed leaflets and canvassed for this party and I can assure you that I and my colleagues often received abuse from the public, though not as much as many might think, to be fair. People would not even engage in reasoned discussion, out of either fear of being considered a modern day heretic and ostracised - "what will the neighbours think?" - or out of a genuine belief that we were 'Nazis' and essentially evil.

I now have just a passing interest in politics and almost none in party politics. I think it is rigged, in fact I know firsthand that the media maligned my party at every opportunity - they exaggerated, distorted, fabricated or ignored facts to suit their agenda. Again, I have always maintained that the demographic changes are deliberate.

It was only when I read the Bible, prayed and received signs from God that it all made sense to me. The End Times as prophesied will not be stopped. Mass-immigration is all part of a diabolical plan - the Tower of Babel in reverse. Jesus spoke in parables. Jesus was God incarnate. Why wouldn't he have communicated in parables and allegorically in the Old Testament? He surely did. Destroying the nations is an affront to God.

As a Christian I have changed a lot. Whilst in my brief period of political activism I never hated anyone, but rather just wanted to ensure my homeland was preserved, I now try to love all people regardless of their ethnicity or even their character defects. It is difficult, and I am flawed. I even try to love the politicians that have sold out for money and power, those I consider traitors, as Jesus said "Love thine enemy."
 
I agree to an extent. Certainly the thought that Thomas Edison must have more inventions to his name that the entire sub-Saharan peoples have in their whole history has occurred to me more than once. However, I do think that East Asians stifle creativity with their need for conformity. To be an inventor, one has to think outside of the box, so to speak.

I think it's worth remembering that 99.9999999% of European people do not advance civilisation in any meaningful way. We all must be grateful to those who do. The reason we live in comfort is a result of the ingenuity of others. The other thing to remember is the majority of Europeans have either subscribed to the current social-Marxist ideology, or are too cowardly to do anything about it.

Many years ago, almost two decades back, I was a member of a 'far-right' political party. I wasn't a member for very long, just two years. I distributed leaflets and canvassed for this party and I can assure you that I and my colleagues often received abuse from the public, though not as much as many might think, to be fair. People would not even engage in reasoned discussion, out of either fear of being considered a modern day heretic and ostracised - "what will the neighbours think?" - or out of a genuine belief that we were 'Nazis' and essentially evil.

I now have just a passing interest in politics and almost none in party politics. I think it is rigged, in fact I know firsthand that the media maligned my party at every opportunity - they exaggerated, distorted, fabricated or ignored facts to suit their agenda. Again, I have always maintained that the demographic changes are deliberate.

It was only when I read the Bible, prayed and received signs from God that it all made sense to me. The End Times as prophesied will not be stopped. Mass-immigration is all part of a diabolical plan - the Tower of Babel in reverse. Jesus spoke in parables. Jesus was God incarnate. Why wouldn't he have communicated in parables and allegorically in the Old Testament? He surely did. Destroying the nations is an affront to God.

As a Christian I have changed a lot. Whilst in my brief period of political activism I never hated anyone, but rather just wanted to ensure my homeland was preserved, I now try to love all people regardless of their ethnicity or even their character defects. It is difficult, and I am flawed. I even try to love the politicians that have sold out for money and power, those I consider traitors, as Jesus said "Love thine enemy."

You just need to read Edward Dutton and Charles Murray's books to understand Race and IQ from a factual basis.
 
It was only when I read the Bible, prayed and received signs from God that it all made sense to me. The End Times as prophesied will not be stopped.
I've come to this understanding too, and it hurts, but it's obvious. We just don't know if the time will be suspended. With the way things are going, in my view, we might get 10 or 20 years, but I don't see this lasting much longer than our lifetimes. Tech will be huge maybe not in 10, but in 20 or 25 more it'll be even less recognizably human in society. We ain't seen nothing yet.
 
I've come to this understanding too, and it hurts, but it's obvious. We just don't know if the time will be suspended. With the way things are going, in my view, we might get 10 or 20 years, but I don't see this lasting much longer than our lifetimes. Tech will be huge maybe not in 10, but in 20 or 25 more it'll be even less recognizably human in society. We ain't seen nothing yet.
I think it's interesting that 2033 will mark 2,000 years since the crucifixion. Just look at Isaiah's prophecy (Chapter 3):

[Nb: remember that the 'chosen people' are those who accept Christ, following Jesus' ministry]

People will oppress each other—
man against man, neighbor against neighbor. [racial/class conflict?]
The young will rise up against the old, [seeing this with the 'boomers'?]
the nobody against the honored. [socialism?]

The look on their faces testifies against them;
they parade their sin like Sodom; [this is obvious!]
they do not hide it.
Woe to them!
They have brought disaster upon themselves.

Youths oppress my people,
women rule over them. [feminism - more female leaders to come; or the feminisation of politics]
My people, your guides lead you astray; [does anyone doubt this?]
they turn you from the path.


See the full chapter: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah 3&version=NIV
 
Back
Top