The exceptions to the rule, however, do not invalidate the rule, and conservatives in particular allow themselves to be manipulated by liberals focusing on the exceptions. That's precisely how abortion was norma
Last year in Warrenton, VA, the ex-wife of a judge involved
in some Charlottesville cases attempted to meet an 8-year-old girl in a motel room to abuse her. It's a gruesome case. Thankfully she was talking to an undercover agent and was arrested.
This is how the most liberal of liberals spins it:
What the libtard says is mostly true (we do not know if she is notably not LGBT--she sounds at least B to me, and of course if you do LGBTQPMAP+ then she really is in the group). And low IQ people or people who don't have time to sit and think fall into the trap of, "Yes, abusers come in all sexual preferences. This is a really good point."
But this is an
extreme edge case. That doesn't matter to the people reading it because they don't see how they are being manipulated.
If I had a bowl containing 500 M&Ms, and inside just 1 of them was feces instead of chocolate, all other things being equal, would you eat any M&Ms from this bowl if you knew about this? I hope your answer is of course not.
So we KNOW that gays are much more likely to abuse children than straights. Gays admit this to each other. It doesn't mean ALL gays abuse children, it just means if you're in a position to make public policy, you don't let trannies pick which restroom they want to use.
These same liberal retards want to ban guns "if it just saves one life" but also think people should use whatever restroom they want. There's no consistency except the edge case argument.
I was initially going to post this with a disclaimer that this was slightly off topic, but since this is the ex-wife of a judge who was sanctioning/sentencing people involved with Charlottesville, well, it's just reiterates to me that PF is on the right side, secular or whatever, and that we should support them in their fight against evil.