Papal conclave 2025

1746883882591.png
Without going into the information we have on their views Sarah is a man i can follow and trust based off of his physical presentation. Looking at the new pope and previous intuitively alarm bells go off, i feel something there that is not right and i want to get away from it. This goes beyond judging on attractiveness or old age thats not what im saying, do they radiate good energy and trusthworthiness or do you feel uneasy looking at them. I know i do, there is something there that is not right. ( the old pic is a young leo on the left )
1746884428035.png
View attachment interview with brother.mp4
 
Last edited:
View attachment 20823
Without going into the information we have on their views Sarah is a man i can follow and trust based off of his physical presentation. Looking at the new pope and previous intuitively alarm bells are going off, i feel something there that is not right and i want to get away from it. This goes beyond judging on attractiveness or old age thats not what im saying, do they radiate good energy and trusthworthiness or do you feel uneasy looking at them. I know i do, there is something there that is not right.
View attachment 20824
View attachment 20825
I wouldn't go too far with this but I generally think, as the years go by, physiognomy is massively underrated.

I don't think that the modern person wants to believe in things like inheriting the sins of your father(s) because of egalitarianism. However, the more you look at things the more you realize, and the extremes will show you this (like reasoning by extreme does), there is clearly something to DNA and existence in ALL facets of life: physical, spiritual, and psychological.
 
I wouldn't go too far with this but I generally think, as the years go by, physiognomy is massively underrated.

I don't think that the modern person wants to believe in things like inheriting the sins of your father(s) because of egalitarianism. However, the more you look at things the more you realize, and the extremes will show you this (like reasoning by extreme does), there is clearly something to DNA and existence in ALL facets of life: physical, spiritual, and psychological.
Yes I do believe a lot can be inherited and hence the stereotypical features of the Jews.

A large contribution to physiognomy also comes from the sins you commit over time. As they accumulate, they distort the face as one gets older. Hence why people like Klaus Schwab look the way they do. Many of these people look fine when young too, but they do not age well. The best thing you can do for your looks as you get older is to seek virtue whenever possible.

And I would add that to someone like Sarah inspires confidence. He resembles the wise village elder, who is discerning and ready to crush iniquity. Francis on the other hand looked like he was ready to throw you under the bus.

Many modern women who sleep around will look great at 20, but over the years you see how their faces become twisted. Some may still be objectively attractive later, but there's just something off you can't quite put your finger on. Like the "thousand cock stare".

Probably this is by design so that we are wary when we see someone with such a look.
 
Without going into the information we have on their views Sarah is a man i can follow and trust based off of his physical presentation. Looking at the new pope and previous intuitively alarm bells go off, i feel something there that is not right and i want to get away from it. This goes beyond judging on attractiveness or old age thats not what im saying, do they radiate good energy and trusthworthiness or do you feel uneasy looking at them. I know i do, there is something there that is not right. ( the old pic is a young leo on the left )
View attachment 20824

Just so people are clear, Leo is the guy in the background; his appearance does not give off any vibes to me except weakness. He looks weak of conviction.

The guy with black curly hair on the left, however, looks like a schemer and social climber you could never trust however, lol. But Leo in the background looks totally harmless, on the weaker side.

He may turn out to be a wolf in sheep's clothing. We shall see. But based on his mentor, Cupitch, things are looking very bad.
 
Just so people are clear, Leo is the guy in the background; his appearance does not give off any vibes to me except weakness. He looks weak of conviction.

The guy with black curly hair on the left, however, looks like a schemer and social climber you could never trust however, lol. But Leo in the background looks totally harmless, on the weaker side.

He may turn out to be a wolf in sheep's clothing. We shall see. But based on his mentor, Cupitch, things are looking very bad.
Thank you for the correction i was mistaken then, feel free to edit my post. Leo in the background does look completely normal but from what i have seen from his other apearances i still feel the same.
 
Last edited:
The amount of praise this new Pope is getting from the mainstream press is probably the biggest red flag of them all,


A ‘mirror image’ of Francis​

Pope Leo will likely be a “mirror image” of Francis – a different man but a continuation of his predecessor’s focus on serving the poor, missionary work and encouraging dialogue within the church, said John Lydon, an Augustinian friar who lived and worked with Prevost in Peru in the 1990s.

...

Climate change will likely be another one of Pope Leo’s top priorities, continuing Francis’ vocal calls for environmental preservation, those close to him said.

...

Sister Barbara Reid, the president of the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago, expressed optimism that Pope Leo will continue Pope Francis’s efforts to include women in ordained ministries and to encourage more acceptance of LGBTQ people in the church.

“I was so delighted, as many of us were, when Pope Francis famously said, ‘Who am I to judge?’ and it opened a door for acceptance,” she said. “I think Pope Francis was so clear that everybody belongs, everybody needs to have full respect and dignity, everybody needs to know they are welcome as they are in the church, and I am quite confident that our new pope will share that perspective and help us take the next steps forward.”


...

“It’s not a given just because in society … a woman can be president, or women can have many different kinds of roles of leadership in the world,” he said, according to The Associated Press. “It’s not like there’s an immediate parallel to say ‘In the church, therefore.’”

Prevost’s public comments on LGBTQ people have been scant but suggest he may take a more restrained stance than Francis, who never condoned same-sex marriage in the church but encouraged congregations to treat LGBTQ people with compassion.


-----------


So, he may be less pro-Gay than Francis? But still open-borders, climate change Pope. He's also made previous comments about not ordaining women, it seems, so that should be a relief for Catholic members. I guess that's all we can do for speculation at this point.
 
A large contribution to physiognomy also comes from the sins you commit over time. As they accumulate, they distort the face as one gets older. Hence why people like Klaus Schwab look the way they do. Many of these people look fine when young too, but they do not age well. The best thing you can do for your looks as you get older is to seek virtue whenever possible.
This is certainly Bro Nathanael's point of view.
He resembles the wise village elder, who is discerning and ready to crush iniquity. Francis on the other hand looked like he was ready to throw you under the bus.
I totally agree with that. We know that Bergoglio was in the vein of a socialist/communist, however, already.
but there's just something off you can't quite put your finger on. Like the "thousand cock stare".
I usually dispute this because it's actually the attitude that cinches it, since you can sense what they used to be, and you won't deal with their attitude (if you even ever were going to) without real youth anymore. The stare is the least objective thing thrown around on the fora I've been to over the years, with women and killers, and it's largely bunk in my view: you see what you want to see; obvious bias.
The guy with black curly hair on the left, however, looks like a schemer and social climber you could never trust however, lol.
No, that's Leo.
 







This happened just before the Conclave. Article dated 4 May 2025: "A Catholic diocese in northern Peru is alleged to have paid $150,000 to silence critics ... The report alleges that three Peruvian girls, longtime public critics of Prevost who blame him for covering up their sexual abuse by a popular priest, recently received the payments and have gone silent."
 
No, that's Leo.

Hmm, now you've got me questioning myself.

Here is a good pic from his side:

new-pope-cardinal-robert-prevost-conclave-050825-006d6200aa9f4e2a9b0be1d103348e4e.jpg


Here is young pic:

1746884428035-png.20824


Whoever the young man on the left is, has a very pointy nose. Pope Leo has a very round nose from the side. The man in the back has a round nose.
 
Here is young pic:

1746884428035-png.20824


Whoever the young man on the left is, has a very pointy nose. Pope Leo has a very round nose from the side. The man in the back has a round nose.
The young man on the left is definitely Prevost based on various articles and tweets stating he met Pope John Paul II. Compare the picture with the below (without eyeglasses).

20230130080128_5e20060c80862a900d5e305938c3990d920b29ac8f0e4324eaa5bc9006f40ae1.webp

Mgr-Robert-Francis-Prevost-nouveau-prefet-dicastereles-eveques_0.jpg

cq5dam.thumbnail.cropped.1500.844.jpeg
 
Because the Church needs based takes in the state that it is in.
The RCC is the Pope, you can be as based as you like but the Pope has the last say on your baseness. He can declare a new obligatory sacrament of anal dildoing for every catholic and you'd have no recourse against the guy according to RCC dogma. You have no say in the matter and you have to follow or face excommunication.
 
Back
Top