We already have, and we already are one, that's the point. If you don't have unity, the same mind of the Church, it's already gone. Sorry, this is just logical.How else will the Gates of Hell not prevail?
We already have, and we already are one, that's the point. If you don't have unity, the same mind of the Church, it's already gone. Sorry, this is just logical.How else will the Gates of Hell not prevail?
I wouldn't go too far with this but I generally think, as the years go by, physiognomy is massively underrated.View attachment 20823
Without going into the information we have on their views Sarah is a man i can follow and trust based off of his physical presentation. Looking at the new pope and previous intuitively alarm bells are going off, i feel something there that is not right and i want to get away from it. This goes beyond judging on attractiveness or old age thats not what im saying, do they radiate good energy and trusthworthiness or do you feel uneasy looking at them. I know i do, there is something there that is not right.
View attachment 20824
View attachment 20825
Yes I do believe a lot can be inherited and hence the stereotypical features of the Jews.I wouldn't go too far with this but I generally think, as the years go by, physiognomy is massively underrated.
I don't think that the modern person wants to believe in things like inheriting the sins of your father(s) because of egalitarianism. However, the more you look at things the more you realize, and the extremes will show you this (like reasoning by extreme does), there is clearly something to DNA and existence in ALL facets of life: physical, spiritual, and psychological.
Without going into the information we have on their views Sarah is a man i can follow and trust based off of his physical presentation. Looking at the new pope and previous intuitively alarm bells go off, i feel something there that is not right and i want to get away from it. This goes beyond judging on attractiveness or old age thats not what im saying, do they radiate good energy and trusthworthiness or do you feel uneasy looking at them. I know i do, there is something there that is not right. ( the old pic is a young leo on the left )
View attachment 20824
Thank you for the correction i was mistaken then, feel free to edit my post. Leo in the background does look completely normal but from what i have seen from his other apearances i still feel the same.Just so people are clear, Leo is the guy in the background; his appearance does not give off any vibes to me except weakness. He looks weak of conviction.
The guy with black curly hair on the left, however, looks like a schemer and social climber you could never trust however, lol. But Leo in the background looks totally harmless, on the weaker side.
He may turn out to be a wolf in sheep's clothing. We shall see. But based on his mentor, Cupitch, things are looking very bad.
This is certainly Bro Nathanael's point of view.A large contribution to physiognomy also comes from the sins you commit over time. As they accumulate, they distort the face as one gets older. Hence why people like Klaus Schwab look the way they do. Many of these people look fine when young too, but they do not age well. The best thing you can do for your looks as you get older is to seek virtue whenever possible.
I totally agree with that. We know that Bergoglio was in the vein of a socialist/communist, however, already.He resembles the wise village elder, who is discerning and ready to crush iniquity. Francis on the other hand looked like he was ready to throw you under the bus.
I usually dispute this because it's actually the attitude that cinches it, since you can sense what they used to be, and you won't deal with their attitude (if you even ever were going to) without real youth anymore. The stare is the least objective thing thrown around on the fora I've been to over the years, with women and killers, and it's largely bunk in my view: you see what you want to see; obvious bias.but there's just something off you can't quite put your finger on. Like the "thousand cock stare".
No, that's Leo.The guy with black curly hair on the left, however, looks like a schemer and social climber you could never trust however, lol.
This happened just before the Conclave. Article dated 4 May 2025: "A Catholic diocese in northern Peru is alleged to have paid $150,000 to silence critics ... The report alleges that three Peruvian girls, longtime public critics of Prevost who blame him for covering up their sexual abuse by a popular priest, recently received the payments and have gone silent."
No, that's Leo.
This is bizarre. If any person in the black and white photo is the new Pope, it's the guy on the left. I've seen him multiple times, that is him. This is not a question.Hmm, now you've got me questioning myself.
Yes, that's him, there are other younger photos out there. Apparently he is part black African Creole as well.This is bizarre. If any person in the black and white photo is the new Pope, it's the guy on the left. I've seen him multiple times, that is him. This is not a question.
The young man on the left is definitely Prevost based on various articles and tweets stating he met Pope John Paul II. Compare the picture with the below (without eyeglasses).Here is young pic:
![]()
Whoever the young man on the left is, has a very pointy nose. Pope Leo has a very round nose from the side. The man in the back has a round nose.
For any Spanish speakers in this forum, you'll see in the video below (starting around minute 42) Prevost giving the standard NATO talking points. I think there's very good reason to believe that the American deep state was influential in helping to get him elected.
Agreed. The side profile of current Leo matches very closely with the guy on the left in the old photo.This is bizarre. If any person in the black and white photo is the new Pope, it's the guy on the left. I've seen him multiple times, that is him. This is not a question.
The RCC is the Pope, you can be as based as you like but the Pope has the last say on your baseness. He can declare a new obligatory sacrament of anal dildoing for every catholic and you'd have no recourse against the guy according to RCC dogma. You have no say in the matter and you have to follow or face excommunication.Because the Church needs based takes in the state that it is in.