The fact he is willing to publicly discuss these issues, putting himself at serious risk, makes him seem like a good man. I wasn't sold on him until he didn't back down on his discussions, even after the Trump meeting.
Nick Fuentes Thread
- Thread starter MusicForThePiano
- Start date
The fact he is willing to publicly discuss these issues, putting himself at serious risk, makes him seem like a good man. I wasn't sold on him until he didn't back down on his discussions, even after the Trump meeting.
I have long had the same criticism of Nick. That he is just a snot nosed kid who is too arrogant to listen to the "wignats" who were right the entire time. Worse off, he then slowly steals their talking points, but then not only doesn't give them acknowledgement, he goes on to keep attacking them.
The problem with this, for Nick, is since he is only parroting talking points, and doesn't know them in and out and the foundation of them, he cannot offer a viable path forward. The path forward is organization around a racial super majority and Christianity, and then the political process can begin. He is advising the opposite, he is advising to individually infiltrate the system, but without a stated purpose or group, other than "to the right of the GOP".
The flip side Corey, as far as I can see, is not explaining a path forward either. Though, reading him over the years, I think he would agree with what I said, instead of saying "you are stupid to think this will work", he should lay out a path forward and then defend it, not just attack another path forward.
This is a good post by Nick, at least the message of not putting up with the controlled opposition spreads.
I think Nick's plan is a lot more viable and realistic than whatever Mahler is proposing. "Subversion" doesn't only go one way. The right lost the culture wars because they never had a long game. They're not going to win it now by still neglecting the long game.
The right "lost" the culture war because they were paid to do so.
I think Nick has some good points. People who agree with him need to take this very seriously. Workout, eat right, cut all drugs, work hard, build up wealth, become independent of the system as you can. Secretly fund organizations that will help spread grassroots growth. But even Nick himself doesn't do these things, eating junk food and scared to workout, he doesn't make much of a leader.
But if you get into the GOP and they get an idea that you agree with Nick, they will toss you out right away.
No political party cares about the ideas of the people on the ground. You can go in there and be the most tatted up, wignat, Christless conservative all you want, the GOP will put you on canvas duty or collecting signatures. The only ones who's ideas really matter are the people who have the power of the office, and even then, the people who pay the politicians are the only ones who's ideas really matter. People like Nick will never be the leader of any movement that stops this, but he's doing a good job of exposing the grift where he does.
What does it take to actually change the country and governance, however that looks, back to the leaders that care about the country, even if they have somewhat disputed notions of what's best for culture, national unity, government size, etc?
I have some thoughts but don't want to bias you.
I agree, Nick is a great messenger and is spreading the word far and wide. I was on a chat website and a person from Qatar asked me what I thought of Nick Fuentes, because they were a big fan of his. I was shocked people in Qatar know who he is.
Simply, a better people. We get the leaders we deserve.
True, but how do you get better people when the system and both parties import worse people and promote the worst people from within?
There's really only one answer to that and it's God's grace. I can't hold a gun to your head and make you a better person. I can hold a gun to your head and make you do everything I want you to do but I can't hold the gun there forever. If the people are grace non-responders then there's only one way this goes down.
JR5
Other Christian
I don't see a general influencer thread (just threads on specific influencers), so I will put this here:
"The Battle for Influence: Why Some Figures and Ideas Succeed and Others Don't"
This post examines how elites control influencers, ensuring they follow approved narratives or face consequences. It discusses examples like Andrew Tate, Tucker Carlson, and Joe Rogan, and how movements such as the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street were co-opted or suppressed. The central idea is that elites manage the influence of various groups by regulating their reach, ensuring they align with the desired narrative direction.
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-battle-for-influence-why-some
"The Battle for Influence: Why Some Figures and Ideas Succeed and Others Don't"
This post examines how elites control influencers, ensuring they follow approved narratives or face consequences. It discusses examples like Andrew Tate, Tucker Carlson, and Joe Rogan, and how movements such as the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street were co-opted or suppressed. The central idea is that elites manage the influence of various groups by regulating their reach, ensuring they align with the desired narrative direction.
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-battle-for-influence-why-some
Yes, it was a good post and is largely accurate, but everyone know this. The question is always discerning what information is the most reliable and following it. I recently have found much greater accuracy in geopolitical discussions by following the money and realizing what's going on with the US/Israel ceding control to the financial players, who of course run the US and its government, as much as the US intel agencies and Mossad do.
He used to recommend The Unz Review to his readers but has recently had a falling out with them. Ron Unz appears to have made a comment in an article there that Fuentes didn't like, and yesterday Andrew Anglin published an article criticizing him (Anglin and Fuentes had a falling out when Fuentes began collaborating with Richard Spencer). Fuentes has dismissed UR as a Russian-controlled outlet.
Last edited:
Nick wasn't arrested after being caught telling people to storm the capitol on Jan 6th. Nick allowed a large account on Twitter. Lots of questions about Nick's allowance of reach, while many other wiser and kinder men are banned from Twitter. It seems his role is to be the final gatekeep and it isn't going to work. Things are just too dire in this country and having a dork who eats junk food and doesn't work out try to lead real men, will never work.
lol, what in flip floppity doo is this?
These “fight the communist axis” feds are too much.
Can't speak to your earlier points, but I see Nick's point in the video. The conspiracy theory mindset that is so prevalent on the right can very easily cross over from healthy skepticism to unbridled superstition, and there are many, many grifters on the right who take advantage of this.