Nick Fuentes Thread

[It_Is_My_Time]

Something to consider when thinking about INMT's laughable how come "China will take over and turn everyone to fertilizer" theory: how come they haven't done this in Africa already?

Africa:
- does not have the Pacific Ocean as a barrier between it and China.
- already has China entrenched deep in with China basically strip mining it of it's resources
- is an actual third world society. A big part of INMT's argument for the "China takes over the entirety of the US" theory is that the US will eventually become too weak to resist Chinese takeover due to third world immigration lowering the IQ of the country to the point of it of being incapable of matching the more high IQ Chinese. If this is the case, then it should be way easier for China to take over Africa which isn't merely 60% or 70% third world (or whatever estimate you want to think the US's third world immigration population percentage will be in 40 years) but is 100% third world. The IQ and tech difference between China and Africa at this point is greater at the moment then it will be between the US and China even in 50 years.

IIMT has insisted his "the stronger country will always take the land of the weaker countries" is an ironbound historical law multiple times on this board. It's become a trademark IIMT meme at this point in the same vein as working 70 hours a week or having 70 20 year old women hitting on him. Example of him exerting this theory:

Post in thread 'The China Thread'

Sep 29, 2025

You ever heard of the Pacific ocean bro?
Have you seriously studied Chinese history at all?
They have been a trading people for thousands of years and almost all of their major history is within their borders. Far beyond being just merchants who suck a local economy dry, they are also able to observe trends; I.e. most empires that expand due to violent acquisition eventually collapse under their own weight.

I agree with you on some things, but it's hard to take you seriously when you throw this type of claim in there willy nilly.

Yea, you think a silly ocean will be a...

• It_Is_My_Time

• 

Post in thread 'The China Thread'

Sep 29, 2025

Are you aware that Marco Polo went over the Silk Road to China 700 plus years ago and before that, the Genghis Khan had conquered from Mongolia all the way to the Danube? Maybe the Chinese learned a lesson from their northern neighbor, not soon to be forgotten?

Why do you project your culture and way of thinking on everyone else??

Yes, I am aware. So, now answer this simple question of mine.

When White people no longer exist in any real sense, who will stop the Chinese from taking the west?

• It_Is_My_Time

If "White people no longer exist in any real sense, who will stop the Chinese from taking the west?", is true, I would ask why it's not already happening in countries that are 1) closer to China and have 2) no white people. If his law is true then shouldn't Africa already have been conquered by China at this point? I can use India as an example too - it's right next to China and if Indians in the West are causing it to collapse then surely a country that is all Indian should already fallen to China by INMT's logic.

LOL, China is already taking over Africa. You don't know about this?

Why is China so far taking over China softly and with kid's gloves? The west is still White enough to be powerful enough to cause them real problems. They just have to sit and let the demographic time bomb take down the west before they take the kid gloves off.

 

[Wutang]

I wrote "China is already deeply entrenched in Africa strip mining it of it's resources". That's hardly the same as the way you've seen describing how China will do in the US in the next few decades. The way you are describing what's going to happen in the US with China in the future sounds more similar to what happened to the Native Americans when the Europeans came. Recall your many descriptions of China "turning people into fertilizer". You've always talked about "taking the land" as in conquering it which is far from China is doing in Africa. That's why you get these puzzled reactions from other forum members when you start talking about China. It's happening right now in this thread, it's happened in the thread I just posted above, and it happened a few months ago in another totally unrelated thread since you just have just weird humilation fetish about being cucked by the Chinese

Post in thread 'Latest Irish Inanity'

Jul 10, 2025

This is the likeliest outcome. In order for the Chinese to take over most of the native inhabitants would have to leave first. It takes full scale war to do that.

Most western people will never consider leaving their country. Of those that actually do only a small amount will end up doing it. It's usually people at the end of both spectrums, extremely nonchalant guys who leave on a whim or rational folks who put years of planning into it. Mainly the former, while members of the latter group will think themselves out of leaving.

Furthermore, all issues get normalised over time. It's...

• Maddox

• 

Is this your geopolitical version of you talking about working 80 hours a week or having 80 20 year old women fawning over you where you speaking with your usual typical hyperbole style? The difference between you and others that use hyperbole is that other people typically use it to make a point more noticeable via artistic overexaggerating whereas in your case you actually are speaking literally since your isolation from society how rendered you incapable of discerning what's going on in the world.

Also again, why hasn't China taken over India already when it's a next door neighbor and occupying it with an invading force to "take the land" would be way more feasible? A poster asked you "How exactly would the Chinese army take over Ireland since they're halfway across the world?" in the other thread (almost forgot you had even suggested China could occupy Ireland militarily which is even more ridiculous) which I thought would should have made you consider why if China is so set on taking over lower IQ third word countries, why hasn't it done so already with countries that they could actually feasible march in with their massive land forces without having to worry about pesky obstacles such as an entire ocean blocking the way.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

I wrote "China is already deeply entrenched in Africa strip mining it of it's resources". That's hardly the same as the way you've seen describing how China will do in the US in the next few decades. The way you are describing what's going to happen in the US with China in the future sounds more similar to what happened to the Native Americans when the Europeans came. Recall your many descriptions of China "turning people into fertilizer". You've always talked about "taking the land" as in conquering it which is far from China is doing in Africa. That's why you get these puzzled reactions from other forum members when you start talking about China. It's happening right now in this thread, it's happened in the thread I just posted above, and it happened a few months ago in another totally unrelated thread since you just have just weird humilation fetish about being cucked by the Chinese

Post in thread 'Latest Irish Inanity'

Jul 10, 2025

This is the likeliest outcome. In order for the Chinese to take over most of the native inhabitants would have to leave first. It takes full scale war to do that.

Most western people will never consider leaving their country. Of those that actually do only a small amount will end up doing it. It's usually people at the end of both spectrums, extremely nonchalant guys who leave on a whim or rational folks who put years of planning into it. Mainly the former, while members of the latter group will think themselves out of leaving.

Furthermore, all issues get normalised over time. It's...

• Maddox

• 

Is this your geopolitical version of you talking about working 80 hours a week or having 80 20 year old women fawning over you where you speaking with your usual typical hyperbole style? The difference between you and others that use hyperbole is that other people typically use it to make a point more noticeable via artistic overexaggerating whereas in your case you actually are speaking literally since your isolation from society how rendered you incapable of making discerning what's going on in the world.

Also again, why hasn't China taken over India already when it's a next door neighbor and occupying it with an invading force to "take the land" would be way more feasible? A poster asked you "How exactly would the Chinese army take over Ireland since they're halfway across the world?" in the other thread (almost forgot you had even suggested China could occupy Ireland militarily which is even more ridiculous then your other theory) which I thought would should have made you consider why if China is so set on taking over lower IQ third word countries, why hasn't it done so already with countries that they could actually feasible march in with their massive land forces without having to worry about pesky obstacles such as an entire ocean blocking the way.

Same routine, same wasted energy, no one here is motivated by these kinds of posts. More and more are realizing the less White the west becomes the more it falls apart. The west isn't a region, it is a people, and replacing those people with 80 and 90 IQ third worlders will turn it into a third world country.

How long can a third country hold off China, when China is the lone superpower in a few decades? Not long.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

They already few a balloon over our country, now they got gutless Trump to back down on tariffs. They are just starting, their technology and innovation is decades beyond ours, because they promote the best and brightest and we turned our country into the make-a-wish foundation and opened up the borders to hostile third worlders.

The funny thing was when China came out with laser technology to shoot down missies and the USA was left with its third world "engineers" trying to figure out 1990's technology and Israel begging China to sell it to them. China said "no", LOL.

Wait, aren't you saying tariffs are the worst thing ever for American economy?

 

[Wutang]

And if you are going to say "well it's just cause China is being patient and waiting for the IQ gap to widen more before they start their conquests", I'll present you with your own words in this post

Post in thread 'The China Thread'

Oct 1, 2025

Excellent questions, I will take the time to answer later as it is a pretty good and fairly wide subject

It really is a good question, I look forward to your answers.

As for me, I fell into a situation where I ended up having a Chinese roommate for over a decade straight. I have always been interested in other cultures, as I have seen the USA as a weird capitalist hellhole for 25+ years, and I know there has to be better ways to live life than running everyone into the ground.

Getting to know Chinese people, via my roommate, was a great experience. As a White person, there is...

• It_Is_My_Time

• 

But once the west is comprised of a majority of non-White people, it is over for the west. There is no way possible that countries comprised of 90 IQ scam artists, 85 IQ roofers, and 80 IQ violent criminals, can hold up for even a week v. the Chinese. This is so obviously clear, to deny it by now is just to deny reality. It brings me great peace to know that if Whites do want to commit mass suicide, that the next boss isn't going to put up with this third world dysgenic out breeding good people nonsense.

There's already countries around China that are majority non-whites. One of them is their immediate neighbor India which I'm guessing you were referring to when you talked about "90 IQ scam artists". And since don't think little geographical hinderances such as having an ocean will can stop China from dropping in and conquering other countries, I'm guessing you'll agree that China should have easy access to the countries with "85 IQ roofers" (Latin America) and "80 IQ criminals" (Africa). You also wrote that countries that mostly consist of these sort of people wouldn't "hold up a week v. the Chinese" meaning you believe they are easy pickings for China. By your theory of "the strongest country will always take the land", China should have moved in already to these places especially given that they are so weak they wouldn't be able to resist for a week. How comes this hasn't happened yet?

Same routine, same wasted energy, no one here is motivated by these kinds of posts. More and more are realizing the less White the west becomes the more it falls apart. The west isn't a region, it is a people, and replacing those people with 80 and 90 IQ third worlders will turn it into a third world country.

How long can a third country hold off China, when China is the lone superpower in a few decades? Not long.

How come the countries that are currently already third world countries still unconquered by China?

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Wait, aren't you saying tariffs are the worst thing ever for American economy?

Worst thing ever? No. A tax on the middle class to pay for endless wars? Yes

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

And if you are going to say "well it's just cause China is being patient and waiting for the IQ gap to widen more before they start their conquests", I'll present you with your own words in this post

Post in thread 'The China Thread'

Oct 1, 2025

Excellent questions, I will take the time to answer later as it is a pretty good and fairly wide subject

It really is a good question, I look forward to your answers.

As for me, I fell into a situation where I ended up having a Chinese roommate for over a decade straight. I have always been interested in other cultures, as I have seen the USA as a weird capitalist hellhole for 25+ years, and I know there has to be better ways to live life than running everyone into the ground.

Getting to know Chinese people, via my roommate, was a great experience. As a White person, there is...

• It_Is_My_Time

• 

There's already countries around China that are majority non-whites. One of them is their immediate neighbor India which I'm guessing you were referring to when you talked about "90 IQ scam artists". And since don't think little geographical hinderances such as having an ocean will can stop China from dropping in and conquering other countries, I'm guessing you'll agree that China should have easy access to the countries with "85 IQ roofers" (Latin America) and "80 IQ criminals" (Africa). You also wrote that countries that mostly consist of these sort of people wouldn't "hold up a week v. the Chinese" meaning you believe they are easy pickings for China. By your theory of "the strongest country will always take the land", China should have moved in already to these places especially given that they are so weak they wouldn't be able to resist for a week. How comes this hasn't happened yet?

Yes, once China is the lone superpower, no one will be able to stop them. India, Central America, North America, it doesn't matter, they will not be able to stop them. China is smart, unlike the USA, they will wait to move when it is safe, they are in no rush, and the technology gap is still too close. It is a few decades away, most likely, but it is obviously coming.

 

[Wutang]

Yes, once China is the lone superpower, no one will be able to stop them. India, Central America, North America, it doesn't matter, they will not be able to stop them. China is smart, unlike the USA, they will wait to move when it is safe, they are in no rush, and the technology gap is still too close. It is a few decades away, most likely, but it is obviously coming.

According to your theory, these countries already shouldn't be able to stop China and will "fall within a week" due to them not merely having large immigration populations of sub 90 IQ people but instead consisting solely of the native sub 90 iq people. They should already have been conquered by the prime INMT law of geopolitics of "The stronger country will always take the land". As pointed out already, a few of these countries also don't have the geographical barriers that the US and West has with China so if your law is true, then it's even more likely that these conquests should already happened - yet they haven't.

You saying "well it's going to happen in a few decades" is the same thing you are doing when you went from saying Tel Aviv was no longer going to exist from the Iranian missiles to "well it was about to happen but good thing Iran decided to hold back". You make some ridiculous grand statement or prediction based on your mind being brainrotted from consuming slop 3 hour deep dive podcasts non-stop all day and when someone one comes along and points out the obvious flaws of your theory you have to retreat to either "well it was about to happen but good thing righteous Iran/China/turd world country held back" or "it'll happen in decades - trust me!"

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

According to your theory, these countries already shouldn't be able to stop China and will "fall within a week" due to them not merely having large immigration populations of sub 90 IQ people but instead consisting solely of the native sub 90 iq people. They should already have been conquered by the prime INMT law of geopolitics of "The stronger country will always take the land". As pointed out already, a few of these countries also don't have the geographical barriers that the US and West has with China so if your law is true, then it's even more likely that these conquests should already happened - yet they haven't.

You saying "well it's going to happen in a few decades" is the same thing you are doing when you went from saying Tel Aviv was no longer going to exist from the Iranian missiles to "well it was about to happen but good thing Iran decided to hold back". You make some ridiculous grand statement or prediction based on your mind being brainrotted from consuming slop 3 hour deep dive podcasts non-stop all day and when someone one comes along and points out the obvious flaws of your theory you have to retreat to either "well it was about to happen but good thing righteous Iran/China/turd world country held back" or "it'll happen in decades - trust me!"

They probably could not stop China, but they could make it painful. And if the entire world right now turned on China for doing this aggression, then they would possibly be beaten. So, China, in no rush, will wait until the coast is clear. I'm amazed anyone posting on this forum isn't aware of this by now.

If you honestly think a bunch of third worlders will be able to stop China, you just are not living in reality. All that it means is that the White people who have run the globe for 500 years will disappear and the next group up will be China and they will not be nearly as kindhearted or soft on their enemies.

 

[Wutang]

They probably could not stop China, but they could make it painful. And if the entire world right now turned on China for doing this aggression, then they would possibly be beaten. So, China, in no rush, will wait until the coast is clear. I'm amazed anyone posting on this forum isn't aware of this by now.

The fact that other posters have reacted to your China taking the land of the rest of the world theory with raised eyebrows when then they do react to it should make you consider the question of what is more likely: either all these people must be wrong which you find surprising since it seems so obvious to you - or that your theory is simply bizarre to people who aren't holed up in the sort of bubble you are since it's just unconnected with reality.

If you are amazed that most other people on this forum who are open towards non-normie thinking and consume alternative sources of information don't find your reasoning plausible, then it's a sign that you have gone too far off the rails and are off in your own little world where no one else is venturing and you need to do a sanity check on yourself and consider why the sort of theories you consider to be normal are seen as unreal and out of this world. Hopefully the amazement and shock that you felt from seeing that other people here aren't buying what you are selling (except for this secret cadre of anonymous people you claim seek you out via PM for mentorship) will inspire introspection on why you are getting this sort of reaction from other regular posters.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

The fact that other posters have reacted to your China taking the land of the rest of the world theory with raised eyebrows when then they do react to it should make you consider the question of what is more likely: either all these people must be wrong which you find surprising since it seems so obvious to you - or that your theory is simply bizarre to people who aren't holed up in the sort of bubble you are since it's just unconnected with reality.

If you are amazed that most other people on this forum who are open towards non-normie thinking and consume alternative sources of information don't find your reasoning plausible, then it's a sign that you have gone too far off the rails and are off in your own little world where no one else is venturing and you need to do a sanity check on yourself and consider why the sort of theories you consider to be normal are seen as unreal and out of this world. Hopefully the amazement and shock that you felt from seeing that other people here aren't buying what you are selling (except for this secret cadre of anonymous people you claim seek you out via PM for mentorship) will inspire introspection on why you are getting this sort of reaction from other regular posters.

Fine, then you can explain to everyone here, how a world that is filled with 95 and below IQ people will stop the Chinese as they use their 140+ IQ citizens to advance their technology year over year. When the west is full of 95 and lower IQ people, and the rest of the world remains where it is at now, who will stop the Chinese and how will they do it?

 

[Wutang]

Fine, then you can explain to everyone here, how a world that is filled with 95 and below IQ people will stop the Chinese as they use their 140+ IQ citizens to advance their technology year over year. When the west is full of 95 and lower IQ people, and the rest of the world remains where it is at now, who will stop the Chinese and how will they do it?

I would point to the current world where China is surrounded by sub 95 IQ countries as an example of a world where China - in violation to your law on "strong will country will take the land' - has yet to conquer any of these people despite the conditions that you claim should trigger such a conquest - namely the IQ and tech gap is already present.

You are the one that has put forth this theory so you need to be the one that provides the explanation of why it hasn't happened yet. The only reason this topic is even coming up is because you are the one person here on this forum that has said over and over again "The Chinese will take over the US or Ireland or whatever country has a large population of third worlders". Multiple other posters have asked you about how this is supposed to happen and your response to all these questions have always been it's always been a natural law that a stronger country will take the land of a weaker country.

Post in thread 'The China Thread'

Sep 29, 2025

Obviously they can do what they want in the scenario you describe, no one is disputing that. The point is that they have no reason to, but you refuse to admit this.

I don't think you are discussing in good faith, so good day to you sir.

What do you mean they have no reason to do so? The west is full of valuable resources, that will be completely wasted if not run by an organized and civilized society. Are you suggesting they will be the first humans, of all time, to say "nah, we don't need that, we can just let other tribes take it and waste it". This scenario has never...

• It_Is_My_Time

What do you mean they have no reason to do so? The west is full of valuable resources, that will be completely wasted if not run by an organized and civilized society. Are you suggesting they will be the first humans, of all time, to say "nah, we don't need that, we can just let other tribes take it and waste it". This scenario has never happened in human history.

As seen here, you are claiming this is something that will always inevitably happen. Since you are the one putting forth the very strong claim that this sort of conquest will always happen when there's the sort of IQ and tech gap that exists between China and sub 90 IQ nations, you are the one that needs to back it up and explain why it hasn't happened yet. In the case of why the US and Ireland hasn't been conquered yet you could claim it's because the percentage of whites hasn't followed below a critical rate yet but then you need to explain why China hasn't conquered countries that not only have 98% non-white people and are more geographically accessible.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

I would point to the current world where China is surrounded by sub 95 IQ countries as an example of a world where China - in violation to your law on "strong will country will take the land' - has yet to conquer any of these people despite the conditions that you claim should trigger such a conquest - namely the IQ and tech gap is already present.

You are the one that has put forth this theory so you need to be the one that provides the explanation of why it hasn't happened yet. The only reason this topic is even coming up is because you are the one person here on this forum that has said over and over again "The Chinese will take over the US or Ireland or whatever country has a large population of third worlders". Multiple other posters have asked you about how this is supposed to happen and your response to all these questions have always been it's always been a natural law that a stronger country will take the land of a weaker country.

Post in thread 'The China Thread'

Sep 29, 2025

Obviously they can do what they want in the scenario you describe, no one is disputing that. The point is that they have no reason to, but you refuse to admit this.

I don't think you are discussing in good faith, so good day to you sir.

What do you mean they have no reason to do so? The west is full of valuable resources, that will be completely wasted if not run by an organized and civilized society. Are you suggesting they will be the first humans, of all time, to say "nah, we don't need that, we can just let other tribes take it and waste it". This scenario has never...

• It_Is_My_Time

As seen here, you are claiming this is something that will always inevitably happen. Since you are the one putting forth the very strong claim that this sort of conquest will always happen when there's the sort of IQ and tech gap that exists between China and sub 90 IQ nations, you are the one that needs to back it up and explain why it hasn't happened yet. In the case of why the US and Ireland hasn't been conquered yet you could claim it's because the percentage of whites hasn't followed below a critical rate yet but then you need to explain why China hasn't conquered countries that not only have 98% non-white people and are more geographically accessible.

And back to step 1, you ignoring both that not the entire world is devoid of competent White people, yet, and that China will be much more advanced in 20 or 30 years v. the rest the world than they are right now, making it an easier battle for them.

You can waste your energy attacking me, I don't care, others can start to see what is shaping up and you will not be able to stop that. Have a good evening.

 

[Wutang]

And back to step 1, you ignoring both that not the entire world is devoid of competent White people, yet, and that China will be much more advanced in 20 or 30 years v. the rest the world than they are right now, making it an easier battle for them.

You can waste your energy attacking me, I don't care, others can start to see what is shaping up and you will not be able to stop that. Have a good evening.

You are ignoring your own theory that you've stated over and over again that states China should have already made the moves you claim it would make if your theory of "country has mostly sub IQ 90 people means China will attack and take it over". Not only that, such a country should only be able to resist for a week in your own words. According to the other claims you've made, the battle as of now (not in 20 to 30 years) should be pretty easy and quick. So why hasn't it happened? Could it be possible that like all these other grand theories you've made about geopolltics to the smaller slice of life ones such as about what 20 year old women are attracted to are the product of a unmoored mind that no one should be taking seriously?

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

You are ignoring your own theory that you've stated over and over again that states China should have already made the moves you claim it would make if your theory of "country has mostly sub IQ 90 people means China will attack and take it over". Not only that, such a country should only be able to resist for a week in your own words. According to the other claims you've made, the battle as of now (not in 20 to 30 years) should be pretty easy and quick. So why hasn't it happened? Could it be possible that like all these other grand theories you've made about geopolltics to the smaller slice of life ones such as about what 20 year old women are attracted to are the product of a unmoored mind that no one should be taking seriously?

I've already addressed this above, everyone else can see it as well, why you are trying to ignore it remains to be seen. I don't have the time or energy to type the same thing over and over. It is done, have a good evening.

 

[Wutang]

I'm sure you'll continue to be typing the same thing over and over again about China's impending world conquests on this forum so I'm not holding my breath about you claiming to not have energy for it. And why are you saying "good evening" and going to bed, aren't you in the middle of your 18 hour work day?

 

[Get2choppaaa]

Worst thing ever? No. A tax on the middle class to pay for endless wars? Yes

It's just more ever moving goal post behavior.

Fine, then you can explain to everyone here, how a world that is filled with 95 and below IQ people will stop the Chinese as they use their 140+ IQ citizens to advance their technology year over year. When the west is full of 95 and lower IQ people, and the rest of the world remains where it is at now, who will stop the Chinese and how will they do it?

Why do we have to believe that China has 140 IQ citizens.

If you've spent any length of time engaging with Chinese I'm not sure how folks can believe that. If you know how things are done over there and work practices .... It's hardly a high trust society and workmanship is SHIT.

It's like assuming every smart Indian engineer to in meet is the norm for India.

The iq in both places is more likely to be in the 80s than in the mid 100s. Both countries have tons and tons of poverty.

I don't buy this Chinese superiority shit. They're one bad dictator from a collapse and have had economic troubles of their own.

I mean it's kinda like you're endlessly arguing for the collapse and fall of your own civilian by pagan demons just because youre unhappy with your current lot in life.

Just sayin....