Nick Fuentes Thread

The timing of Fuentes' attacks on Tucker and Candace is pretty suspicious, just as public opinion in the US is turning against Israel, AIPAC and their influence on American politics, and the two major pundits that have been exposing them happen to be... Tucker and Candace.

The best thing that can be said about Nick Fuentes is that he's a dumb, attention-seeking, trouble-making fag. The more troubling possibility is that he's a compromised fed doing agitprop in the RW populist camp.
 
For just a weird gay kid on a basement he sure does attract a lot of attention.

I dont know enough about Fuentes just the clips he puts on Telegram but he doesnt seem dumb. He is extreme and purist.
 
InspCallahan said:
Didn't see this posted?

Click to expand...

Yeah, Fuentes makes some really good points which leads me to riff on the hypothesis that Trump was (((reinstalled))) because The Noticing was reaching fever pitch and so to release the pressure (((they))) gave the white working class (who are disorganized yet armed to the teeth) a win to distract them from their anger that was inching them closer to armed, organized resistance.

It's the classic jew game of "pressure/release" coupled with the very effective psyop of "don't believe your lying eyes."
PurpleUrkel said:
(((Their))) whole thing is toying with us via pressure, release, pressure, release... It could be that they felt they had been pushing their agenda too far too fast which resulted in an uptick in unacceptable levels of JQ-noticing so they decided to ease up on the throttle and release the pressure by throwing us an inconsiquential bone to lull us back into complacency and throw us off the JQ-trail.
Click to expand...
PurpleUrkel said:
(((Their))) whole thing is long game pressure/release, pressure/release in an attempt to eliminate Christianity from the face of planet Earth. They put the screws to white men (pressure) and when The Noticing gets too close to the JQ truth they give us a second Trump term (release).
Click to expand...
And from Jan. 29th 2024:
PurpleUrkel said:
A Trump win will also act as a personal pressure release valve which will keep me from joining a militia and doing something stupid.
Click to expand...

Fuentes makes some good observations to expand on this "all the world's a stage" and how Vance, Tucker, and Candace's success has been "allowed" if not completely artificially produced. Between Tucker and Fuentes, Fuentes seems the most organic and truthful out of the two. I'm not saying Nick isn't compromised, but if I had to choose between Tucker and Nick on being innocent on The Fed issue I'd have to go with Nick by the narrowist of margins.

But this brings up a greater issue, we all know we're being f*cked with and that many people are guilty of lying to our faces. The only question is, who are they? And so until further notice, everyone who is allowed to speak in the public square while getting paid millions of dollars to do so and living in the lap of luxury (i.e. Tucker and Candace) should be considered guilty until proven innocent.
 
Problem is where are all the Alpha Sean Connery Ass Kickers and Slappers giving the Right legitimate historical discourse of resisting this entrenched Menace? Not Big Arm Gym Bros with AR15s!

The Jewish Power is quite Insidious and I really don't know what the correct solution realistically to take on this monster? I mean it does historically need to be an Elite, not necessarily some (kid) as many here will say...I get it, but there has been too many charlatans in the so called Conservative pipeline that have fooled us, so for many of us suspicion arises moreso the last 40 to 50 years of Conservative failure. I'm not saying Fuentes is our guy totally, but the ones that have been rolled out have been deceivers for the Judeo-Masonic empire.
 
PurpleUrkel said:
But this brings up a greater issue, we all know we're being f*cked with and that many people are guilty of lying to our faces. The only question is, who are they? And so until further notice, everyone who is allowed to speak in the public square while getting paid millions of dollars to do so and living in the lap of luxury (i.e. Tucker and Candace) should be considered guilty until proven innocent.
Click to expand...

The question I have for you is would it better for Tucker and Candace to not exist? There seems to some kind of assumption that without these people everyone would be watching Fuentes. Go look at Tucker's catalog.


I understand Fuentes being upset with Tucker because he doesn't want to interview him. Tucker implied it's because he got offended by the CIA stuff but Tucker is neither here nor there. That's a legit complaint but Nick attacked Candace who did interview him. The issue here is don't bite the hand that feeds you with these unnecessary purity tests. There's a ton of people I can consider ideologically impure but at the end of the day nobody cares and it doesn't matter. As far as I'm concerned this new breed of dissent media where they're questioning almost everything is amazing. I consider it a form absolution for these people. Tucker is too "multicultural" for me but I appreciate him pushing certain topics, I appreciate it a lot. Something real gatekeepers or better yet disinformation agents like Shapiro or Poole don't do. This new dissent media is not just moving the Overton Window, it's ideological capture of the window. If everyone is talking about it, it will seep into the broader consciousness.
 
Sandalwood Peak said:
The question I have for you is would it better for Tucker and Candace to not exist?
Click to expand...
Ideally, yes, because they obfuscate and distract from the fact that you can only fight fire with fire. Words are not going to work in this current battle against evil. We are too far gone. You cannot "negotiate" with pedophiles, pornographers, illegal border crossers, gangsters, cartel members, jews, corrupt politicians, and billionaires. The only thing that will bring them to their knees and make them submit to the rule of law is when they are looking down the barrel of a gun.

Unfortunately, we aren't anywhere near crossing the threshold of heritage Americans having had enough. And so things will continue to deteriorate while millionaire talking heads occasionally say a radical thing or two in an attempt to give us some hopium feels [all while trying to sell us more shi*ty made in China products via their (((sponsors)))]. In the end, they are just delaying the inevitable which existentially speaking is a disservice. It would be better to rip the band aid off and get down to brass tacks (Civil War 2.0).

Sandalwood Peak said:
Tucker is too "multicultural" for me but I appreciate him pushing certain topics, I appreciate it a lot.
Click to expand...
I think this is the issue. They get us into these states of "Yeah! He just said it!" which gets us defending him and thinking he's on the side of the common man, but when you really pull back the curtain he's just another spoiled rich kid who got what he wanted (to be famous) and had a leg up on everyone else because of his parents wealth and being able to afford a high end private education which helped him develop a powerful and influential social circle at a young age.

With Candace, she would be nowhere near as famous as she is if she was a fat, ugly, white man with the same message and content.

Nick, I'm not really sure about. Is he gay? Is he compromised? Who knows. He just seems slightly more authentic than Candace and Tucker. But I watch all 3 (via the clips here on CiK) for pressure release and entertainment value, but I don't expect anything from any of them as they all are trying to make money by running their mouths on controversial subjects in public which could land a bullet in their head(s)... seems pretty low IQ to me and not worth it (especially if you have children).
 
Who isn't controlled opposition? Evidently Hitler was in some circles..

If he is so be it....but most of the so called political discourse has been Jewish Controlled Narrative.

Our last 98.9% purists here?, (The Old Right)?
Lindbergh, Ford, Father Coughlin, Huey Long, etc.
 
Cooper said:
The timing of Fuentes' attacks on Tucker and Candace is pretty suspicious, just as public opinion in the US is turning against Israel, AIPAC and their influence on American politics, and the two major pundits that have been exposing them happen to be... Tucker and Candace.

The best thing that can be said about Nick Fuentes is that he's a dumb, attention-seeking, trouble-making fag. The more troubling possibility is that he's a compromised fed doing agitprop in the RW populist camp.
Click to expand...

What? They attacked him first for one, and Fuentes has been talking about Israel/AIPAC/etc for years whilst Candace has only in the past 6 months said a few things (which she has mostly walked back) and Tucker has barely said anything. This is so backwards.
 
Fuentes dropped support for Russia during last night's show. When the war with Ukraine first broke out, he had a Z logo prominently displayed for weeks, so it's quite a change. He attributed some of this change of heart to Richard Spencer, one of the most vocal pro-Ukraine voices in the "alt-right," although he stopped short of actually supporting Ukraine. He said he agrees with Trump's efforts to put pressure on Russia to reach a ceasefire and peace deal as quickly as possible.
 
Valentine said:
What? They attacked him first for one, and Fuentes has been talking about Israel/AIPAC/etc for years whilst Candace has only in the past 6 months said a few things (which she has mostly walked back) and Tucker has barely said anything. This is so backwards.
Click to expand...

Candace and Tucker have a much larger and more normie audience, which they have done a great job of smartly bringing them slowly out of the ZOG plantation. Fuentes doesn't have such constraints.



FrostBITE said:
Fuentes dropped support for Russia during last night's show. When the war with Ukraine first broke out, he had a Z logo prominently displayed for weeks, so it's quite a change. He attributed some of this change of heart to Richard Spencer, one of the most vocal pro-Ukraine voices in the "alt-right," although he stopped short of actually supporting Ukraine. He said he agrees with Trump's efforts to put pressure on Russia to reach a ceasefire and peace deal as quickly as possible.
Click to expand...

Shift towards NATO looks like another element pointing towards Fuentes selling out.
 
FrostBITE said:
Fuentes dropped support for Russia during last night's show. When the war with Ukraine first broke out, he had a Z logo prominently displayed for weeks, so it's quite a change. He attributed some of this change of heart to Richard Spencer, one of the most vocal pro-Ukraine voices in the "alt-right," although he stopped short of actually supporting Ukraine. He said he agrees with Trump's efforts to put pressure on Russia to reach a ceasefire and peace deal as quickly as possible.
Click to expand...
Richard Spencer has rebranded himself as a liberal only with belief in race realism since around 2017 so it's not surprising that he's a big anti-Russia guy now.
 
Valentine said:
What? They attacked him first for one, and Fuentes has been talking about Israel/AIPAC/etc for years whilst Candace has only in the past 6 months said a few things (which she has mostly walked back) and Tucker has barely said anything. This is so backwards.
Click to expand...

100 percent this. It's incredible dishonest to try frame the course of events in such a way that it seems as if Fuentes attacked the kosher duo Owens and Carlson when it's obvious the opposite happened. Props for calling the BS out.

Can't wrap my head around the narrative building of shady Carlson adepts and their handlers. Are they really going for the 'Carlson too red pilled and based for Fuentes ergo they are trying the assassinate his character' angle? Protip, that's not going to stick.

1754246968367330m.jpg
 
PurpleUrkel said:
Fuentes makes some good observations to expand on this "all the world's a stage" and how Vance, Tucker, and Candace's success has been "allowed" if not completely artificially produced. Between Tucker and Fuentes, Fuentes seems the most organic and truthful out of the two. I'm not saying Nick isn't compromised, but if I had to choose between Tucker and Nick on being innocent on The Fed issue I'd have to go with Nick by the narrowist of margins.

But this brings up a greater issue, we all know we're being f*cked with and that many people are guilty of lying to our faces. The only question is, who are they? And so until further notice, everyone who is allowed to speak in the public square while getting paid millions of dollars to do so and living in the lap of luxury (i.e. Tucker and Candace) should be considered guilty until proven innocent.
Click to expand...

You mentioned a few red flags yet forgot a couple of others. Tucker Carlson regularly wears the Kabbalah bracelet, which is a 12th century Jewish mystery cult that stands synonymous with occultist Luciferianism. Aka Satanism. Furthermore Tucker Carlson is from a CIA family, with several family members having served in the agency. Lil Tuck himself allegedly applied to yet 'was denied' after which he became the biggest talking head on the right. Totally believable story and we don't ask any questions. But it doesn't stop there, TuckTuck is big buddies with Hunter Biden, worked for Rupert Murdoch for the better part of 20 years, and mentioned Kissinger as one of his mentors.

Tucker is also part of the Pilgrim Society, a Freemason associated club centered in London. Other famous members include Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Prescott Bush, Allen Dulles, JP Morgan, David Rockefeller and Jacob Schiff to name a few.

The thing about this Carlson - Fuentes feud is that you can be critical of Fuentes. The man has his shortcomings and flaws, and they deserve to be called out. However, you can not be critical of Fuentes and subsequently start talking up a Luciferian three letter associated millionaire Freemason like Tucker Carlson. That's simply either mouthbreather or glowie territory.



IMG_20250808_001413_160.jpg
 
Hilarious fragments. Tucker anno 2025 is very concerned about the fate of young White men, and Fuentes is apparantly an extremist voice which must be silenced on the matter because nazis bad.

Some handles: below is a fairly recent clip of Tucker Carlson (2023) calling the prospect of Whites becoming a minority in the US 'exciting', subsequently calls anyone who objects to this and who speak up for White Americans a nazi. Guess that video is some much needed perspective on Carlson's recent chimpout aimed at a man who, there it comes, stands up for White Americans.



 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top