Nick Fuentes Thread

LaAguilaNegra said:
Clavicular sounds just like @It_Is_My_Time (second part of first video linkes). Posting his stuff here until he gets his own thread.



Click to expand...

I have never heard of this guy before, but he is right, if the GOP only does 5% of what is needed, then the are of no use and the results of the election doesn't matter.

The only thing I would challenge him on is I am not 100% sure the DNC is the acceleration choice. Brining in millions of Mestizos will do less damage to this country than Trump bringing in millions of Indians. Also, the GOP's stance on Israel probably has more young people questioning our govt. than ever before.

When asked what he is doing, on top of his good answer, he should include "and I am in the role of Atlas and right now I am shrugging".
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
Why? She is the GOP prop used to get Whites to get excited for White replacement by using the boogie man "Islamic Extremism" which they will never do anything about because their donors demand Islamic immigration and funding.
Click to expand...

It’s a match made in heaven bro. Both are against immigration, both appeared on Piers and were called racist bigots, and it would quash the Nick Fuentes is gay rumors. It kills 3 birds (more) with one stone. Pure power couple move. Last of all it would be funny and that’s why I’m recommending it. Get on it Nick, literally.
 
GrecoRoman said:
It’s a match made in heaven bro. Both are against immigration, both appeared on Piers and were called racist bigots, and it would quash the Nick Fuentes is gay rumors. It kills 3 birds (more) with one stone. Pure power couple move. Last of all it would be funny and that’s why I’m recommending it. Get on it Nick, literally.
Click to expand...
She isn't against immigration, she is just against Islamic immigration, which in reality, if a vote came up to stop it, her donors would demand she voted against it. She is a tool of the satanic elites.
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
She isn't against immigration, she is just against Islamic immigration, which in reality, if a vote came up to stop it, her donors would demand she voted against it. She is a tool of the satanic elites.
Click to expand...

I’m half trolling man so lighten up. It would still be funny and the Piers and other libs of the world’s heads would explode if they dated.
 
Get2choppaaa said:
Where did you get that from anything I said?

Is this another one of your reading comprehension issues where you claim something with out proof...or did I somewhere say I support political violence?

As I explicitly do not.
Click to expand...
Allow me to clear up some confusion. Stochastic terrorism is a term leftists made up, which is a confusing concept, (which there is a thread on the forum talking about it.)

I wasn’t accusing you of supporting political violence in the slightest. Just to be clear.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Allow me to clear up some confusion. Stochastic terrorism is a term leftists made up, which is a confusing concept, (which there is a thread on the forum talking about it.)

I wasn’t accusing you of supporting political violence in the slightest. Just to be clear.
Click to expand...
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Bro it sounds like you believe in stochastic terrorism.
Click to expand...
Yet you said it sounds like that's what I support... So that's why I am/was confused.

Can you help me understand what you were saying so I can respond?
 
Get2choppaaa said:
Can you help me understand what you were saying so I can respond?
Click to expand...
So the concept is a bit confusing, but to give an example, leftists accused Trump of stochastic terrorism back on Jan 6, 2021. The claim was Trump was inciting violence even though he never advocated that, such as when he told people to “fight.” So in this case, it seems that kinda concept was being applied to IIMT.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
So the concept is a bit confusing, but to give an example, leftists accused Trump of stochastic terrorism back on Jan 6, 2021. The claim was Trump was inciting violence even though he never advocated that, such as when he told people to “fight.” So in this case, it seems that kinda concept was being applied to IIMT.
Click to expand...
Yes, now I see... agreed, context with quotes sometimes hard to gauge... It appears the only logical conclusions to me from IIMT arguments since we can't vote our way out and black pills are all to be offered
 


I wonder what the solution to the feminism rampant in the conservative movement is. Perhaps pastors need to be more clear about submissiveness. Or more conservative women like Sarah Stock or Pearl Davis calling out bad behavior.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:


I wonder what the solution to the feminism rampant in the conservative movement is. Perhaps pastors need to be more clear about submissiveness. Or more conservative women like Sarah Stock or Pearl Davis calling out bad behavior.
Click to expand...


The solution is stronger men. I don’t have much faith that priests will do much, at least in the US. My guess is overseas they might be more strict but here I’ve seen women dress like total whores for weeks at a time at both Catholic and Orthodox churches and not be called out or spoken to. I can only assume because they kept doing it.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
I wonder what the solution to the feminism rampant in the conservative movement is. Perhaps pastors need to be more clear about submissiveness.
Click to expand...
Regardless of what pastors do, the "conservative" movement will continue to shift with the culture since it is astroturfed and a fake opposition to the left. They've already given up on both abortion and LGBT. Perhaps it is now time for them to give up on feminism too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top