Nick Fuentes Thread

#1 Saying insulting things about a recently deceased person in public/from a public platform.
Regardless of what or how you feel/think about them because of the American views on life and death, the value placed on each individual human life, and a certain sense of decorum.

#2 Openly going after someone's spouse or kids, especially if they are not making themselves available/part of public discourse. Being an edgelord is fine if you want to clickbait and get disenfranchised young men to chuckle and share your post. Where it doesn't work is if you want to be part of the greater conversation and be taken seriously.
I’m American, but is it true these are not super taboo in other nations?
 
Well I kinda think calling out India is a big deal.
Calling out India, right now, might be the most important step if you want to save the west. India is the final death blow to the west in all ways. We all know JD Vance is a fraud, just like Trump is, but for those who are still blue pilled, the India thing even tarnishes Vance. That is how Nick can easily ratio the sitting VP.
 
Regarding Vance's kids, if they all marry whites and raise their kids Catholic, is Nick going to hold this against them and rant about how they are this or that? Also, why does Nick think it's fine to go after other people's families online and then whine when someone brings up his folks??


There seems to be a bit of a divide in America (and also somewhat on this forum) about whether someone's spiritual condition or ethnic origin is more important. I would argue the former is several orders of magnitude more critical, especially for anyone posting on Christ is King forum.
Depends on where they stand on the right of White people to exist. If they support White majority ethnostates, thus the ability for Whites to exist, then they will be welcomed by Nick's followers. If not, as most in the GOP are staunchly against this, then they will be rightfully seen as enemies of the Nick fan base.
 
Back
Top