Nick Fuentes Thread

I tuned in for a bit of that yesterday, I've had my nitpicks with Fuentes over the years but I was so happy to hear him call out Jones's boomer-style fixation on the WWII 'founding mythology' of the modern era i.e. Hitler is the highest evil, fighting Hitler is the highest good; anyone who's doing bad things are the REAL Nazis!! It's truly a Jewish paradigm. He successfully made the point that the true battle is actually Christ vs Antichrist which is easy to forget when getting swept up with the details of geopolitics. Respect for that.
 
That was a great discussion- I watched the whole thing at the gym and on my way to work. Nick said the US must leverage its position to force Israel to make a deal- he admitted that there are different "power structures" although Alex and him don't see eye to eye on one of them being supreme.
 
I was just thinking today, after watching a clip of him on twitter, that he really is a remarkable individual. To come this far and become such a force in this online political sphere organically at such a young age is phenomenal. I can't even imagine how influential he'll be in 10, or even 20 years time.
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
I watched it live. Nick doing his homework and learning more history is a big step. I don't think Alex could have Nick back on now that he has more information and knowledge.
Click to expand...
Nick bodied him in the first debate they had about Hitler. It's not hard, frankly. The most difficult thing is that Alex acts increasingly erratic and obnoxious and one still tries to be somewhat friendly to him.
The thing he did when they debated Israel and Alex just suddenly got up and left he room and whenever he was present he did this very childish ADHD thing where he just opened up 5 new threads of debate, that were only loosely connected to the topic at hand.

I noticed this is a thing bluepilled people do. They get super nervous and try to hijack the conversation somehow and steer it into a less controversial direction, or give some kind of framing that relativizes the entire topic at hand.
Either that or they start blankly staring into the air, as if you were sexually molesting them by providing an assessment outside of the liberal framework.
 
Nick has a world of potential, but Trump will be the albatross that sinks him, if he is both legit and not very bright. We will find out.

I am impressed at his growth. He doesn't have the knowledge of the TRS guys, but he is learning from them and using their talking points on purple pill ideas. He is great at presentation and communication, which gives him the advantage v. the TRS guys. You can know the world, but if you can't communicate it, then you are of no use, and this is where Nick is really shining.

But Nick has a serious Trump issue. He is out here, correctly identifying the problem, then tying himself to Jared Kushner and George Soros by backing Trump, which is also hurting his credibility. So, God is about to give Fuentes the biggest test of his life. When the satanic elites install Trump, and Trump makes Biden looks soft in the Middle East, as he now bragging he will do, what will Nick do? This will be the real decision if Nick can propel himself to the face/leadership of the counter-revolution, or if he becomes another forgotten Gavin McInnis when another guy comes along to lead the counter-revolution.
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
But Nick has a serious Trump issue. He is out here, correctly identifying the problem, then tying himself to Jared Kushner and George Soros by backing Trump, which is also hurting his credibility. So, God is about to give Fuentes the biggest test of his life.
Click to expand...
Definitely disagree. Nick is not claiming that any of Trumps faults are nonexistent, but Trump is, as before, strongly getting opposed by the Talmudic elite. Trump has an affinity for his followers, even if he himself holds retarded boomer views. Nick is very clear about that and I think that's more or less the view of most dissident right Trumpers.

Nick's adherence to the Pope is what I find much more problematic, because the Vatican constantly undermines his position while actually holding moral authority. Trump is just a politician with qualities. Some good, some bad, but there is a political opening associated with him, and there is also no alternative.
The same goes for the Ye thing. Yeah, Ye did the manic negro routine and ultimately cucked out, but the exposition was still great. Politics is about working with what is available. Supporting Trump generally doesn't preclude you from criticizing him morally, and Vivek is not going to gain enough traction, so it's Trump.

The idea of Trump being more hawkish than Biden is pretty ridiculous. The Biden entity literally just started a war with Yemen and backs Israel's mass murder against Palestinians and Lebanese. Trump made too many concessions and got bamboozled by his Jew friends, but there is a good chance of that not happening again. And if it does, it's just the same as what we would have gotten anyway. There is literally no downside to supporting Trump in the race.

If that would preclude one from pointing out the issues according to one's own perception, then I would agree with you, but it's not an either/or.
 
Raskolnikov said:
Definitely disagree. Nick is not claiming that any of Trumps faults are nonexistent, but Trump is, as before, strongly getting opposed by the Talmudic elite. Trump has an affinity for his followers, even if he himself holds retarded boomer views. Nick is very clear about that and I think that's more or less the view of most dissident right Trumpers.

Nick's adherence to the Pope is what I find much more problematic, because the Vatican constantly undermines his position while actually holding moral authority. Trump is just a politician with qualities. Some good, some bad, but there is a political opening associated with him, and there is also no alternative.
The same goes for the Ye thing. Yeah, Ye did the manic negro routine and ultimately cucked out, but the exposition was still great. Politics is about working with what is available. Supporting Trump generally doesn't preclude you from criticizing him morally, and Vivek is not going to gain enough traction, so it's Trump.

The idea of Trump being more hawkish than Biden is pretty ridiculous. The Biden entity literally just started a war with Yemen and backs Israel's mass murder against Palestinians and Lebanese. Trump made too many concessions and got bamboozled by his Jew friends, but there is a good chance of that not happening again. And if it does, it's just the same as what we would have gotten anyway. There is literally no downside to supporting Trump in the race.

If that would preclude one from pointing out the issues according to one's own perception, then I would agree with you, but it's not an either/or.
Click to expand...
If Trump was "opposed by the Talmudic elite" he would already be in prison and wouldn't be bragging he is the "most pro-Israel president in the history of the USA" and Jared Kushner wouldn't be his right-hand man. This will sink Nick among his fans if he stays with this silly take that Trump is the way forward. If Trump loses or goes away, Nick doesn't have to worry. If Trump wins and presides like he did from 2017 to 2021, Nick is finished.

I thought Nick was a "tradition Catholic" which would mean he would oppose the Pope and his satanic liberal open borders agenda. Is this not accurate?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top