Natty or Not

Again, if you're a top 10% and women are fat, on drugs, not young, not into committing when they are actually valuable, that's YOUR fault. lol
That is why i said on this planet i only think in terms of eastern european, southern european, south american, asian, middle eastern etc. Everywhere that is not the west basically. We have a lifetime, there are still enough years left on the clock, it is entirely possible and realistic.
 
That is why i said on this planet i only think in terms of eastern european, southern european, south american, asian, middle eastern etc. Everywhere that is not the west basically. We have a lifetime, there are still enough years left on the clock, it is entirely possible and realistic.
In Southern Europe everyone is nationalistic and plus people stick to tight knit social circles. That is more of an issue than the age gap for finding a woman as a foreigner.

South America you can easily find a young attractive girl who would agree to marry you despite a 20 year age gap but 99.9% of them have no morals and have toxic personality traits so even though age gap is not an issue finding a wife material woman is an issue.

Asia, the middle east and eastern europe you would probably have a better chance than other places.
 

This aritcle stands out on the website, most of which seems uninteresting, however this is a really good article.

Matches my experience perfectly. Single women stay single and pass tons of good men for no reason. It's happening on such a wide scale it's killing off civilizations, 50% of women are like this. Just incredible stuff.

The red pill comment from the article which really hits hard:

Recently a family member passed away.
She was 90 years old. Single all her life. Never had kids.

She always cried in Christmas, and the only people in her life were the half dozen people that expected to inherit some of her wealth.

The world wants to extract the most out of you, whether you are a man or a woman.

Women should start to opening their eyes before it’s too late.

If girls could only speak to older women like this, and get red pilled from a young age, our society wouldn't be dying right now.
 
Matches my experience perfectly. Single women stay single and pass tons of good men for no reason. It's happening on such a wide scale it's killing off civilizations, 50% of women are like this. Just incredible stuff.
What do you think the reason is for this?

People call others out on this forum for analyzing society because they think some faceless dude (let's say me) is just a LARPer or is lying on the internet. The only reason I post is to tell others that you can have XYZ and all objective, be highly rated, whatever you want to call it, and this still applies.
The red pill comment from the article which really hits hard:
It's like they find it amazing that they are given something in life that they didn't earn, and either they take advantage of it or they don't, and then they have the backend of their lives for 75% of it even, where they are not paid any mind. Shocking, lol - or you could just ask a man and he'd tell you, as your attention and value depends on "men" anyway. They act as if men who have had to work for 20-30 years to make themselves good, great, survive, etc. give a flying fk about their not capitalizing and wasting away. It's bizarre, but shows you "agency". If women right now didn't have DEI or dumb jobs, they'd nearly all be working until age 70. Fewer of them save anything at all. I wonder if they have even researched SSA, lol.
 
Do you think the younger women would actually listen or take the advice onboard? Very unlikely in 99% of cases.

Considering no such interactions take place today, why do you think they wouldn't listen? It's certainly better than not trying.

What do you think the reason is for this?

Because young women no longer receive advice from older women, and have very little interaction with them at all. Elderly women used to play matchmaker for younger women, for a good reason.

This is really related to the destruction of Church culture. Instead of young women listening to the older women at Church, they are sent off to college to get destroyed. Very few of them make it out spiritually intact.

Personally I see no value to sending young women to college. Causes far more harm than good. Only married mothers should be eligible for college, or women over 40 - this would keep women focused on their true job that God ordained for them from the beginning.
 
Last edited:
Personally I see no value to sending young women to college. Causes far more harm than good. Only married mothers should be eligible for college, or women over 40 - this would keep women focuses on their true job that God ordained for them from the beginning.
Yes, this is the conclusion you'll eventually come to: women aren't helpmates, in fact they've been basically abused to become other things entirely, and namely that is weak, consuming economic units, and/or weak versions of men that create greater societal inefficiencies, especially in postmodern, egalitarian oriented, marxist cultures.
 
Considering no such interactions take place today, why do you think they wouldn't listen? It's certainly better than not trying.
Firstly the older generation of women today are mostly boomers. And boomers are the ones who destroyed the world and in general are messed up people and are in no position to give advice to anyone. Boomers destroyed the wise older person archetype. Also women today are more arrogant, narcissistic, molly coddled, entitled, and stubborn then ever before in the whole of human history. 50 years ago younger women might have been willing to take advice from their elders but that is by and large no longer the case in 2025.
 
Firstly the older generation of women today are mostly boomers. And boomers are the ones who destroyed the world and in general are messed up people and are in no position to give advice to anyone. Boomers destroyed the wise older person archetype. Also women today are more arrogant, narcissistic, molly coddled, entitled, and stubborn then ever before in the whole of human history. 50 years ago younger women might have been willing to take advice from their elders but that is by and large no longer the case in 2025.

Elderly women at Church are completely different than elderly women outside of the Church.
 
Elderly women at Church are completely different than elderly women outside of the Church.
They are but they still act like a guy who has his stuff together isn't looking for XYZ in a wife or LTR. Just like the old people. Normies don't reflect on much beyond their own experience. Most people are variable in thoughts but base level are normies. That's why few make strong statements, have strong opinions, or look at things from a man or young man's point of view.

It's funny because a lot of these women have daughters who didn't get married in the early 20s. I've talked to them. They are clueless, like most women, about most things. "We thought we had to" or "now you can have kids at 30+" or "now this that or the other" all because some guys simp and a population boom. It's literally a foreign concept to them (pun intended) that a guy would go to another place because women don't actually improve your life here. Some don't have sons, but I've noticed even those don't really care. They are just concerned with their own lives as they age. That's fine, it's just that they shouldn't have opinions on things then; just say you don't know and don't care.
 
They are but they still act like a guy who has his stuff together isn't looking for XYZ in a wife or LTR. Just like the old people. Normies don't reflect on much beyond their own experience. Most people are variable in thoughts but base level are normies. That's why few make strong statements, have strong opinions, or look at things from a man or young man's point of view.

It's funny because a lot of these women have daughters who didn't get married in the early 20s. I've talked to them. They are clueless, like most women, about most things. "We thought we had to" or "now you can have kids at 30+" or "now this that or the other" all because some guys simp and a population boom. It's literally a foreign concept to them (pun intended) that a guy would go to another place because women don't actually improve your life here. Some don't have sons, but I've noticed even those don't really care. They are just concerned with their own lives as they age. That's fine, it's just that they shouldn't have opinions on things then; just say you don't know and don't care.

I've yet to meet a single elderly woman who says women shouldn't have children.

I've even had elderly women bring young women to me, but they've rejected me because I'm not the man of their dreams or whatever (even though I regularly attract younger/hotter outside of the Church), so I can definitively state elderly women in the Church are leagues above secular elderly, even if they aren't perfect.

I'm confident that if more young women had more positive older female Church influence in their life, the childless rate of millenial women would only be 75%, not 50%. In other words, things would only be half as bad, which would be like the 1970s - a far cry from the world of death and decay we currently inhabit.

The destruction of the Church has gone hand in hand with the destruction of our personal lives.
 
I've even had elderly women bring young women to me, but they've rejected me because I'm not the man of their dreams or whatever (even though I regularly attract younger/hotter outside of the Church), so I can definitively state elderly women in the Church are leagues above secular elderly, even if they aren't perfect.
I've not seen this much, so glad to hear it.
The destruction of the Church has gone hand in hand with the destruction of our personal lives.
Again, people chose secularism en masse since the 1970s, and we saw this motion as people taking the church less seriously even if they went, that's the key point. It really boils down to the biological reality that even if there aren't as many 7s to go around, let's say, you can get reasonable pairs as long as the woman is young. If she isn't, as we've seen, it destroys the whole point of family since guys have a hard line on that, and if they are forced to be second or fourteenth choices (even if they decide to get married as beta bux) as a reproductive strategy, it still doesn't work out because of the woman and society.
 
So again you are proving my point that young women from today's generation will not listen to the advice of older women.

No, a few rejections don't mean anything. What matters is the intent. The older women try to be matchmakers as is natural for them, which was my original point. Church women > Secular women. If more women were like Church women, then the pressure on younger women would be greater and more of them would take marriage seriously. There aren't enough older women to create any social code today, so younger women just scoff at the idea.

Again, people chose secularism en masse since the 1970s, and we saw this motion as people taking the church less seriously even if they went, that's the key point. It really boils down to the biological reality that even if there aren't as many 7s to go around, let's say, you can get reasonable pairs as long as the woman is young. If she isn't, as we've seen, it destroys the whole point of family since guys have a hard line on that, and if they are forced to be second or fourteenth choices (even if they decide to get married as beta bux) as a reproductive strategy, it still doesn't work out because of the woman and society.

Everyone thought they knew better. That they knew better than centuries of accumulated wisdom. Truly disgusting generation.
 
Everyone thought they knew better. That they knew better than centuries of accumulated wisdom. Truly disgusting generation.
You encounter these secular people all the time, especially in the age of politics and everyone having an opinion (particularly painful when it is women and based on jobs they have, pensions, etc). It really was stark during the covscam nonsense; the really fearful, political and secular people exposed themselves. As you age you find that your past of harmony and nostalgia, and respect for elders was easier, and everything is harder now. Yes, it's a test, but it also shows you how foolish the things of this world are, and the base frailty of people, really is.
 
You encounter these secular people all the time, especially in the age of politics and everyone having an opinion (particularly painful when it is women and based on jobs they have, pensions, etc). It really was stark during the covscam nonsense; the really fearful, political and secular people exposed themselves. As you age you find that your past of harmony and nostalgia, and respect for elders was easier, and everything is harder now. Yes, it's a test, but it also shows you how foolish the things of this world are, and the base frailty of people, really is.

I believe a defining characteristic of the dissident right is to look up to our grandparents, or the past in general, as the role model to live, but exactly the reasons you've described. We grew up with extremely flawed (to put it politely) parents, and we want nothing to do with them.

It is a great selection process going on, and it is unfortunately much harsher on the women than the men. Women are the bottleneck and it creates a very difficult environment for men, but also great opportunity for spiritual growth as well. Hardship is food for the soul, there have been many Saints who would have loved to suffer in our generation under such conditions.
 
We grew up with extremely flawed (to put it politely) parents, and we want nothing to do with them.
I can't identify with this, but I've recognized it is true for the overwhelming majority (I even met them throughout my life); otherwise I agree with your post.

there have been many Saints who would have loved to suffer in our generation under such conditions.
questionable, but I see what you are getting at. Like Rose said, it's far more psychological now. Less simple. Way more complex.
 
Back
Top