Latest UK Lunacy

Not going to nitpick, but in my experience as a native Scotsman, Its usually inferred to mean South Asian i.e. Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani etc.


She looks like a witch.
Never in my life had I heard that, until recent years. Never. And its only politicians and talking heads who call Muslims "asian". Everyone else calls them arabs, muslims, pakis, middle easterners or something similar.
 
Never in my life had I heard that, until recent years. Never. And its only politicians and talking heads who call Muslims "asian". Everyone else calls them arabs, muslims, pakis, middle easterners or something similar.

I have to concur, but I'm from London. Maybe that has an effect, since there's so many immigrants here?
 
That's weird. Here in the US, Asians are Chinese, Japanese, and all other countries whose people look similar to them.

Indians, Pakis, and those from Bangalore are just known as Indians...or towel heads; whichever you prefer.
It's all by design, sure they live on the same (sub) continent but none of the true Asians want anything to do with the pajeets.

A Japanese, hell even a Chinese or Korean would never want to be associated with these "people". But they're "Asian" so the comfortable whites will create their own cognitive dissonance and let them all in.
 
It's all by design, sure they live on the same (sub) continent but none of the true Asians want anything to do with the pajeets.

A Japanese, hell even a Chinese or Korean would never want to be associated with these "people". But they're "Asian" so the comfortable whites will create their own cognitive dissonance and let them all in.
We did all this on the last forum.. all of it. Its like the Jordan Peterson thread where people are still debating whether he is "just confused" and being exploited when all the receipts for him being a long term plant is there on the first page of the thread.
You in particular are always punching down on White people in Anglo countries that are not your own for being stupid and weak or gullible or simply charging you too much money for their labour. Its a very Jewish trait.

To summarise:
The debate raged on the last forum.
On one side naming Pakistanis Indians and Bangladeshis as "Asian" was a government psy op. as discussed above.

On the other side people argued that it is a simple equation as to how many people from the whole Asian landmass are in your country.
In America - with its Pacific coast, its history of Korean immigration post Korean War, ARVN families post Vietnam War, its Colonial History in the Philippines, its Japanese and Hapa population in places like Hawaii and California, imported Rothschild Coolies building the railroads, the origin of the phrase "slumming it" being organised middle class tours of the Chinese slums in places like San Francisco, - any mention of "Asians" and a vision of oriental East Asians immediately springs to mind.
In the UK with its history of Colonial involvement in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh and its history of Kalergi in migration by these groups - say the word "Asian" and people will immediately think of Sikhs, Muslims or Hindus.
They argued it was just a question of which Asian groups were the majority in your country - East Orientals from Eastern Asia or brown people from South West Asia.
I was a child in the UK in the 1970s and 1980s and "Asian" always meant Sikhs, Muslims, Hindus (the UKs mainly Cantonese Asian population was comparatively very small).
People pushing this viewpoint pulled up all these song lyrics from the 1960s and 1970s about the "Asians at the curry house" or "that Asian with his turban".

If the term Asian for brown people IS a government psy-op **(and I wouldn't put that past a government that has the Tavistock Institute at its disposal)** then it has to date back to at least the 1960s when all these Kashmiris and Punjabis and Pathans first started pouring in and appearing on British high streets.. because Asian meaning Brown has always been the case in the UK since they first started appearing - so a government psy-op from its very inception,
and nothing recent as many doubled down during the Last long debate on the Last forum.

Personally I like Confucius' demand that there be a 'rectification of terms' and the correct words for the correct items be employed.
Therefore I would like Kamala Harris to be renamed a "mixed jewish-Indian terrorist-concubine harpy' and the term "Asian" to be only applied exclusively to paler slant eyed East Asians .. and not the Indian subcontinent populations.
 
Last edited:
We did all this on the last forum.. all of it. Its like the Jordan Peterson thread where people are still debating whether he is "just confused" and being exploited when all the receipts for him being a long term plant is there on the first page of the thread.
You in particular are always punching down on White people in Anglo countries that are not your own for being stupid and weak or gullible or simply charging you too much money for their labour. Its a very Jewish trait.

To summarise:
The debate raged on the last forum.
On one side naming Pakistanis Indians and Bangladeshis as "Asian" was a government psy op. as discussed above.

On the other side people argued that it is a simple equation as to how many people from the whole Asian landmass are in your country.
In America - with its Pacific coast, its history of Korean immigration post Korean War, ARVN families post Vietnam War, its Colonial History in the Philippines, its Japanese and Hapa population in places like Hawaii and California, imported Rothschild Coolies building the railroads, the origin of the phrase "slumming it" being organised middle class tours of the Chinese slums in places like San Francisco, - any mention of "Asians" and a vision of oriental East Asians immediately springs to mind.
In the UK with its history of Colonial involvement in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh and its history of Kalergi in migration by these groups - say the word "Asian" and people will immediately think of Sikhs, Muslims or Hindus.
They argued it was just a question of which Asian groups were the majority in your country - East Orientals from Eastern Asia or brown people from South West Asia.
I was a child in the UK in the 1970s and 1980s and "Asian" always meant Sikhs, Muslims, Hindus (the UKs mainly Cantonese Asian population was comparatively very small).
People pushing this viewpoint pulled up all these song lyrics from the 1960s and 1970s about the "Asians at the curry house" or "that Asian with his turban".

If the term Asian for brown people IS a government psy-op **(and I wouldn't put that past a government that has the Tavistock Institute at its disposal)** then it has to date back to at least the 1960s when all these Kashmiris and Punjabis and Pathans first started pouring in and appearing on British high streets.. because Asian meaning Brown has always been the case in the UK since they first started appearing - so a government psy-op from its very inception,
and nothing recent as many doubled down during the Last long debate on the Last forum.

Personally I like Confucius' demand that there be a 'rectification of terms' and the correct words for the correct items be employed.
Therefore I would like Kamala Harris to renamed a "mixed jewish-Indian terrorist-concubine harpy' and the term "Asian" be only applied exclusively to paler slant eyed East Asians .. and not the Indian subcontinent populations.

Yeah I was part of the old forum, thanks Barron.

It's payback for the payeets the ones who don't understand that they're being used by the....
 
UK here. "Asian" here is Indian sub-continent, due to the legacy of empire. Chinese, etc are "East Asian", and there are not a lot if them in the grand scheme of things. A small percentage of Chinese in the cities, not many Japanese or Korean, so they don't get much of a mention. So, if the government is saying "Asian" to try and hide the crime statistics, we know the truth. I'd swap most of our "Asian" population out for "East Asian" in a heartbeat. In smaller numbers, neither are a problem, but mass importing Muslims into the UK is suicide...but then TPTB know that. Anarcho-tyrrany is well on the way, which explains Two-Tier Kier and the collapse of the policing system into little more than an intellectual Gestapo.
 
UK here. "Asian" here is Indian sub-continent, due to the legacy of empire. Chinese, etc are "East Asian", and there are not a lot if them in the grand scheme of things. A small percentage of Chinese in the cities, not many Japanese or Korean, so they don't get much of a mention. So, if the government is saying "Asian" to try and hide the crime statistics, we know the truth. I'd swap most of our "Asian" population out for "East Asian" in a heartbeat. In smaller numbers, neither are a problem, but mass importing Muslims into the UK is suicide...but then TPTB know that. Anarcho-tyrrany is well on the way, which explains Two-Tier Kier and the collapse of the policing system into little more than an intellectual Gestapo.
It's so bad in the UK. If I was still there and I had options, I would be looking to move away ASAP.
 
Actually, no. In the UK "asian" means Chinese, Japanese or Korean. Or anyone with similar looks.

The government and media however, have recently begun describing middle eastern and Pakistanis as "Asian", as well as the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans. This is to obscure the true nature of who commits so many acts of terror, sexual assault and "honour" killings.

It's just the same as the way they used to say "the religion of peace" immediately after saying Islam.

Everyone knows the truth anyway.
Interesting. I've heard pakis and pajeets called asian from so many British sources, I thought it was common usage, including Brits on the forum.

However, I can easily believe this usage was pushed in recent years to obscure who're actually being talked about.

It does seem like that term applied to Japan, China etc. Even in that case, I used to always think of all the slant eyed races as oriental. I think even for them the term asian was intended to be more generic. Asia has so many different peoples that it makes sense to be more specific whenever you are talking about them. It doesn't make sense to use one term for Pakis, Mongolians, Siberians, Laotians, etc.
 
One thing about the UK - the normies are slowly beginning to see the decline, but its all too little too late.
Nearly every norm Brit I speak to says that the country is being destroyed in slow motion, that they have lost all faith in people like the government and the police but remain incapable of seeing the bigger picture.

One thing that is now happening, post Covid, is that the town centres of every conurbation are in steep decline.
Its unheard of for British high streets to be full of empty shop fronts - happening now - and often when there AREN'T empty store fronts its all ugly migrant owned kebab shops and vape shops. Even tiny villages are getting curry houses with no customers and no need for customers as they are run as fronts by Pakistani heroin gangs.
Local taxi firms that have operated in rural areas for years and are known to all the locals are folding in the face of 3rd world taxi firms run by 3rd world drug money.

One other thing is that the British security state has done everything to weaken trust in the police whilst doing everything to ensure the rise and weaponisation of its favourite clients, 3rd world crime gangs, not least the Albanian drug mafia.
Its not just two tier, its a two tier policing where your average working man wanting his streets back is up against spoilt welfare queens who can torture their enemies in private addresses and carry around AKs in their cars, all with impunity.

NOW what bothers me is that - in the run up to the Bolshevik Revolution - the convicts were all released from jail.
In the run up to the summer of Black Lives Matter Riots, the prisoners were all being released from jail (Covid don't you know?)

NOW the Kier Starmer government is letting violent prisoners out of the jails (overcrowding everyone!) ..
The UK is being prepped for something.
 
Can I ask why you think so? Less mass immigration? Less feminists? More right wing government? I know little about Switzerland.
Less population density
Limited illegal and legal migration from the 3rd world
Beautiful scenery
Less central top down government
Lower taxes
Actual policemen doing police work
Full employment
More entrepreneurial environment for business
You get paid what you're worth

This is just a small part. I would say visit and have a look around.

You can't come and work here easily if you are a brit though because of brexit.
 
Less population density
Limited illegal and legal migration from the 3rd world
Beautiful scenery
Less central top down government
Lower taxes
Actual policemen doing police work
Full employment
More entrepreneurial environment for business
You get paid what you're worth

This is just a small part. I would say visit and have a look around.

You can't come and work here easily if you are a brit though because of brexit.
Sounds decent actually. Isn't the law enforcement mega strict and woke mind virus pretty strong there though?

Still seems a lot saner overall than UK?
 
Sounds decent actually. Isn't the law enforcement mega strict and woke mind virus pretty strong there though?

Still seems a lot saner overall than UK?
The law enforcement is strict. I've come to view it as a good thing. There is also a lot of social pressure to behave like civilised people.

There's the usual balance of woke and non woke. Currently the right of centre people's party hold the majority in the Swiss parliament
 
The law enforcement is strict. I've come to view it as a good thing. There is also a lot of social pressure to behave like civilised people.

There's the usual balance of woke and non woke. Currently the right of centre people's party hold the majority in the Swiss parliament

Unfortunately for people with an EU passport it's quite difficult to settle and work in Switzerland from my research, do you think this is correct?
 
Interesting. I've heard pakis and pajeets called asian from so many British sources, I thought it was common usage, including Brits on the forum.
In my day(when I lived there)most sub continental asians were 'Pakis'. These are the ones that lived next door to you,worked in the potbanks(pottery industry of Staffordshire),drove the taxis,had the ginger coloured bearded grandad, wife15 -20 years younger than him and usually four plus children and claiming welfare.The Indians were the next level up,paper shop owners, textile workers or owned Heathrow Airport.

When you went for a curry or an 'Indian', the chefs/cooks and general staff were usually Bangladeshi or Pakis.The Indian restaurant of today,run by actual Indians is a relatively new phenomenon,maybe something to do with Pataks nicking all the Bangladeshi 'Indian' restaurant recipes.
Japanese were Japs and Chinese were Chinks.After a heavy session of drink,many yoots would all pile down to the Chinkies or 'go for a curry'. Everything in between was a wog or a gook.
 
In my day(when I lived there)most sub continental asians were 'Pakis'. These are the ones that lived next door to you,worked in the potbanks(pottery industry of Staffordshire),drove the taxis,had the ginger coloured bearded grandad, wife15 -20 years younger than him and usually four plus children and claiming welfare.The Indians were the next level up,paper shop owners, textile workers or owned Heathrow Airport.

When you went for a curry or an 'Indian', the chefs/cooks and general staff were usually Bangladeshi or Pakis.The Indian restaurant of today,run by actual Indians is a relatively new phenomenon,maybe something to do with Pataks nicking all the Bangladeshi 'Indian' restaurant recipes.
Japanese were Japs and Chinese were Chinks.After a heavy session of drink,many yoots would all pile down to the Chinkies or 'go for a curry'. Everything in between was a wog or a gook.

I thought you lot called them "curries" gooks and chinks. I'm getting old I guess. Japs, sure but they don't really deserve that.
 
In my day(when I lived there)most sub continental asians were 'Pakis'. These are the ones that lived next door to you,worked in the potbanks(pottery industry of Staffordshire),drove the taxis,had the ginger coloured bearded grandad, wife15 -20 years younger than him and usually four plus children and claiming welfare.The Indians were the next level up,paper shop owners, textile workers or owned Heathrow Airport.

When you went for a curry or an 'Indian', the chefs/cooks and general staff were usually Bangladeshi or Pakis.The Indian restaurant of today,run by actual Indians is a relatively new phenomenon,maybe something to do with Pataks nicking all the Bangladeshi 'Indian' restaurant recipes.
Japanese were Japs and Chinese were Chinks.After a heavy session of drink,many yoots would all pile down to the Chinkies or 'go for a curry'. Everything in between was a wog or a gook.
Bear in mind that the media, even in those less PC days, did not read out the news saying "Police are on the look out for a man in his 20s of Paki appearance"
"Wait a second Angela, wasn't the suspect supposed to be a Curry?" "Yeah thats what I said. I didn't say he was a Wog did I?"
smile and turn to audience.. "And he's definitely not a Gook, either. Now here's Jackie with the weather..."
No,
These people from the Indian Subcontinent in the media were referred to as "Asians" - census forms, government forms also offered the "Asian (Indian Pakistani Bangladeshi)" box to tick.
Now maybe that was a government pay-op or maybe not, but in my own lifetime going back all these decades the term Asian has always meant Indian subcontinent in the UK.

Whether it should? No, it shouldn't. But thats a different discussion.
 
Back
Top