And they want us to believe Dresden and Hiroshima were the holocausts, I think they were not, it's largely propaganda, burning cities that were already empty, I think we live in Babylon and the more we deny God, the closer the real fire will come.
The cities were not empty, everyone fleeing the receding and collapsing eastern front, including many non-Germans who also did not want to be caught up by the red army of rapey mongols were funneled through Dresden as it is a major crossroads, the first hub in Germany just west of the border of Moravia / Bohemia / Czechia (where Prague is).
You should become a script writer for the next holocaust movie. Good stuff.
I think Dresden is vastly exaggerated. I think it's political play that it's pushed up, a nice new trope to create division.
1. Well Auschwitz, so bad, evil nazis
2. Well Dresden, so bad, evil west
I don't say nothing happened, I say zoom out, why is this coming up? I hear it from many different sides.
To me Dresden is the same as Hiroshima. Also vastly exaggerated.
"Dresden" is used as a tool to say, now it needs to stop, this never again, we went to far, we need international peace now.
Which means secured US hegemony over the world.
One side has been suppressed, and one side has been vastly exaggerated to the realm of the fictitious, not both. It doesn't work that way. The winners write the records and impugn the loser with all kinds of slander. This is human nature, and worse when jews are running the narrative.
They will never take down one of their phony holohoax memorials in any of these European cities, they will probably start putting more up the more every other memory of the truth becomes suppressed.
What you're saying here is that both sides are liars, and outsiders who hear this will be more confused, that the truth is as arbitrary as an atheist postulating an abstract mathematical formula. The truth does not fear investigation, and the fact that so many forces are at work to prevent these investigations from taking place is proof that the lies are only what is pushed.
If what you believe is true, then the Germans would be able to advocate for themselves on the victim totem pole of atrocities for this, the rapes from the Stalinist hordes, the bombings of also Hamburg and Cologne and Berlin as well, and the Rhine-Meadows starvation camps, but they are not allowed to, even to this day. I tried to go look at the Rhine-Meadows but there were huge areas off limits to anyone, because people will find human remains there still in Wehrmacht uniforms, and some people have found some before being forcibly removed and fined by brainwashed German law enforcement.
There are no huge major headlines about removing this memorial from Dresden, they want the Germans to shut up and stop thinking about this time period, except for their continued browbeating and submission based on the warped and twisted psychological guilt trip their judeo-masonic overlords have imposed on them. The German people are forbidden self-autonomy in any kind of political or national interest. I thought you understood this.
You are right about US Hegemony, but the US is controlled by jews who are profiting massively off of their lolocaust racket, a racket that only exists and survives by completely suppressing the truth.
The camps in Poland are pathetic, hyper-sensationalized. As for Auschwitz in particular, the chimney of the fabled crematorium isn't even attached to the building, and it is obvious that the "gas chambers" were former latrines that had walls broken down to appear larger (if anyone's ever done a remodeling, they can see the breaks in the continuous floor and walls).
Unlike the jewish fable, these scorch marks are not an exaggeration:
You really can't say what you think or know until you visit the place in person, and talk to enough people there. I know you've done some traveling yourself, but this is my take on any place. This city was completely wiped off the map save for a few structures that could withstand the infernos. There is a wild mix of old-old and new-old buildings, most obvious along the river banks in the city where classical architecture is mixed with socialist structures from the Soviet East Germany rule. Kreuzkirche is still showing evidence of the damage. When it was rebuilt, the inside of the church was reconstructed using very bland and ugly concrete, so it is clearly visible how much of the church was destroyed during the bombings. That’s also the reason, why many consider this church to be the ugliest in the city, because it was deliberately made ugly to add salt on already opened wounds. Most damaged buildings were demolished soon after the war so at most you would find a few empty lots, but nowadays even those have been mostly filled out. Two of the most prominent remnants of the war during DDR times were the palace and the Frauenkirche in the city center, as they weren't deemed important enough to maintain by the Soviets, but they've also been rebuilt now.
Unless you're from the area you're visiting, you're never going to know the full story about any queries you may have about things there. This architecture introspective talks about the details of the cities reconstruction:
https://birdinflight.com/en/architectura-2/20221214-postwar-dresden.html