Iran-Israeli Conflict Thread

I still think this whole thing is little more than bluster meant to appease the Israelis and scare the Iranians into signing a disadvantageous deal. I expect to see some nominal bombings and missile strikes take place over the coming weeks, but I think Trump realizes that anything more than that would not only be extremely difficult for the U.S. military to sustain logistically, but would provide very little geostrategic benefit for the U.S., and would be politically disastrous to boot. At the end of the day, like all bullies, Trump operates mostly on hot air and bravado. He talks a big game and then ends up delivering very little before walking away and declaring victory. I'll be surprised if this latest brouhaha turns into anything more serious than the previous "war".
 
I'll be surprised if this latest brouhaha turns into anything more serious than the previous "war".

This whole scenario over the last three decades has been like a bad marriage between The Goy Who Cried Wolf and the movie Groundhog Day. Oh, "this time" Israel and Iran are going to go to the mat and "the US will put boots on the ground in Iran on behalf of Israel."

Ain't gonna' happen.

How many times can someone hear the same (((MSM))) proclamation before realizing it will never come true?

The question thus becomes, "Why would (((They))) keep pushing this same false narrative over and over again, year in year out, decade after decade, yet never actually pull the trigger?"

I think most men here can figure out an answer to that.
 

He said Iran has agreed that it will "never, ever have … nuclear material that will create a bomb," which he called a "big achievement." The country's existing stockpiles of enriched uranium would be "blended to the lowest level possible" and "converted into fuel, and that fuel will be irreversible," according to Albusaidi.

And Iran is willing to grant inspectors from the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency "full access" to its nuclear sites in order to verify the terms of the deal, said Albusaidi.

"There would be zero accumulation, zero stockpiling, and full verification," he said. Albusaidi said that if there is a fair and endurable deal in place, he is "quite confident" that even American inspectors will have access at some point in the process.

Seems very at odds with what Trump was saying earlier today about his unhappiness with the current state of negotiations though.
 
Not that we need proof for this but if war starts on purim it will show that it's a religious war and nothing else. One more thing to boot: Iranians are Persians, Persians are Semites. How can Jews attack Iranians and not be considered antisemites then... Or maybe the Jews are really Khazars and all their semitic claims are simply bullshit...
Yes what Cooper said. Iranians are Indo-Europeans and come under the Indo-Iranian sub branch of Indo Europeans.
 
Trump clearly wants to see Venezuela, Cuba, Yemen, Iran, and Afghanistan eliminated from the list of rogue anti-US states, he is taking steps to try to make this happen.

One can only assume North Korea is in his sights as well. That would make a clean sweep of troublesome small states, leaving only Russia and China, who are willing to bargain and cooperate.

Edit: Also the Mexican cartels.
 
Yes what Cooper said. Iranians are Indo-Europeans and come under the Indo-Iranian sub branch of Indo Europeans.
Look up what the word “Iran” means in Farsi and when they changed the name of their country from “Persia” to Iran and the reason why. I forget many here don’t listen to red pill podcasts.

It is worth it, trust me.
 
Look up what the word “Iran” means in Farsi and when they changed the name of their country from “Persia” to Iran and the reason why. I forget many here don’t listen to red pill podcasts.

It is worth it, trust me.
Please share these 'red pill podcasts', I'd like to have a laugh too. As for AS not being red-pilled on Iran, this member is with high certainty a diaspora Iranian himself, or at least from that part of the world - this is quite clear from his postings and positions.

As for whatever theory you are alluding to, Persians are a sub-branch of the Iranic peoples. The Iranic peoples in itself are centered around Indo-European/ Yamnaya origin story and language but then again so are Hindus/ Indians with their Vedic emphasis, Indo-European language and Yamnaya originated caste system (meant to protect Yamnaya/ Brahmin Aryan racial purity+power structures through the generations and keep the Dasa/ Indus Valley aborigines from moving upwards.

Looking at the Indian Subcontinent today we see how that panned out, the Yamnaya conquerors have genetically vanished into that sea of brown underlings. Due to modern genemapping we know that in Northwestern India only 10-15 percent of DNA is derived from steppe pastoralist Yamnaya ancestry and that's only in the North West. In places like Kalkotta, where people speak the Indo European Bengali language, it's close to zero. The highest amount of Yamnaya DNA on the Subcontinent can be found in isolated Afghan mountain villages and upper class Pakistani circles, Imran Khan who is a Nyazi nobleman has very clear Yamnaya traits and in Nuristan blondism is not uncommon.

Yamnaya DNA share is higher in Iran but not by much. Modern Iranians are mostly comprised of ancient Zagrossian Neolithics, Southern Hunter Gatherers and then the gene influxes from the steppe (Yamnaya and later the Turkic khaganates), Iraq/Arabia, and the Indian Subcontinent. These modern findings and conclusions were already reached by National Socialist racial scientists in the 30s bytheway, people like Hans Gunther and Alfred Rosenberg talked up Iran's historical decay to the mixing of the original Yamnaya conquerors with the local brown host populations. Bringing in Germany's most famous racial scientists here because there's a high chance that this is what you are referring to.

Persia and Iran(ics). High ancestry Yamnaya Sarmatian/ Scythians Iranics once dwelled the Central Asian steppes from Ukraine to Xinjiang but were in several waves eventually replaced by Turkics and Slavics.

EDIT : just noted they colored Azeris as Iranic. Very bold move, Azeris are genetically Causcasoids and have high Iranic admixture. Culturally and historically close to Iran too. Azerbaijan is an etymological Iranian word as well, Azeris consider themselves Turkic though so this map was made by probably an Iranian nationalist.

Map_of_Iranian_ethnic_groups.png
Percentage Yamnaya DNA. In Iran these fair skinned horseriding steppe pastoralists would be called Aryans.
HCIILlTaQAAoaeE.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Israeli attack on Iranian targets. Size, scope and number of targets yet unknown. State of emergency has been declared in Israel. Attack coincided with a relatively large attack on Hezbollah targets in Lebanon





 
Last edited:
Please share these 'red pill podcasts', I'd like to have a laugh too. As for AS not being red-pilled on Iran, this member is with high certainty a diaspora Iranian himself, or at least from that part of the world - this is quite clear from his postings and positions.

As for whatever theory you are alluding to, Persians are a sub-branch of the Iranic peoples. The Iranic peoples in itself are centered around Indo-European/ Yamnaya origin story and language but then again so are Hindus/ Indians with their Vedic emphasis, Indo-European language and Yamnaya originated caste system (meant to protect Yamnaya/ Brahmin Aryan racial purity+power structures through the generations and keep the Dasa/ Indus Valley aborigines from moving upwards.

Looking at the Indian Subcontinent today we see how that panned out, the Yamnaya conquerors have genetically vanished into that sea of brown underlings. Due to modern genemapping we know that in Northwestern India only 10-15 percent of DNA is derived from steppe pastoralist Yamnaya ancestry and that's only in the North West. In places like Kalkotta, where people speak the Indo European Bengali language, it's close to zero. The highest amount of Yamnaya DNA on the Subcontinent can be found in isolated Afghan mountain villages and upper class Pakistani circles, Imran Khan who is a Nyazi nobleman has very clear Yamnaya traits and in Nuristan blondism is not uncommon.

Yamnaya DNA share is higher in Iran but not by much. Modern Iranians are mostly comprised of ancient Zagrossian Neolithics, Southern Hunter Gatherers and then the gene influxes from the steppe (Yamnaya and later the Turkic khaganates), Iraq/Arabia, and the Indian Subcontinent. These modern findings and conclusions were already reached by National Socialist racial scientists in the 30s bytheway, people like Hans Gunther and Alfred Rosenberg talked up Iran's historical decay to the mixing of the original Yamnaya conquerors with the local brown host populations. Bringing in Germany's most famous racial scientists here because there's a high chance that this is what you are referring to.

Persia and Iran(ics). High ancestry Yamnaya Sarmatian/ Scythians Iranics once dwelled the Central Asian steppes from Ukraine to Xinjiang but were in several waves eventually replaced by Turkics and Slavics.

EDIT : just noted they colored Azeris as Iranic. Very bold move, Azeris are genetically Causcasoids and have high Iranic admixture. Culturally and historically close to Iran too. Azerbaijan is an etymological Iranian word as well, Azeris consider themselves Turkic though so this map was made by probably an Iranian nationalist.

View attachment 27652
Percentage Yamnaya DNA. In Iran these fair skinned horseriding steppe pastoralists would be called Aryans.
View attachment 27650
Does any of this have anything to do with when or why they changed the name of their country?
 
Back
Top