Donald Trump and US expansionism in North America
- Thread starter LaAguilaNegra
- Start date
More than likely we’ll get embargoed. That will kind of suck if we’re honest.
Matt Forney weighs in on the Danish announcement they will look for a common way forward with the US on Greenland!
Essentially the US is dropping the facade which politely covers its power. There definitely still feels like there are above/behind-the-scenes hedgers, hedging, and jostling.
Last edited:
The only country which left NATO was France. And might leave again. The ONLY country which asked NATO support was US. Let that sink in. Americans were the only country in NATO which sctivated the alliance. The american jewish hipocrisy is disgusting.
France doesnt have american military bases.
Being in NATO or outside means nothing in terms of expense for US military. The cost of european bases which will always be there in NATO or outside NATO. To project power globally. Because european bases are needed by US military. Its not because of NATO they exist but to serve U.S. jewish interests.
The capacity to project military power from european bases is essential for US. But for europeans it has a big cost which means going along with US madness and jew guidance. Since US is the country where international jews have the tightest grip.
U.S. is not in NATO to help europeans. I dont think americans are this generous. NATO serves U.S. interests. Its US military. With NATO or without NATO nothing would change for US military budget.
I hope US leaves NATO asap. It would be great news for Europe if NATO breaks. If Iran attacks US they might ask NATO suport again. Nobody wants it. Already the ukrainian madness created 100% by anglos is enough.
France doesnt have american military bases.
Being in NATO or outside means nothing in terms of expense for US military. The cost of european bases which will always be there in NATO or outside NATO. To project power globally. Because european bases are needed by US military. Its not because of NATO they exist but to serve U.S. jewish interests.
The capacity to project military power from european bases is essential for US. But for europeans it has a big cost which means going along with US madness and jew guidance. Since US is the country where international jews have the tightest grip.
U.S. is not in NATO to help europeans. I dont think americans are this generous. NATO serves U.S. interests. Its US military. With NATO or without NATO nothing would change for US military budget.
I hope US leaves NATO asap. It would be great news for Europe if NATO breaks. If Iran attacks US they might ask NATO suport again. Nobody wants it. Already the ukrainian madness created 100% by anglos is enough.
Last edited:
^^ if the USA agrees to leave nato and hang Ukraine out to dry, what’s to stop Russia from rolling their tanks in to annex Poland/France/ Germany etc ?
Ukraine is russian. Always been russian. U.S. is not supporting anything. They are with english instigating a conflict. The war started because americans and UK want to expand NATO to Ukraine. France and specially Germany were always 100% against it. Nobody should support ukraine. Nobody is supporting Ukraine. They are laundering billions. And trying to get a foothold. And ukrainians are being slaughtered into meat grinders. Ukraine Its russian sphere of influence. Like all those ex ussr shitholes. Nobody gives a shit about.
The real goal is to put US (NATO) boots on the ground in Ukraine and attack russia. This is a stupid retarded jewish plan. Which could only be conceived by dissonant dumb jews. Nobody conquered russia from outside. And who would want russia? And manage it?
Now Germany has been cut out from cheap energy and is starting to being cornered. The nordstream was cut by americans.
No tanks will roll into France. Hitler was wanted. Maybe you dont learn this simple truth in jewish land. All the elites in Europe were in favor of Hitler. Until that lunatic went full retard. English, french all wanted nazism. Because jewish culture is shit. Nobody wants it. Influence sure. Not dominance.
Russians and americans entered a conflict between european powers. Which weakened the continent. And this allowed russians to enter. Russia never had invaded Europe. But the opposite happened many times more. Russians being raped by single European countries. Napoleon ravaged russia.
In American revolution war it was the same French and Russians helped Americans against english.
When you talk about europe. Single countries ruled the world. Not the continent unified. Germans and french never worked together like they are doing now.
The finish alone without any support repealed russians. What is this retardation.
Nobody fears russia. Russia+China is something different.
But why do Americans want to prevent tanks from rolling into Europe? They are so good hearted. Because they will be next. If for some incredible reason europe falls into Russian or Chinese influence who do you think will fall next? You think Americans can handle europe+russia+China? US retreating into a regional power won’t work. Another western power needs to emerge to take its place. Like it’s been for the last 500 years.
It was in European and American self interest to have a pact of mutual protection. Now that Jews run US it’s not. Cause US is about to crash and burn. The goal of US military is not protection of American people or Europe it’s to blow up shit and make money. More things to blow up more money. US people has lost control of many institutions. But US military can have a real damaging impact.
Last edited:
You’re getting a little warmer. The goal of the USA military, at least in my lifetime, has always been israel first.
The USA still has a sizable nuclear stockpile
Germany has no military as per the ww2 surrender terms.
The USA still has a sizable nuclear stockpile
Germany has no military as per the ww2 surrender terms.
Some valid points mentioned in the post above. While Russia has no plans to conquer Europe, it has historically expressed the desire to re-take Constantinople. Even as late as the 18th century there was a belief that Russia could christianize large parts of Muslim Europe.
Obviously, if Russia actually were to enter into a military conflict with Turkey, western nations would use the opportunity to attack Russia and would get full support from the elites, Jews and the Vatican to do so. Thus, unfortunately, Islam is here to stay.
That said, some Russians do support the notion that occupying countries like Germany could essentially assure long term peace, given that it would render them incapable of military action against Russia. As Magoo said, western Europe has been attacking Russia for centuries and always failed at the expense of millions of Russian lives.
Obviously, if Russia actually were to enter into a military conflict with Turkey, western nations would use the opportunity to attack Russia and would get full support from the elites, Jews and the Vatican to do so. Thus, unfortunately, Islam is here to stay.
That said, some Russians do support the notion that occupying countries like Germany could essentially assure long term peace, given that it would render them incapable of military action against Russia. As Magoo said, western Europe has been attacking Russia for centuries and always failed at the expense of millions of Russian lives.
Right. That brings the question, would Germany be better off under Russian rule instead of being ruled by the EU?
If Russia rolled their tanks into Poland and then Germany, and says “we are kicking out all of the Muslim invaders and will make Germany safe”, would the majority of Germans enjoy this?
The only way Russia does any of this would be if they got assurances from whoever is in the White House to not launch nuclear weapons
Trumph should be careful!!
Reading the comments on IG from people taking this seriously...
Im hearing a retired general on television saying that when US invoked article 5 of NATO there was european airplanes and personnel which flew to US in order to guarrantee the safety of americans.
And the guy is right:
European NATO AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) planes were deployed to the U.S. for air surveillance after 9/11 as part of Operation Eagle Assist, starting in October 2001, to help cover radar gaps and support the U.S. defense, marking the first time NATO deployed forces in support of a member's defense under Article 5. These multinational-crewed E-3 Sentry aircraft flew missions over the U.S. until May 2002, allowing U.S. AWACS to focus on Afghanistan and providing continuous air defense during a period of heightened security.
loooll part of the personnel was from Denmark.
So danish military 20 years ago went to US to guarrantee their safety and now they are being backstabbed?!?!
Five NATO AWACs aircraft, one NATO Trainer Cargo Aircraft, and a detachment of 200 personnel arrived in the U.S. from Geilenkirchen, Germany, on October 9-10. The aircraft are based at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, where they will operate with North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), helping to defend the continental United States in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks. The United States asked NATO to deploy the AWACs aircraft to assist in the NORAD mission, to allow other U.S. aircraft of this type to deploy elsewhere, and to share the burden of NORAD AWACs flights.
This deployment is part of NATO's historic invocation of Article 5 of the NATO charter, which embodies the principle of collective defense: an attack on one is an attack on all. Personnel for this NATO detachment come from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the United States.
Requests for media interviews or media orientation flights on NATO or U.S. AWACs can be directed to NORAD Public Affairs, (719) 554-6889.
Looolll
Wait the guy is back. U.S. is no longer an ally but a possible enemy. And a joint statement of defence will be signed between all eu members. EU will no longer be a economic powerhouse but a military also. And money is already being deployed.
The orange elephant is a disaster internationally. But its a good thing. Some clarity. And competition.
And the guy is right:
European NATO AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) planes were deployed to the U.S. for air surveillance after 9/11 as part of Operation Eagle Assist, starting in October 2001, to help cover radar gaps and support the U.S. defense, marking the first time NATO deployed forces in support of a member's defense under Article 5. These multinational-crewed E-3 Sentry aircraft flew missions over the U.S. until May 2002, allowing U.S. AWACS to focus on Afghanistan and providing continuous air defense during a period of heightened security.
loooll part of the personnel was from Denmark.
So danish military 20 years ago went to US to guarrantee their safety and now they are being backstabbed?!?!
NATO AWACs Deployed to the United States
Five NATO AWACs aircraft, one NATO Trainer Cargo Aircraft, and a detachment of 200 personnel arrived in the U.S. from Geilenkirchen, Germany, on October 9-10. The aircraft are based at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, where they will operate with North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), helping to defend the continental United States in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks. The United States asked NATO to deploy the AWACs aircraft to assist in the NORAD mission, to allow other U.S. aircraft of this type to deploy elsewhere, and to share the burden of NORAD AWACs flights.
This deployment is part of NATO's historic invocation of Article 5 of the NATO charter, which embodies the principle of collective defense: an attack on one is an attack on all. Personnel for this NATO detachment come from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the United States.
Requests for media interviews or media orientation flights on NATO or U.S. AWACs can be directed to NORAD Public Affairs, (719) 554-6889.
Looolll
Wait the guy is back. U.S. is no longer an ally but a possible enemy. And a joint statement of defence will be signed between all eu members. EU will no longer be a economic powerhouse but a military also. And money is already being deployed.
The orange elephant is a disaster internationally. But its a good thing. Some clarity. And competition.
Last edited:
Zelensky signed bilateral security pacts with about 30 countries, one of them being Denmark. If Trump invades Greenland, Ukraine would be obligated to fight the US. Of course, we know those agreements were just for the media narrative, and are essentially toilet paper.
Strictly speaking, the post WW2 demilitarization ended in the 1950s. Their existing military is highly constrained, but it's inaccurate to say the have no military.
100% yes. That goes for the whole of Europe.
We need a new Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. When that was announced in August '39 the Anglo-zionists shut their pants. Their goal always was and still is to dis-unite Europe, because a continental Euro-Asian alliance will dominate everyone by nature. But the current soy-leaders of Europe (installed by the Anglo-jews) do not have the stomach to steer Europe to the East.
Do not advocate for violence and unlawful behavior
I could make a decent argument, that Europe in the United States simply need to kill all jew and israel influence to recover their countries
Europe has spent almost as much money and personell to help the US in its' numerous endless wars as the US has itself.
Now, guess the name of an US "ally" that has never helped the US with either money, weapons or personell?