No one can "land" on something that isn't a solid matter. Deception from the usual suspects as always.
Here is some moon stuff for you curious minds:
"20 Proofs NASA faked the moon landings"
I've annotated the points here for those who don't have time to sit through 20 minutes of a video:
1. The moon is a simply a luminary, a non-physical light in the sky, not a spherical terrafirma planetoid as maintained by NASA and modern astronomy.
On clear days we can see on a waxing or waning cycle the blue sky can be seen through the moon. On clear nights during a waxing or waning is is possible to see stars directly through the surface. With each new moon, the moon disappears and remains invisible for that one day.
Even members of the royal astronomical society have recorded their confusion at being able to see stars through the moon Sir James South of the Royal Observatory in Kensington wrote that "On my first looking into the telescope, a star of about the 7th magnitude was some minutes of a degree distant from the moons dark limb, I saw that its occultation by the moon was inevitable, but the star, instead of disappearing the moment the moon's edge came in contact with it, apparently glided on the moon's dark face, as if it had been seen through a transparent moon, or as if a star were between me and the moon. I have seen a similar apparent project several times. The cause of this phenomenon is involved in impenetrable mystery."
2. The entire concept of a "vacuum" of space is impossible.
3. The amount of radiation claimed to exist in space, especially in the so-called "Van-Allen Belt" was far too strong for the astronauts flimy suits, starting at an altitude of 1,000 miles upt o 15,000 miles NASA claims there exists a deadly band of radiation that would kill or seriously injure anyone passing through in a matter of minutes.
4. Temperatures on the moon supposedly range from 279 degrees below zero during the night time, which is far colder than Antarctica's coldest winter, and up to 243 degrees above zero during midday, which is hotter than boiling water. NASAs suits could not withstand these temperatures. The kodak film in their cameras would not survive these temperatures.
5. In photos of Apollo 11, Buzz Aldrin can be seen wearing different colored gloves and different length boots in pictures supposedly taken within minutes of each other.
6. None of the Apollo missions brought with them any extra studio lighting with them on the lunar lander, so the sun should be the only light source on the moon and in all pictures taken there. The light should only come from one direction and the shadows should be cast in the opposite direction, however in dozens of official NASA photos there are shadows being cast in up to three directions simultaneously, often at up to 90 degree angles, which can only be the result of multiple light sources not present on the moon.
7. Many pictures purportedly showing the sun from the moon are clearly studio spotlights and not the sun. For example, Apollo 12 photo AS12466765, after computer enhancement, reveals a large light bulb in the center of the "sun".
8. Several Apollo images show a defined separation line where the ground meets with what can only be a studio backdrop. If they were filming on an actual planetoid, the ground would seamlessly meet the background, leaving no such dividing line. NASA has been found using the same contours and repeated backdrops on allegedly completely different parts of the moon.
9. Computer enhancement of NASA images reveal photo manipulation and evidence of pstudio trickery. For example, as the Apollo 17 lunar lander lifts off, photo AS1715123201 shows a clear shadow being cast on the ceiling of the studio.
10. Computer enhancements done on images of "the earth" taken from "the moon" reveal clear photo trickery. By gradually removing the hues comprising black from the backgrounds, a bright rectangular artifact appears around the earth, proving it to be a composite image. There are numerous of these rectangular doctored "earth" photographs that can be found.
11. In the original Apollo 16 photo AS1610717446 there is a rock with the letter "C" engraved into it, and another "C" drawn in the dirt next to it, which is characteristic to fake stage rocks on a set where a set designer demarcates prop positions. After being exposed for this, NASA doctored the two "C's" out of the photo.
12. In several bits of video footage from the Apollo missions, there is evidence of the astronauts using wires to achieve a more weightless appearance. During Apollo 14, there are many occasions where light reflects off the wires attached to their backpacks, making them momentary become visible.
13.Obvious video anomaly of the Flags flapping around in the non-existent "space wind."
14. Another video anomaly, when watching at double speed, the gravity illusion disappears whether they are "moon" walking or in a "moon" buggy.
15. No stars in the background of any moon photos in any of their appropriate positions, more evidence of studio fakery.
16. The Apollo 11 photo AS11405922 of the lunar lander, supposedly on the moon will see a pathetic 1969 attempt at creating high-tech-looking equipment using flimsy construction paper, gold foil, scotch tape, and metal shower rods. The idea that the piece of junk shown in the photo flew to the "moon" and back is laughably ludicrous.
17. Apollo 11 image AS11495926 shows a closeup of the foot pads of the lunar lander without a speck of dust on them and without a burn print or crater under its 10,000 lb thrusters, as if the lander was gently set down with a crane.
18. During the Apollo 11 mission, Richard Nixon made a "historic" phone call from DC to Neil Armstrong on the moon, showing both men live on split screen TV. The call allegedly went from the oval office in DC to Houston where it was "routed" into space via mission control through the "capsule communicator". There was no discernable delay in the phone call whatsoever.
19. Examinations of the many supposed "moon rocks" given museums to the world over by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. Shortly after Apollo 11, private investigator Paul Jacobs reported asking the US department of geology head whether he had examined the moon rocks, and if he could verify their authenticity, to which the geologist simply laughed and insinuated that "people high up in the US government knew all about the cover up." More recently in 2009, curators at Amsterdam's Rijkamuseum investigated their moon rock personally given to them by Armstrong and Aldrin in 1969, only to find that it was just a worthless of petrified wood from earth.
20. Not only is the entire video record fraught with fraud, but after years of ignoring freedom of information act requests, NASA finally officially claimed in 2001 that all the original Apollo 11 videos had conveniently "disappeared" from their records, so no one could analyze them.They have also claimed to have lost all original audiotapes from the Apollo missions, and that their "contractors" have lost all prints and plans for the lunar rover, the LEM lander, and Apollo ship engines.
The preponderance of evidence is stacked so high against NASA that anyone who honestly and unbiasly investigates the so-called "moon landings" comes to the same undeniable conclusion: all of the Apollo missions were faked on earth using a variety of hollywood trickery.
"Kubrick"
Here is some moon stuff for you curious minds:
"20 Proofs NASA faked the moon landings"
I've annotated the points here for those who don't have time to sit through 20 minutes of a video:
1. The moon is a simply a luminary, a non-physical light in the sky, not a spherical terrafirma planetoid as maintained by NASA and modern astronomy.
On clear days we can see on a waxing or waning cycle the blue sky can be seen through the moon. On clear nights during a waxing or waning is is possible to see stars directly through the surface. With each new moon, the moon disappears and remains invisible for that one day.
Even members of the royal astronomical society have recorded their confusion at being able to see stars through the moon Sir James South of the Royal Observatory in Kensington wrote that "On my first looking into the telescope, a star of about the 7th magnitude was some minutes of a degree distant from the moons dark limb, I saw that its occultation by the moon was inevitable, but the star, instead of disappearing the moment the moon's edge came in contact with it, apparently glided on the moon's dark face, as if it had been seen through a transparent moon, or as if a star were between me and the moon. I have seen a similar apparent project several times. The cause of this phenomenon is involved in impenetrable mystery."
2. The entire concept of a "vacuum" of space is impossible.
3. The amount of radiation claimed to exist in space, especially in the so-called "Van-Allen Belt" was far too strong for the astronauts flimy suits, starting at an altitude of 1,000 miles upt o 15,000 miles NASA claims there exists a deadly band of radiation that would kill or seriously injure anyone passing through in a matter of minutes.
4. Temperatures on the moon supposedly range from 279 degrees below zero during the night time, which is far colder than Antarctica's coldest winter, and up to 243 degrees above zero during midday, which is hotter than boiling water. NASAs suits could not withstand these temperatures. The kodak film in their cameras would not survive these temperatures.
5. In photos of Apollo 11, Buzz Aldrin can be seen wearing different colored gloves and different length boots in pictures supposedly taken within minutes of each other.
6. None of the Apollo missions brought with them any extra studio lighting with them on the lunar lander, so the sun should be the only light source on the moon and in all pictures taken there. The light should only come from one direction and the shadows should be cast in the opposite direction, however in dozens of official NASA photos there are shadows being cast in up to three directions simultaneously, often at up to 90 degree angles, which can only be the result of multiple light sources not present on the moon.
7. Many pictures purportedly showing the sun from the moon are clearly studio spotlights and not the sun. For example, Apollo 12 photo AS12466765, after computer enhancement, reveals a large light bulb in the center of the "sun".
8. Several Apollo images show a defined separation line where the ground meets with what can only be a studio backdrop. If they were filming on an actual planetoid, the ground would seamlessly meet the background, leaving no such dividing line. NASA has been found using the same contours and repeated backdrops on allegedly completely different parts of the moon.
9. Computer enhancement of NASA images reveal photo manipulation and evidence of pstudio trickery. For example, as the Apollo 17 lunar lander lifts off, photo AS1715123201 shows a clear shadow being cast on the ceiling of the studio.
10. Computer enhancements done on images of "the earth" taken from "the moon" reveal clear photo trickery. By gradually removing the hues comprising black from the backgrounds, a bright rectangular artifact appears around the earth, proving it to be a composite image. There are numerous of these rectangular doctored "earth" photographs that can be found.
11. In the original Apollo 16 photo AS1610717446 there is a rock with the letter "C" engraved into it, and another "C" drawn in the dirt next to it, which is characteristic to fake stage rocks on a set where a set designer demarcates prop positions. After being exposed for this, NASA doctored the two "C's" out of the photo.
12. In several bits of video footage from the Apollo missions, there is evidence of the astronauts using wires to achieve a more weightless appearance. During Apollo 14, there are many occasions where light reflects off the wires attached to their backpacks, making them momentary become visible.
13.Obvious video anomaly of the Flags flapping around in the non-existent "space wind."
14. Another video anomaly, when watching at double speed, the gravity illusion disappears whether they are "moon" walking or in a "moon" buggy.
15. No stars in the background of any moon photos in any of their appropriate positions, more evidence of studio fakery.
16. The Apollo 11 photo AS11405922 of the lunar lander, supposedly on the moon will see a pathetic 1969 attempt at creating high-tech-looking equipment using flimsy construction paper, gold foil, scotch tape, and metal shower rods. The idea that the piece of junk shown in the photo flew to the "moon" and back is laughably ludicrous.
17. Apollo 11 image AS11495926 shows a closeup of the foot pads of the lunar lander without a speck of dust on them and without a burn print or crater under its 10,000 lb thrusters, as if the lander was gently set down with a crane.
18. During the Apollo 11 mission, Richard Nixon made a "historic" phone call from DC to Neil Armstrong on the moon, showing both men live on split screen TV. The call allegedly went from the oval office in DC to Houston where it was "routed" into space via mission control through the "capsule communicator". There was no discernable delay in the phone call whatsoever.
19. Examinations of the many supposed "moon rocks" given museums to the world over by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. Shortly after Apollo 11, private investigator Paul Jacobs reported asking the US department of geology head whether he had examined the moon rocks, and if he could verify their authenticity, to which the geologist simply laughed and insinuated that "people high up in the US government knew all about the cover up." More recently in 2009, curators at Amsterdam's Rijkamuseum investigated their moon rock personally given to them by Armstrong and Aldrin in 1969, only to find that it was just a worthless of petrified wood from earth.
20. Not only is the entire video record fraught with fraud, but after years of ignoring freedom of information act requests, NASA finally officially claimed in 2001 that all the original Apollo 11 videos had conveniently "disappeared" from their records, so no one could analyze them.They have also claimed to have lost all original audiotapes from the Apollo missions, and that their "contractors" have lost all prints and plans for the lunar rover, the LEM lander, and Apollo ship engines.
The preponderance of evidence is stacked so high against NASA that anyone who honestly and unbiasly investigates the so-called "moon landings" comes to the same undeniable conclusion: all of the Apollo missions were faked on earth using a variety of hollywood trickery.
"Kubrick"
