Criticisms of The Power Structure in Russia

LOL...
Putin has black belt in Judo.


5315ede1eab8ea602900c54d



5315ede0ecad04896d6f6139
Not bad for a jew.
 
Alexander Dugin is not a person who should be taken seriously. He is, first and foremost, a crook. Unfortunately, there are many people who have good willpower but either not very high or not well-developed intelligence to tell apart someone who is smart from someone who uses a lot of smart words. Dugin is a perfect example of a latter. But Westerners tend to overestimate his actual influence.

One thing he is certainly good for is that his unofficial international network of fans of Rene Guenon, with some Russian state money flowing into it, and Arktos+associates. There are not many publishers out there that will accept a book on race-realism, for example.
 


🇷🇺
💰
Russia restores the value of housewives' work

The State Duma has prepared a bill that will make domestic work officially paid.

While the West is pushing women to sacrifice everything for a pittance, Moscow is preparing a revolutionary law: paying those who raise children or care for their loved ones.

-A salary for those who build the future
-Strict criteria to avoid abuse
-Priority to Russian citizens

While the EU subsidizes mass immigration and gender deconstruction, Russia invests in its own people and traditional family values.



 
Last edited:


"THE ROTHSCHILDS NEVER FORGAVE PUTIN FOR THIS! And now they want your children to die for their greed!Did you know that Yukos, the oil company that produced 20% of Russia’s gas, was secretly under the control of British based Zionist globalist Jacob Rothschild, who also controlled the British Royal Family? Putin then returned to the Russian state and the Russian people the gas in Rothschild's control. The Rothschilds were furious and started planning the war against Russia."
 
^The new Tsar, thankfully enough, understands that one of the main tools for the destruction of Russia is the instrumentalisation of their ethnic minorities, most notably their Muslims, as seen in Syria, Yugoslavia, China etc. Russia's enemies would love to sew the kind of ethnic strife you are advocating here to destabilize and dismantle Russia.

Native Russian Muslims are well integrated and steer Russia towards more conservative values:



And a quick overview of Putin's neutralizing the main internal threat to Russia earlier in his tenure:

 
Just an update:

This is from 9/23/24:
Russia hasn't achieved a single strategic goal - as laid out by Putin on February 23 2022, and neither is it going to. The Donbass will not be liberated, Ukraine will not preserve a neutral status after the war, Ukraine will not be demilitarized and denazified, Russia will not be granted its own sphere of influence...

1000003501.jpg

We're at the 8 month mark @Cooper... The "special" operation will be over and Ukraine should be demilitarized by September, huh?

🤡 Honk! Honk! 👽
 
Why don't you post my full message instead of truncating it and misquoting me? Here it is:

NATO's plan is failing, badly, your assessment of the situation is very poor. It is their plan which has proven to be delusional, while Russia's response has been shrewd. 2 years into this conflict and NATO still can't produce shells in sufficient numbers, while the Russian MIC has been scaling up massively its production of shells, tanks, and drones/missiles of all type.

NATOs objective of regime change and the dismantling of Russia is a pipe dream, Putin's position has been reinforced with this war, both domestically and abroad, outside the West. Russia's economy is thriving, they are reaping dividends from foreign firms being replaced by domestic products, and from Russian capital being repatriated as the oligarchs can no longer invest abroad.

Russia has been waging this war on second gear, while preserving its economy and limiting its military losses, which have been around 90k KIAs vs about 7x as much for Ukraine. With a couple of exceptions (early assaults on Vulhedar), Russia hasn't been doing "human wave attacks", this is a NAFO-level talking point, it is the Ukrainians who have been doing that all along, especially in their offensive on the Surovikin line.

Ukraine is losing the war of attrition, their positions across the front are shaky. They don't have a pool of 6 million men, their population today is down to around 18 million and skews heavily towards older people as a majority of their young men have bailed.

Russia will be in a position to demilitarize Ukraine, either via negotiation next year, or on the frontlines.

Read again my last sentence above, carefully, and not your edited version.

This is the reality of the Ukraine war:
Current Ukrainian KIAs: over 1 million
Current Russian KIAs: around 110,000

In the first couple of years Ukrainian losses hae outstripped Russian ones by around 7 to 1, the ratio has been worse this year:


Notice the evolution here:


Finally, one important point that escapes most pro-NATO war critics - Germany lost WW1 and capitulated without the western allies having ever crossed into German territory:

map-Western-Front-World-War-I.jpg


WW1, like the Ukraine war, is a war of attrition, and Ukraine is getting badly attrited. Uneducated observers look at the frontline and jump to the wrong conclusion that Russia is losing because the lines aren't moving fast enough, missing the real picture of Ukrainian attrition. At some point later this year this reality will be harder to hide.
 
Back
Top