Charlie Kirk Thread

Don't think. This is exactly the issue with Biblical "gotcha." Don't drink, don't fornicate out of wedlock, treat people well, be kind, eat well, lend help to those less fortunate than yourself, read The Bible, go to church, exercise, don't be greedy, don't accept money you haven't truly earned, work hard, be honest, don't watch porn, don't smoke, pray everyday, accept Jesus Christ as your Savior, and defend yourself and your loved ones against external threats of evil and unjust persecution by unrepentant attackers.

Romans 10 lays out what Christianity is about. It's about belief in the living God and the son that was sent who preached of the living God.

It's a little strange that you're arguing against some rule based pacificism, while arguing for other rules. Following rules for their own sake is not what Christianity is about. Anyone is welcome to explain why I'm wrong.

Therefore, I don't need to ask fellow Christians for permission to defend myself. It's a non-issue.
 
Yes, I'm talking about all of that bullsh*t. And you think those are the only "weird" translations? No way, those are just the ones we know about. They're called "secret societies" for a reason. Historically if you want to hurt your enemy you burn their books (their history) and alter their important religious texts. It's the oldest trick in the book. The original psyop.


No I don't. I never cared for Charlie Kirk and I think he was a Ziocuck as this thread title once accurately reflected. But like many I felt sympathy for his plight which softened me up a bit to the psyop that has been his death. However, seeing the cash grab response of TPUSA, the weird "facts" and confusing details of his assassination, and the strange reaction to his death by those closest to him, I have come full circle back to my original sentiment on the subject. I think Kirk and his enterouge were/are most likely charlatans seeking attention and money above all else (because birds of a feather flock together). God, and doing the will of God were not their primary objective which is most likely why his life ended in the chaotic, dark, and violent way that it did.

You just don't wind up getting "assasinated." People often bring that sh*t onto themselves by working in the shadows and going down to the crossroads and making deals with the devil (and/or his disciples, the jews).
You keep calling KIrk a 'ziocuck' and yet there are plenty of rumours that accepting money from certain sources and then pulling back may well have lead to his death.

I have no reason to believe Kirk was not a genuine person and sure it took him some time to understand some of his enemies but he paid the ultimate price for that.
 
Candace getting squirrelly on Erika and the whole TPUSA gang... Claiming the same "Egyptian" private jets (apparently a favorite vehicle of Mossad?) seemed to be following Erika around for a couple of years having been at the same airport as her some 70+ times (including in Provo on the day Charlie was whacked). She also is talking about a lot of other shady activity surrounding TPUSA and Charlie's assassination, can't quite make sense of it all, but it's interesting nonetheless:

 
Brutal description from Charlie's head of security of how he tried to stop the bleeding. He apparently immediately jumped on top of Charlie to cover him from more possible shots.

 


Telegram co-founder suggests French involvement in Charlie Kirk’s death​

 
I don't really care for the uncharitable view about Erika Kirk. I think it's poor form to look at any and every chance to insinuate she's some harlot which is what some are doing here.

Dirty pool in my book but I do understand why some jaded folks think this is the case.

Erika Kirk took money from israel. This is the sane money that Charlie Kirk took a stand to refuse to continue taking just before his assassination.

I’m not ready to say Erika had her husband assassinated, I think israel had him whacked, but she’s making sure to profit from the assassination, the number thrown around is $150 million, and Erika is also pledging to use her platform “to fight antisemitism “

 
Erika Kirk took money from israel. This is the sane money that Charlie Kirk took a stand to refuse to continue taking just before his assassination.

I’m not ready to say Erika had her husband assassinated, I think israel had him whacked, but she’s making sure to profit from the assassination, the number thrown around is $150 million, and Erika is also pledging to use her platform “to fight antisemitism “

I dont think she has other alternatives. Unless being ran over while crossing a road.
My guess is she didnt knew nothing before.

 
Gratuitous cursing is not permitted on the forum. Cursing should be strictly limited and used emphatically, not for mean-spirited insults.
Erika Kirk took money from israel. This is the sane money that Charlie Kirk took a stand to refuse to continue taking just before his assassination.

I’m not ready to say Erika had her husband assassinated, I think israel had him whacked, but she’s making sure to profit from the assassination, the number thrown around is $150 million, and Erika is also pledging to use her platform “to fight antisemitism “

@Get2choppaaa thoughts on Erika taking money from Israel?

How long do we have to wait for this bitch to grieve before we can start criticizing her?
 
@Get2choppaaa thoughts on Erika taking money from Israel?

How long do we have to wait for this bitch to grieve before we can start criticizing her?
Well I'm not sure what money she had or hasnt taken but TPUSA does a good job of getting the majority of US right together for dialogue including the Zionist right.

Clearly I'm aligned with Charlie's views on the Jewish influence on the right as being deplorable and incongruent with America first.

As far as your second question:
You can criticize her all you want but it's pretty disgusting to call her a "bitch"... We are talking about a widow here, not Hilary Clinton.

Again pattern of behavior by you which doesn't reflect well on you or the forum.
 
Well I'm not sure what money she had or hasnt taken but TPUSA does a good job of getting the majority of US right together for dialogue including the Zionist right.

Clearly I'm aligned with Charlie's views on the Jewish influence on the right as being deplorable and incongruent with America first.
Charlie was a Zionist.
As far as your second question:
You can criticize her all you want but it's pretty disgusting to call her a "bitch"... We are talking about a widow here, not Hilary Clinton.

Again pattern of behavior by you which doesn't reflect well on you or the forum.
So because she’s a widow she should be immune from criticism? But if she wasn’t calling her a bitch would be fine?
 
Charlie was a Zionist.
For a while he was.

Then he pivoted.

I am assuming you are unfamiliar with what Charlie said towards the end of his life about the Jewish Israeli first donors and why he was not in favor of their position.

Again, this is hashed out in the Charlie Kirk thread. Go read it for context if you need.
So because she’s a widow she should be immune from criticism? But if she wasn’t calling her a bitch would be fine?
Because you don't have any justification to call her a bitch.

You simply don't like the way she presents.

If you want to say you don't agree with Ben Shapiro wing the opening speaker at AmFest I agree.


You call someone a bitch when they've done something knowingly wrong that is mean spirited.

If you want to keep looking like someone slinging mud and using pejoratives regarding a woman whose trying to honor her husbands legacy through running the institution he founded you're only going to attract fringe idiots who need to touch grass and stop listening to Candace Owens gobbley gook.
 
Back
Top