Charlie Kirk Thread

[PurpleUrkel]

I don't see Charlie preaching against forgiveness in this clip.

He's not preaching against forgiveness, he just doesn't mention it. He mentions killing the perpetrator who would kill him and says nothing about the corrupt "State" doing it. This Biblical interpretation that it is some high up authority in government that is supposed to punish criminals while it is us plebs who are supposed to forgive our unrepentant attackers until the State carries out (((it's))) elongated, tiresome version of liberal justice just doesn't square with the red pill belief in small government due to the fact that the government has become corrupted by (((evil))) forces.

The real issue is that all religious/political grifters have a similar modus operandi and TPUSA does not seem to be exempt from this having showed all the classic signs [tax exempt "non-profit," large endowment based on "donations," cult of personality leader(s) living lives of luxury, attracting shady characters that leads to threats, intimidation, law suits, and even violence, etc]. It is not just one thing like "Erica Kirk seems fake," it is a slew of red flags that when looked at carefully, in their totality, and with a critical eye, don't add up to being something honest, true, and good.

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

He mentions killing the perpetrator who would kill him and says nothing about the corrupt "State" doing it.

Everytime he talked about the death penalty, he is referring to it as a judicial punishment. Show me a clip where he appeals to mob justice or personal vengeance.

This Biblical interpretation that it is some high up authority in government that is supposed to punish criminals while it is us plebs who are supposed to forgive our unrepentant attackers until the State carries out (((it's))) elongated, tiresome version of liberal justice just doesn't square with the red pill belief in small government due to the fact that the government has become corrupted by (((evil))) forces.

This is not even an interpretation. It's just Romans 13. The liberals don't believe in it either, they believe in mob justice.

 

[Sandalwood Peak]

That’s just it, Charlie had started to turn down hundreds of millions of jew/israeli money just a week before his assassination.

I don't hate Charlie Kirk and I don't believe in the "brainwashed white people" cope.

I don't see the need to whitewash his earthly deeds. I'm not even sure what's the argument. He was bad but repented before he died? I personally never felt the need to attack him, even though I think debating SJWs is retarded. They should be bullied, not debated. Them celebrating his death proves my point. Are people feeling guilty about calling him a Zionist and a faggot when he was alive?

As far as him pushing the Jewish agenda, it doesn't bother me all that much. I think the Jews are a good example themselves why it doesn't matter. Israelis are very liberal as far as I'm aware. Israelis also condone murdering kids for their personal gain or "security". White people on the other hand are very different. White people too are very liberal. Whites DO NOT condone doing anything for their benefit. This is a problem with white people themselves, not with being brainwashed. At the end of the day, I don't hold it against Charlie for working for them. Thanks to the white race you either sperg in a dark basement, or you go sell out. Isn't that the divide on the forum as well?

 

[Thomas More]

He's not preaching against forgiveness, he just doesn't mention it. He mentions killing the perpetrator who would kill him and says nothing about the corrupt "State" doing it. This Biblical interpretation that it is some high up authority in government that is supposed to punish criminals while it is us plebs who are supposed to forgive our unrepentant attackers until the State carries out (((it's))) elongated, tiresome version of liberal justice just doesn't square with the red pill belief in small government due to the fact that the government has become corrupted by (((evil))) forces.

The real issue is that all religious/political grifters have a similar modus operandi and TPUSA does not seem to be exempt from this having showed all the classic signs [tax exempt "non-profit," large endowment based on "donations," cult of personality leader(s) living lives of luxury, attracting shady characters that leads to threats, intimidation, law suits, and even violence, etc]. It is not just one thing like "Erica Kirk seems fake," it is a slew of red flags that when looked at carefully, in their totality, and with a critical eye, don't add up to being something honest, true, and good.

This doesn't follow at all. The scriptures about the obeying the government are not talking about some ideal Christian government. They are specifically referring to the pagan Romans who had conquered Israel. Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's is talking about the Roman Emperor, regardless of his many flaws.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Candace saying Charlie Kirk thought zionists were going to kill him. She also talks about how the usual suspects are attempting to co-opt Charlie's pro-Israel legacy (and cement it in stone) by saying that Tucker interviewing the "antisemite" Nick Fuentes was a betrayal to Kirk because he was a lover of all things Israel:

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Myron and Hodge Twins discussing all the odd things surrounding the Charlie Kirk hit, the TPUSA post-assassination cash grab, and how the first stage of grief is pyrotechnics:

 

[Northumber]

Another thing, Nick Fuentes' sudden move towards more mainstream circles after this whole thing seems manipulated.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Everytime he talked about the death penalty, he is referring to it as a judicial punishment. Show me a clip where he appeals to mob justice or personal vengeance.

It's not about "mob justice" it's about good, honest, hardworking Christian people defending themselves against Muslim, Hindu, jewish, and Hispanic invaders before "personal vengeance" is required. We are at war, and so what does the Bible say about killing your enemy in a time of war? I'm talking Old Testament as the New Testament is quite obviously a jewish psyop to get Christians to lay down their arms and embrace their Christ-denying (((oppressors))) with forgiveness and open arms.

Personally, I'm not all that concerned with what Charlie Kirk thought or believed as I don't see him as a highly intelligent and spiritual person. He seemed more like a Joel Olstein evangelical type who preached about the virtue of a simple life of Jesus-like poverty and good deeds towards the poor yet lived a life of fame and luxury. Just another new age evangelical hypocrite in bed with the jews, hence the previous title of this thread (which it should be returned to in pursuit of academic and historical honesty), "Charlie Kirk Ziocuck."

This doesn't follow at all. The scriptures about the obeying the government are not talking about some ideal Christian government. They are specifically referring to the pagan Romans who had conquered Israel. Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's is talking about the Roman Emperor, regardless of his many flaws.

Again, New Testament "stuff." We must use our God given brain to think for ourselves on modern existential dilemmas. And in no way do I believe that God wants me to lie down and take it while jews and muzzies destroy my Christian people's way of life. The government is run by Antichrist jews and evangelical zionists and you want me to obey their laws and commands? I don't think so.

 

[Northumber]

I'm talking Old Testament as the New Testament is quite obviously a jewish psyop to get Christians to lay down their arms and embrace their Christ-denying (((oppressors))) with forgiveness and open arms.

I must be missing context from another thread.

 

[Tippy]

I must be missing context from another thread.

Yeah what is this guy supposedly a Catholic as well but denying the NT?

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

Personally, I'm not all that concerned with what Charlie Kirk thought or believed as I don't see him as a highly intelligent and spiritual person. He seemed more like a Joel Olstein evangelical type who preached about the virtue of a simple life of Jesus-like poverty and good deeds towards the poor yet lived a life of fame and luxury. Just another new age evangelical hypocrite in bed with the jews, hence the previous title of this thread (which it should be returned to in pursuit of academic and historical honesty), "Charlie Kirk Ziocuck."

You have a damned if you do/damned if you don't mentality towards Kirk.

I'm talking Old Testament as the New Testament is quite obviously a jewish psyop to get Christians to lay down their arms and embrace their Christ-denying (((oppressors))) with forgiveness and open arms.

This is pure insanity. Watch that in your hatred of Jews you don't become one.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Watch that in your hatred of Jews you don't become one.

Please don't attribute the words "hate jews" to me. Hate implies wanting to do harm to someone and I have no such desires or inclinations. I have a strong dislike towards jews, I am a counter-semite, not an antisemite. Much less do I waste my time "hating" anonymous jews "out there," and the two jews I do know I like and get along with.

Yeah what is this guy supposedly a Catholic as well but denying the NT?

It's a bit more subtle, grey, and nuanced than the stark black and white terminology you are using. The New Testament isn't the issue here, the real issue is that The Bible has been altered throughout its history by our enemies (the usual suspects) as an act of psychological warfare to get us to "turn the other cheek" while (((they))) subjugate us and financially rape the world in pursuit of unlimited usury.

Mission (Almost) Accomplished.

 

[Northumber]

The New Testament isn't the issue here, the real issue is that The Bible has been altered throughout its history by our enemies (the usual suspects) as an act of psychological warfare to get us to "turn the other cheek" while (((they))) subjugate us and financially rape the world in pursuit of unlimited usury.

Do you have a thread open about this? I disagree about alterations (unless you are talking about the weird translations ... like Jefferson's, or Scofield with it's "notes", or Mormon, or modern woke translations).

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Do you have a thread open about this? I disagree about alterations (unless you are talking about the weird translations ... like Jefferson's, or Scofield with it's "notes", or Mormon, or modern woke translations).

Yes, I'm talking about all of that bullsh*t. And you think those are the only "weird" translations? No way, those are just the ones we know about. They're called "secret societies" for a reason. Historically if you want to hurt your enemy you burn their books (their history) and alter their important religious texts. It's the oldest trick in the book. The original psyop.

You have a damned if you do/damned if you don't mentality towards Kirk.

No I don't. I never cared for Charlie Kirk and I think he was a Ziocuck as this thread title once accurately reflected. But like many I felt sympathy for his plight which softened me up a bit to the psyop that has been his death. However, seeing the cash grab response of TPUSA, the weird "facts" and confusing details of his assassination, and the strange reaction to his death by those closest to him, I have come full circle back to my original sentiment on the subject. I think Kirk and his enterouge were/are most likely charlatans seeking attention and money above all else (because birds of a feather flock together). God, and doing the will of God were not their primary objective which is most likely why his life ended in the chaotic, dark, and violent way that it did.

You just don't wind up getting "assasinated." People often bring that sh*t onto themselves by working in the shadows and going down to the crossroads and making deals with the devil (and/or his disciples, the jews).

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

The Bible has been altered throughout its history by our enemies (the usual suspects) as an act of psychological warfare to get us to "turn the other cheek" while (((they))) subjugate us and financially rape the world in pursuit of unlimited usury.

Can you cite any evidence for this? Textual variants are one thing. Translations are another. But you seem to have more of a problem with Jesus' teachings than anything else.

No I don't. I never cared for Charlie Kirk and I think he was a Ziocuck as this thread title once accurately reflected. But like many I felt sympathy for his plight which softened me up a bit to the psyop that has been his death. However, seeing the cash grab response of TPUSA, the weird "facts" and confusing details of his assassination, and the strange reaction to his death by those closest to him, I have come full circle back to my original sentiment on the subject. I think Kirk and his enterouge were/are most likely charlatans seeking attention and money above all else. God, and doing the will of God were not their primary objective which is most likely why his life ended in the chaotic, dark, and violent way that it did.

You just don't wind up getting "assasinated." People often bring that sh*t onto themselves by working in the shadows and going down to the crossroads and making deals with the devil (and/or his disciples, the jews).

If he was assassinated for turning down Jew money and beginning to question Israel, how was he a ziocuck? You could say he started out that way, but he certainly didn't go out that way.

 

[Wutang]

I thought if anything saying that you accept the Old Testament while rejecting the New Testament makes you more of a Jew - not less.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Can you cite any evidence for this? Textual variants are one thing. Translations are another. But you seem to have more of a problem with Jesus' teachings than anything else.

Take a look around. What do you think has happened here? The evidence is right before you. Christians misinterpreted scripture and wound up with a usurious jew boot on their neck. And nowhere does Jesus insist that we must allow ourselves to be attacked without defending ourselves. And yet here we are.

I thought if anything saying that you accept the Old Testament while rejecting the New Testament makes you more of a Jew - not less.

Don't think. This is exactly the issue with Biblical "gotcha." Don't drink, don't fornicate out of wedlock, treat people well, be kind, eat well, lend help to those less fortunate than yourself, read The Bible, go to church, exercise, don't be greedy, don't accept money you haven't truly earned, work hard, be honest, don't watch porn, don't smoke, pray everyday, accept Jesus Christ as your Savior, and defend yourself and your loved ones against external threats of evil and unjust persecution by unrepentant attackers.

Could care less where, when, and by whom these "suggestions" and rules were written. The important lesson is to think for yourself and not believe everything you read. The written word is easily manipulated.

 

[Iakobos]

Take a look around. What do you think has happened here? The evidence is right before you. Christians misinterpreted scripture and wound up with a usurious jew boot on their neck. And nowhere does Jesus insist that we must allow ourselves to be attacked without defending ourselves. And yet here we are.

How did Christians take over the Roman Empire?

 

[Tippy]

Take a look around. What do you think has happened here? The evidence is right before you. Christians misinterpreted scripture and wound up with a usurious jew boot on their neck. And nowhere does Jesus insist that we must allow ourselves to be attacked without defending ourselves. And yet here we are.


Don't think. This is exactly the issue with Biblical "gotcha." Don't drink, don't fornicate out of wedlock, treat people well, be kind, eat well, lend help to those less fortunate than yourself, read The Bible, go to church, exercise, don't be greedy, don't accept money you haven't truly earned, work hard, be honest, don't watch porn, don't smoke, pray everyday, accept Jesus Christ as your Savior, and defend yourself and your loved ones against external threats of evil and unjust persecution by unrepentant attackers.

Could care less where, when, and by whom these "suggestions" and rules were written. The important lesson is to think for yourself and not believe everything you read. The written word is easily manipulated.

If you want to pick and choose from the Bible based on your own individual belief system, I question whether you are Catholic.

Also, you disparage the J's yet they also reject the NT as you do for similar reasons (they don't agree with Christ's message).

 

[Vas Incrementum]

Please don't attribute the words "hate jews" to me. Hate implies wanting to do harm to someone and I have no such desires or inclinations. I have a strong dislike towards jews, I am a counter-semite, not an antisemite. Much less do I waste my time "hating" anonymous jews "out there," and the two jews I do know I like and get along with.


It's a bit more subtle, grey, and nuanced than the stark black and white terminology you are using. The New Testament isn't the issue here, the real issue is that The Bible has been altered throughout its history by our enemies (the usual suspects) as an act of psychological warfare to get us to "turn the other cheek" while (((they))) subjugate us and financially rape the world in pursuit of unlimited usury.

Mission (Almost) Accomplished.

These takes are right out of 4chan, Purple. With such beliefs maybe becoming a Muslim would be a good fit for you. The altering of the Bible over time is what they believe and they're very martial, detest Jews and are conquest oriented and they'd tackle decadence and degeneracy (except their own of course). Maybe starting a Murican Taliban could be the way to go.